Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

InterceptorX and NA fuel savings application

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-02-2006, 09:09 AM
  #1  
RX8 on April 5/06
Thread Starter
 
vapourit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: near Toronto
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
InterceptorX and NA fuel savings application

I'm actually more interested in the possible fuel savings in tuning an NA 8 with the IntX. Of course I wouldn't mind if leaning out the higher RPM points would lead to higher output.

I know there's been some talk about the possible fuel savings of tuning with the IntX, but nothing specific.

Do you still need a scanner to read AFR and chart it, or does the IntX with a WBo2 sensor allow you to output and analyse your results to a laptop?
Old 06-02-2006, 09:12 AM
  #2  
Fire-Spewing Maniac
 
Bindon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldnt the cost of the intercpetor completely outweigh the fuel savings for the next few years?
Old 06-02-2006, 09:18 AM
  #3  
always preoccupied.
 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yah... If you think about it, you might raise your mileage enough to save 5-7 dollars per fillup, likely closer to the 5 dollar side, which means it'd take you over 300 fillups, approximately, to save the money it cost you to buy the interceptor. And say you fill up your tank every 3 days, that's anywhere between 2.5 and 3 years before you've offset the cost.

Doesn't seem like it'd be worthwhile to me...
Old 06-02-2006, 09:31 AM
  #4  
ROTARY POWERED CYBORG
 
misterwilson007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: "the 'ham"
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you commute 100 miles a day like me it might be a worth it!
Old 06-02-2006, 09:38 AM
  #5  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I don't think it would help much. Your car runs an AFR of 14.7 in closed loop. You're going to see improvements in open loop, but do you really drive for long periods of time over 4,500 rpm?

You could lean closed loop even more, but it's not going to give you huge gains.

It sounds like you're just trying to find justification in getting one
Old 06-02-2006, 09:46 AM
  #6  
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
When you factor in getting to run regular gas, slightly better mileage, more power and upgrade to FI potential down the road, the X starts sounding pretty good.
Old 06-02-2006, 09:47 AM
  #7  
always preoccupied.
 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by misterwilson007
If you commute 100 miles a day like me it might be a worth it!
I was using estimations of filling up, with the Interceptor-X, after ~270 miles, which would still be approximately every 3 days like I used. Which means it'd still take you 2.5 to 3 years to offset the cost.
Old 06-02-2006, 09:54 AM
  #8  
RX8 on April 5/06
Thread Starter
 
vapourit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: near Toronto
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know they aren't huge gains, I'm wondering if people have leaned out the lower rpm area, not just the higher range (as mysql101 was saying). I don't know what the fuels savings would be. However, if it was a few hundred dollars a year and I got 20-30hp at a few points at higher rpm (which is possible with the Intx, especially if you 8 happens to run very rich, which a lot do) it may be a good deal. Also, if you get an intake, mid-pipe, exhaust, etc. you can re-tune and if you go FI you can re-tune again. Then it seems like a better deal.

I want to get one for the future, but if I can get some fuel savings now too, that might put me over the edge. I just haven't seen much info on tuning for fuel savings on NA vehicles.

Can the IntX change the rpm range that the additional injectors kick in?
Old 06-02-2006, 10:38 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
I thought I'd run some numbers. Don't kill me if it's not correct for your area or car. It's just an example. Substitute your gas prices and mileage in. This also assumes that the Int gives a fuel economy improvement.

I'm assuming you have a 16 gallon fuel tank and fill it with exactly 16 gallons every time you fill up. Let's say that right now you average 18.75 mpg. That will take you 300 miles per tank. Let's say you need to pay $3.10 per gallon of high octane. That equals $49.60 per fill up. Now let's say with the Interceptor you go 325 miles per tank of gas. That will get you about 20.3 mpg. Now if you can use low octane gas let's just say you are paying $2.85 per gallon.

High octane, stock ecu gets you 300 mles for $49.60. Low octane, Int-X gets you 325 miles for $45.60. 325/300=1.083 Multiply $49.60 X 1.083 = $53.71. This is how much it costs you to go 325 miles with the stock ecu and high grade fuel. I had to convert this to get dollar per mile figures even.

So now we see that going 325 miles on the stock ecu and high octane costs around $53.73 and the Int-X costs around $45.60 to go the same distance. That is a savings of $8.13 per 325 miles. The Int-X costs $1600. 1600/8.13= 196.8. That's how many tanks of gas you'll need at the same gas prices to break even. If gas prices go up or down, and they will, this number and the time it takes to get there will change. 196.8 X 325 miles = 63,960 miles. That's how far you have to go to break even. Remember this assumes everything is constant and that these numbers are accurate. They are always changing. This is just an example.

Now don't think the Int is a bad piece that's not worth it. If your only intention is to save money on fuel, it's a very long term investment. After the above mileage figure is hit, you're saving about 2 1/2 cents per mile. The Int will give you more power wich is always nice. How many people spend money on exhausts and intakes that get no mileage increase and no noticable power increase? If you aren't getting mileage and you aren't getting power, what are you getting? Sound? That's worth it to a lot of people. How many people spend money on turbo kits that increase your power but decrease your mileage? You get one at the expense of the other. The power boost is nice though. At least this can give 2 benefits, even if one is more long term. Noticable gains in power but nothing miraculous and a slight mileage improvement. You can't expect it to do miracles but every little bit helps.

You also open the door for future forced induction, nitrous, different fuels...

If your only intention is to save money on gas, this isn't the best way to go about it. More frugal driving habits is where it is at. If you want to do other mods and get the most out of them as well as eventually save enough on gas to pay the unit off, this is a great way to do it. This is the mod that is more like a credit card bill. You have a balance and over time you eventualy pay it off. In the case of this example, it will be paid off in just under 64,000 miles. For some people that is 2 years. For others it is 5.

Even if you get no mileage increase, the difference in octane prices will take about 120,000 miles to get to the break even point. That's a long time but the product is still giving returns on the original investment even if you never get to the break even point. No other product out there does that. If you are using low octane now and don't switch but are getting a mileage increase, the same thing happens. The only way you can lose is if you get no increase of any kind in any area and we already know that isn't the case. Most parts for the car are purchases. The Interceptor is an investment.

Last edited by rotarygod; 06-02-2006 at 01:10 PM.
Old 06-02-2006, 10:44 AM
  #10  
ROTARY POWERED CYBORG
 
misterwilson007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: "the 'ham"
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql101
It sounds like you're just trying to find justification in getting one
BINGO!!!

^Nice post RG^
Old 06-02-2006, 11:32 AM
  #11  
Dongbag extrordinare
 
morkusyambo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Away from the fruits of my labor
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink And for those of us that stay above 4500rpms...

So this should really save some gas for those of us that love to rev
Old 06-02-2006, 11:39 AM
  #12  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
right if you go around at wot all teh time then you might see the savings quicker- since there is more to lean out higher up the rpm range
Old 06-02-2006, 01:01 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Jaguar_MBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice write-up rotarygod...that is a quality post.
Old 06-02-2006, 02:41 PM
  #14  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
I have a feeling that those of us getting around 14 mpg now & driving mostly in the city with lots of gearchanging and WOT will see a quicker return on investment

Although much of that could be offset by the increased tendancy to go WOT due to the extra fun factor of more power - oh well !
Old 06-02-2006, 08:59 PM
  #15  
always preoccupied.
 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I thought I'd run some numbers.
I wish I could pay $3.10 per gallon for premium. It's $3.15+ per gallon for REGULAR here, and it's slightly below the nation average last time I checked

And you pretty much ran similar numbers as far as miles/mpg or at least the ratios as I did when I came up with my figures, I just didn't type it out lol. Just goes to show you wont really see any offset for a long time...
Old 06-02-2006, 10:18 PM
  #16  
the giant tastetickles
 
yiksing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the basement
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does save some fuel with the X where mileage spent goiing to the petrol station is saved for your trips.
Old 06-03-2006, 08:30 AM
  #17  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
I wish I could pay $3.10 per gallon for premium. It's $3.15+ per gallon for REGULAR here, and it's slightly below the nation average last time I checked
I would say the avg is 2.70 - 2.80 right now:

http://www.gasbuddy.com/gb_gastemperaturemap.aspx
Old 06-03-2006, 09:29 AM
  #18  
always preoccupied.
 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, I hadn't checked in about a month or so... No fair, it went down everywhere except the West Coast. I remember when the East Coast was paying almost 50 cents more per gallon.
Old 06-03-2006, 12:43 PM
  #19  
ay bay bay
 
presequel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 626, CA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
premium out here for me is 3.50
Old 06-03-2006, 10:35 PM
  #20  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Premium here is about 3.45.

IT went up to 3.65 for a day or 2, but came back down. and stays at 3.4~ ish for quite a while.

Man, this is still expensive. You know it kinda sucks to know that Im actually paying more money for gas than my monthly payment.

Nice post RG, I have one concern tho. Theres no "good" Rotary tuner that I can think of(or around) in New York. So ....

Is there like a IntX Tunning 101 kind of thing on this board? I searched but found nothing.
Old 06-03-2006, 10:52 PM
  #21  
always preoccupied.
 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
Theres no "good" Rotary tuner that I can think of(or around) in New York. So ....

Kahren (aim name is kahren1981) might make the trip. He's in CT and goes to NJ every so often for tuning and such. He does rotary engine building and rotary/piston tuning for a living and has tuned rx8's before as well. He knows his stuff and is a great builder/tuner.
Old 06-04-2006, 03:02 PM
  #22  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
My Inter X is not maped for NA but it can be changed. But it is for sale, only two weeks old. Contact me if you might want it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hunterkelley24
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
14
06-14-2022 08:32 AM
cliffkemp
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
10-03-2015 11:11 PM
urbanvoodoo
RX-8 Discussion
2
09-30-2015 12:41 AM
RotaryMachineRx
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
1
09-29-2015 10:26 PM
DeltaJ802
RX-8 Discussion
3
09-29-2015 01:20 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: InterceptorX and NA fuel savings application



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 PM.