The official Evo X thread
#202
#203
Registered
There's a good write-up in Sport Compact Car regarding the Tommi M. Edition Evo VI as compared to the current IX. The writer claims the Tommi Edition is arguably the best Evo made so far.
#204
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question still stands though, Is it just the 8 series that was in the US
Last edited by Tyguy; 08-28-2007 at 03:25 PM.
#206
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Evo VIII and IX are the only USDM Evos. The VI in SCC magazine was either a EDM transplant to the US or JDM/British conversion to LHD. I'm pretty sure the Evo VI was the first one England got by the way.
#207
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#208
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not as much the TME as the Evo VI. I would trade my Evo right now for a Evo VI even though performance wise they're very similar the older model is a little lighter and more tossable. This is one of the reasons why I'm not totally sold on the Evo X. I'm affraid it's going to be a dumbed down version of what the Evo should be. It's already happened with the WRX, we'll see with the Evo X. If Mitsubishi manages to screw it up I'll be keeping my Evo and buying a daily driver BMW 135i in a couple years.
#209
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly what I was talking about with my wife over dinner. Great minds think a like I guess.
If the X ends up becoming a watered down pig then of course another option is the forthcoming STI. Supposedly it's going to be lighter than the current STI and will inevitably have some tweaks to the power and handling (and hopefully steering feel) so it could be a viable option...assuming of course that a hatchback doesn't turn your stomach.
#210
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
I'm not going to act like I know a whole lot about the history of WRX/STIs, but was that comment directed at the upcoming hatchback model or the most recent model out? or even before that? Any one specific reason you'd say it's dumbed down? I dislike the hatchback, but not sure if that's the reason you say that. Just interested in what you think the change was that shouldnt have been made
#211
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1
Exactly what I was talking about with my wife over dinner. Great minds think a like I guess.
If the X ends up becoming a watered down pig then of course another option is the forthcoming STI. Supposedly it's going to be lighter than the current STI and will inevitably have some tweaks to the power and handling (and hopefully steering feel) so it could be a viable option...assuming of course that a hatchback doesn't turn your stomach.
Exactly what I was talking about with my wife over dinner. Great minds think a like I guess.
If the X ends up becoming a watered down pig then of course another option is the forthcoming STI. Supposedly it's going to be lighter than the current STI and will inevitably have some tweaks to the power and handling (and hopefully steering feel) so it could be a viable option...assuming of course that a hatchback doesn't turn your stomach.
#212
Registered
It will likely be dumbed down with lots of assists. FWIW, in that same SCC issue, they clocked the masked Evo X doing laps at Willow Springs notably faster than the late Evo IX MR. No numbers were quoted however.
#213
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not going to act like I know a whole lot about the history of WRX/STIs, but was that comment directed at the upcoming hatchback model or the most recent model out? or even before that? Any one specific reason you'd say it's dumbed down? I dislike the hatchback, but not sure if that's the reason you say that. Just interested in what you think the change was that shouldnt have been made
#214
Blue By You
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Evo already has lots of assists, but they're not the least bit intrusive.
#215
i pwn therefore i am
I don't get where they're going with the Evo X anymore. Much to the dismay of many current Evo owners it appeared as though they were going towards a more electronically assisted, more user-friendly, potentially more bulky design. But with every rendition it looks more and more like a base Lancer. The fender flares are gone, the interior looks 90% like a Lancer with gaping holes in the dash, and vents that look like they're from a 1984 Ford Bronco. They took away the sharp, aggressive lines and added in tacky boy-racer looking features.
Seems to me there's a real danger that many people from the old Evo camp are going to dislike it because of it's lack of rawness and many people from the opposite end of the spectrum are still going to see a Lancer with a turbo in it.
Maybe I'll just buy an RX-8 and get a cheating turbo. The best of both worlds!
Seems to me there's a real danger that many people from the old Evo camp are going to dislike it because of it's lack of rawness and many people from the opposite end of the spectrum are still going to see a Lancer with a turbo in it.
Maybe I'll just buy an RX-8 and get a cheating turbo. The best of both worlds!
#216
Registered
Personally, I'm not against assists, but many seem to associate assists with "nannying" and consequently, "dumbing" down. I don't blame them. I sometimes really want to be able to practically accommodate a very basic and balanced sports car, like a 60s Lotus Elan coupe and really feel the rawness.
Assist technology still has lots of potential for improvement, so I'm all for it.
#218
i pwn therefore i am
#221
i pwn therefore i am
#223
i pwn therefore i am
And BTW, I don't want you banned for saying something is ugly. I want you banned because you've gone around trolling the entire time you've been here.
#224
Registered