Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Next Rotary A 16 X

 
Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #26  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
great news!! direct iiiiiinnnnnjection!!!
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #27  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by alnielsen
From the picture, the ports look larger, than the current engine. Also, since this would be an all new engine, wouldn't Mazda design the rear endplate to accept the current bell housing bolt pattern?
not necessarily. we know from a year or 2 ago that they were working on a new tranny for the "2nd gen rx-8" . RG heard from the engineer himself while at 7stock. so there woudl be no need to make it backwards compatible if other factors pushed in a different direction(strength , durability etc)
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 05:42 PM
  #28  
86rx7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Thoose housings look thin,.. like 12a housings. Did you guys think of the fact that with the current side port intake/exhaust increasing the eccentricity and decreasing the rotor width effectivly gives you a much larger avaliable port volume vs displacment then the current motor? It should breath even better at high rpm,..
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #29  
alfy28's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by XDEEDUBBX
the future will hold some interesting concepts..
i cant wait to see what xdeed does that car when it comes out :P
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #30  
djgiron's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 585
Likes: 9
From: Denver
Wonder if it will have a DSG like everyone else is doing?
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 07:06 PM
  #31  
Endgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
That is what I was wondering....
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #32  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by 86rx7
Thoose housings look thin,.. like 12a housings. Did you guys think of the fact that with the current side port intake/exhaust increasing the eccentricity and decreasing the rotor width effectivly gives you a much larger avaliable port volume vs displacment then the current motor? It should breath even better at high rpm,..
yes, but the increased rotating mass and the longer distance from the center of rotation to the apex(torque arm) might limit the rpm. I hope i am wrong.
________
Vaporizer Wiki

Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 01:27 PM.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #33  
solo8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Just don't put it in an ugly car!
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #34  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
I think they are probably gonna put it in the next rx, I highly doubt the rx8 will get a 16X rotor intime before it is axed
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #35  
Daemos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Canada ---> Australia
Originally Posted by Renesis_8
yes, but the increased rotating mass and the longer distance from the center of rotation to the apex(torque arm) might limit the rpm. I hope i am wrong.
Well isn't the whole reason rotaries can run such high rpms is supposedly because the rotors only move at 1/3 the speed as pistons would at similar rpms.

Looking also at the way a rotary works, if everything was balanced correctly, using strong enough materials, I don't know why there wouldn't be a problem =/
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #36  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
In general a longer stroke engine has a lower redline. Usually. This is a longer stroke so who knows. We'll see.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 03:28 PM
  #37  
solo8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
I'm not much of a tech head, but haven't the revs been more limited by what the transmissions can handle than the engine?

Seems like the bigger challenge is building a transmission to mate to it. Most suggest the Renesis has always had more revs to give than the transmissions have been able to handle. If that's the case I wouldn't worry too much about the if this engine redlines slightly lower. Worry about the tranny.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #38  
heyarnold69's Avatar
Rotary wanabee
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
agree. bump
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 05:50 PM
  #39  
Larouche's Avatar
Have FUN
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
I dont think the transmission can be a problem. A formula 1 engine run at 19 000 RPM. I know it cost a lot more but just a reduction gear can limit the speed of the transmission... just my 2 cents
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 08:04 PM
  #40  
77mjd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
From: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
I wonder if any work was done in development and testing that figured out a way to reduce some of the carbon buildup?
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 11:52 PM
  #41  
T-von's Avatar
The game changer!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 1
From: Tx
Originally Posted by rotarygod
In general a longer stroke engine has a lower redline. Usually. This is a longer stroke so who knows. We'll see.


I know one thing, I hope the larger stationary gears and e-shaft are beefed up substantially since the centrifugal forces of the heavier larger rotors are now further away from the e-shafts center of rotation. That will put way more stress on them.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #42  
T-von's Avatar
The game changer!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 1
From: Tx
Originally Posted by solo8
I'm not much of a tech head, but haven't the revs been more limited by what the transmissions can handle than the engine?

Seems like the bigger challenge is building a transmission to mate to it. Most suggest the Renesis has always had more revs to give than the transmissions have been able to handle. If that's the case I wouldn't worry too much about the if this engine redlines slightly lower. Worry about the tranny.


Automatics and cutches can limit and engines rpm. This new rotary will have a larger overal trochoid. Look at it as and older 13b housing being able to fit inside this newer one. So by design, everything else has to be bigger. I don't think Mazda is making the rotors wider. Anyways this overal larger size should effect the rpm red line some. You have more weight furthur away from the e-shafts center of rotation. This increases the centrifugal forces.

Last edited by T-von; Oct 19, 2007 at 12:03 AM.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 06:58 AM
  #43  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by T-von
I know one thing, I hope the larger stationary gears and e-shaft are beefed up substantially since the centrifugal forces of the heavier larger rotors are now further away from the e-shafts center of rotation. That will put way more stress on them.
Are you sure the rotors are going to be heavier?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 07:33 AM
  #44  
I8U's Avatar
I8U
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: Carolina Beach, NC
Originally Posted by ASH8
The 16X is Wider in Diameter, so to answer my own question It probably will not mate onto the tranny's bell housing let alone engine mounting points...
It's only gonna be 20mm wider...wouldn't for see that much work needed to actually make it work.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #45  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Yes, it is the perfect opportunity for the rotors to be lightened significantly, which is not as easy as it sounds. Structural integrity is a dog when you're reducing mass. This becomes most apparent in racing where the loads are greater and the high rpms are more sustained.

Paul.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #46  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
Originally Posted by I8U
It's only gonna be 20mm wider...wouldn't for see that much work needed to actually make it work.
I don't think we know if it's wider yet. They increased every other dimension making it a "long stroke". They might not have widened the rotors at all. They could ahve though but I don't see them being 20mm wider. I guess we'll find out soon enough though.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #47  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
how soon?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 09:33 AM
  #48  
bulletproof21's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 665
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte
I know they are showing this new engine next week for the Tokyo show but does anyone know if they will announce new hp numbers for it at the show too?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 09:43 AM
  #49  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Originally Posted by bulletproof21
I know they are showing this new engine next week for the Tokyo show but does anyone know if they will announce new hp numbers for it at the show too?
Dear God, please; NO HORSEPOWER #s

Just kidding. They can print whatever they want to. I'll be as happy to see some figures as the next guy.

Paul.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 10:52 AM
  #50  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
p.s. press kits are embargoed until press day but ive got a lead on a couple print and e


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.