slash128's Top Mount Build
I'm so happy the TQ curve, according to VD, looks so flat!
I was skeptical of the placement nd wastegate size but it seems to be doing fine. No boost problems? Glad to see you're happy with it. Really hope to see some official dyno numbers soon.
I was skeptical of the placement nd wastegate size but it seems to be doing fine. No boost problems? Glad to see you're happy with it. Really hope to see some official dyno numbers soon.
and to top it off the local state trooper station is right in that area and I saw someone pulled over. I didn't want to be the next.I will try to get a better video starting at lower RPM, just not sure when yet.
I don't really notice any boost problems, but this is my first real boosted car, so not necessarily sure. It seems to top out at 9-10psi and hold there pretty steady. I don't have any boost controller yet either.
Ya open dump. I was having trouble getting it to fit up so I just had a shop hack off the return pipe and weld it closed. It is pretty freakin loud but makes it easy to swap springs!
Bummer you lost the bid! It turned out to be not a bad kit. There are some things I would like to change, but overall, well you see the results.
Bummer you lost the bid! It turned out to be not a bad kit. There are some things I would like to change, but overall, well you see the results.
Last edited by slash128; Apr 9, 2013 at 04:20 PM.
from what I have found the bottem is either 11.02 or 10.88, it doesn't mean its 10.88 I just consider that zone 11.00. each car is different, and I have seen the bottem change from just changing a tune.
Here ya go - looking good !
I would say this though :
*WHP looks about right for the boost you are running (9psi right ?)
*Mass airflow( and therefore load) at 425g/s looks way too high for the amount of boost and the whp.
I would say this though :
*WHP looks about right for the boost you are running (9psi right ?)
*Mass airflow( and therefore load) at 425g/s looks way too high for the amount of boost and the whp.
Last edited by Brettus; Apr 12, 2013 at 03:40 PM.
yeah I thought about messing with the tune to make it work with less/more realistic g/s but I really didn't want to change everything, you can see the logs and see the voltage, really g/s doesn't mean anything to me, the maf voltage says more because everyone can have a different scale. but its the same maf voltage. that is the constant
I could easily lower the injector scale, then lower the maf scale, and vise versa, make my injector scale huge, so it puts in less fuel, then tell the maf it has 1000g/s haha.
we pretty much have the same setup, similar sized turbo's, and we are both bouncing on that 4.77 voltage area. although my tune has 808 injector scale and going to 380g/s his is 850 injector scale and 425g/s.
I could easily lower the injector scale, then lower the maf scale, and vise versa, make my injector scale huge, so it puts in less fuel, then tell the maf it has 1000g/s haha.
we pretty much have the same setup, similar sized turbo's, and we are both bouncing on that 4.77 voltage area. although my tune has 808 injector scale and going to 380g/s his is 850 injector scale and 425g/s.
Ya, but it's just fun to see these virtual dyno charts. At least we can see it going in the right direction
I emailed Hank over at AAF to see about getting a proper dyno. Kinda want to wait for my BHR coils first.
I emailed Hank over at AAF to see about getting a proper dyno. Kinda want to wait for my BHR coils first.


