Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Mazda RX-VISION Concepts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-16-2015, 07:52 AM
  #601  
Rockie Mountain Newbie
 
Bladecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,601
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by ASH8
Not Australia, USA, SA-G owners are complaining they are using engine oil to dealers.
Dealers are instructed to do a oil level test and see if consumption is above 'normal' and re- check and get customer back after 1200 miles to confirm.
I hate to ask, but receiving a complaint from the consumer about oil consumption, performing an oil consumption test, and actually proving that the SkyActiv-G engines are actually using an excessive amount of engine oil in a 1200 mile period are three entirely different things.

I have to ask:

Of all the cars in the US that have had the oil consumption test performed on them, how many (percentage wise) have actually required an engine repair afterwards? And which engine is it that's having the most issues? The 2.0 or the 2.5?

Like I said, my CX-5 has the 2.5, I drive it 80% highway (75 mph and above here in Colorado) at high altitude (5k feet and above), and in my 5k mile oil changes (almost always Pennzoil 0W-20), I never get to the low mark on the dipstick, not even to the 1/4 low mark.

I also hate to point out the obvious - The average American automotive consumer is dumber than a bag of rocks.

BC.
Old 11-16-2015, 08:43 AM
  #602  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 109 Posts
For some humor: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...%20consumption


No car is immune to oil consumption complaints.
Old 11-16-2015, 10:42 AM
  #603  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Bladecutter
I hate to ask, but receiving a complaint from the consumer about oil consumption, performing an oil consumption test, and actually proving that the SkyActiv-G engines are actually using an excessive amount of engine oil in a 1200 mile period are three entirely different things.

I have to ask:

Of all the cars in the US that have had the oil consumption test performed on them, how many (percentage wise) have actually required an engine repair afterwards? And which engine is it that's having the most issues? The 2.0 or the 2.5?

Like I said, my CX-5 has the 2.5, I drive it 80% highway (75 mph and above here in Colorado) at high altitude (5k feet and above), and in my 5k mile oil changes (almost always Pennzoil 0W-20), I never get to the low mark on the dipstick, not even to the 1/4 low mark.

I also hate to point out the obvious - The average American automotive consumer is dumber than a bag of rocks.

BC.
I go 5,000 miles before change of Mobil 1 0w20 Full Syn in my Mazda CX-5 with the 2.0 Sky-G. Granted i drive relatively aggressively, my dip stick never indicates below 4/5 even right before its due for oil change.

The VQ35 in the Infiniti I traded in drank more engine oil than both the RX-8 and CX-5 combined per mile.

I also hate to say it, but most of the forum members are idiots on Mazda247.com posting about their CX-5. There was a thread asking "When did CX-5 change to a CVT?" The CX-5 never had a CVT probably never will. Most of the members blame the car for user errors.

Last edited by SayNoToPistons; 11-16-2015 at 10:46 AM.
Old 11-16-2015, 11:31 AM
  #604  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 109 Posts
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
Most of the members blame the car for user errors.
Consumers of manufactured products. Full stop.
Old 11-16-2015, 07:58 PM
  #605  
Registered
 
refugeefrompistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 452
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda's New Turbo Rotary Engine Reportedly Coming In 2017

Originally Posted by carscoops.com
If there's a future Mazda RX-7, it will add the 16X code-named unit under its hood. The new engine is expected to develop well over 400hp and chances are it will power the rear wheels through a gearbox integrated into the rear axle to improve weight distribution.
Huh, looks like its going to be upmarket.
Old 11-16-2015, 08:25 PM
  #606  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Originally Posted by refugeefrompistons
Mazda's New Turbo Rotary Engine Reportedly Coming In 2017



Huh, looks like its going to be upmarket.
Mine's better:

According to a report from Motoring, the production rotary engine will make its debut in 2017 when Mazda celebrates the rotary’s 50th anniversary year. But rather than using the 1.3-liter 13B Renesis rotary from the RX-7, the new production RX model will feature a larger, twin-rotor 1.6-liter 16X engine boasting a twin-800cc rotor setup that will generate at least 450 horsepower. It is also believed that the Japanese automaker is working on a two-stage turbo system that takes advantage of electric turbocharging to provide high performance in the lower rpm band before the exhaust-driven turbo takes over at higher revs.

As a result, the new Skyactiv-R rotary engine should spin beyond 8,000 rpm and be more fuel efficient than Mazda’s previous rotary engine.
It also goes on to say:

As for the sports car itself, expect the RX-9 to have a dual-clutch transmission that will be integrated into the rear axle to improve weight distribution. More importantly, as is evident with the new Mazda MX-5 Miata, the production RX model is looking to use lightweight components to bring its weight to around 3,100 pounds. If it all comes to fruition, the next-generation Mazda RX sports car would be competitive with even Porsche 911 models, but for now, these are just rumors.

Last edited by ShellDude; 11-16-2015 at 08:44 PM.
Old 11-17-2015, 04:48 AM
  #607  
Registered
 
Drumm09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DAMMIT Mazda........ I want a MANUAL
Old 11-17-2015, 07:16 AM
  #608  
Registered
 
Drumm09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It all sounds exciting and Expensive. I am really hoping they keep their next Rotary car in the mid to late 30's range.
Old 11-17-2015, 07:25 AM
  #609  
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
 
200.mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: BALLS DEEP
Posts: 5,639
Received 2,363 Likes on 1,992 Posts
if they are going after 911s it will be way to pricey like the fd. i wont give a **** what it cost if theres no clutch pedal tho. no stick no sale
Old 11-17-2015, 08:17 AM
  #610  
Registered
 
Drumm09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somehow I have "Hope" that although pricey, it won't be THAT Pricey. Not 911 pricey. Common now.. Mazda would be shooting themselves in the foot with that decision. The reason the last rx-7 didn't sell as well is because they positioned themselves next to the 911 and we all know how that worked out.

All this technology sounds exciting and expensive, perhaps they could price it closer to, say, Mustang GT or Infiniti G37. Maaaaybe Audi TT even. But 911? The allmighty porsche 911? That would been insane. Even Cayman prices would be silly for them to do.

I guess we'll sit tight and patiently wait till 2017. But i agree that No clutch would mean No sale. For me and many other Rotary fans.
Old 11-17-2015, 08:45 AM
  #611  
1% evil, 99% hot gas.
iTrader: (21)
 
wankelbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Forest Hill, MD
Posts: 1,107
Received 129 Likes on 94 Posts
How to identify bullshit:
Motoring claims...


Also, how do you "improve" a perfect 50/50 weight balance?

And what is that "‘instability’ at low rpm" horseshit? My rotary is smooth as butter from idle to 9000 RPM.

.

Last edited by wankelbolt; 11-17-2015 at 08:49 AM.
Old 11-17-2015, 08:48 AM
  #612  
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
 
200.mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: BALLS DEEP
Posts: 5,639
Received 2,363 Likes on 1,992 Posts
Originally Posted by wankelbolt
How to identify bullshit:


Also, how do you "improve" a perfect 50/50 weight balance?

.
easy you put the obese normal american driver in the middle of the car. we know its been done before lol
Old 11-17-2015, 05:54 PM
  #613  
What am I doing here?
 
NotAPreppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes on 510 Posts
I dunno... A DCT just doesn't seem in keeping with Mazda's philosophies
Old 11-17-2015, 06:31 PM
  #614  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes on 109 Posts
Motoring has no idea what Mazda's philosophies are either, so they will keep spewing hypothetical ideas spawned from ************ using magazine articles as lube.

And for some reason, people will keep believing them as "fact", when the only "fact" they have ever had proven right was on sheer accident (after Mazda made press releases that they didn't embelish too much).

Please stop giving their article any belief in validity. It's 100% garbage.
Old 11-17-2015, 06:55 PM
  #615  
///// Upscale Zoom-Zoom
 
wannawankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,570
Received 179 Likes on 156 Posts
Originally Posted by Drumm09
Somehow I have "Hope" that although pricey, it won't be THAT Pricey. Not 911 pricey. Common now.. Mazda would be shooting themselves in the foot with that decision. The reason the last rx-7 didn't sell as well is because they positioned themselves next to the 911 and we all know how that worked out.

All this technology sounds exciting and expensive, perhaps they could price it closer to, say, Mustang GT or Infiniti G37. Maaaaybe Audi TT even. But 911? The allmighty porsche 911? That would been insane. Even Cayman prices would be silly for them to do.

I guess we'll sit tight and patiently wait till 2017. But i agree that No clutch would mean No sale. For me and many other Rotary fans.
I agree - I could have bought that RX-7 in 1993 but I would have been car-poor (but happy). But it was well out of my proce range. My substitute, a Integra-GSR that I had for a very long time and enjoyed every mile.
Old 11-19-2015, 07:10 AM
  #616  
Proud lurker since 2005
 
Kabura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Trois-Rivieres, Canada
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheels Magazine has a feature on the RX-Vision (it even makes the cover) for its December 2015 edition:


Old 11-19-2015, 12:09 PM
  #617  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
The fact that they photoshopped an "RX-7" tag on it already made them lose all credibility.
Old 11-19-2015, 01:16 PM
  #618  
Registered
 
djgiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
I do recall reading in several places Mazda was working on an electric Turbo system, so maybe there is a bit of truth to the 2 stage electric turbo part. And with their iLoop system, they should have the power to spin the turbo at low rpms before the exhaust takes over to help with turbo lag while keeping top end HP.
Old 11-20-2015, 06:28 AM
  #619  
40th anniversary Edition
 
gwilliams6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grapevine, Texas
Posts: 2,926
Received 133 Likes on 114 Posts
Mazda officials have already hinted at the Tokyo Auto show that it will be a RX7 and not a RX9, so that tag is reasonable.
Old 11-20-2015, 12:06 PM
  #620  
Registered
 
djgiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Of course after reading about the new CX's exhaust/turbo setup, maybe they will use a similar type of system to spool up a larger turbo faster . . .
Old 11-21-2015, 01:19 AM
  #621  
Registered
 
Dokuji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's just a gorgeous car. I hope they don't stray too far from this design for production.
Old 11-30-2015, 03:07 PM
  #622  
Registered
 
WranglerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just throwing into this thread to be notified when someone posts that specs on the engine have been leaked lol
Old 12-01-2015, 01:34 AM
  #623  
Registered
 
soundawake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 56
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dokuji
It's just a gorgeous car. I hope they don't stray too far from this design for production.
I agree. The odd forum comment (on mostly other forums I frequent) that the car is ugly, or even hideous, just baffles me. I honestly don't think that Mazda could have done better.
Old 12-01-2015, 10:57 AM
  #624  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Looks are subjective, a lot of people think the RX-8 is an ugly car (which I love obviously) and a lot of people think the FRS/BRZ is a beautiful car and I think it's lame looking.

That said, I don't think the RX-Vision is ugly but I don't think the overall look is amazing either, it looks very concept car, a look we have seen many times.
Old 12-01-2015, 05:55 PM
  #625  
Registered
 
soundawake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 56
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda's Confusing Plan to Resurrect the Famously Dirty Rotary Engine | WIRED


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Mazda RX-VISION Concepts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.