Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Possible New Upgrade for Greddy Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-06-2012, 01:07 PM
  #26  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by kma5783

I wouldn't say it's just a little better than the stock Greddy, overall I think it's a much better option, although I do agree the 60-1 Wheel is probably an even better option.

.
Ok - it's a fair bit better than the Greddy, but not 'better' enough
My guess is it would flow about the same as the 3071 and my turbo (To4e 57trim) which are both maxed out at 320whp.
Old 02-06-2012, 01:14 PM
  #27  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,721
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
you may not be able to put one on directly, but a tight radius elbow and then maybe a Tial MV-R or downsize to a -S

you have other alternatives besides the plain-jane 3071/3076 vanilla versions too ...

though you might consider that going bigger may offer less than expected results as the Greddy manifold starts becoming the limiting factor; the general routing and transition to the turbine is about as poopy of a design as it gets


.

Last edited by TeamRX8; 02-06-2012 at 01:24 PM.
Old 02-06-2012, 01:16 PM
  #28  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brettus
Ok - it's a fair bit better than the Greddy, but not 'better' enough
My guess is it would flow about the same as the 3071 and my turbo (To4e 57trim) which are both maxed out at 320whp.
A 57 trim To4E compressor does not max out at 320rwhp on a rotary. That is an easy 400rwhp turbo mated to a P trim wheel. I've done it several times....
Old 02-06-2012, 01:19 PM
  #29  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
A 57 trim To4E compressor does not max out at 320rwhp on a rotary. That is an easy 400rwhp turbo mated to a P trim wheel. I've done it several times....
On a Renesis?
Old 02-06-2012, 01:24 PM
  #30  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
A 57 trim To4E compressor does not max out at 320rwhp on a rotary. That is an easy 400rwhp turbo mated to a P trim wheel. I've done it several times....
cough - you sure about that ? I've see guys on the 7 forum up around the 320-330 with a 57 trim but that seems to be about it .Would love to see those dynos ....
Old 02-06-2012, 01:35 PM
  #31  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brettus
cough - you sure about that ? I've see guys on the 7 forum up around the 320-330 with a 57 trim but that seems to be about it .Would love to see those dynos ....
How about a video..


@ 16psi this same car made 406rwhp. Stock ports even...

Turbo for turbo the 6 port renesis makes even more peak HP over an older 4 port 13B...

Yes I know its also a 60 trim.. Don't have any videos of 57 trims...

Last edited by Turblown; 02-06-2012 at 01:37 PM.
Old 02-06-2012, 01:54 PM
  #32  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Hmmm - very interesting . MM tries to tell me my 320 is BS and you come along and say 400 is possible .


Interesting discussion about it here :

http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.ph...highlight=To4e

Last edited by Brettus; 02-06-2012 at 01:56 PM.
Old 02-06-2012, 02:50 PM
  #33  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brettus
Hmmm - very interesting . MM tries to tell me my 320 is BS and you come along and say 400 is possible .


Interesting discussion about it here :

http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.ph...highlight=To4e
I posted in that thread about 3 years ago..

Most of those guys are using restrictive log manifolds, used rotors and housings in their engines, and not very good engine tunes...

I did a back to back from a cast manifold and 2.5" downpipe to one of our tubular units, and 3.5" exhaust and it was worth 30 ft lbs of torque throughout the entire powerband..

I am assuming you are using restrictive greddy manifold, and tiny greddy t2 turbine housing. Probably not going to hit 400rwhp with that, but I would think 320rwhp wouldn't be that hard to do...
Old 02-06-2012, 03:13 PM
  #34  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
I posted in that thread about 3 years ago..

Most of those guys are using restrictive log manifolds, used rotors and housings in their engines, and not very good engine tunes...

I did a back to back from a cast manifold and 2.5" downpipe to one of our tubular units, and 3.5" exhaust and it was worth 30 ft lbs of torque throughout the entire powerband..

I am assuming you are using restrictive greddy manifold, and tiny greddy t2 turbine housing. Probably not going to hit 400rwhp with that, but I would think 320rwhp wouldn't be that hard to do...
You seem to be re-writing the rules on what was thought to be the approx. whp per lb of air as expressed by others on the 7 forum .

What would you put the number at as optimal , with all the right componentry ?
Old 02-06-2012, 03:28 PM
  #35  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brettus
You seem to be re-writing the rules on what was thought to be the approx. whp per lb of air as expressed by others on the 7 forum .

What would you put the number at as optimal , with all the right componentry ?
Max is probably around 440rwhp with methanol injection, and a big ignition system @ 20+psi. I did that twice but never did dyno. The car did beat up a few cars at the dragstrip indicating those power levels.

I remember when the forum guys told me I wouldn't hit 450rwhp on a V1 compressor wheel and I did............... with a Carb

I am not rewriting anything, there are plenty of guys making more than the forum averages who don't go on the internet..
Old 02-06-2012, 03:30 PM
  #36  
Registered
 
999miki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
Turbo for turbo the 6 port renesis makes even more peak HP over an older 4 port 13B...
Is Renesis overall more efficient on airflow basis than 13B? Or is it just better BSFC in top end? Assuming that good build 13B produces over 8.5 crank HP from each pound of air, how would Renesis stand against it?

Hope its not some secret sauce
Old 02-06-2012, 03:40 PM
  #37  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,721
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
this is not a general turbo rotary discussion, never miss a chance do you?

Old 02-06-2012, 04:01 PM
  #38  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
this is not a general turbo rotary discussion, never miss a chance do you?
]
Hard to tell who you are addressing here - but your comment is at least true to form and equally as useful as 99% of your posts .
Old 02-06-2012, 04:06 PM
  #39  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,721
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
Hard to tell who you are addressing here - but your comment is at least true to form and equally as useful as 99% of your posts .
Were you boasting about your accomplishments with other style rotary engines in other vehicles using other turbo setups in a RX8 Greddy turbo upgrade thread?

it wasn't addressed to you, otherwise the same applies so please feel free to put it where the sun doesn't shine down under

edit: after reviewing thread it actually applies more to you
Old 02-06-2012, 04:15 PM
  #40  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Well when I get my turbo back I will slap it on the dyno along with a stock RX-8 and see what she does maybe I should ship my car to Europe, I hear those dyno's give great numbers
Old 02-07-2012, 01:35 PM
  #41  
Bat Mobile Driver
 
ELI063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: From Florida back to my home lands in MIchigan
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ haha
Old 02-07-2012, 03:00 PM
  #42  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kma5783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
Ok - it's a fair bit better than the Greddy, but not 'better' enough
My guess is it would flow about the same as the 3071 and my turbo (To4e 57trim) which are both maxed out at 320whp.
Really? The 3071R top out at 320whp, not what I would expect to see.

Originally Posted by TeamRX8
you may not be able to put one on directly, but a tight radius elbow and then maybe a Tial MV-R or downsize to a -S

you have other alternatives besides the plain-jane 3071/3076 vanilla versions too ...

though you might consider that going bigger may offer less than expected results as the Greddy manifold starts becoming the limiting factor; the general routing and transition to the turbine is about as poopy of a design as it gets


.
I was thinking the same thing for the wastegate.

What other options might you recommend?

I agree that the manifold design is definitely a limiting factor, I have the Esmeril Kit but chose not to use it because I think a low mount is a better option. I was thinking of doing a completely custom setup but then found an amazing deal on a greddy kit. Now you're making me think of pursuing at least a custom manifold.

Originally Posted by Turblown
A 57 trim To4E compressor does not max out at 320rwhp on a rotary. That is an easy 400rwhp turbo mated to a P trim wheel. I've done it several times....
Originally Posted by pdxhak
On a Renesis?
Same Question, has it been done a renesis?


Now let's keep this thread on topic of a Greddy Turbo upgrade not a general turbo discussion.
Old 02-07-2012, 03:11 PM
  #43  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
It's such a tight fit, is a tubular Greddy manifold replacement even possible?
Old 02-07-2012, 03:43 PM
  #44  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by kma5783
Really? The 3071R top out at 320whp, not what I would expect to see.

.
Well , in light of what Turblown has been saying let me qualify it a little more .

On this forum there have been fewer than 5 dynos posted for any turbo mated to the greddy manifold/downpipe that have made more than 300whp . The highest of those being my own (T04e 57) at 333whp and Chickenwafer's (3071) at 332whp. This is some 7 years after the kit was introduced. See link . https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-major-horsepower-upgrades-93/highest-horsepower-dynos-sc-turbo-nitrous-post-them-here-180037/
And there have been a LOT of people try for better numbers.

There have been reports of better results than this but for whatever reason those people choose not to post them.

Last edited by Brettus; 02-07-2012 at 03:49 PM.
Old 02-07-2012, 03:48 PM
  #45  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Was yours done on one of those fancy "corrected" euro dynos?
Old 02-07-2012, 03:48 PM
  #46  
Registered
iTrader: (13)
 
comebackqid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: California
Posts: 997
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
not very good with this, and I'm not very renesis turbo savvy either this is my first rotary car but I plan on going turbo after getting a spare motor and all the components with a good rebuild etc. before doing so. So I figured I'd try to help kma5783 on this search because I plan on going the greddy way too.I will try to find other upgrades besides the BNR upgrade which is looking like the best choice so far, but I found this today and wonder if this could be modified the same way as a T3071R (TX3071R) the outline is interchangable with a 3071R but it flows what a 3076R does.

http://www.034motorsport.com/turboch...o-p-21267.html
Old 02-07-2012, 03:52 PM
  #47  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by comebackqid
not very good with this, and I'm not very renesis turbo savvy either this is my first rotary car but I plan on going turbo after getting a spare motor and all the components with a good rebuild etc. before doing so. So I figured I'd try to help kma5783 on this search because I plan on going the greddy way too.I will try to find other upgrades besides the BNR upgrade which is looking like the best choice so far, but I found this today and wonder if this could be modified the same way as a T3071R (TX3071R) the outline is interchangable with a 3071R but it flows what a 3076R does.

http://www.034motorsport.com/turboch...o-p-21267.html

that would be a great choice if you can make it fit - GTX3071 and GTX3076 have both been discussed on here before at some length

Last edited by Brettus; 02-07-2012 at 03:57 PM.
Old 02-07-2012, 03:56 PM
  #48  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Was yours done on one of those fancy "corrected" euro dynos?
Search Noob
Old 02-07-2012, 03:58 PM
  #49  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kma5783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
I think there's some room for improvement, better turbine entrance angle would help, use of an external wastegate, also from what I've read a wastegate preferred manifold design is better.
Old 02-07-2012, 03:59 PM
  #50  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by Brettus
Search Noob


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Possible New Upgrade for Greddy Turbo?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.