Did a baseline dyno on my 04 rx8 6spd
#1
Did a baseline dyno on my 04 rx8 6spd
did a base run today on a dynamic Dyno.........
car did 184.4 hp
not to bad I guess, since I came from a 2003 mustang Gt making 400hp
but this car does get the girls to look !!!
(i had a pretty, young bank teller start flirting with me in the drive thru line---the mustang never got that !!! )
car did 184.4 hp
not to bad I guess, since I came from a 2003 mustang Gt making 400hp
but this car does get the girls to look !!!
(i had a pretty, young bank teller start flirting with me in the drive thru line---the mustang never got that !!! )
#2
Watch your six
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: alabama
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll go ahead and say it.. because rest assured..someone will if i don't..
POST PICS OF THE DYNO RUN...............................please
and what gear did you dyno in? conditions? etc..
thanks.
POST PICS OF THE DYNO RUN...............................please
and what gear did you dyno in? conditions? etc..
thanks.
#5
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by gxsilver
did a base run today on a dynamic Dyno.........
car did 184.4 hp
not to bad I guess, since I came from a 2003 mustang Gt making 400hp
but this car does get the girls to look !!!
(i had a pretty, young bank teller start flirting with me in the drive thru line---the mustang never got that !!! )
car did 184.4 hp
not to bad I guess, since I came from a 2003 mustang Gt making 400hp
but this car does get the girls to look !!!
(i had a pretty, young bank teller start flirting with me in the drive thru line---the mustang never got that !!! )
Originally Posted by dmp
what is a dynamic dyno?
#6
RX8 and a Truk....
Philo - I didn't see if you answerd - sorry to topic jump;
Were the dyno numbers from your recent dyno 'correct'? If so, do you know what the correction factor was?
Were the dyno numbers from your recent dyno 'correct'? If so, do you know what the correction factor was?
#7
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by dmp
Philo - I didn't see if you answerd - sorry to topic jump;
Were the dyno numbers from your recent dyno 'correct'? If so, do you know what the correction factor was?
Were the dyno numbers from your recent dyno 'correct'? If so, do you know what the correction factor was?
#9
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by philodox
you should always use uncorrected results for a forced induction system. the reason being is with FI you create your own atmospheric conditions from pressurizing the air. make sense?
:D
#10
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by dmp
However, humidity, heat, etc, can change things - I think corrected values are still valid, having said that, I always use uncorrected results anyway...to me its more important what my car actually measures at, not what it'd measure in a 'perfect world'.
:D
:D
For a N/A car, corrected values are useful.. but for forced induction, they are very sketchy.
#12
Rangers Lead The Way!
Originally Posted by cretinx
Why are these cars dynoing so low? If they've got 238 hp like Mazda claims they should be putting down at least 200 hp stock.
#13
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by philodox
For a N/A car, corrected values are useful.. but for forced induction, they are very sketchy.
#17
Registered
iTrader: (5)
Sorry your wrong Jon, corrected numbers are important no mater what. Blown engines are not exempt. We use these corrections so we can compare engines run in differnt conditions. If I run a test in Santa Monica and you run yours in Denver who has more power. I'd beat you hans down every time. You have to get a correction for altitude and temp and water vapor.
We all correct to the same standard. Now standards are different. We have SAE and Standard. All after market people use Std all Oem's use SAE.
The SAE uses ........................I don't remember. but I think it's 29.38 Hg and 70f.
Std is 29.92 and 60f. you can see the diff.
The factors seem to be accepted through out the industry. Except by some men in the RX 8 club.com. Well like I said "Just because it is written does not mean it is carved in stone"
Who knows there might be another Ricardo in our ranks.
We all correct to the same standard. Now standards are different. We have SAE and Standard. All after market people use Std all Oem's use SAE.
The SAE uses ........................I don't remember. but I think it's 29.38 Hg and 70f.
Std is 29.92 and 60f. you can see the diff.
The factors seem to be accepted through out the industry. Except by some men in the RX 8 club.com. Well like I said "Just because it is written does not mean it is carved in stone"
Who knows there might be another Ricardo in our ranks.
#18
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
We all correct to the same standard. Now standards are different. We have SAE and Standard. All after market people use Std all Oem's use SAE.
The SAE uses ........................I don't remember. but I think it's 29.38 Hg and 70f.
Std is 29.92 and 60f. you can see the diff.
The SAE uses ........................I don't remember. but I think it's 29.38 Hg and 70f.
Std is 29.92 and 60f. you can see the diff.
Tis why I don't compare my car with any car but those run during my dyno sessions...Thus, I only read 'measured'.
#20
Registered
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
Sorry your wrong Jon, corrected numbers are important no mater what. Blown engines are not exempt.
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ft.Lauderdale
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please help me understand something. Mazda states 238hp. We see rx-8 club members all the time with 210-220 at the crank. Then we "assume" a 20% loss. Why dose this car only put 170-180 to the rear wheels? Don't get me wrong I love my car but crap we jump all over products that claim 5-15hp increases and spend $300.00-$1200.00 for them and we are down 58hp from the claimed crank hp to actual wheel hp. What is the reason for that big of a loss?!?!?!?!
#25
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by leigh44
Please help me understand something. Mazda states 238hp. We see rx-8 club members all the time with 210-220 at the crank. Then we "assume" a 20% loss. Why does this car only put 170-180 to the rear wheels? Don't get me wrong I love my car but crap we jump all over products that claim 5-15hp increases and spend $300.00-$1200.00 for them and we are down 58hp from the claimed crank hp to actual wheel hp. What is the reason for that big of a loss?!?!?!?!
Just a correction - I have yet to see ONE rx8club member dyno his engine at the crank. Automakers NEVER rate their cars at 'wheel HP'. We are likely down 10-20HP from what mazda rates...based on our WHEEL HP and guessing what acceptable drive-train losses should be.