dry 55 nos or wet 55 shot ?
09-10-2008, 11:06 AM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dry 55 nos or wet 55 shot ?
hi there im a owner of a 2004 velocity red with 30000 miles . i have beeen wanted to put a 50 or 55 shot for a while but i dont know to much about nos. should i go with the dry 55 shot just to be more safe or go ahead and install the wet . i have read thread of alot of people using wet but im kind of scare to blow my motor. please let me know some opinions since im planing to use it a quite often im in the military and here we go to car shows and races all year including the german race wars and the nurbrging race track. thanks for your commments
09-10-2008, 02:12 PM
#3
Just as a cliff note:
Dry system is pumping in NO2 without extra gas and runs your car leaner (more dangerously) while it relies on the closed loop performance of the car to reactively add fuel.
Wet systems pump in NO2 and gas to go with the additional oxygen.
Read the thread linked above thoroughly.
Dry system is pumping in NO2 without extra gas and runs your car leaner (more dangerously) while it relies on the closed loop performance of the car to reactively add fuel.
Wet systems pump in NO2 and gas to go with the additional oxygen.
Read the thread linked above thoroughly.
09-10-2008, 02:45 PM
#6
Just as a cliff note:
Dry system is pumping in NO2 without extra gas and runs your car leaner (more dangerously) while it relies on the closed loop performance of the car to reactively add fuel.
Wet systems pump in NO2 and gas to go with the additional oxygen.
Read the thread linked above thoroughly.
Dry system is pumping in NO2 without extra gas and runs your car leaner (more dangerously) while it relies on the closed loop performance of the car to reactively add fuel.
Wet systems pump in NO2 and gas to go with the additional oxygen.
Read the thread linked above thoroughly.
I think. One of you google hounds go check it out for me, my internet tubes are clogged.
09-10-2008, 02:57 PM
#7
HAVOC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
while your correct about the chemical compisition, N2O is a naturally occuring gas, not neccierraly a contributeing factor to smog
EDIT: it is a greenhouse gas, nothing to do with smog. besides, when burnt in the engine it seperates and binds to form water and CO2. mother nature produces over twice as much N2O than humans do
EDIT: it is a greenhouse gas, nothing to do with smog. besides, when burnt in the engine it seperates and binds to form water and CO2. mother nature produces over twice as much N2O than humans do
Last edited by WingleBeast; 09-10-2008 at 03:03 PM.
09-13-2008, 12:40 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
duworm
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
10-01-2015 04:57 PM
