Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

K&N Filter is ready....

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #1  
StealthTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,286
Likes: 184
From: A Pacific Island.
Cool K&N Filter is ready....

K&N has finished their drop-in replacement for the factory filter.

Part # 33.2284

S
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #2  
bunglega's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
http://www.knfilterchargers.com/sear...x?Prod=33-2284
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 01:59 PM
  #3  
Dookie_Rx-8's Avatar
FourOneMuthaFcuknFive
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Yes ....how much is it i cant find a price????
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #4  
Dookie_Rx-8's Avatar
FourOneMuthaFcuknFive
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
oh ya anyone know how many exta hp?
(im hoping for extra 2hp so we can be the same as the s2000 hp..haha)
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #5  
jimyoung's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks Alaska
Called the distributer here and the part # is good but it has yet to be released to the distributor to be able to order. Said to check back in "acouple of weeks " as they can't even order as yet.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 03:10 PM
  #6  
Tirxer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Virginia, USA
will it be better than the stock filter?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #7  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Originally posted by Tirxer
will it be better than the stock filter?
Better how?

Make more power? 2 HP MAX, at the very most, since that's what some people have found from the stock intake with the filter removed in dyno testing. (You'll never feel a 2 HP improvement)

Better filtering? No, it's been proven in many tests that K&N filters flow more air compared to same-size paper filters, but do a poorer job of filtering out fine dirt particles.

My opinion - gaining 2 hp (at peak rpm only, below 7K you wouldn't gain any power at all) isn't worth degrading the filtering capabilities of the intake.

Regards,
Gordon
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #8  
tpryor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I ordered mine on-line this morning - $46. It was already up on their site, and they claim to be right down the street from K&N - company was Fox Performance (4filters.com). No advertising intended, just facts......
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 06:48 PM
  #9  
Dookie_Rx-8's Avatar
FourOneMuthaFcuknFive
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
So your saying k&n isnt worth it?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #10  
Tirxer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Gord96BRG
Better how?

Make more power? 2 HP MAX, at the very most, since that's what some people have found from the stock intake with the filter removed in dyno testing. (You'll never feel a 2 HP improvement)

Better filtering? No, it's been proven in many tests that K&N filters flow more air compared to same-size paper filters, but do a poorer job of filtering out fine dirt particles.

My opinion - gaining 2 hp (at peak rpm only, below 7K you wouldn't gain any power at all) isn't worth degrading the filtering capabilities of the intake.

Regards,
Gordon
u decide Dookie_Rx-8
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #11  
success07's Avatar
I'm Kind of a Big Deal
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
tpryor - Let us know what you think once you install and take it for a spin, k?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #12  
StealthTL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,286
Likes: 184
From: A Pacific Island.
Cool Particles......

That seems to be the consensus among long time tuners - that a K&N will let some particles thru, that the factory filter will stop.

In my 'ricer' days, I was willing to let the engine suffer, if it meant hearing the wonderful intake howl from a K&N cone. But with the '8 I feel the stock filter is big enough (come ON people, it's feakin HUGE!) and I want the motor to last, a LONG time.

Every time I mention K&N to 'Zoomer, I get "the lecture", on particle size, and flow rates, and the little score marks made by dirty apex seals.......

So I'm going with Gordon on this, I will get a nice clean stock filter, and go with that.

I would still like to open up that hole thru the front bulkhead, the one that is WAY smaller than the MAF intake....I feel THAT is where the real gains in flow will be.

S
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 05:50 AM
  #13  
tpryor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by success07
tpryor - Let us know what you think once you install and take it for a spin, k?
Will do.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 08:29 AM
  #14  
310Guy's Avatar
4AT poor mileage king
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: now... 818 area code
Can you guys point me to some site that talk about K&N not being that great? To be honest, this is the first time I've heard that tuners "agree" K&N will allow certain particles in while a factory filter will not. Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #15  
Rotary Nut's Avatar
"...I'm a Dapper Dan man"
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 840
Likes: 1
From: Newport News, Va
I posted this same response in a thread where the owner was complaining about a rough idle quality after installing a cold air intake.

You need to be real careful about OILED filter elements. It has been discovered that using an oiled filter medium ne K&N, the oil is sucked out of the filter and passes thru the MAF, coating the "hot-wire" mass airflow sensor thereby skewing any air sensor readings and will affect MPG and idle quality.

Alot of drivers on the VW forums have had to pay for the replacement of the MAF (not covered under warranty) after they installed a K&N filter element (either a cold-air or OEM drop in replacement) The MAF has a fine wire inside (or a fine wire mesh) and the oil from the K&N filter was coating the wire and messing with the engine calibration settings.


Some MAFs can be cleaned but most cannot. The wire is heated during normal operation and the oil that sits on the wire burns (cokes) itself to the wire making it impossible to remove.

DO NOT use excessive amounts of oil when cleaning and re-saturating the filter. It was found that after oiling the filter blow out excess oil with high pressure air from an air compressor.


Last edited by Rotary Nut; Feb 4, 2004 at 03:49 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #16  
gettingan8's Avatar
...
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: ..
Just installed a K&N filter in my RX-8. I had never looked at the original filter before and I was impressed with the original filter. I would not have ordered a K&N if I had seen what a good (large filter area) filter came with the car.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 09:48 PM
  #17  
mdw33333's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Well, I've got the Green Filter drop -in because my experience with K&N has led me to believe that they "over-oil" their filters before packaging. As stated before in this thread, that's not good.

After years of only using K&N, I got the Green Filter simply because they had one for the 8 before K&N. After seeing their filter out of the packaging, I didn't think it was properly oiled because my K&N filters had always been "drenched" in oil. I called Green Filter and they stated that K&N "over-oiled" their filters on "many occasions."

I've been happy with the Green Filter so far, but I'm waiting until a proven cold-air system is introduced.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cliffkemp
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Dec 24, 2024 10:48 AM
Hunterkelley24
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
14
Jun 14, 2022 08:32 AM
airlive
New Member Forum
5
Jun 28, 2020 07:46 AM
Danield97
Series I Trouble Shooting
1
Sep 30, 2015 05:59 PM
drlubell
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
Sep 26, 2015 11:58 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.