McLaren Mercedes F1 - VS - Street Cars
04-14-2005, 02:25 PM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B.A.R Honda F1 vs Honda race bike vs Honda race boat, which one is faster in a drag race you ask? Watch and find out: http://player.narrowstep.tv/nsp.aspx?player=F1R&void=1562',%20752,%20522#
Last edited by Hanzo; 04-14-2005 at 02:28 PM.
04-14-2005, 07:22 PM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boulder/Denver, Colorado
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice thanks Hanzo.... I can't get enough of these F1 vids.
Tell you the truth I thought the Bike was gonna take it... What do you think those bikes run in the quarter? Low 10's would be my guess.... so that prob puts the F1 in at least the low 10's???? Just throwing crap out cause I have no idea so tell me how fast they really are!!
Tell you the truth I thought the Bike was gonna take it... What do you think those bikes run in the quarter? Low 10's would be my guess.... so that prob puts the F1 in at least the low 10's???? Just throwing crap out cause I have no idea so tell me how fast they really are!!
04-15-2005, 07:00 AM
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PetersonPeleRx8
Nice thanks Hanzo.... I can't get enough of these F1 vids.
Tell you the truth I thought the Bike was gonna take it... What do you think those bikes run in the quarter? Low 10's would be my guess.... so that prob puts the F1 in at least the low 10's???? Just throwing crap out cause I have no idea so tell me how fast they really are!!
Tell you the truth I thought the Bike was gonna take it... What do you think those bikes run in the quarter? Low 10's would be my guess.... so that prob puts the F1 in at least the low 10's???? Just throwing crap out cause I have no idea so tell me how fast they really are!!
04-15-2005, 07:14 AM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are some interesting videos about F1 cars:
http://www.sportnetwork.net/main/s107/st45216.htm
Some cool video clips: http://f1plus.net/video
http://www.sportnetwork.net/main/s107/st45216.htm
Some cool video clips: http://f1plus.net/video
04-17-2005, 05:51 AM
#34
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PetersonPeleRx8
The latest edition of EVO mag has both the F40 and F50 with 0-60mph times of 3.7 seconds. I seriously doubt either of these cars can turn in a 4 second 0-100 time. Especially considering the Enzo has a 0-60 of 3.4 seconds and a 0-100 of 6.7
Hey Ike is there any way you could send me that video of the F50 racing? And what the crap is wrong with posting a video of one of the sweetest cars ever cruising around? that's LAME imo.
Hey Ike is there any way you could send me that video of the F50 racing? And what the crap is wrong with posting a video of one of the sweetest cars ever cruising around? that's LAME imo.
Here's that video, there's really no racing involved just speeding around and it's in europe so I hope I don't get yelled at
Click here to see Video
Last edited by IkeWRX; 04-17-2005 at 06:05 AM.
04-17-2005, 11:19 AM
#36
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boulder/Denver, Colorado
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ya hanzo I would think that with someone else, but Ike wouldn't make that mistake, at least I don't think 
And the EVO mag I got those #'s out of specifies mph. So, if that's true Ike that is mighty impressive!!! And if Ike was confusing them, and they claimed a 0-100kph of 4.8, that's way too slow for the F50 since that would be the 0-60 mph number. Thanks for that vid man, awesome. At the end when the F50 takes off on the right side of the tunnel it sounds sooo good.
And the EVO mag I got those #'s out of specifies mph. So, if that's true Ike that is mighty impressive!!! And if Ike was confusing them, and they claimed a 0-100kph of 4.8, that's way too slow for the F50 since that would be the 0-60 mph number. Thanks for that vid man, awesome. At the end when the F50 takes off on the right side of the tunnel it sounds sooo good.
04-17-2005, 11:45 AM
#37
Lawyer in training :)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ha, that's a neat Honda video (and interesting comparison at that). Not sure, though, why the boat guy thought he would come from behind, considering the F1 does 3x his speed and they're completely on a straightaway :D
04-17-2005, 11:47 AM
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boulder/Denver, Colorado
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha I thought the same thing Mark, the only chance he had (the boat) was to carry enough speed since he was on a roll to begin with. But "coming from behind" was not the way to put that.
04-17-2005, 04:14 PM
#39
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PetersonPeleRx8
Ya hanzo I would think that with someone else, but Ike wouldn't make that mistake, at least I don't think
And the EVO mag I got those #'s out of specifies mph. So, if that's true Ike that is mighty impressive!!! And if Ike was confusing them, and they claimed a 0-100kph of 4.8, that's way too slow for the F50 since that would be the 0-60 mph number. Thanks for that vid man, awesome. At the end when the F50 takes off on the right side of the tunnel it sounds sooo good.
And the EVO mag I got those #'s out of specifies mph. So, if that's true Ike that is mighty impressive!!! And if Ike was confusing them, and they claimed a 0-100kph of 4.8, that's way too slow for the F50 since that would be the 0-60 mph number. Thanks for that vid man, awesome. At the end when the F50 takes off on the right side of the tunnel it sounds sooo good.
F1 car was 0-60 in 3 seconds and 3.4 0-100 topspeed 206. The F50 was 0-60 3.7 and 0-100 in 4.8, topspeed 202, and yes those are MPH. I don't know if they made a mistake but when taking the two around a track together they claimed that up to 160mph the F50 kept up remarkably well.
04-21-2005, 12:53 PM
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
These are the exact numbers Topgear listed...
F1 car was 0-60 in 3 seconds and 3.4 0-100 topspeed 206. The F50 was 0-60 3.7 and 0-100 in 4.8, topspeed 202, and yes those are MPH. I don't know if they made a mistake but when taking the two around a track together they claimed that up to 160mph the F50 kept up remarkably well.
F1 car was 0-60 in 3 seconds and 3.4 0-100 topspeed 206. The F50 was 0-60 3.7 and 0-100 in 4.8, topspeed 202, and yes those are MPH. I don't know if they made a mistake but when taking the two around a track together they claimed that up to 160mph the F50 kept up remarkably well.
0-60 in 3 seconds sounds more like a F3000 (one step lower than F1).
From what TopGear said the Enzo F60 is the fastest they've ever tested around the track: http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/powerlaps/ Which is no match with the F1 car on semi wet condition (F60: 1.19.0) (Renault F1 RB25: 59.0)
Here is the Top Gear video with the F1: http://www.blingblingvids.com/f1.avi Here is the codec so you can watch if you don't already have it: http://www.xvidmovies.com/codec/
Last edited by Hanzo; 04-21-2005 at 01:02 PM.
04-21-2005, 01:50 PM
#42
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hanzo
If they are comparing F50 it's probably compared to an older F1 car. The 0-62mph in 2.5 is from 2 years ago, Williams FW25 F1 car: http://www.sportnetwork.net/main/s107/st36352.php
0-60 in 3 seconds sounds more like a F3000 (one step lower than F1).
From what TopGear said the Enzo F60 is the fastest they've ever tested around the track: http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/powerlaps/ Which is no match with the F1 car on semi wet condition (F60: 1.19.0) (Renault F1 RB25: 59.0)
Here is the Top Gear video with the F1: http://www.blingblingvids.com/f1.avi Here is the codec so you can watch if you don't already have it: http://www.xvidmovies.com/codec/
0-60 in 3 seconds sounds more like a F3000 (one step lower than F1).
From what TopGear said the Enzo F60 is the fastest they've ever tested around the track: http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/powerlaps/ Which is no match with the F1 car on semi wet condition (F60: 1.19.0) (Renault F1 RB25: 59.0)
Here is the Top Gear video with the F1: http://www.blingblingvids.com/f1.avi Here is the codec so you can watch if you don't already have it: http://www.xvidmovies.com/codec/
04-21-2005, 02:08 PM
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
It was an F1 car that was a few years older than the F50 that Prost won the championship with.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tigg.z
New Member Forum
0
08-26-2015 09:51 PM
