the perfect management
02-23-2007, 01:02 PM
#101
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
The #14 is for air temp, Benny said it will correct for a different sensor. Were building a different coolent temp sensor for the fans, them not comming on is why you overheated, or started to. Cams working on that as we speak.
Yeah, the fans didn't come on and the engine temp gauge never left minimum.
It also didn't have an accurate reading.
This is only with v2.0 software. It worked correctly with the old software.
02-23-2007, 02:27 PM
#103
RotoRocks Powered
Originally Posted by cavemancan
This is making more sense now. So based on the graph shown at 90 deg Cell its at 0% injecttor pulse duration.
I can see how inaccurate this graph is. Especially when each point that you can adjust for is several deg's away from each other.
With that said if we were to modify the software to include more points (adjustability by degree) we would also need to alter the GUI of the interface. I think this can be done.
I can see how inaccurate this graph is. Especially when each point that you can adjust for is several deg's away from each other.
With that said if we were to modify the software to include more points (adjustability by degree) we would also need to alter the GUI of the interface. I think this can be done.
I used a VB Decompiler Lite (trial), and it quickly pulled out the code for forms out of it but the rest of the app is compiled to machine code, so it is assembly which I am not that intuitive with (last used back in school years ago)
If you want, you can get the latest copy of the Int-X soft from: http://www.microtechefi.com/software/setup.zip
If you do this sort of thing often, you'll have no trouble sorting what goes where on this thing.
02-23-2007, 02:33 PM
#104
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
What glitches did you notice if any with the old version, I think it was 1.4. I think ive seen more glitches whith the 2.0, what do you think MM.
02-23-2007, 08:22 PM
#108
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Benny was saying that sometimes the ECU would bypass the temps and still go into closed loop. My goal is to keep it in open loop so I can tune all around, I dont want any stock control from the ECU at all. If it holds my tune without trimming the benifits are in my favor. My goal is 13 A/F to 3500 RPMs then 12.5 to redline. In VAC im looking for 15 to 16 A/F for cruzzing. If this is acomplished im looking at 200 miles city and 300 miles highway from a tank of gas. Like I said before ive accomplished this tune and everythings great till the next day when it starts trimming.
02-24-2007, 11:33 AM
#112
I presume you mean while in boost.
I actually am -20 in a lot of the area around the torque peak. An even wider area on the trailing to increase the split.
The OEM PCM will try to put 30°+ of timing with only 8° of split. That wouldn't be very nice at the torque peak with 12 PSI+.
I actually am -20 in a lot of the area around the torque peak. An even wider area on the trailing to increase the split.
The OEM PCM will try to put 30°+ of timing with only 8° of split. That wouldn't be very nice at the torque peak with 12 PSI+.
02-24-2007, 11:59 AM
#121
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
Can you thnk of anyway that I can go into total open loop for the time being till I get the dongle
This will keep the read temp down around 170°F.
It will also make your idle high and your coolant fans won't come on.
It will probably keep your APV closed too, but I'm not sure of that.
Or, you can just do what I keep telling you to do. Your choice.
02-24-2007, 12:20 PM
#122
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I already have the O2 dongle and its not working, it keeps settling itself back to 11 to 11.5. It makes it feel to spongy compared to 12.5. What else can you think of. I have to order a veristor with the rite values, radioshack dosnt have one.
