Mazda admits power deficiency!
#276
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Guildford
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by THOR
Something I found on Mazda's UK web site:
"The RENESIS power-train will be available in two variations: the High Power specification (177kW (231PS) @8200rpm with a 9000 rpm limit) and the Standard Power unit (141kW(192PS)@7000rpm with a 7500 rpm limit) for regular driving but with superb drivability. Click here to see the Mazda RX-8 Technical Specifications."
So in England which has far less stringent emission testing than California the Renesis can only muster 231PS, or 228 horsepower? So in California does that equal 239 horsepower? Probably not. In fact as I have stated before with the dyno outputs being seen this car is only making approx 210-215 horsepower. A local RX-8 went to Sears Point raceway and ran a 15.3 1/4 mile at 90MPH. Sounds like about 210 horsepower to me and not a 9 horsepower deficit as Mazda stated.
Thor.
Something I found on Mazda's UK web site:
"The RENESIS power-train will be available in two variations: the High Power specification (177kW (231PS) @8200rpm with a 9000 rpm limit) and the Standard Power unit (141kW(192PS)@7000rpm with a 7500 rpm limit) for regular driving but with superb drivability. Click here to see the Mazda RX-8 Technical Specifications."
So in England which has far less stringent emission testing than California the Renesis can only muster 231PS, or 228 horsepower? So in California does that equal 239 horsepower? Probably not. In fact as I have stated before with the dyno outputs being seen this car is only making approx 210-215 horsepower. A local RX-8 went to Sears Point raceway and ran a 15.3 1/4 mile at 90MPH. Sounds like about 210 horsepower to me and not a 9 horsepower deficit as Mazda stated.
Thor.
I have no idea how this compares to Californian emmissions standards.
#278
Always On The Prowl
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jims5543
I got to say you sure are dramatic. You must be from the RX7Club.
I got to say you sure are dramatic. You must be from the RX7Club.
Anyhow, so has Mazda told us the reason why the hp numbers were lower yet?
#279
I Just Can't STOP!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any word on why the lower rating?
Was it just a mis-com between Japan and Mazda NA?
I'm assuming the engine always made 238bhp, just adverstised wrong.
I still think I'll take delivery.
Was it just a mis-com between Japan and Mazda NA?
I'm assuming the engine always made 238bhp, just adverstised wrong.
I still think I'll take delivery.
#280
A voice from the AT wilderness
I think the decision on whether to purchase the car with this new information has become much more difficult for someone buying an automatic. (I know that I'm in the minority as a (potential) future AT owner, so I guess it sucks to be me ;-) As I'm sure you all have read in many other posts, the (lack of) performance in the AT is much more noticeable than the MT. Now that the AT has shown to be (at best) 197HP, I've become truly torn as to whether $30,800 is too much for what I'm getting. If I was buying an MT, I would be leaning to buying it as the performance difference is not as great.
It looks like I'm going to pull back my deposit and what to see what happens with the brand. I have no ill will towards Mazda. A mistake was made, it was owned up to, and there is a solution being offered. I just don't think the AT is worth the $$$ right now.
Is there anyone else stuck in this purchase purgatory???
It looks like I'm going to pull back my deposit and what to see what happens with the brand. I have no ill will towards Mazda. A mistake was made, it was owned up to, and there is a solution being offered. I just don't think the AT is worth the $$$ right now.
Is there anyone else stuck in this purchase purgatory???
#281
RX8Club.com Founder
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St Louis MO
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jims5543
I got to say you sure are dramatic. You must be from the RX7Club.
I got to say you sure are dramatic. You must be from the RX7Club.
#282
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jims5543
I was kind of hoping we would see results like the newest Cobra. A lot of owners are seeing RWHP that is the same as flywheel claims.
I was kind of hoping we would see results like the newest Cobra. A lot of owners are seeing RWHP that is the same as flywheel claims.
It turns out that that problem was due to a late exhaust change and intake manifold problems (from an external supplier).
Don't ever expect SVT to make a HP claim again that isn't met or exceeded by independent dyno testing.
#283
Originally posted by loco4rx8
Yeah, word of mouth is powerful. In this case, though, I'm of the opinion that most people just don't care about these numbers and certainly don't frequent these types of boards. We are some really cool people around here, but we're different from most. :D I just don't think Joe or Jane Shmo is going to ever hear about this and if they do, they probably won't really care much.
I hope I'm right anyway. This could get messy if Dateline or somebody got hold of it and ran a big story on Mazda, Ford, and other "deceitful" automobile companies.
I just really don't think Mazda has anything to hide here. They were wrong on the HP, and they admitted it. They are doing something to make it right with their customers. It's frustrating, but that's about it.
Yeah, word of mouth is powerful. In this case, though, I'm of the opinion that most people just don't care about these numbers and certainly don't frequent these types of boards. We are some really cool people around here, but we're different from most. :D I just don't think Joe or Jane Shmo is going to ever hear about this and if they do, they probably won't really care much.
I hope I'm right anyway. This could get messy if Dateline or somebody got hold of it and ran a big story on Mazda, Ford, and other "deceitful" automobile companies.
I just really don't think Mazda has anything to hide here. They were wrong on the HP, and they admitted it. They are doing something to make it right with their customers. It's frustrating, but that's about it.
And you would be wrong.....
I have been following this forum for awhile and was thinking about trading in my Formula (it is now 16 years old). With all of the talk on this site and the low gas mileage it is looking bad.
I think I will wait until next year to see what happens.
#284
Re: lots of new faces
Originally posted by graphicguy
Yea...there looks to be a lot of new "trolls" who have registered here lately who are a wee bit jealous of our rides.
Yea...there looks to be a lot of new "trolls" who have registered here lately who are a wee bit jealous of our rides.
However, I have been reading this forum for a couple of months since it was the only 'good' place that I could find info about the RX8. I was hoping to test drive one and see how good it was when I completed my move from NY to Houston. Now, I see oil light problems, fuel mileage problems and now horsepower problems.
Defend your purchase all you want, but for some who were looking to buy it makes you pause to see all of this stuff on your own site by OWNERS of the car.
#285
Originally posted by Jims5543
Has anyone considered telling Mazda to shove its offer and FIX the car like Ford FIXED the Cobras and got their customers the HP they claimed they would get??
I have a vested interest in how you handle this. I know some of you are new to the rotory world trust me 20+HP is something you can feel. I drove my RX-7 to a dyno with 190 RWHP needing to tune my S-AFC real bad after we were done I had 225RWHP and the car felt like an animal. I can only say you don't know what your missing. The smooth linear pull the rotary gives off is decieving. My car felt like it pulled hard all the way to 7K RPM when in actuality the HP dropped hard a 6500RPM. It sure didn't feel like that.
I feel Mazda OWES you what you paid for not just a pay off to shut up and pretend its O.K. My interest here is that I want a RX-8. I am waiting for the Mazdaspeed addition in hopes that it will be more interesting. Accepting Mazda's offer just tells them that consumers can be bought and they really dont need to deliver what was advertised.
You have to wonder how the conversation went down with the big wigs. I mean they had to come up with a dollar figure that they knew you would snap up and shut up for. Dont be chumps organize and force them to deliver what they advertised just like Ford did.
Right now I have more respect for Ford for how they handled their Cobra fiasco.
Has anyone considered telling Mazda to shove its offer and FIX the car like Ford FIXED the Cobras and got their customers the HP they claimed they would get??
I have a vested interest in how you handle this. I know some of you are new to the rotory world trust me 20+HP is something you can feel. I drove my RX-7 to a dyno with 190 RWHP needing to tune my S-AFC real bad after we were done I had 225RWHP and the car felt like an animal. I can only say you don't know what your missing. The smooth linear pull the rotary gives off is decieving. My car felt like it pulled hard all the way to 7K RPM when in actuality the HP dropped hard a 6500RPM. It sure didn't feel like that.
I feel Mazda OWES you what you paid for not just a pay off to shut up and pretend its O.K. My interest here is that I want a RX-8. I am waiting for the Mazdaspeed addition in hopes that it will be more interesting. Accepting Mazda's offer just tells them that consumers can be bought and they really dont need to deliver what was advertised.
You have to wonder how the conversation went down with the big wigs. I mean they had to come up with a dollar figure that they knew you would snap up and shut up for. Dont be chumps organize and force them to deliver what they advertised just like Ford did.
Right now I have more respect for Ford for how they handled their Cobra fiasco.
PS: Don't flame I love the 8
Last edited by zthang; 08-24-2003 at 11:07 AM.
#286
Originally posted by BOOSTD 7
Uhmmm, look who's talking ... Mr. "I've been banned from rx7club numerous times".
Uhmmm, look who's talking ... Mr. "I've been banned from rx7club numerous times".
Look at you trying to suck me into a flame war so you can ban me.
I know how to play by the rules now so its really not a problem anymore. I have a current membership there just choose not to use it. I do however use the PM system to keep tabs with some friends I have made over the years.
If any of you think your fellow rotary fans are giving each other hi 5's over this you are wrong. I personally am really upset over this. I want one and will get one in the next year or two. I am anxious to see what the aftermarket has to offer as far as power adders.
#288
Originally posted by zthang
This is a Z owner here, and i've been reading this thread like crazy the last couple days because its so interesting. And honestly, I think the owners here are taking this in too much stride. You guys paid ~$30k for this car. Have you forgotten that? That is a heck of a lot of money for a sporty looking coupe. True, 9hp isn't much, but i thought from the beginning that 248hp was pushing it price-wise. The incredible quality of a BMW 3 could be a better choice at that price b/c they're sporty too. But anyways back to what I was saying....LISTEN TO THIS GUY!!!!! You owners should really think about ganging up on Mazda and CALLING THEM OUT!! Make them give you what you paid for. Don't play into their game and accept their first offer....its like in a lawsuit, never take the first offer. Please dont flame me or call me a flamer. I think this car looks HOT, and I want to see it live up to its potential so that when i see an 8 at a stoplight in my Z, I can look over and give that dude a nice head-nod b/c weve got nice performance cars that give incredible bang for the buck.
PS: Don't flame I love the 8
This is a Z owner here, and i've been reading this thread like crazy the last couple days because its so interesting. And honestly, I think the owners here are taking this in too much stride. You guys paid ~$30k for this car. Have you forgotten that? That is a heck of a lot of money for a sporty looking coupe. True, 9hp isn't much, but i thought from the beginning that 248hp was pushing it price-wise. The incredible quality of a BMW 3 could be a better choice at that price b/c they're sporty too. But anyways back to what I was saying....LISTEN TO THIS GUY!!!!! You owners should really think about ganging up on Mazda and CALLING THEM OUT!! Make them give you what you paid for. Don't play into their game and accept their first offer....its like in a lawsuit, never take the first offer. Please dont flame me or call me a flamer. I think this car looks HOT, and I want to see it live up to its potential so that when i see an 8 at a stoplight in my Z, I can look over and give that dude a nice head-nod b/c weve got nice performance cars that give incredible bang for the buck.
PS: Don't flame I love the 8
Thanks, finally!! I am a member of Stangnet and I am in the process of posting up to the 99 Cobra owners howe they managed to get Ford to fix this. I personally feel this is the only option Mazda should be offering. If you take the $500 and run trust me there will be board members with Ford laughing that it worked. Then it will SUCK for us future RX-8 owners that have to accept the fact that you caved into them.
You RX-8 owners hold the bargaining power right now think what would be in your best interest before you decide. Mazda is holding its breath right now hoping you'll fall for this quick fix offer and go away.
#289
Originally posted by Lee Chun
sucks for someone who hasn't taken delivery yet. i would looove to have 500 bucks and free maintenence..
sucks for someone who hasn't taken delivery yet. i would looove to have 500 bucks and free maintenence..
#290
Y'llNotSeeNothinLikeIt
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jims5543
Wouldn't it be better to get the car you paid all that money for??
Wouldn't it be better to get the car you paid all that money for??
Originally posted by Jims5543
You RX-8 owners hold the bargaining power right now think what would be in your best interest before you decide. Mazda is holding its breath right now hoping you'll fall for this quick fix offer and go away.
You RX-8 owners hold the bargaining power right now think what would be in your best interest before you decide. Mazda is holding its breath right now hoping you'll fall for this quick fix offer and go away.
#291
Originally posted by THOR
Something I found on Mazda's UK web site:
"The RENESIS power-train will be available in two variations: the High Power specification (177kW (231PS) @8200rpm with a 9000 rpm limit) and the Standard Power unit (141kW(192PS)@7000rpm with a 7500 rpm limit) for regular driving but with superb drivability. Click here to see the Mazda RX-8 Technical Specifications."
So in England which has far less stringent emission testing than California the Renesis can only muster 231PS, or 228 horsepower? So in California does that equal 239 horsepower? Probably not. In fact as I have stated before with the dyno outputs being seen this car is only making approx 210-215 horsepower. A local RX-8 went to Sears Point raceway and ran a 15.3 1/4 mile at 90MPH. Sounds like about 210 horsepower to me and not a 9 horsepower deficit as Mazda stated.
Thor.
Something I found on Mazda's UK web site:
"The RENESIS power-train will be available in two variations: the High Power specification (177kW (231PS) @8200rpm with a 9000 rpm limit) and the Standard Power unit (141kW(192PS)@7000rpm with a 7500 rpm limit) for regular driving but with superb drivability. Click here to see the Mazda RX-8 Technical Specifications."
So in England which has far less stringent emission testing than California the Renesis can only muster 231PS, or 228 horsepower? So in California does that equal 239 horsepower? Probably not. In fact as I have stated before with the dyno outputs being seen this car is only making approx 210-215 horsepower. A local RX-8 went to Sears Point raceway and ran a 15.3 1/4 mile at 90MPH. Sounds like about 210 horsepower to me and not a 9 horsepower deficit as Mazda stated.
Thor.
#293
Originally posted by eskimo
So... what you're saying is, suck 'em dry, spit 'em out, take 'em for all their worth. Do that and who wins? Lawyers. We could squeeze an extra few $ out, and Mazda will stop making great cars. IANAL, RU?
So... what you're saying is, suck 'em dry, spit 'em out, take 'em for all their worth. Do that and who wins? Lawyers. We could squeeze an extra few $ out, and Mazda will stop making great cars. IANAL, RU?
#294
Originally posted by 350 Formula
And you would be wrong.....
I have been following this forum for awhile and was thinking about trading in my Formula (it is now 16 years old). With all of the talk on this site and the low gas mileage it is looking bad.
I think I will wait until next year to see what happens.
And you would be wrong.....
I have been following this forum for awhile and was thinking about trading in my Formula (it is now 16 years old). With all of the talk on this site and the low gas mileage it is looking bad.
I think I will wait until next year to see what happens.
No, I don't believe I am, thank you. You are not the type of person I was referring to as Joe and Jane Schmo. You have been reading this site for a while. 99% of people are not reading this site.
As for "all the talk on the site," are you just selectively reading? There have been many positive posts from owners who are very happy with their cars. Unfortunately, on any owners forum, a lot of the posts are going to be focussing on problems. That's the nature of the beast. You'll find that at ANY car forum.
I was reading the forum before I decided to make my purchase. I drove the car, loved it, and bought it despite the complaints of a few. If you decide to wait for a while, more power to you. I initially wanted to do that, but after driving the car and falling in love, I just couldn't bring myself to wait any longer.
#295
Originally posted by Napboy
Are you telling us that we should have sympathy for Mazda when they knowingly advertised falsely? And if you think that consumers standing up for their rights is a lose-lose situation, I'm afraid you're mistaken. The attitude is not to punishish Mazda and bankrupt them, but rather get a fair settlement after negotiation. And believe me, Mazda will survive no matter what we do.
Are you telling us that we should have sympathy for Mazda when they knowingly advertised falsely? And if you think that consumers standing up for their rights is a lose-lose situation, I'm afraid you're mistaken. The attitude is not to punishish Mazda and bankrupt them, but rather get a fair settlement after negotiation. And believe me, Mazda will survive no matter what we do.
#296
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cincinnati/Dublin, OH
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I took delivery of mine a few weeks ago.
I am very happy with the car........ as I never expected it to be lightning fast. Also, I have had NO quality/reliability issues.
I say we take their offer AND get them to re-tune the ECU's.
Unlikely, maybe. But, it is worth a shot.
I am very happy with the car........ as I never expected it to be lightning fast. Also, I have had NO quality/reliability issues.
I say we take their offer AND get them to re-tune the ECU's.
Unlikely, maybe. But, it is worth a shot.
#297
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dorset, UK
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FWIW... Regarding the quote that Thor posted...
As far as we are led to believe, here in the UK the RX-8 will meet the future (2005/6?) EU emissions regulations which are STRICTER than current California regs.
As far as we are led to believe, here in the UK the RX-8 will meet the future (2005/6?) EU emissions regulations which are STRICTER than current California regs.
#298
Originally posted by eskimo
What did I pay all that money for? HP? not. If it were, I woulda gotten a Z. But I needed a back seat and a sunroof, and I needed a car that would fit in my garage.
So... what you're saying is, suck 'em dry, spit 'em out, take 'em for all their worth. Do that and who wins? Lawyers. We could squeeze an extra few $ out, and Mazda will stop making great cars. IANAL, RU?
What did I pay all that money for? HP? not. If it were, I woulda gotten a Z. But I needed a back seat and a sunroof, and I needed a car that would fit in my garage.
So... what you're saying is, suck 'em dry, spit 'em out, take 'em for all their worth. Do that and who wins? Lawyers. We could squeeze an extra few $ out, and Mazda will stop making great cars. IANAL, RU?
FORD - Fixed its cars.
Mazda - gives you a check pats you and the back and breathes a sigh of relief you went for their offer.
I am saying get Mazda to fix your car not pay you off. You did not get what you paid for. You bought a RX-8 with 210 HP not 247 as advertised.
I case you do not read back a few pages or posts for that matter.
I want to buy an RX-8 and I am simply waiting for the Mazdaspeed addition. I want you RX-8 owners who are holding the cards for every potential customer to step up and make Mazda fix it. LIKE FORD DID.
#299
No not teriible at the track, just not enough horsepower to run quicker. Sears Point is typically 2 tenths slower than Sacramento here in California. If you look at this site:
http://douglevinmotorsports.com/HP_calc.htm
And put in 15.3, 90mph and 3000 pounds you get 171 hp at the wheels based on trap speed and 166 horsepower at the wheels based on ET. Change the ET to 15.1 (Sacramento) and you get 173 horsepower at the wheels based on ET. Thats about what these cars are making at the tires on various dynos. The car should run around a 14.2@96 mph to be making the 239 horsepower claim I think.
Thor.
http://douglevinmotorsports.com/HP_calc.htm
And put in 15.3, 90mph and 3000 pounds you get 171 hp at the wheels based on trap speed and 166 horsepower at the wheels based on ET. Change the ET to 15.1 (Sacramento) and you get 173 horsepower at the wheels based on ET. Thats about what these cars are making at the tires on various dynos. The car should run around a 14.2@96 mph to be making the 239 horsepower claim I think.
Thor.
Last edited by THOR; 08-24-2003 at 01:18 PM.
#300
jims
Originally posted by Jims5543
No thats what you are saying.
FORD - Fixed its cars.
Mazda - gives you a check pats you and the back and breathes a sigh of relief you went for their offer.
I am saying get Mazda to fix your car not pay you off. You did not get what you paid for. You bought a RX-8 with 210 HP not 247 as advertised.
I case you do not read back a few pages or posts for that matter.
I want to buy an RX-8 and I am simply waiting for the Mazdaspeed addition. I want you RX-8 owners who are holding the cards for every potential customer to step up and make Mazda fix it. LIKE FORD DID.
No thats what you are saying.
FORD - Fixed its cars.
Mazda - gives you a check pats you and the back and breathes a sigh of relief you went for their offer.
I am saying get Mazda to fix your car not pay you off. You did not get what you paid for. You bought a RX-8 with 210 HP not 247 as advertised.
I case you do not read back a few pages or posts for that matter.
I want to buy an RX-8 and I am simply waiting for the Mazdaspeed addition. I want you RX-8 owners who are holding the cards for every potential customer to step up and make Mazda fix it. LIKE FORD DID.
As far as them doing something about upping the HP, the only way they'll do that is if the RX8 starts languising on the dealer's lot and they have to bump up the value quotient somehow (or they'll just discontinue making the car). So far, dealers are selling all that they can get their hands on, so that's not an option either.
IF you haven't bought an RX8 yet and this is a big issue for you, the other choice is to spend about $3K more and get a similarly performing 350Z, that's not nearly as refined as the RX8. Or, you can spend about $10K more and get a vette and have one of the fastest cars commercially available (short of the exotics).
Lots of choices here.
Last edited by graphicguy; 08-24-2003 at 01:21 PM.