Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Pettit Super Charger Owners

Old May 14, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #7101  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
Thanks for the feedback MM. I have been in contact with Greg and Jeff. Jeff is the TT director for the SE region. They have told me to get my hp down to what I mentioned, use no bigger than a 245 tire, basic coilovers and bars with weight at 3150 or so and I should be at TTC.
I would be at a power to weight ratio of approx 11.6/1 and you are right that i wouldnt have much room for anything else.
It was interesting that water injection doesnt cost any points. No methanol can be used however---in any class--unless you run the open ones.
I would not TT without a real cage however. Not going at it to have a undisputed winner of a car, but rather a car that i would be honestly competitive with.
Maybe getting time for another DD?
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 03:38 AM
  #7102  
Rote8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 2
From: Boosted...
Originally Posted by olddragger
nothing for the 09'+s yet.

Yall I am semi seriously thinking of using my car to become a competitive NASA TT car.
With the low boost pulley (hp about 270 or so?) i can just make the TTC class--its thought.
I could be very competitive in that class. I would no longer use it for a DD and a proper cage would be installed.
Think Cam would sponser me --lol!
Hard decisions.
OD
Wow, good luck.
Can't you drive a car with a cage on the street?
I made 297RWHP with a stock pulley and no porting.

/NASA??? You won't be like the JATO guy on Mythbusters; will you?
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 08:26 AM
  #7103  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
297 with the small pulley? Damn--come to think of it i was pulling over 300g/sec myself.
It may be easier to just go TTB. max power to weight there is 10.25/1 i think and i know i can make that--plus have room for a better suspension tires---this is not a firm decision yet guys--just doing due diligence. But i think i am ready to go to the next step.
Most people dont realize with a little added power the 8 can be a force to reckon with.

Look at this vid with mike driving a na car

http://vimeo.com/8047700

Last edited by olddragger; May 15, 2010 at 08:33 AM.
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 06:54 PM
  #7104  
Rote8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 2
From: Boosted...
A question I have not been able to answer;

Do extremely high MAF numbers cause tire spin, or does the tire spinning and motor revving, cause high MAF numbers?

/Is this like the chicken and the egg?
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 07:55 PM
  #7105  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by olddragger
Thanks for the feedback MM. I have been in contact with Greg and Jeff. Jeff is the TT director for the SE region. They have told me to get my hp down to what I mentioned, use no bigger than a 245 tire, basic coilovers and bars with weight at 3150 or so and I should be at TTC.
I would be at a power to weight ratio of approx 11.6/1 and you are right that i wouldnt have much room for anything else.
Interesting. What HP mark did they set for you?
When I sent in my dyno (340 HP at the boost that I run on the track) and weight (3314 with me in it), they classed me to TT-C +14 and just counting in my suspension pushed me into TT-B.

Originally Posted by Rote8
A question I have not been able to answer;

Do extremely high MAF numbers cause tire spin, or does the tire spinning and motor revving, cause high MAF numbers?

/Is this like the chicken and the egg?
lol

You serious?
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 08:15 PM
  #7106  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,844
Likes: 1,798
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Interesting how those classes are made up . Is it peak power they go on or "area under the curve " ?
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 08:21 PM
  #7107  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
260-275 range depending where my weight went. This is with BASIC coilovers and bars and tire size no bigger than 245. No other mods. That would get me to TTC+14 they thought.
I would hate being that close to be thrown into TTB or DQ'ed because there was cold air temps that day.
I think just giving it up and going TTB may be the sane thing to do.
I have heard about a turbo'd RX8 that would have placed 3nd in TTB if he had been running TT.
Track times where there.
you are under a 10/1 ratio?

Brettus ---its peak power after 3 pulls.
OD
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #7108  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,844
Likes: 1,798
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by olddragger

Brettus ---its peak power after 3 pulls.
OD
hmmm - not meaning to start anything but .........with turbo you could tune for a flat power curve and have huge advantage
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 08:26 PM
  #7109  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
Interesting how those classes are made up . Is it peak power they go on or "area under the curve " ?
It's based on modification and arbitrary decision making.
In our case, equipping the car with aftermarket forced induction means a director looks at our dyno sheet and weight and comes up with a "comparable" platform (in our case, the BMW 135i Coupe), which puts us in TT-C with an additional 14 point penalty.
6 more points and you are in TT-B with cars like the ZR-1 Corvette, Ferrari 348, Mustang Cobra SVT, Mercedes E55 AMG and Porsche 997 Carrera.
6 points are springs, shocks and a swaybar.
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 09:08 PM
  #7110  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by olddragger
260-275 range depending where my weight went.
I guess you could dial back the power, but you would have to demonstrate that there is no way to increase it on the fly.

Originally Posted by olddragger
you are under a 10/1 ratio?
Yeah, I'm 9.2:1

Originally Posted by Brettus
hmmm - not meaning to start anything but .........with turbo you could tune for a flat power curve and have huge advantage
Well, clearly a turbo set-up with the same peak power is always going to have the advantage over an S/C on a road course.
Reply
Old May 15, 2010 | 11:48 PM
  #7111  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,844
Likes: 1,798
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Well, clearly a turbo set-up with the same peak power is always going to have the advantage over an S/C on a road course.
yes, but the advantage can be made even greater by tuning for a flat hp curve . If the number is say 280 you could have 280 from 6000 through to 8500 .

And it can be done without a boost controller which gets around the 'altering on the fly' issue .
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #7112  
jskup1's Avatar
The Chief
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Damn, think my engine is done. Doing some unspirited driving the other day. My car started misfiring, All my dash lights lit up, and I've got a HUGE smoke cloud behind me. DTC's P0300 and P204. Had car towed to house. Found LOTS of oil in intake and in spark plugs for rear rotor. No oil on floor and no coolant loss. I'm thinking I lost a seal. Any other causes perhaps?
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #7113  
paulmasoner's Avatar
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 3
From: Colfontaine, Belgium
Originally Posted by Brettus
yes, but the advantage can be made even greater by tuning for a flat hp curve . If the number is say 280 you could have 280 from 6000 through to 8500 .

And it can be done without a boost controller which gets around the 'altering on the fly' issue .
I think thats exactly his point, in a lot of arguments


Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 11:38 AM
  #7114  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
Sorry to hear that JSK---that sucks.
You can use the 09 short block you know?

No argument here that turbo offers more flexibility in a rd racing situation, every system has benefits and negatives of their own.
Dont forget to add the lotus (na version) and the Porsche 993 (non turbo!) thats in TTB
OD
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #7115  
zenrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
ThreadJack

No, it's not an RX8, but I can't let Denny have all the fun...

Yes, I'll be keeping my day job

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rcl1Nfpwu8
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #7116  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by jskup1
Damn, think my engine is done. Doing some unspirited driving the other day. My car started misfiring, All my dash lights lit up, and I've got a HUGE smoke cloud behind me. DTC's P0300 and P204. Had car towed to house. Found LOTS of oil in intake and in spark plugs for rear rotor. No oil on floor and no coolant loss. I'm thinking I lost a seal. Any other causes perhaps?
Will it start and run? Does it sound like a motor boat?
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 03:19 PM
  #7117  
jskup1's Avatar
The Chief
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Yep pretty much. Took a lot of effort just to get it from the driveway into the garage.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 06:12 PM
  #7118  
zenrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Sorry to hear about the problems, JS.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 08:32 PM
  #7119  
Rote8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 2
From: Boosted...
Originally Posted by jskup1
Damn, think my engine is done. Doing some unspirited driving the other day. My car started misfiring, All my dash lights lit up, and I've got a HUGE smoke cloud behind me. DTC's P0300 and P204. Had car towed to house. Found LOTS of oil in intake and in spark plugs for rear rotor. No oil on floor and no coolant loss. I'm thinking I lost a seal. Any other causes perhaps?
Mark and disconnect the coils from the ECU.
Remove the leading plugs.
Spin the engine and listen: do you here even pulses or PULSE, pulse, PULSE, PULSE, pulse ....

OR

Have a friend spin it with a finger in one leading plug hole; does it feel even?
Try the other hole; same test.

Sorry to hear about it, hope it's OK
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 08:38 AM
  #7120  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
the all dash lights lit up throws me here. On my blown engines I never had a dash light come on that fast?

Z baby---man the hp of that M3 shows doesnt it? Wow--tapping 160--now thats a different world. I would probably blow out all my wheel liners at that speed. Love the video set up.

The one thing I wish i could do is to increase acceleration from 115mph to 135mph. This car is pretty quick from 60 to 115, but after that you can tell its air footprint could be better.
Has anyone other that Juan installed the 09 underpanels?
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:56 AM
  #7121  
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 45
Originally Posted by Rote8
Mark and disconnect the coils from the ECU.
It might be much easier and less prone to error to disconnect the e-shaft sensor. That way, both the ignition and fuel systems are not operational.
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 10:52 AM
  #7122  
jskup1's Avatar
The Chief
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
It might be much easier and less prone to error to disconnect the e-shaft sensor. That way, both the ignition and fuel systems are not operational.
Charles, I still have your fuel pump tool. With this going on, I haven't gotten around to the fuel pump. I might just ship it back to you and get it from you again later.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 08:14 AM
  #7123  
turtlesdove3's Avatar
Regular
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Rote8
A question I have not been able to answer;

Do extremely high MAF numbers cause tire spin, or does the tire spinning and motor revving, cause high MAF numbers?

/Is this like the chicken and the egg?
You serious? any answers?
Reply
Old May 19, 2010 | 08:20 PM
  #7124  
Rote8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 2
From: Boosted...
Originally Posted by turtlesdove3
You serious? any answers?
Semi serious.
I have noticed the data logs during a tire spinning pull show a higher MAF than if the tires did not break loose, but who is to say which is cause and effect.

Reply
Old May 19, 2010 | 08:36 PM
  #7125  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
So that was a serious question? lol

The MAF just measures throughput. Nothing "causes" it.

The motor is just an air pump. It passes a fixed amount of air through itself per rev. The blower is fixed-displacement, so it stuffs a fixed amount of air into the motor per rev.

Now, if you take some of the drag off of the drive train (i.e. the car), what do you think happens?
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.