Baseline Automated Tuning Beta Now Available for Download
#577
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tried everything but, the stinky leg to get rid of that cel! It was running pretty good so I logged with it on. Well, I applied the logs but just did 2.77 down m-.96. 3.01 and up at m-1.02. Reflashed, fired it up and light disappeared. Went up the road to get to operating temps and it ran nice. Stopped at idle and nearly no fluctuations at all. In drive and in park. It really felt smooth. I only drove about 4 miles about 20 mins ago.
I double checked everything and was in no rush like last night sending you the wrong screen pics.
Here are the new screen pics.
I double checked everything and was in no rush like last night sending you the wrong screen pics.
Here are the new screen pics.
#580
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So. You feel there is something wrong here? I'm going to do at least one more set of logs and see where the numbers are at. There is something about starting the MAF over 2.x. Cel both times that I plugged in values larger than 2.x.
Last edited by Its Chey; 08-31-2009 at 05:07 AM.
#582
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After Chase had me do halves the other night, I wanted to just try. I'm noticing that anytime the values start above 2, a cel is thrown. Just like before when I used Chases' tune and scaled the MAF. It bogged down and ran like I was towing a Scarab to the river. Cel. So I just decided to apply it this way. Now, it could be way off. However, it runs good and I'm baffled as to why it takes off from a dead stop so well. Not manual well but, better than I have ever experienced in this car.
This is why I am going to take additional logs. I will keep posting up data for everyone to help analyze and correct me when wrong. No doubt I'm still dumb but, I refuse to give up...........................yet.
But, but, but, but, I gots a goooood brain. You make Simple Jack hop-py.
This is why I am going to take additional logs. I will keep posting up data for everyone to help analyze and correct me when wrong. No doubt I'm still dumb but, I refuse to give up...........................yet.
But, but, but, but, I gots a goooood brain. You make Simple Jack hop-py.
#584
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have to admit I'm not satisfied even after driving it. That is why I want to see the next set of logs before proceeding any further. Guess work isn't proof of anything which is why I'm still unsatisfied.
Just to ask and make sure. I'm looking for my m-values to read in the .98's or so?
#586
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My second wind to keep going and suppress the feelings failure. Post back soon enough. Then on to these fuel tables..........................
Recommendations?
Last edited by Its Chey; 08-31-2009 at 08:39 PM. Reason: To add juice
#587
rot8ing
iTrader: (1)
No, not the m-values. On the stock MAF .86=1.96. We came up with .86=2.06. Then logged again with cel. I out of the blue after staring at it for awhile punched in m-value .96. I liked the curve and it ended up .86=1.98. Below the 2.xx threshold that is puzzling me. Just trial and error. Oh, the 2.06 with m-value .96=1.98. Just wanted to clear up possible confusion. I didn't start over, as that would have made 1.96=1.88.
Have to admit I'm not satisfied even after driving it. That is why I want to see the next set of logs before proceeding any further. Guess work isn't proof of anything which is why I'm still unsatisfied.
Just to ask and make sure. I'm looking for my m-values to read in the .98's or so?
Have to admit I'm not satisfied even after driving it. That is why I want to see the next set of logs before proceeding any further. Guess work isn't proof of anything which is why I'm still unsatisfied.
Just to ask and make sure. I'm looking for my m-values to read in the .98's or so?
so like you made datalog 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on the stock map. and when you scaled your maf with baseline, you used data logs 1, 2 and 3. Then you saved the map you made with those m-values. then you scaled with baseline again using 4,5, and 6. and you changed the map you just saved using the m-values you just got.
that would be bad.
#589
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
make sure you are logging what you are tuning. this sounds to me like you scaled the stock maf and flashed, then you threw some other logs you had already back into baseline, and scaled what you flashed using those logs.
so like you made datalog 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on the stock map. and when you scaled your maf with baseline, you used data logs 1, 2 and 3. Then you saved the map you made with those m-values. then you scaled with baseline again using 4,5, and 6. and you changed the map you just saved using the m-values you just got.
that would be bad.
so like you made datalog 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on the stock map. and when you scaled your maf with baseline, you used data logs 1, 2 and 3. Then you saved the map you made with those m-values. then you scaled with baseline again using 4,5, and 6. and you changed the map you just saved using the m-values you just got.
that would be bad.
#590
Nope - you can leave the scale alone in Baseline.
Just log - scale the airflow (not volts ) in the MAF, load in the tune and go log it... then (Get Ready for the the next tune) in baseline to get rid of the old info.... and load in your second set of logs and rescale.
If you need to call me tonight after I get out of work we can run through it.
Just log - scale the airflow (not volts ) in the MAF, load in the tune and go log it... then (Get Ready for the the next tune) in baseline to get rid of the old info.... and load in your second set of logs and rescale.
If you need to call me tonight after I get out of work we can run through it.
#591
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope - you can leave the scale alone in Baseline.
Just log - scale the airflow (not volts ) in the MAF, load in the tune and go log it... then (Get Ready for the the next tune) in baseline to get rid of the old info.... and load in your second set of logs and rescale.
If you need to call me tonight after I get out of work we can run through it.
Just log - scale the airflow (not volts ) in the MAF, load in the tune and go log it... then (Get Ready for the the next tune) in baseline to get rid of the old info.... and load in your second set of logs and rescale.
If you need to call me tonight after I get out of work we can run through it.
#593
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#595
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#598
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After the MAF min change a P0335 CEL was thrown. However, I ran a log on the tune that has the MAF scale that I posted above .86=1.98 etc. This is the m-values for that log. Seems to be closer????
Post #572 is the MAF I'm running.
Post #572 is the MAF I'm running.
Last edited by Its Chey; 09-10-2009 at 08:27 PM.
#600
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts