Official GT-R info (pricing!)
#152
Destroying Threads
#153
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
i watch every episode of best motoring i dont remember any episode of best motoring or hot version that has z06 vs sti, but unless its raining like crazy, i dont see how its possible the sti would even come close to the z06's lap time at tsukuba.
it dosnt make sense because they usually pit cars of the same performance class together, its highly unlikely theyd have stock z06 vs sti on best motoring or hot version in the same race.
it dosnt make sense because they usually pit cars of the same performance class together, its highly unlikely theyd have stock z06 vs sti on best motoring or hot version in the same race.
Last edited by playdoh43; 10-17-2007 at 12:47 PM.
#154
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i watch every episode of best motoring i dont remember any episode of best motoring or hot version that has z06 vs sti, but unless its raining like crazy, i dont see how its possible the sti would even come close to the z06's lap time at tsukuba.
it dosnt make sense because they usually pit cars of the same performance class together, its highly unlikely theyd have stock z06 vs sti on best motoring or hot version in the same race.
it dosnt make sense because they usually pit cars of the same performance class together, its highly unlikely theyd have stock z06 vs sti on best motoring or hot version in the same race.
It was the S204 STI and it was the slowest of all the cars on the track in the time attack. The Suby held up the pack for 3 laps so it got the win.
#155
#158
Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. Has any1 seen this?
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
Last edited by Aspire705; 10-17-2007 at 03:29 PM. Reason: fix link
#159
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. Has any1 seen this?
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
#160
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. Has any1 seen this?
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
#164
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
man.. just go to the homepage and click on it yourself
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage
its got a transaxle mounted on the back, interesting, but how did they make it so heavy? But that just means more potential for a lighter GTR. There are awful lots of gadgets in the GTR, aluminium trim, power seats, etc etc.
it pulls 0.99g too!
________
Live Sex
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage
its got a transaxle mounted on the back, interesting, but how did they make it so heavy? But that just means more potential for a lighter GTR. There are awful lots of gadgets in the GTR, aluminium trim, power seats, etc etc.
it pulls 0.99g too!
________
Live Sex
Last edited by Renesis_8; 09-11-2011 at 01:28 PM.
#165
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
the R-34 is 3672.9 lbs, seems they were never nimble, but this new one really is porky
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/3...e-R34-GTR.html
on best motoring they've said that what really makes good handling is linear and predictable progression, what made them not like the c6 vette was due to its unpredictable handling near the limit.
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/3...e-R34-GTR.html
on best motoring they've said that what really makes good handling is linear and predictable progression, what made them not like the c6 vette was due to its unpredictable handling near the limit.
#166
Downhill Touge FTW!!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Buena Park
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thing about best motoring is that the results are almost ALWAYS off. In 75% of the races Tsuchiya wins or that one old guy...no matter what car they drive..
type r civic vs STI....civic wins
modded rx8 vs modded civic...civic wins
I love best motoring..but i dont take their results to mean anything
type r civic vs STI....civic wins
modded rx8 vs modded civic...civic wins
I love best motoring..but i dont take their results to mean anything
#167
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
The thing about best motoring is that the results are almost ALWAYS off. In 75% of the races Tsuchiya wins or that one old guy...no matter what car they drive..
type r civic vs STI....civic wins
modded rx8 vs modded civic...civic wins
I love best motoring..but i dont take their results to mean anything
type r civic vs STI....civic wins
modded rx8 vs modded civic...civic wins
I love best motoring..but i dont take their results to mean anything
On topic : GT-R was never light, but its potential keep it on the top of the list. and with all the luxury stuff they have in there ... maybe if you take all the stuff out like leather seats and stuff. not hard to get 100 lbs off.
#168
I DO IT FOR THE LULZ!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eastman, Ga
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uhmm...just to get back on topic for a sec. Has any1 seen this?
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
Curb Weight: 3792 pounds
http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../71017001/1065
Maannnn...whaaatt a porker!!! Guess that's to be expected right? <Ahem> Carry on.
But still thats just more car to love!
Last edited by Mech_head; 10-17-2007 at 10:01 PM.
#172
Grand Chancellor
that is why cars these days are getting more powerful - to offset its increased weight.
#173
yeah the 3792lbs weight just made me give up on the GTR. Hello Z06! with its quite lean 3132lb weight...
600lbs Lighter! You can't tell me that all wheel drive and LESS power is going to help makeup for that are you?
The unmasking of it... makes me want them to put the mask back on it as well. I'm rather disappointed. Even if they came out with a version thats 300lbs lighter with all fancy carbon fiber this and that - for the price you would pay for all that extra you could buy the Z06 and buy some insane mods and get into 600+HP territory and STILL have money left over.
600lbs Lighter! You can't tell me that all wheel drive and LESS power is going to help makeup for that are you?
The unmasking of it... makes me want them to put the mask back on it as well. I'm rather disappointed. Even if they came out with a version thats 300lbs lighter with all fancy carbon fiber this and that - for the price you would pay for all that extra you could buy the Z06 and buy some insane mods and get into 600+HP territory and STILL have money left over.
#174
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A good driver takes 100 (absolute minimum) to 200 milliseconds to complete each shift, and longer as the race wears down and he gets tired.
A lot slower than an F1 gear box at 30-50 milliseconds but a lot faster than me!
#175
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the shifting speed debate... 100ms shift on a manual trans is not that outrageous. And no you will not be shifting 10 times in 1 second. There is no reason to do this since you need to wait for the car to speed up or slow down enough to need a gear change.... Any physically, it is much easier to make one 0.1s shift every half a second or so, than 10 0.1s shifts in a row... Once you get the action into "muscle memory" I'm sure 0.1s can be possible, maybe a little less even. Personally I think I am somewhere around 0.3 (and am working on getting that number down...).