Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

They said, it couldnt be built- FT-86

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-07-2009, 12:42 PM
  #76  
Registered User
 
vash_241987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Tx
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alfy28
actucally i wasnt being spiteful. i just looked at all your post, and sound like fanboy talk.

well if that is the case, then explain to me why Celica floppped in sales here in the US, cant say because it was a FF car. when ppl where buying up Intgras and Civics like candy.

which is why subbie needs this more then toyota does in the US. Subbies is not hurting in japan, because tehre is alot of time attacks freaks there.
the last celica didn't do great, I believed that toyota just didn't care anymore. It was pretty low on power, even the GT-S. The aftermarket did help out much either, there wasn't too much out there. Plus the fact that there was so much out for the civic and integs, not alot of ppl cared for the celica...well except for girls, and the Mr 2 owners how have swapped their engine for the celicas. I think this MR-S has the swap...pretty good of a light wieight NA


[embed]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0hhbGcTQKEc&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0hhbGcTQKEc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/embed]
Old 10-07-2009, 01:14 PM
  #77  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Gripen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alfy28
actucally i wasnt being spiteful. i just looked at all your post, and sound like fanboy talk.

well if that is the case, then explain to me why Celica floppped in sales here in the US, cant say because it was a FF car. when ppl where buying up Intgras and Civics like candy.

which is why subbie needs this more then toyota does in the US. Subbies is not hurting in japan, because tehre is alot of time attacks freaks there.
It was unfortunate that the Celica did not succeed, but it was not a surprise. That car was designed to compete against the Integra coupe, but it was introduced towards the end of the then current DC2 Integra's product cycle. When the RSX debuted it was a more refined, comfortable and powerful car at a similar price point. Then for MY2002 Subaru finally brought over the WRX to the states. Why would anyone buy a Celica GT-S when for about the same price you could get the WRX? It had more power, more torque, had AWD, was more practical and, for the enthusiasts, was so much more easy to modify?
Old 10-07-2009, 01:32 PM
  #78  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gripen
It was unfortunate that the Celica did not succeed, but it was not a surprise. That car was designed to compete against the Integra coupe, but it was introduced towards the end of the then current DC2 Integra's product cycle. When the RSX debuted it was a more refined, comfortable and powerful car at a similar price point. Then for MY2002 Subaru finally brought over the WRX to the states. Why would anyone buy a Celica GT-S when for about the same price you could get the WRX? It had more power, more torque, had AWD, was more practical and, for the enthusiasts, was so much more easy to modify?
So my next question is, why did rsx fail to the civic?

if your answer the way that i hope you do, then you will see why toyota wouldnt do the same mistake as acura/honda did.

which brings up another question. if these specs are true, which seems very unlikely. who is going to buy a toyota ft86 (in the US) over the Hyndai genises coupe?

sounds like toyota would be making teh same mistakes that they did with the Celica. but with different drive terrarin, sorta defeats the purpose of launching a car that no one will buy, esepcially over the genises coupe.

but like the magazines in japan states, tehy will brand it as a subbie, with more HP. seems logical to me.

Last edited by alfy28; 10-07-2009 at 01:35 PM.
Old 10-07-2009, 01:50 PM
  #79  
Registered User
 
vash_241987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Tx
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alfy28
So my next question is, why did rsx fail to the civic?

if your answer the way that i hope you do, then you will see why toyota wouldnt do the same mistake as acura/honda did.

which brings up another question. if these specs are true, which seems very unlikely. who is going to buy a toyota ft86 (in the US) over the Hyndai genises coupe?

sounds like toyota would be making teh same mistakes that they did with the Celica. but with different drive terrarin, sorta defeats the purpose of launching a car that no one will buy, esepcially over the genises coupe.

but like the magazines in japan states, tehy will brand it as a subbie, with more HP. seems logical to me.
well if subie is getting it, that would suck....just cause the subie dealer closed down a few years ago where I live .
Old 10-07-2009, 01:58 PM
  #80  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vash_241987
well if subie is getting it, that would suck....just cause the subie dealer closed down a few years ago where I live .
which explains why subbie really needs this car in the US.


Several sketches have leaked out featuring the Subaru-branded version of a coupe co-developed with Toyota. Although supposedly not yet green-lit by Subaru, the car is continuing to push forward as a Toyota.

Toyota will debut their FT-86 concept at the Tokyo Motor Show later this month. Details of the concept were sent out in a release earlier this week, with Toyota confirming the vehicle's use of the Subaru 2.0-liter Boxer engine. The engine could be tuned as high as 200 hp, a 25% increase over its normal output.

The Subaru sketches show a car that looks near-identical to the photos released by Toyota. The differences between the vehicles are more or less cosmetic. Subaru's vehicle has a third brake-light built into the spoiler. Tailpipes appear to be hidden as well, while side mirrors have been left off altogether.

However, the rumor-mill is suggesting that Subaru is grappling with the decision to push forward with a self-branded version of the car. The company has carved out a niche for themselves in the auto industry for providing all-wheel-drive vehicles. Meanwhile, the coupe under development is believed to be rear-wheel-drive for both auto makers.

The benefit of building the car is that Subaru will have the opportunity to freshen their image. With sales of the Outback, Tribeca, and Impreza flagging, a sporty coupe may be exactly what the company needs. Subaru was one of the few auto makers to come out of last year's industry-wide tailspin in decent shape. The automaker will be looking to build momentum into 2010 and 2011.


http://www.worldcarfans.com/10910072...ketches-leaked
Old 10-07-2009, 02:24 PM
  #81  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Gripen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alfy28
So my next question is, why did rsx fail to the civic?

if your answer the way that i hope you do, then you will see why toyota wouldnt do the same mistake as acura/honda did.

which brings up another question. if these specs are true, which seems very unlikely. who is going to buy a toyota ft86 (in the US) over the Hyndai genises coupe?

sounds like toyota would be making teh same mistakes that they did with the Celica. but with different drive terrarin, sorta defeats the purpose of launching a car that no one will buy, esepcially over the genises coupe.

but like the magazines in japan states, tehy will brand it as a subbie, with more HP. seems logical to me.
The RSX and Civic are targeted at different demographics. If you're refering to the Civic Si, then that clarifies this question. Some of the reasons that led to the demise of the RSX are: 1)Consumer tastes were changing. People wanted something more practical while remaining sporty. Coupes at this price point were going out of style when hatchbacks, like the 3, were gaining in popularity. 2) Aside from the EP3 Civic Si, the current Civic Si was cheaper, yet just as powerful. Why pay more for a similar car (RSX)? 3) Acura's product lineup was going more upscale and the RSX did not fit that vision. Honda wouldn't take it because they already had the Civic Si, so the RSX was left to die out without a replacement.

The Genesis coupe is not the target (except in price) with the FT-86, not with those dimensions. I see that the Civic Si and VW GTI are the most plausible competitors.
Old 10-07-2009, 02:28 PM
  #82  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Gripen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alfy28
The benefit of building the car is that Subaru will have the opportunity to freshen their image. With sales of the Outback, Tribeca, and Impreza flagging, a sporty coupe may be exactly what the company needs.

http://www.worldcarfans.com/10910072...ketches-leaked

Well, from a Toyota enthusiast's standpoint, that's disappointing to hear. A coupe is one thing that Subaru hasn't had in a while and I know that the GC8 Impreza was sorely missed when the GDA/GDB were introduced.

The front end of the last sketch in the link reminds me of a G35.
Old 10-07-2009, 02:40 PM
  #83  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gripen
The RSX and Civic are targeted at different demographics. If you're refering to the Civic Si, then that clarifies this question. Some of the reasons that led to the demise of the RSX are: 1)Consumer tastes were changing. People wanted something more practical while remaining sporty. Coupes at this price point were going out of style when hatchbacks, like the 3, were gaining in popularity. 2) Aside from the EP3 Civic Si, the current Civic Si was cheaper, yet just as powerful. Why pay more for a similar car (RSX)? 3) Acura's product lineup was going more upscale and the RSX did not fit that vision. Honda wouldn't take it because they already had the Civic Si, so the RSX was left to die out without a replacement.

The Genesis coupe is not the target (except in price) with the FT-86, not with those dimensions. I see that the Civic Si and VW GTI are the most plausible competitors.
exactly my point. glad you answered the way that i thought you would. your actually thinking before posting. so my next question is,

Toyota already stated that they are looking at 20K range, which Tc is 20k range. why would toyota pit both cars against each other?

any how, i give up ( this time i am being honest) because its hard to talk to someone who ignores all the signs because his dream of toyota bringing back t he AE86 to a fanclub in the US, taht didnt exist till the last 2-3years.

also like to add, i am never serious about my post. lots of it, just for fun . i just like pointing out why your reasons dont really make any sense. but hey , glad you are a toyota fan like my self. [

Last edited by alfy28; 10-07-2009 at 02:43 PM.
Old 10-07-2009, 03:02 PM
  #84  
the Doctor
iTrader: (1)
 
Feras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i want that MR-S
Old 10-08-2009, 04:45 AM
  #85  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
In the UK they are calling it the NEW Toyota CELICA!
Old 10-08-2009, 12:56 PM
  #86  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
Nice. Looks like a what a Celica would look like in today's time.
Old 10-08-2009, 12:59 PM
  #87  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
I wonder if there are functional vents underneath the headlights?

Old 10-12-2009, 02:57 PM
  #88  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by pdxhak
Alright here is my chop. I suck at this stuff but this car has peaked my interest

More chops but these are not mine but I wanted to keep them together. I'm liking this car in black with the BBS Japan LM-R wheels!





Old 10-12-2009, 03:35 PM
  #89  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
very nice looking, love the black.
Old 10-14-2009, 12:27 AM
  #90  
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
CarAndDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose Area
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the biggest reason, already mentioned, that the RSX was not replaced was Acura wanted to go upscale and a car starting around $20K and attracting the "wrong" crowd was not desired. Too bad nothing replaced it, even if it moved upwards to around 25K. Of course, I think I read Acura/Honda is thinking of bring in an entry-level sporty car again. Of course, it will be ugly.

And the Celica - the styling was a bit odd and the pricing was way out of whack for the performance you got. And essentially, the Scion tC took it's place and also got a lot of folks who might have bought an Acura RSX. Even though I haven't driven either, I am under the impression that tC is far blander to drive than the Celica and RSX.

Here's hoping any new sporty coupe that Toyota brings out is more akin go the IS-F and not the Camry LE.
Old 10-14-2009, 12:55 AM
  #91  
You Dumbass!!!
 
Symbioticgenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like GTR from the side\profile view. Just a more relaxed back end. Front looks sexy, from the fangs, to the shark mouth looking like it will bite you.

Mazda cars smile in victory, This thing looks like it will swallow the opposition whole.

I just want to know how much it weighs, and how nice the Chassis is.
Old 10-14-2009, 05:15 AM
  #92  
FLAME ON!
 
@!!narotordo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Strip Club
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool. Make me one in blue
Old 10-14-2009, 10:04 AM
  #93  
Need'd a Turbo
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
black is hawt
Old 10-14-2009, 12:04 PM
  #94  
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
 
bose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Taylorsville, UT
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's a blue one I made.

FT86.jpg?t=1255539857
Old 10-14-2009, 12:26 PM
  #95  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bose
Here's a blue one I made.

[IMG]http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn228/boseters/FT86.jpg?t=125553985xxx7[IMG]
Sweet i like. is there any way, you can do the wheels a little smaller? i would like to see how it looks.
Old 10-14-2009, 12:31 PM
  #96  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
alfy, here is a link to a bunch of good chops of the FT-86. Of course everyone here will agree my chop with TE37's is the best

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6
Old 10-14-2009, 01:06 PM
  #97  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Woot thanks man.
i would love to have one in this color or white
as for wheel color, it would be dark bronze or gun metal.
but for white car it wuld be dark bronze.
i just wanted to see how the color of the wheels would look. not wanting those wheels though

Attached Thumbnails They said, it couldnt be built-  FT-86-chop23.jpg  
Old 10-14-2009, 01:16 PM
  #98  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
I'm liking the old school wheels. Not digging the different color front and rear bumper though.



This is a nice chop as well

Old 10-14-2009, 01:19 PM
  #99  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And my other choice

Attached Thumbnails They said, it couldnt be built-  FT-86-white86.jpg  
Old 10-14-2009, 01:25 PM
  #100  
rotary courage
 
m477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The back needs to slope more, it has too much of a "hunchback of Notre Dame" look. (although I realize this is probably done to increase rear passenger headroom)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: They said, it couldnt be built- FT-86



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.