Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Rx8 Or 350Z..

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 05:13 PM
  #126  
areitu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally posted by cwerdna
I'd be curious to see those threads on 350Z forums. I can't think of any on lightly or unmodded Zs that needed new engines.
Supercharged Zs have blown engines. Some of the people on the board who aren't too bright are shying away from it suddenly. One of the guys who has a supercharged Z (and blew the engine) said he expected it because he drove his car like it was intended to be driven.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #127  
cwerdna's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally posted by areitu
Supercharged Zs have blown engines. Some of the people on the board who aren't too bright are shying away from it suddenly. One of the guys who has a supercharged Z (and blew the engine) said he expected it because he drove his car like it was intended to be driven.
Err... I wouldn't consider supercharging to fall under the category of unmodded or lightly modded cars! Those don't count. Sure, the Smithtown Nissan guys ran >300 shots of NOS (as high as 375) on stock internals and blew their engine... but that's insane! That's 375 hp to an engine that produces 287... Also, not my idea of a light mod.

How many of the failed RX-8 engines had forced induction or NOS (well, that's also FI too)?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 05:21 PM
  #128  
zerobanger's Avatar
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Originally posted by cwerdna
I'd be curious to see those threads on 350Z forums. I can't think of any on lightly or unmodded Zs that needed new engines.



As for 10Best, the Z was on there for 2003. See http://www.caranddriver.com/article....ticle_id=2423. As for 1/4 mile... there's a lot of variation, but the fastest stock time I've seen so far is 13.73. It seems to be in the very high 13s or low 14s unless the driver was lousy or they were at high altitudes and/or high temps.
13.73, LOL Dreaming is good.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 05:27 PM
  #129  
cwerdna's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally posted by zerobanger
13.73, LOL Dreaming is good.
Take a look at the post by 1.8T at http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...0&pagenumber=5

and stx at http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...0&pagenumber=5

I would like to see the timeslips though... What's the best 1/4 mile here on a stock 8? I recall Judge Ito had a 14.5 and I recall him mentioning that he'd be drag racing for 15 years. Heck, I've only had my license for 12 and only had a car worth racing for 2...
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #130  
zerobanger's Avatar
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Originally posted by cwerdna
Take a look at the post by 1.8T at http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...0&pagenumber=5

and stx at http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...0&pagenumber=5

I would like to see the timeslips though... What's the best 1/4 mile here on a stock 8? I recall Judge Ito had a 14.5 and I recall him mentioning that he'd be drag racing for 15 years. Heck, I've only had my license for 12 and only had a car worth racing for 2...
I ran 12.99 @ 108 in my bone stock 1994 Rx-7.:D
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #131  
zerobanger's Avatar
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
and Mr ITO ran a 14.2
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 05:59 PM
  #132  
cwerdna's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally posted by zerobanger
and Mr ITO ran a 14.2
I see a 14.32 https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...threadid=17031 but he wrecked his 1st gear in the process. Hmmm... My bad though... his 14.32 post was pretty recent. I'd been following his 14.5 thread from awhile ago. Where's his 14.2?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #133  
Rick's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Richland WA
Originally posted by zerobanger
I ran 12.99 @ 108 in my bone stock 1994 Rx-7.:D
I ran a 13.1 @ 108 w/12.5 pounds of boost on 18" wheels & street tires. What type of tires did you use?

Last edited by Rick; Dec 24, 2003 at 06:06 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 06:13 PM
  #134  
zerobanger's Avatar
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Originally posted by cwerdna
I see a 14.32 https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...threadid=17031 but he wrecked his 1st gear in the process. Hmmm... My bad though... his 14.32 post was pretty recent. I'd been following his 14.5 thread from awhile ago. Where's his 14.2?
Ok, you said 14.4 I said 14.2, its 14.3. Who the *** cares? the 350Z and RX-8 both make pathetic drag cars. One has doesn't have enough torque to get it off the line, the other is a fat pig that has the top end of a butterfly (and an interior that was designed by a 10 year old with his first lego set).
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 06:32 PM
  #135  
areitu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally posted by zerobanger
Ok, you said 14.4 I said 14.2, its 14.3. Who the *** cares? the 350Z and RX-8 both make pathetic drag cars. One has doesn't have enough torque to get it off the line, the other is a fat pig that has the top end of a butterfly (and an interior that was designed by a 10 year old with his first lego set).
I think I quote you in my rx7club.com sig. :D

The 350Z dosen't have top end. The RX8 does. From the back seat, at least. The 350Z and the G35C are extremely similar cars, platform and engine-wise. In fact, the G35C posts better skidpad numbers than the 350Z (less tailhappy at the limit, better tires). A friend of mine has a G35C 6MT and the Technosquare ECU remap. Instead of the engine pulling the same through the rev range, it gains top end where power usually peters out. Think of it as something like the Canzoomer mod. Makes it a REAL sports car rather than a great chassis with a truck engine.

I prefer the 350Z's interior over the G35C's, but the RX8 over both. Unless you stare at the door or the center console all day, the 350Z interior really isn't that bad.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 07:50 PM
  #136  
fstfd3spower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Look what i started..

well i think im getting rx8. More i look at it, more i like it.
Interior is so much better. i got 2 cars that are fast...dont need another afast car.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 11:34 PM
  #137  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally posted by Elara
If you state you position politely, as in: "I don't like the 8 because I don't like the HP/I don't think it has enough torque/I don't trust the engine because it's a first year run" and not "The 8 sucks *** and you are stupid cause you bought it" no one cares that you don't like it and say so. You're more than entitled to your own opinion. Look at Ike. He doesn't seem to like it, yet because he's NICE about it, he's pretty well respected.

As for your little jab, there- ever so clever of you to ignore the actual facts. The buy back didn't have to happen- Mazda was NICE to everyone. They were well within their rights to go "oops, we screwed up, sorry about that, here's the real hp." and leave it at that. How many other companys have done that and actually tried to make good on their mistake? Engine flooding hasn't happened the majority of us, and the same goes for the blown engines. We have heard a rumor that there have been as many as what, 70 total? Out of more than 10,000 cars now floating around? And we don't have any hard proof from Mazda or anyone else (no offense Canzoomer).

There are no more issues with this car than any other first year run. And there are no recalls. So what's your point?
Do you actually think Mazda did this to be nice? They did it to prevent future lawsuits and preserve some credibility and not make people angry so the future of their brand is less tarnished. If you look at the numbers Mazda came up with it's right on the threshold of 5% and I believe that's the point where people are able to take legal action. Had they rated the car at 237 (which still seems to be out of wack) it would have come out to 5.1%, and I have yet to see why Mazda came up with the 238 number other than to keep themselves out of legal hot water. The buyback and free maintenance offer was to save themselves money in the future and many lawsuits, not to be nice.

Also, you're nutty if you think the RX-8 has topend and the Z doesn't, everything I've seen seems to point to the Z pulling away very hard from the RX-8 after the 100mph point is broken.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:13 AM
  #138  
zerobanger's Avatar
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Originally posted by IkeWRX
Do you actually think Mazda did this to be nice? They did it to prevent future lawsuits and preserve some credibility and not make people angry so the future of their brand is less tarnished. If you look at the numbers Mazda came up with it's right on the threshold of 5% and I believe that's the point where people are able to take legal action. Had they rated the car at 237 (which still seems to be out of wack) it would have come out to 5.1%, and I have yet to see why Mazda came up with the 238 number other than to keep themselves out of legal hot water. The buyback and free maintenance offer was to save themselves money in the future and many lawsuits, not to be nice.

Also, you're nutty if you think the RX-8 has topend and the Z doesn't, everything I've seen seems to point to the Z pulling away very hard from the RX-8 after the 100mph point is broken.
I dont know about the rx-8, but I drove the 350Z and its a DOG (other than when first hit the gas). at 4000 rpm you feel like a butterfly.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:13 AM
  #139  
syntrix's Avatar
I like cheese!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 3
From: Little Rock, AR (was vegas)
IMHO, MNAO had two options.

Leave the power and deal with new emissions requirements on the cats that require more longevity than older standards.

Change the power, increase cat life, and as a premptive motion, offered buybacks to the people that have purchased them.

Ike, have you driven an RX8 at speed? For some reason it feels like it's pulling faster in the higher gears.

Sure the Z has more tq/hp, it's a great 2 seater with a V6 in it

But the USDM cars are pretty much the same, except for the port reflash .

So if the ecu were putting out JDM specs, would that technically be "stock"??

Gotta love the Z!! Nissan did right with that car for what it is!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:32 AM
  #140  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally posted by syntrix
IMHO, MNAO had two options.

Leave the power and deal with new emissions requirements on the cats that require more longevity than older standards.

Change the power, increase cat life, and as a premptive motion, offered buybacks to the people that have purchased them.

Ike, have you driven an RX8 at speed? For some reason it feels like it's pulling faster in the higher gears.

Sure the Z has more tq/hp, it's a great 2 seater with a V6 in it

But the USDM cars are pretty much the same, except for the port reflash .

So if the ecu were putting out JDM specs, would that technically be "stock"??

Gotta love the Z!! Nissan did right with that car for what it is!
I only took the RX-8 to about 90 on my testdrive. But if you look at the mag numbers, the G35 and Z pull much stronger at higher MPH even against the pre production car. For instance in C&D the G35 beat the RX-8 to 130 by 6.7 seconds, at 130mph that is an obscene amount of carlengths. It's even more telling when you consider there was only a 1.3 second difference 0-100. Then consider the Z is lighter and has a slightly more freeflowing exhaust and 10 more HP.

Zerobanger, I find it impossible that you actually drove a Z, or you;re just misrepresenting. It's hardly a dog and I think just about everyone that has ever driven one will agree with me whether they like it or not.

Ike
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:40 AM
  #141  
zerobanger's Avatar
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Originally posted by IkeWRX

Zerobanger, I find it impossible that you actually drove a Z, or you;re just misrepresenting. It's hardly a dog and I think just about everyone that has ever driven one will agree with me whether they like it or not.

Ike
too ******* bad. I drove one 3 weeks ago at the nissan dealer in Oakland california. Like I said, when I first hit the gas it was great, then it got really boring. It has NO top end.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:41 AM
  #142  
syntrix's Avatar
I like cheese!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 3
From: Little Rock, AR (was vegas)
I thought the weight of the Z was about 3200-3300. 3225 at edmunds

Might want to 2x check the RX8 weight With popular options: 3,029 lbs [ http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/disp...ehicleCode=RX8 ] <- hope that link works, and some sport RX8's are in the 29's.

How is the 350Z lighter?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:51 AM
  #143  
RX8-TX's Avatar
Senior Geek
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
Originally posted by syntrix
How is the 350Z lighter?
I believe he was comparing the G & Z
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:54 AM
  #144  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally posted by RX8-TX
I believe he was comparing the G & Z
Correct.


Zero, if the Z is a dog then it's a Greyhound and the RX-8 is a Beagle.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:55 AM
  #145  
syntrix's Avatar
I like cheese!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 3
From: Little Rock, AR (was vegas)
Ok, that makes sense!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 12:56 AM
  #146  
RX8-TX's Avatar
Senior Geek
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
Originally posted by IkeWRX
Correct.


Zero, if the Z is a dog then it's a Greyhound and the RX-8 is a Beagle.
Dude, I don't like Greyhounds....I like Chihuahua's!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 01:03 AM
  #147  
zerobanger's Avatar
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Originally posted by IkeWRX
Correct.


Zero, if the Z is a dog then it's a Greyhound and the RX-8 is a Beagle.
I dont own an Rx-8. I own an Rx-7, compared to my car the 350Z feels like a turtle.

Just the facts.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 04:31 AM
  #148  
areitu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
The G/Z do feel like turtles without the Technosquare ECU flash. They lean it out a bit on top and it gains a lot more pull. Stock, it basically feels the same when you floor it at 4500rpm and 5500rpm. They might have more actual power at the top end than the RX8, but the engine pulls flatly through the rev-range. That's the point we're trying to get across.

The RX8 starts off gently and surges forward when all those ports click open. It makes the car feel light. I liked it a lot in stock form, I can't imagine the port reflash.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #149  
Morning Wood's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Originally posted by zerobanger
I dont own an Rx-8. I own an Rx-7, compared to my car the 350Z feels like a turtle.

Just the facts.
so then the rx-8 must be a snail?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #150  
Broker73's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Ike, R&T has the 8 from 0-100 in 15.9, and the G35 14.9 I believe

you keep refering to C&D 0-130 time, and I have seen no link or info on this. The cars are almost identical in the 0-60 and 1/4 mile. But as per usual you will find something or say something to try and put holes in any info that is presented to you. The street start time for the G35 is lower, but with any highreving engine like the 8, it is going to be a weakness. In fact, R&T had to launch the G35 to get a 6.1 0-60. Just face it, between the 2, you have almost identical performance.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.