Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Official GT-R info (pricing!)

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 03:25 PM
  #26  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Daemos
What most people forget that transmissions like the DSG and SMG transmissions ARE manual transmissions, they are sequential manual transmissions just like those in F1 cars, The Veryon has a 7 speed DSG.

DSGs are manual transmissions that have clutches and syncros that are controlled by using paddle shifters, the auto part is an addon to the this type of transmission.

Having driven both a 6MT GTI and TT and comparing them to the DSG version, the DSG is an amazing transmission, it's much more engaging IMO, because it reacts so fast, it does what YOU want it to do.

The DSG equipped cars were not only faster in a straight line, but faster around corners because you could downshift, and it will revmatch for you, but since the shifts are so lighting quick, around tight corners where you would normally bounce off the revlimiter in say 2nd gear, you can quickly shift to third gain more momentum, then downshift back to second in fractions of a second without losing time like you would with a regular MT.

Just like an MT, if you put it in non-auto mode, it'll hold gears as long as you want, although once you hit the fuel cut it'll automatically upshift for you, but you can ride the engine near redline until it blows up and the transmission won't shift, until either you upshift or you hit the fuel cut which it'll upshift for you.

DSG is great, I am very impressed, if the DSG in the Evo X and the GTR is anything like the DSG in the GTI and TT, I won't miss a traditional shifter and clutch MT style.

The DSG is not sequential, which is the main reason for having two clutches. Also, it's absolutely an automatic, it's just a very good one. If it can and will shift for you it's an automatic, end of story.

This is purely opinion, but I found the DSG to be far less engaging than the MT. I felt disconnected and like I was playing a video game with the DSG. Also, the power modulation possible with a MT will never be achieved by an automatic car, not matter how advanced the system is.

DSG is only faster when it has the launch control. In the US where there is no launch control the fastest stock cars have been MT's. No matter how fast the car shifts, an excellent driver is still better in this case. Also, there have been a couple track tests with the DSG against the MT GTI, and the MT was always faster around the road course even when the DSG car was faster in a straight line.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 03:38 PM
  #27  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
Yeah but who the hell buys a car like this and takes it to the track? I never see F450's or Lambos on the track like $30k cars. Guess we'll just have to wait and see what Nissan has up there sleave.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 03:56 PM
  #28  
RoXanneBlack8's Avatar
stop flooding ur engines
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 1
From: NE
the both of u are wrong....

dsg is a manual, it has gears and synchros and a clutch disc (two of them). thats a manual trans. an auto has clutch packs and valve bodies both of which the dsg has not.....

ppl track supercars all the time, do u ever track ur 8? bc i do. and i see nothing but supercars. my 8 was the cheapest car on the track. i very much enjoy getting my doors blown off by vipers zo6s porsches and aston martins...
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #29  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by RoXanneBlack8
the both of u are wrong....

dsg is a manual, it has gears and synchros and a clutch disc (two of them). thats a manual trans. an auto has clutch packs and valve bodies both of which the dsg has not.....

ppl track supercars all the time, do u ever track ur 8? bc i do. and i see nothing but supercars. my 8 was the cheapest car on the track. i very much enjoy getting my doors blown off by vipers zo6s porsches and aston martins...
Until it has a clutch pedal it's still an automatic.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #30  
Daemos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Canada ---> Australia
Originally Posted by Ike
Until it has a clutch pedal it's still an automatic.
So all F1 cars are autos?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #31  
RazzyBRX-8's Avatar
Representin'!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by Ike
Until it has a clutch pedal it's still an automatic.

Ike, I completely agree with you, in all seriousness.

(I'm being serious, in case that came across as sarcastic.)
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #32  
RoXanneBlack8's Avatar
stop flooding ur engines
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 1
From: NE
yes well the word automatic and manual are defined as i said.

YOU can THINK its an auto all u want, but its literally a manual trans...

whateevr, internet arguing hurts my head
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #33  
DemonRX-8's Avatar
I got nothing good to say
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Tysons Corner, VA
Wow, this thread has gone horribly but interestingly OT.

The key distinction is that these SMG/DSG boxes do not have a torque convertor and the associated driveline losses. They are manual gear boxes, albeit automatically (or paddle) shifted. I agree there's a lot of satisfaction in expertly rowing your own gears, but to say there's no advantage to SMG/DSG would just plain be wrong. F1 cars are driven by the best driver's in the world and yet they have these "automatic" gear boxes. Here's one of my favorite clips of Ayrton Senna's 1991 Manaco pole laps in a convential manual box: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUkv6...elated&search= The YouTube clip loses some of the quality, but if you watch that clip in full resolution on a big screen TV it's just insane! And today's F1 car's are turning the same if not faster lap times with less power. Granted there are many technological advances that contribute to that, but these new gearboxes are a big part of it.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #34  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by DemonRX-8
Wow, this thread has gone horribly but interestingly OT.

The key distinction is that these SMG/DSG boxes do not have a torque convertor and the associated driveline losses. They are manual gear boxes, albeit automatically (or paddle) shifted. I agree there's a lot of satisfaction in expertly rowing your own gears, but to say there's no advantage to SMG/DSG would just plain be wrong. F1 cars are driven by the best driver's in the world and yet they have these "automatic" gear boxes. Here's one of my favorite clips of Ayrton Senna's 1991 Manaco pole laps in a convential manual box: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUkv6...elated&search= The YouTube clip loses some of the quality, but if you watch that clip in full resolution on a big screen TV it's just insane! And today's F1 car's are turning the same if not faster lap times with less power. Granted there are many technological advances that contribute to that, but these new gearboxes are a big part of it.
Furthermore, F1 today completely blows compared to days of old.

I'm not denying that these new gearboxes are good, but a manual and automatic isn't defined by whether is has a clutch or a torque converter. If you have to manually disengage the clutch and select a gear it's a manual, if you push a little button and the car does the rest of the work for you it's an automatic whether it's done so with a clutch or not. I'm the one being literal here, some of you are the ones placing constarints on the definition of manual and automatic that simply don't exist. Lastly, yes, the current F1 cars are automatics.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #35  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
I agree with Ike there,

manuals = doing the mechanical work ourselves (both clutch and shifter) instead of electric motors doing it for us.

Clutch = you gotta push it, its all linked mechanically
same as shifter, the shifter in the SMGs send digital signals. (expect for sequential boxes?)
________
GLASS BUBBLERS

Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 01:22 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:12 PM
  #36  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Who cares about the meanings of words? The issue should be whether or not a sports car should shift for you. That's just really out of this world for me. I have to have my own gears to shift, that's half of the fun of driving a sports car. Will they eventually have automatic steering and braking too?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:21 PM
  #37  
Daemos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Canada ---> Australia
You guys really NEED to drive the new Audi and VWs and compare the 6MT to the DSG.

The DSG is really really that good IMO. I wouldn't complain if I had one.

You CAN select your own gears, and you CAN upshift/downshift whenever you want. And it does it faster than you could with a normal clutch/gearbox
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:24 PM
  #38  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Daemos
You guys really NEED to drive the new Audi and VWs and compare the 6MT to the DSG.

The DSG is really really that good IMO. I wouldn't complain if I had one.

You CAN select your own gears, and you CAN upshift/downshift whenever you want. And it does it faster than you could with a normal clutch/gearbox
I have, in fact I've driven the same car with DSG and manual back to back, I'll stick with MT cars... By the way, no one here is denying that they're very good automatic trannys.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:26 PM
  #39  
DemonRX-8's Avatar
I got nothing good to say
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Tysons Corner, VA
I'll concede to the literal definition - they do shift automatically, so a spade is a spade. And I admit I love shifting manually also, so there's something lost with electronics/hydraulics doing the work. I just wanted to point out the technical distintion about the torque converter. I've driven the old (05 or 06 model IIRC) M3 with SMG and it was a POS based on my limited test drive. Supposedly BMW's new SMG is much better and I'd still like to get a drive in a truely well done setup. I do believe it's the way of the future, like it or not.

F1 today definitely has some faults (e.g. controlled tires, very strict aero and other technical regulations), but it's still my favorite form of motor racing. I particularly like the new knock-out qualifying format. In a sense it's pretty much the true race!
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #40  
Daemos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Canada ---> Australia
Originally Posted by Ike
I have, in fact I've driven the same car with DSG and manual back to back, I'll stick with MT cars...
I just think the DSG is really really impressive, much better than I had ever thought it would be.

That and I thought the 6MT in both the GTI and the TT are sloppy, and the clutch wasn't the greatest either, it felt more engaging with the DSG than with the 6MT.

Maybe it's just those two cars, but the 6MT in those cars are pretty blah.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:50 PM
  #41  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by DemonRX-8
F1 today definitely has some faults (e.g. controlled tires, very strict aero and other technical regulations), but it's still my favorite form of motor racing. I particularly like the new knock-out qualifying format. In a sense it's pretty much the true race!
There's one big thing missing from F1 today that's pretty important to auto racing IMO. There's no actual racing going on! Well, it's getting better, but a few years ago it was quite stale.

Now this is racing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kl2tIFxSEGA

RIP Gilles Villeneuve
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 01:20 AM
  #42  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
Originally Posted by Ike
I have, in fact I've driven the same car with DSG and manual back to back, I'll stick with MT cars... By the way, no one here is denying that they're very good automatic trannys.
So I guess you'r not going to get the EvoX
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 01:36 AM
  #43  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by DOMINION
So I guess you'r not going to get the EvoX
The Evo X will be available in MT and AT.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 02:26 AM
  #44  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
What!?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 02:33 AM
  #45  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Mitsubishi isn't stupid, that's what.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 02:41 AM
  #46  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
Correction its Shitsubishi
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #47  
camaro194's Avatar
Thread Starter
Z owner
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
"The Japanese press is reporting that the GT-R's twin-turbocharged 3.8-liter six-cylinder engine (designated VR38) will produce up to 550 horsepower. Initially, it will be mated only to a sequential automatic gearbox with paddle shifters on the steering wheel. Eventually, Nissan also plans to offer a manual transmission and already is developing uplevel V-spec and Evo variants, according to the local media."

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=122781

Last edited by camaro194; Sep 30, 2007 at 01:28 PM. Reason: Adding link for reference
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #48  
nt5k's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by Daemos
Maybe it's just those two cars, but the 6MT in those cars are pretty blah.
It's impressive because of how crappy the manuals are from audi/vw.

I'm with Ike, I drove the DSG GTI, and yeah it's smooth and blah blah, but who cares. I though I was going to fall asleep.

But back to the GTR, dunno just doesn't do much for me. I regularly sit in traffic with 911 Turbos and they seem to be going the same speed as me.. So who really cares.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 03:42 AM
  #49  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
People like the ones who post stuff like this all over the net and people who post good things in it.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 04:01 AM
  #50  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by nt5k
It's impressive because of how crappy the manuals are from audi/vw.

I'm with Ike, I drove the DSG GTI, and yeah it's smooth and blah blah, but who cares. I though I was going to fall asleep.

But back to the GTR, dunno just doesn't do much for me. I regularly sit in traffic with 911 Turbos and they seem to be going the same speed as me.. So who really cares.
C'mon man, if that's really how you feel then you would be driving something slow and boring that gets great gas mileage.

Anyhow, I think the DSG is too smooth. You barely even know it shifts, even when going full out. A small jerk when shifting would actually make it better IMO. After the initial novelty wears off it really is like playing a boring video game. If I were to own one I'd give it 2 days before I stopped using the stupid little buttons on the steering wheel and just drove it like a regular old automatic 95% of the time.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.