Did a baseline dyno on my 04 rx8 6spd
#26
Even My Dog Searches
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by leigh44
Please help me understand something. Mazda states 238hp. We see rx-8 club members all the time with 210-220 at the crank. Then we "assume" a 20% loss. Why dose this car only put 170-180 to the rear wheels? Don't get me wrong I love my car but crap we jump all over products that claim 5-15hp increases and spend $300.00-$1200.00 for them and we are down 58hp from the claimed crank hp to actual wheel hp. What is the reason for that big of a loss?!?!?!?!
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ft.Lauderdale
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dmp
Just a correction - I have yet to see ONE rx8club member dyno his engine at the crank. Automakers NEVER rate their cars at 'wheel HP'. We are likely down 10-20HP from what mazda rates...based on our WHEEL HP and guessing what acceptable drive-train losses should be.
#28
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by leigh44
Thank you for the correction but i have two concerns. 1-how can a 1.8t v.w. be rated at 180hp and on a dyno put out 168. while our cars are rated at 238 and dyno at 170-180.
2- my point was you would pay an arm and a leg for a dependable, warrentied 10-20 hp and yet its just NOT THERE.
...hence our frustrations. One aspect I'll check - most owners dyno in 3rd or 4th gear...I think 5th gear dynos are more accurate, as gearing doesn't affect the outcome.
I'll letchy'all know in a few weeks
#30
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Then main advantage to a 3rd gear dyno on the RX-8 is that speed times 100 equals RPM.
This was particularly useful for me since the dyno had a difficult time picking up RPM. Others have had a similar experience.
This was particularly useful for me since the dyno had a difficult time picking up RPM. Others have had a similar experience.
Good point. I'll make a couple runs, in a couple different gears to see if the results change.
#31
Originally Posted by zoom44
why do you think that?
For example - the S2000 is rated at 240 hp and dynos around 200. The GS-T Eclipse was rated at 210 by the manufacturer and dynos around 180.
My frickin Celica GT-S was dynoing 175 with an AEM intake and a TRD exhaust.
Unless there's some reasonable explanation I think we should all sue Mazda. My guess is that is has something to do with DSC - I turned it off (hold for 8 seconds) completely and wound up getting slightly better gas mileage - perhaps its sucking up drivetrain power
Does anybody have back to back dynos with DSC on, DSC disengaged (just touch the button), and then DSC fully off?
Last edited by cretinx; 01-28-2005 at 12:23 PM.
#32
Registered
Originally Posted by cretinx
Unless there's some reasonable explanation I think we should all sue Mazda.
Does anybody have back to back dynos with DSC on, DSC disengaged (just touch the button), and then DSC fully off?
Regards,
Gordon
#33
Originally Posted by Gord96BRG
What an incredibly unoriginal idea - and it was just as stupid the first dozen times. You really shouldn't be so lazy, and become more familiar with the search function. Here's the most recent stupid lawsuit discussion, but they go back over 1.5 years: Lawsuit Against Mazda, regarding Horsepower? . There are plenty of discussions about this, and that recent thread has discussions about drivetrain losses (there is no such thing as a standard 15% drivetrain loss).
Again, there are lots of threads about dyno testing and how it's accomplished. Put simply - the RX-8 is not easy to get an accurate dyno run, and DSC definitely interferes. It's all been discussed - it would be worth your while to spend some time reading, rather than expecting to be spoon-fed all the answers!
Regards,
Gordon
Again, there are lots of threads about dyno testing and how it's accomplished. Put simply - the RX-8 is not easy to get an accurate dyno run, and DSC definitely interferes. It's all been discussed - it would be worth your while to spend some time reading, rather than expecting to be spoon-fed all the answers!
Regards,
Gordon
Well, I just read about 40 pages, in particular the thread about suiing Mazda, the thread about low dynos, and the thread with the guy screaming in all caps about his "boy" hooking him up and restoring JDM rated power.
All I can tell is that the car feels quick, quick enough that I don't feel like I wasted my money, not to mention the chassis is FAR better than my old FD3S, and with similar modifications (such as full coilovers, single turbo and 6-piston brakes) should blow that car out of the water.
From what I've read, there seem to be a bunch of explanations and excuses, but this is the best thing I've seen so far.
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Results are all that matter. Horsepower numbers are irrelevant unless you just want to brag. If your car runs a certain speed now and a mod made it faster, that's all that counts. Everyone needs to get off of the whole dyno numbers crap and focus on the actual performance. The most horsepower may win on a computer screen where that is the only factor but in the real world there are too many other variables to consider to make this a true statement. If you insist on getting a dyno, do so to establish a baseline by which you judge gains in percentage over the original. The original number is irrelevant. A gain is a gain and faster is faster. There is no power to recover if there is no performance to recover. Ther performance is the proof.
#34
Senior Geek
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gord96BRG
What an incredibly unoriginal idea - and it was just as stupid the first dozen times. You really shouldn't be so lazy, and become more familiar with the search function. Here's the most recent stupid lawsuit discussion, but they go back over 1.5 years: Lawsuit Against Mazda, regarding Horsepower? . There are plenty of discussions about this, and that recent thread has discussions about drivetrain losses (there is no such thing as a standard 15% drivetrain loss).
Again, there are lots of threads about dyno testing and how it's accomplished. Put simply - the RX-8 is not easy to get an accurate dyno run, and DSC definitely interferes. It's all been discussed - it would be worth your while to spend some time reading, rather than expecting to be spoon-fed all the answers!
Regards,
Gordon
Again, there are lots of threads about dyno testing and how it's accomplished. Put simply - the RX-8 is not easy to get an accurate dyno run, and DSC definitely interferes. It's all been discussed - it would be worth your while to spend some time reading, rather than expecting to be spoon-fed all the answers!
Regards,
Gordon
#35
Administrator
Originally Posted by cretinx
From what I've read, there seem to be a bunch of explanations and excuses, but this is the best thing I've seen so far.
#36
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Gord96BRG
Put simply - the RX-8 is not easy to get an accurate dyno run, and DSC definitely interferes.
That is all.
No power gets pulled and nothing gets altered in the fuel delivery.
#37
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Actually, what happens is the PCM sees the rear wheels spin without the front and it simply fails the entire system and turns it off and lights the indicators.
That is all.
No power gets pulled and nothing gets altered in the fuel delivery.
That is all.
No power gets pulled and nothing gets altered in the fuel delivery.
#38
Registered
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Actually, what happens is the PCM sees the rear wheels spin without the front and it simply fails the entire system and turns it off and lights the indicators.
That is all.
No power gets pulled and nothing gets altered in the fuel delivery.
That is all.
No power gets pulled and nothing gets altered in the fuel delivery.
Regards,
Gordon
#39
Administrator
how to explain then what dmp reports here? - https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...766#post712766
#40
Alright, some interesting news
After contacting KD Rotary (who race preps RX-7s and 8s), they told me that some of their customers used MOTEC and engine dynos, and that the RX-8 dynoed at 241 at the flywheel - which means that Mazda actually OVERrated the RX-8's horsepower!
He also told me alot about the rotor shape, how our cars aren't likely to see more than 300 at the wheels with FI, and that the midpipe/exhaust is an excellent investment which scored 200 horsepower on their dyno.
After contacting KD Rotary (who race preps RX-7s and 8s), they told me that some of their customers used MOTEC and engine dynos, and that the RX-8 dynoed at 241 at the flywheel - which means that Mazda actually OVERrated the RX-8's horsepower!
He also told me alot about the rotor shape, how our cars aren't likely to see more than 300 at the wheels with FI, and that the midpipe/exhaust is an excellent investment which scored 200 horsepower on their dyno.
#41
Registered
Originally Posted by cretinx
He also told me alot about the rotor shape, how our cars aren't likely to see more than 300 at the wheels with FI
#44
Senior Geek
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by philodox
Also, a midpipe and exhaust will not get you 200 at the wheels. They are pulling your strings.
So, yeah.....even removing everything from the cat & on an replacing it with a straight pipe wouldn't do much good.
Last edited by RX8-TX; 02-23-2005 at 10:48 AM.
#47
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by ethan113
Hi, thought I would post my charts here for discussion. This was dynoed at the flywheel. Before and After Decat and Piggyback.
#48
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by philodox
Those numbers in kilo watts or horsepower?
PS = Pferdestarke, or, literally, Horse Strength/Power.
231PS = 228HP
Dyno'd at the flywheel? Did I miss where the guy said he pulled his engine?
#49
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by dmp
PS = Pferdestarke, or, literally, Horse Strength/Power.
231PS = 228HP
Dyno'd at the flywheel? Did I miss where the guy said he pulled his engine?
231PS = 228HP
Dyno'd at the flywheel? Did I miss where the guy said he pulled his engine?
#50
Originally Posted by philodox
I agree with RG. That's BS. Also, a midpipe and exhaust will not get you 200 at the wheels. They are pulling your strings.
If the car dynos at 180 to the wheels, and both GReddy/RB Midpipe and B&B claim 20 at the wheels from their cat-less setups, that would put you at 200 hp.
I'm not saying I'm gonna go out and buy those products from some dynos I see on the manufacturer page or from a shop (in fact I just set the date for my turbo install, so you know where I think the $ is best spent on this car), it doesn't seem unreasonable that you'd gain 20 peak hp from both of these mods together. This is all mere speculation on my part of course, I haven't seen any independent dynos of a catless exhaust yet.