Next Rotary A 16 X
not necessarily. we know from a year or 2 ago that they were working on a new tranny for the "2nd gen rx-8" . RG heard from the engineer himself while at 7stock. so there woudl be no need to make it backwards compatible if other factors pushed in a different direction(strength , durability etc)
Thoose housings look thin,.. like 12a housings. Did you guys think of the fact that with the current side port intake/exhaust increasing the eccentricity and decreasing the rotor width effectivly gives you a much larger avaliable port volume vs displacment then the current motor? It should breath even better at high rpm,..
Thoose housings look thin,.. like 12a housings. Did you guys think of the fact that with the current side port intake/exhaust increasing the eccentricity and decreasing the rotor width effectivly gives you a much larger avaliable port volume vs displacment then the current motor? It should breath even better at high rpm,..
________
Vaporizer Wiki
Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 01:27 PM.
Looking also at the way a rotary works, if everything was balanced correctly, using strong enough materials, I don't know why there wouldn't be a problem =/
I'm not much of a tech head, but haven't the revs been more limited by what the transmissions can handle than the engine?
Seems like the bigger challenge is building a transmission to mate to it. Most suggest the Renesis has always had more revs to give than the transmissions have been able to handle. If that's the case I wouldn't worry too much about the if this engine redlines slightly lower. Worry about the tranny.
Seems like the bigger challenge is building a transmission to mate to it. Most suggest the Renesis has always had more revs to give than the transmissions have been able to handle. If that's the case I wouldn't worry too much about the if this engine redlines slightly lower. Worry about the tranny.
I know one thing, I hope the larger stationary gears and e-shaft are beefed up substantially since the centrifugal forces of the heavier larger rotors are now further away from the e-shafts center of rotation. That will put way more stress on them.
I'm not much of a tech head, but haven't the revs been more limited by what the transmissions can handle than the engine?
Seems like the bigger challenge is building a transmission to mate to it. Most suggest the Renesis has always had more revs to give than the transmissions have been able to handle. If that's the case I wouldn't worry too much about the if this engine redlines slightly lower. Worry about the tranny.
Seems like the bigger challenge is building a transmission to mate to it. Most suggest the Renesis has always had more revs to give than the transmissions have been able to handle. If that's the case I wouldn't worry too much about the if this engine redlines slightly lower. Worry about the tranny.
Automatics and cutches can limit and engines rpm. This new rotary will have a larger overal trochoid. Look at it as and older 13b housing being able to fit inside this newer one. So by design, everything else has to be bigger. I don't think Mazda is making the rotors wider. Anyways this overal larger size should effect the rpm red line some. You have more weight furthur away from the e-shafts center of rotation. This increases the centrifugal forces.
Last edited by T-von; Oct 19, 2007 at 12:03 AM.
Yes, it is the perfect opportunity for the rotors to be lightened significantly, which is not as easy as it sounds. Structural integrity is a dog when you're reducing mass. This becomes most apparent in racing where the loads are greater and the high rpms are more sustained.
Paul.
Paul.
I don't think we know if it's wider yet. They increased every other dimension making it a "long stroke". They might not have widened the rotors at all. They could ahve though but I don't see them being 20mm wider. I guess we'll find out soon enough though.
Just kidding. They can print whatever they want to. I'll be as happy to see some figures as the next guy.
Paul.



but ive got a lead on a couple