Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

General Motors May Fail This Month Without Aid, UAW Chief Says

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-11-2008, 03:22 PM
  #76  
ಠ_ಠ
 
Socket7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Under the Dumbarton Bridge
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MTLbroker
Once again, it's akin to hiring a management consultant to tell you how to run your business.

If you ask me, the solution IS deceptively simple. Make cars that people would want to buy.

In a recent NY Times op-ed piece, someone suggested that Steven Jobs should run GM for awhile as a national service. He'd make a car that people would want to buy. I thought to myself, "Geez, that's bloody insightful - imagine, an iCar!"
And what do you do with their current debts? How do you get rid of the cars they've already made and can't sell, which is holding all of their capitol hostage because they built those cars on credit. Development of a car people would want to buy would take them YEARS, incur millions of dollars of development costs, then further costs to build market and sell the thing, and even then they risk it being a flop. You think that is a viable course of action for GM when they can't pay their operating expenses for a month?

Building a car people want is the way to build a car that sells well. It is not the way to get GM and Chrysler to be profitable companies. There's a difference.

Mullaly is actually the only guy in the big three that doesn't have his head so far up his *** as to require surgery to remove it. He turned Ford from a company that would have failed just like GM and Chrysler into something that can survive the recession. Why do you think that Ford has said repeatedly "we don't really need a bailout, but hey, if the other guys are getting a line of credit, we could put a line of government credit to good use."

Last edited by Socket7; 12-11-2008 at 03:29 PM.
Old 12-11-2008, 03:57 PM
  #77  
Registered
 
limepro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Socket7
You seem to be lacking in knowledge of how government works.

The bailout was approved by the house, and the president approves of the bill.

The senate has not approved the bill, and (real, not neo) conservative republicans are having NONE of it, for the reasons I've stated above. One senator has promised to filibuster the bill, and I think hes a hero. He has support from other republicans too, and the public.

Now, lets address my job, since you bring it up, even though you don't know who i work for or what I do. My company has a huge cash reserve, meaning we can actually pay our own operating expenses. We have no debt, and we command major market share in just about every market we produce products for. We do OEM work for many major manufactures, and we are a global company that does sales in pretty much every continent in the world. Our supply chain is short and efficient, and we only produce enough product to satisfy demand. We have very little capitol locked up in unsold inventory, and last quarter we still saw growth in our company.

That said, we are letting people go. I watch the termination messages in my inbox pop up every couple of days. Sales, marketing, finance, IT, there are cuts everywhere. We aren't buying new hardware like we used to. The future is going to be difficult, but since we have competent management, our company is in no risk of going under. We make products people actually want at affordable prices. Personally, I'm not worried about headcount cuts in my department. Back when our company had 300 employees, we had 3 people supporting them all and we were understaffed. We now have something like 900 employees, we have 4 people. The company I work for is pretty much the antithesis of GM and Chrysler.



A Bailout cannot save GM or Chrysler. The companies are not viable in any sense of the word. They WILL go under regardless of the bailout, and if we're going to have to pay for the unemployment costs of all those people, I'd rather not have thrown 10 billion dollars down the toilet before doing so.

so yes. We should cheer GM and Chrysler going into chapter 11. It's the only way they can become viable again and compete in the market.

Furthermore, Do you realize that if they do go into chapter 11, not everyone gets laid off? Many companies continue to operate while in chapter 11, continue to make products and pay employees.
by my blanket statement i didnt mean you personally but the country as a whole, we are already seeing layoffs as you have stated you have seen people go in your company that has seen growth. It is only projected to get worse and more people losing their jobs. I do want GM to lose the union the only way for that is bankruptcy but at the same time i do not wish them to go bankrupt and millions lose their jobs while they are restructuring.

you also mention them making a product people want after they restructure but in the history of this country how many have you seen bounce back after a chapter 11? i personally cannot think of one although i may be wrong i am sure it is not common.
Old 12-11-2008, 04:07 PM
  #78  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Survival of the fittest. It'll surely throw us into our worst depression ever, ripple out to 10s of thousands of people that support the industry, but hopefully what emerges as a result will be better for us all.
Old 12-11-2008, 10:02 PM
  #79  
Registered
 
limepro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081212/...congress_autos

they are going down, its sad but needed the UAW screwed them over. it would have passed if the UAW had accepted pay cuts for their members instead of being over paid douche canoes.
Old 12-11-2008, 10:14 PM
  #80  
The Slow and the Serious
 
kvndoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by limepro
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081212/...congress_autos

they are going down, its sad but needed the UAW screwed them over. it would have passed if the UAW had accepted pay cuts for their members instead of being over paid douche canoes.
Amazing, isn't it? They'd rather risk losing everything, than give up anything.
Old 12-11-2008, 10:25 PM
  #81  
INDY RX8 CLUB - Officer
 
max5roadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashville,IN
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
******* UAW... Proving once again they have no interest in preserving the company or the livelyhood of the workers they supposedly represent. They'd rather make a political/idealogical statement than assist in efforts to fix a problem.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyl3r
New Member Forum
148
12-02-2019 04:51 PM
UHATEIT
Series I Trouble Shooting
11
03-31-2019 05:31 PM
drebbrnator
Series I Trouble Shooting
11
12-27-2018 07:02 PM
Rotary_Love
New Member Forum
0
08-02-2015 01:34 PM
Obivious
New Member Forum
0
07-29-2015 05:57 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: General Motors May Fail This Month Without Aid, UAW Chief Says



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.