Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Ported renesis engine plus a 150 n2o shot will land me 350rwhp non-turbo..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-09-2004, 08:59 PM
  #76  
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Valley, NY
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
I know he did. 70 hp is way too much even for an air storm. Proper porting will do the trick though well.... hopefully. It sounds like porting is the best tuning method to get significant hp increase and it maybe hell of a good idea for FI applications, provided that side seal problem is a real issue here.
Didn't you post above about a 77 whp increase by using a big fan?
411-334 = 77?
This all confuses me, don't take this as an insult man, I'm just not understanding why an engine needs to be fed massive amounts of air to dyno correctly, moreso than while driving. What's the point of using fans? to sell more products? Any info is appreciated. Thanks.
Old 11-09-2004, 09:20 PM
  #77  
Registered User
 
Vrimmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, tx
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You cannot look at it in absolute values. 77 hp over 334 that is about 22% but 70 hp over 170-180 (what on average we're getting from dynoing rx8) equals roughly 41% - such a gain is unreal. But I am sure that 20% more can be squeezed from rx8 and that would equal 35hp bringing whp to 200-210. Why it needs air to release all the power? WTF knows? I wish I did .......I can only speculate. Perhaps if there is not enough air and the engine is put to stress (high revs) computer retards timing and changes a/f proportions to protect it. Dont worry you will never run out of air while driving it so all the ponies will be pulling on the road... they get lazy on a dyno though
I remember an article in Car and Driver about the effects of using different octane gas on power. Among tested cars was bmw m3 they could never get any real numbers from a dyno on this car because of the lack of blowing air... so they did not post any results for the bimmer.
BTW what do you mean sell more products? Fans you mean? Dont think mazda really cares about how the fans sell... but then who knows that might be a good point

Last edited by Vrimmick; 11-09-2004 at 09:26 PM.
Old 11-09-2004, 09:23 PM
  #78  
RX8Club.com Founder
 
BOOSTD 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St Louis MO
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemastr
I am quite good at popping motors too.
Fortunately it's usually other people's motors that I blow ... fortunately for me that is :D
Old 11-09-2004, 09:27 PM
  #79  
Registered User
 
Vrimmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, tx
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BOOSTD 7
Fortunately it's usually other people's motors that I blow ... fortunately for me that is :D
Are you gonna be driving any rx8s sent to wolf for ecu tuning... say for testing or something?
Old 11-09-2004, 10:20 PM
  #80  
Senor Carnegrande
 
BaronVonBigmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Errr...to everyone above, the point about the fans wasn't "let's simulate how air would be rammed into the motor at highway speeds, maybe that's why power is missing".

The point was: apparently the BWM (our car too, maybe) can sense that the airflow is not matching up with the apparent MPH, so it cuts back on the fuel or timing or what have you. So maybe we won't see an honest, 100% bone stock RX-8 making ~ 200 rwhp until someone runs the car on a 4 wheel dyno with big fans. [/wishful thinking]

Either that, or we're actually only getting 215 or so at the crank, so 180 rwhp is actually accurate. If that's the case, then jumping to 242 rwhp is....absolutely unholy. (Or, we're making 238 even during dyno testing, but our transmissions are lubricated with wood glue and pencil shavings.)

Last edited by BaronVonBigmeat; 11-09-2004 at 10:32 PM.
Old 11-09-2004, 10:52 PM
  #81  
Son what is your Alibi?
iTrader: (1)
 
PoLaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
Sarcasm? No. No air - no power. BMW tuner Dinan showed different power outputs depending on the amount of air being blown on the car while dynoing. They used a 470hp Dinan's M5 (415 expected at the wheels). It put out only 334hp whp on a dyno without blowing air and closed hood. Open the hood and turn on a small shop fan blowing air at 10mph and the number goes up to 371hp at wheels. Still not there. Start a $7000 electric fan that blasts air at 75mph and you'll see big 411 whp. So basically without a wind tunnel or an efficient blower there is no way to measure real hp on a dyno. And even if you take the engine out, the computer won't be fooled and without blowing air it wont show you its full potential. I bet you $50 that is the case with RX8. I wonder if anybody ever tried it.
Ok its not so much how fast the air is moving its how much air is being moved. If you held a dustbuster can up to the intake you’re probably propelling air at some 40+mph at the tip of the Dustbuster straw, but you’re only moving a tiny amount of air. So the more important factor is that you move a large volume of air over the intake, the C&D article your referring too was pretty much a windtunnel moving 11,000 cubic feet (check my #'s) of air per second. And also the major different between our car and the cars in that article is all cars they tested had some from of Forced Induction which probably contributed to the rise large rise in HP (all had air intercoolers), more then a N/A would.

But I'm willing to admit that you right that sticking the 8 on that particular Dyno would yield a close to real world HP number, but it still won’t be exact. For me it’s enough that I know that a 3100-3200lbs car can run a 14.5@94MPH under a hp calculator that’s putting about 197-205 to the wheels which makes me happy. ITS JUST A DAMN #'!!!!

I also fail to see how and I fail too see how the windtunnel Dyno is pertinent to Mr.P&P's testing?.... He dyno'd his stock 8 before he did his porting and he got a 197 once and 184 another time. Then he worked his magic and he dyno’d again and got 242..... As a comparative tool especially if done on the same day nothing beats a Dyno......
Old 11-09-2004, 10:58 PM
  #82  
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Valley, NY
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by BaronVonBigmeat
Errr...to everyone above, the point about the fans wasn't "let's simulate how air would be rammed into the motor at highway speeds, maybe that's why power is missing".

The point was: apparently the BWM (our car too, maybe) can sense that the airflow is not matching up with the apparent MPH, so it cuts back on the fuel or timing or what have you. So maybe we won't see an honest, 100% bone stock RX-8 making ~ 200 rwhp until someone runs the car on a 4 wheel dyno with big fans. [/wishful thinking]

Either that, or we're actually only getting 215 or so at the crank, so 180 rwhp is actually accurate. If that's the case, then jumping to 242 rwhp is....absolutely unholy. (Or, we're making 238 even during dyno testing, but our transmissions are lubricated with wood glue and pencil shavings.)


Ohh, ok that makes more sense, I was not understand the whole fan thing.
Old 11-09-2004, 11:00 PM
  #83  
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Valley, NY
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
You cannot look at it in absolute values. 77 hp over 334 that is about 22% but 70 hp over 170-180 (what on average we're getting from dynoing rx8) equals roughly 41% - such a gain is unreal. But I am sure that 20% more can be squeezed from rx8 and that would equal 35hp bringing whp to 200-210. Why it needs air to release all the power? WTF knows? I wish I did .......I can only speculate. Perhaps if there is not enough air and the engine is put to stress (high revs) computer retards timing and changes a/f proportions to protect it. Dont worry you will never run out of air while driving it so all the ponies will be pulling on the road... they get lazy on a dyno though
I remember an article in Car and Driver about the effects of using different octane gas on power. Among tested cars was bmw m3 they could never get any real numbers from a dyno on this car because of the lack of blowing air... so they did not post any results for the bimmer.
BTW what do you mean sell more products? Fans you mean? Dont think mazda really cares about how the fans sell... but then who knows that might be a good point

I get it now. What I meant about selling more products, was that say a company is dynoing a product. They then use a fan to make the gains seem bigger, thus making their bogus product seem much better than it is. I made this assumption before I understood what you meant about the fans. I thought this was universal among cars which is why I was confused. Now that Baron explained that the ecu senses little to no airflow I understand it and most of my questions don't make much sense. Sorry for all of the confusion.
Old 11-10-2004, 11:18 AM
  #84  
Registered User
 
Vrimmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, tx
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoLaK
I also fail to see how and I fail too see how the windtunnel Dyno is pertinent to Mr.P&P's testing?.... He dyno'd his stock 8 before he did his porting and he got a 197 once and 184 another time. Then he worked his magic and he dyno’d again and got 242..... As a comparative tool especially if done on the same day nothing beats a Dyno......
Well that was just a joke... not funny?
Old 11-10-2004, 01:04 PM
  #85  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
what if the air tunnel dyno was also in a big cooler like at a meat packing plant and we could also have a dehumidifier there too. cold, dry, 200mph wind blowing at the car on a 4wheel dyno. yeah and then we could...
Old 11-10-2004, 01:24 PM
  #86  
Registered User
 
Vrimmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, tx
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what if we dyno it in the outer space using rocket fuel not a bad idea ha?
Old 11-10-2004, 03:01 PM
  #87  
Son what is your Alibi?
iTrader: (1)
 
PoLaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
Well that was just a joke... not funny?
no... i just don't see how its part of the issue at hand...?

Or are you a non believer in the HP he made?

Originally Posted by zoom44
what if the air tunnel dyno was also in a big cooler like at a meat packing plant and we could also have a dehumidifier there too. cold, dry, 200mph wind blowing at the car on a 4wheel dyno. yeah and then we could...
Why a 4wheel/roller? 4wheel doesn't meen there is a pully attached from the rear to the front rollers it just means that you can dyno 4WD cars on them, right?. And far as im concerned there in no "half limp mode" (when the abs light turns on, its normal, alot of cars do the EVO included and they don't have a problem dynoing with the light on) if limp mode engages on the dyno you loose 100hp not 5 or 10.
Old 11-10-2004, 03:07 PM
  #88  
Registered
 
Icemastr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BOOSTD 7
Fortunately it's usually other people's motors that I blow ... fortunately for me that is :D
I haven't blown anyone elses motor yet but I am sure I would be equally skilled at that :D
Old 11-10-2004, 05:55 PM
  #89  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
exactly my point polak- i was being silly because the dyno topic is silly. you can change a number of things about the conditions you dyno in and get a different number with each change. whats the point? dyno your car on the same dyno with as close to the same conditions as possible each time you dyno. the percentage increase or decrease is alot better to go by than just the number. also looking at the charts to see where in the band the power was made.
Old 11-10-2004, 09:03 PM
  #90  
Son what is your Alibi?
iTrader: (1)
 
PoLaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
exactly my point polak- i was being silly because the dyno topic is silly. you can change a number of things about the conditions you dyno in and get a different number with each change. whats the point? dyno your car on the same dyno with as close to the same conditions as possible each time you dyno. the percentage increase or decrease is alot better to go by than just the number. also looking at the charts to see where in the band the power was made.
sarcasam is lost on the young
Old 11-11-2004, 04:54 PM
  #91  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
smrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WHITE HOUSE
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr. Port & Polish were are you installing the n2o hose thats send the juice in to the car,i know charles hooks his up to the rubber piece thats attached to the air cleaner.would you reccomend any other place.
Old 11-11-2004, 07:42 PM
  #92  
SIGSEGV
 
alex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry, the thread grew fast and I didn't want to read it -- sorry --

Is this a wet or dry NOS setup? I think its a dry setup, correct? and, are there any #'s yet?
Old 11-11-2004, 08:03 PM
  #93  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
smrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WHITE HOUSE
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
iam pretty sure he will use a wet system.
Old 11-11-2004, 09:19 PM
  #94  
Cone Killer
 
Kari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
350RWHP? I am sure he is adding additional fuel somewhere as a rotary needs about 4 850CC injectors to handle that much HP.
Old 11-11-2004, 09:22 PM
  #95  
Registered
 
Ajax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 2,390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kari
350RWHP? I am sure he is adding additional fuel somewhere as a rotary needs about 4 850CC injectors to handle that much HP.
if he's ported it, i see no reason why he wouldnt have already replaced the injectors.
Old 11-11-2004, 11:50 PM
  #96  
Registered User
 
Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the whole point of his project was to keep as much stock as possible. Am I wrong? I was under the assumption that everything from the ECU to the Injectors is stock.
Old 11-12-2004, 12:48 AM
  #97  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Kari
350RWHP? I am sure he is adding additional fuel somewhere as a rotary needs about 4 850CC injectors to handle that much HP.
My God! Kari is that you talking? Both cute AND technical. That there is a woman!!!
Old 11-12-2004, 12:49 AM
  #98  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
To do it the easy way you could just use an additional injector controller that doesn't touch the stock fuel or ecu systems. An additional fuel line with it's own dedicated pump could be used for this system. The factory ecu would never see it.
Old 11-12-2004, 05:20 AM
  #99  
Port Master
Thread Starter
 
Mr. Port & Polish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rotary Village
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoLaK
Am i this said "forum member and moderator" ?
Yes sir...
Old 11-12-2004, 12:27 PM
  #100  
Cone Killer
 
Kari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
To do it the easy way you could just use an additional injector controller that doesn't touch the stock fuel or ecu systems. An additional fuel line with it's own dedicated pump could be used for this system. The factory ecu would never see it.
Which with this type of setup would be the best way to go in my opinion. As long as the stock injectors are up to the task of handling the power the car would be making before the nitrous (which with 230-240 that shouldnt really be a problem) adding a secondary injector or two in the intake manifold and having it set to add the fuel when you are on the spray is the way to go. This is the type of setup Icemastr has with his Turbo Van using 4 additional fuel injectors in the intake manifold set with a hobbs pressure switch to activate when the car sees above 2psi and monitored with an EGT gauge and wideband for tuning. With this large of a shot of nitrous I am sure aditional fuel beyond what the stock system would be able to provide. So while I can't say Judge Ito is using a "wet" nitrous kit for sure, I think thats most likely what he is using. For anyone that doesnt know a "wet" nitrous system is one that adds an additional fuel supply rather than just using additional fuel from the stock fuel injectors. Installing larger fuel injectors would add complications to the install as well as possibly decrease fuel economy or make the car a little less driveable.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Ported renesis engine plus a 150 n2o shot will land me 350rwhp non-turbo..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.