Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

9krpmrx8's Boost Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-27-2011, 03:31 PM
  #276  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Following on from the discussion of the last few days , this is how I would see the progression for hp using the base Greddy kit .


240- 260whp - stock greddy turbo with the usual recommended upgrades

280-300 whp - Upgrade the compressor to BNR T04e 50 trim or equivalent . Do the wastegate mod or upgrade the actuator .No other major changes required.

330-350 whp - Upgrade the compressor to BNR 60-1 , upgrade the suction piping to 21/2" min the compression piping to the I/C to 21/4" min , upgrade the I/C . Modify the turbo exit for better flow . Fit 3" exhaust . Upgrade fuel pump , injectors , ignition . Do the wastegate mod or upgrade the actuator. Then pray it all hangs together .

Last edited by Brettus; 04-27-2011 at 04:10 PM.
Old 04-27-2011, 05:36 PM
  #277  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Double post FTW
Old 04-27-2011, 06:01 PM
  #278  
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
 
shadycrew31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burbs,PA
Posts: 5,805
Received 30 Likes on 22 Posts
i think he just wanted to get to the next page.
Old 04-27-2011, 06:04 PM
  #279  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
you fail for not using the 50 posts per page maximum. LOL
Old 04-27-2011, 09:51 PM
  #280  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
it is our nature to mess with stuff. That is how some others make a living.
The scariest words that get in my mind are " I know what i am doing and I can make this better".
If i ever say that out loud my wife has been asked to hit me in the head with whatever is closest.
I remain curious about things, but I now draw the line in making things better. I have learned SOMETHING.
OD
Old 04-27-2011, 10:06 PM
  #281  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by olddragger
it is our nature to mess with stuff. That is how some others make a living.
The scariest words that get in my mind are " I know what i am doing and I can make this better".
If i ever say that out loud my wife has been asked to hit me in the head with whatever is closest.
I remain curious about things, but I now draw the line in making things better. I have learned SOMETHING.
OD

Some things I make better and some worse.
Old 04-27-2011, 10:19 PM
  #282  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
upgrade the suction piping to 21/2" min the compression piping to the I/C to 21/4" min , upgrade the I/C
what are those measurements
Old 04-27-2011, 10:35 PM
  #283  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2-1/2" turbo inlet
2-1/4" turbo outlet/intercooler inlet

I agree, bigger is better. lol... its just really really hard to do with similar pipe routing as the greddy kit.
Old 04-28-2011, 12:13 AM
  #284  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Double post FTW
have to admit i saw that happen and thought F it . Looks good on the top of the page ..... heh
Old 04-28-2011, 12:15 AM
  #285  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
what are those measurements
65mm and 60mm using the correct terminology for the rest of the world ...
Old 04-28-2011, 12:16 AM
  #286  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I found this helpful

Your actual results may vary (ie when you add an IC) so just use my numbers as sort of a bench mark to compare different piping sizes. One thing you guys will notice is that none of the velocites goes above 304 MPH or 0.4 mach. According to Corky Bell, Maximum Boost pg 61, 304 MPH or 0.4 mach is the point at which airflow meets increased resistance (drag) and flow losses are experienced.

Anyways here are the numbers I came up with. The velocities are in miles per hour and mach, and the flow rates are in cfm. Measurements for the piping are in inches.

<FONT COLOR="blue"><FONT SIZE="5">0.4 mach = 304 MPH</FONT></FONT>

2" piping
1.57 x 2 = 3.14 sq in
300 cfm = 156 mph = 0.20 mach
400 cfm = 208 mph = 0.27 mach
500 cfm = 261 mph = 0.34 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">585 cfm max = 304 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


2.25" piping
3.9740625 sq in = 1.98703125 x 2
300 cfm = 123 mph = 0.16 mach
400 cfm = 164 mph = 0.21 mach
500 cfm = 205 mph = 0.26 mach
600 cfm = 247 mph = 0.32 mach
700 cfm = 288 mph = 0.37 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">740 cfm max = 304 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


2.5" piping
4.90625 sq in = 2.453125 x 2
300 cfm = 100 mph = 0.13 mach
400 cfm = 133 mph = 0.17 mach
500 cfm = 166 mph = 0.21 mach
600 cfm = 200 mph = 0.26 mach
700 cfm = 233 mph = 0.30 mach
800 cfm = 266 mph = 0.34 mach
900 cfm = 300 mph = 0.39 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">913 cfm max = 304 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


2.75" piping
5.9365625 sq in = 2.96828125 x 2
300 cfm = 82 mph = 0.10 mach
400 cfm = 110 mph = 0.14 mach
500 cfm = 137 mph = 0.17 mach
600 cfm = 165 mph = 0.21 mach
700 cfm = 192 mph = 0.25 mach
800 cfm = 220 mph = 0.28 mach
900 cfm = 248 mph = 0.32 mach
1000 cfm = 275 mph = 0.36 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">1100 cfm max = 303 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


3.0" piping
7.065 sq in = 3.5325 x 2
300 cfm = 69 mph = 0.09 mach
400 cfm = 92 mph = 0.12 mach
500 cfm = 115 mph = 0.15 mach
600 cfm = 138 mph = 0.18 mach
700 cfm = 162 mph = 0.21 mach
800 cfm = 185 mph = 0.24 mach
900 cfm = 208 mph = 0.27 mach
1000 cfm = 231 mph = 0.30 mach
1100 cfm = 254 cfm = 0.33 mach
1200 cfm = 277 mph = 0.36 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">1300 cfm max= 301 mph = 0.39 mach</FONT>
Old 04-28-2011, 12:20 AM
  #287  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
1lb/min = 14.472 cfm
Old 04-28-2011, 12:22 AM
  #288  
Never Blend In
iTrader: (2)
 
nuke0907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 4,524
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
maybe these pics will help you speed things along and answer some questions. my advice, just get an 18" long 3.5" ID tube, cut it in half, weld a MAF flange on one, use the other behind the bumper to the air filter connected with a 90 degree silicone coupler through the core support.

Name:  DSC_0767.jpg
Views: 151
Size:  113.9 KB
Name:  turbokit4.jpg
Views: 191
Size:  112.3 KB
Name:  turbokit3.jpg
Views: 191
Size:  109.1 KB
Name:  turbokit2.jpg
Views: 195
Size:  106.3 KB
Name:  turbokit1.jpg
Views: 167
Size:  114.3 KB
Name:  DSC_0666.jpg
Views: 210
Size:  95.1 KB
Old 04-28-2011, 12:25 AM
  #289  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
(Pessure Ratio x 14.7) - 14.7 = boost

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob...o_tech103.html
Old 04-28-2011, 12:26 AM
  #290  
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
 
shadycrew31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burbs,PA
Posts: 5,805
Received 30 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
it is our nature to mess with stuff. That is how some others make a living.
The scariest words that get in my mind are " I know what i am doing and I can make this better".
If i ever say that out loud my wife has been asked to hit me in the head with whatever is closest.
I remain curious about things, but I now draw the line in making things better. I have learned SOMETHING.
OD
85% of the time I need to replace the things that "I made better". I never learn the first time around.

Originally Posted by Brettus
65mm and 60mm using the correct terminology for the rest of the world ...
Whats all those MM's? we speak american over here! lol...
Old 04-28-2011, 12:38 AM
  #291  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
I found this helpful

Your actual results may vary (ie when you add an IC) so just use my numbers as sort of a bench mark to compare different piping sizes. One thing you guys will notice is that none of the velocites goes above 304 MPH or 0.4 mach. According to Corky Bell, Maximum Boost pg 61, 304 MPH or 0.4 mach is the point at which airflow meets increased resistance (drag) and flow losses are experienced.

Anyways here are the numbers I came up with. The velocities are in miles per hour and mach, and the flow rates are in cfm. Measurements for the piping are in inches.

<FONT COLOR="blue"><FONT SIZE="5">0.4 mach = 304 MPH</FONT></FONT>

2" piping
1.57 x 2 = 3.14 sq in
300 cfm = 156 mph = 0.20 mach
400 cfm = 208 mph = 0.27 mach
500 cfm = 261 mph = 0.34 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">585 cfm max = 304 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


2.25" piping
3.9740625 sq in = 1.98703125 x 2
300 cfm = 123 mph = 0.16 mach
400 cfm = 164 mph = 0.21 mach
500 cfm = 205 mph = 0.26 mach
600 cfm = 247 mph = 0.32 mach
700 cfm = 288 mph = 0.37 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">740 cfm max = 304 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


2.5" piping
4.90625 sq in = 2.453125 x 2
300 cfm = 100 mph = 0.13 mach
400 cfm = 133 mph = 0.17 mach
500 cfm = 166 mph = 0.21 mach
600 cfm = 200 mph = 0.26 mach
700 cfm = 233 mph = 0.30 mach
800 cfm = 266 mph = 0.34 mach
900 cfm = 300 mph = 0.39 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">913 cfm max = 304 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


2.75" piping
5.9365625 sq in = 2.96828125 x 2
300 cfm = 82 mph = 0.10 mach
400 cfm = 110 mph = 0.14 mach
500 cfm = 137 mph = 0.17 mach
600 cfm = 165 mph = 0.21 mach
700 cfm = 192 mph = 0.25 mach
800 cfm = 220 mph = 0.28 mach
900 cfm = 248 mph = 0.32 mach
1000 cfm = 275 mph = 0.36 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">1100 cfm max = 303 mph = 0.40 mach</FONT>


3.0" piping
7.065 sq in = 3.5325 x 2
300 cfm = 69 mph = 0.09 mach
400 cfm = 92 mph = 0.12 mach
500 cfm = 115 mph = 0.15 mach
600 cfm = 138 mph = 0.18 mach
700 cfm = 162 mph = 0.21 mach
800 cfm = 185 mph = 0.24 mach
900 cfm = 208 mph = 0.27 mach
1000 cfm = 231 mph = 0.30 mach
1100 cfm = 254 cfm = 0.33 mach
1200 cfm = 277 mph = 0.36 mach
<FONT COLOR="blue">1300 cfm max= 301 mph = 0.39 mach</FONT>
good info although I imagine air temp is another factor that needs to be considered in the conversion to g/s. There is also some good info on the Garrett site on this .

That puts the recommended max for
2 " at 306 g/s - approx. 260whp.
2.25" at 387g/s - approx 340whp

So - perhaps the 2" pipe to the IC should be upgraded earlier than I suggested above .

From Garrett
Tubing Diameter: velocity of 200 - 300 ft/sec is desirable. Too small a diameter will increase pressure drop, too large can slow transient response

Last edited by Brettus; 04-28-2011 at 12:51 AM.
Old 04-28-2011, 12:52 AM
  #292  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
That puts the recommended max for
2 " at 306 g/s - approx. 260whp.
2.25" at 387g/s - approx 340whp

how exactly are you calculating this?
Old 04-28-2011, 01:04 AM
  #293  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
/\


Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
1lb/min = 14.472 cfm
I used the info you provided here ....
Old 04-28-2011, 01:06 AM
  #294  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I get that part, but not the WHP part, do you have a chart of given g/s to HP numbers?
Old 04-28-2011, 01:08 AM
  #295  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
I get that part, but not the WHP part, do you have a chart of given g/s to HP numbers?
just from doing a few dynos and making the comparison ....
Old 04-28-2011, 01:14 AM
  #296  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,737
Received 2,023 Likes on 1,648 Posts
well I checked it out on my car tonight while I was doing some routine maintenance. With a rubber elbow and reinforced silicone hose I could get a 3.5" inlet pipe all the way to the motor mount bracket fairly easily. However, I started this by saying "if it were me". I'm funny that way, not suggesting that anyone else should or would do it. As I've proven, it's the summation of incremental improvements combined that net a worthy impact. My car is at 2700# with a full interior. It never could have gotten there if I had the negative mindset that the little bit here and the little bit there doesn't make any difference.

ps: in the calculations above you may have confused boosted/pressurized piping with suction/intake piping. The Corky Bell reference is for pressurized piping, not the turbo inlet/suction piping.


.

Last edited by TeamRX8; 04-28-2011 at 01:21 AM.
Old 04-28-2011, 01:19 AM
  #297  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
I get that part, but not the WHP part, do you have a chart of given g/s to HP numbers?
forgot to mention - if you are on a MM tune . Forget g/s because the way he scales the maf makes that number meaningless for that purpose .
Old 04-28-2011, 01:21 AM
  #298  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
just from doing a few dynos and making the comparison ....
would love to get some of that info from you
Old 04-28-2011, 01:22 AM
  #299  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
is there anyway to scale it back?

so it becomes meaningful again?

post tune?
Old 04-28-2011, 01:23 AM
  #300  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
It never could have gotten there if I had the negative mindset that the little bit here and the little bit there doesn't make any difference.
.
Agreed - but with a piping system bigger is not always better .


Originally Posted by TeamRX8
ps: in the calculations above you have confused boosted/pressurized piping with suction/intake piping.


.
Nope . Was talking about the pressurised pipe to the IC.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 9krpmrx8's Boost Build Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.