Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2010 Mustang unveiled...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-18-2008, 08:55 PM
  #51  
Registered
 
dynamho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwood, NJ
Posts: 1,963
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
However like i said in my last post- that black on the bottom kills it.
I agree that the black on the bottom is not the best treatment, but I think the stylist added that to suppress the boorish thickness and to prevent the car from looking too tall like the current version.

It's a drastic solution for sure. I'd have opted for a darker tone of the body color to achieve a similar effect but I guess that would be an expensive solution.
Old 11-18-2008, 11:54 PM
  #52  
the bukkake master!
 
snipaz2420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
don't know if this link was posted yet

http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-...ang-ab-la2008/
Old 11-19-2008, 12:01 AM
  #53  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wow it looks almost the exact same as the other years... still a POS
Old 11-19-2008, 12:02 AM
  #54  
TNC
iTrader: (1)
 
HockeyRX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Shaolin, NY
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still don't like it
Old 11-19-2008, 12:02 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its ok!!!!
Old 11-19-2008, 07:25 AM
  #56  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watching the special on Speed channel, I found it interesting when the performance engineer came up on the stage. He said they worked to improve both performance and vehicle dynamics and he went on talking about the horsepower. Then he began mentioning "we've worked hard to give the fans what they've been asking for" and I thought surely they must be clamoring for lighter weight and better handling. Nope, power mods. Though, to be fair, I think he mentioned a FRT (giggle) suspension setup as an aside right before he left the stage.
Old 11-19-2008, 08:15 AM
  #57  
IRC Founder
 
risky business's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks slightly better then the one that out currently out.... but that isn't saying much
Old 11-19-2008, 08:19 AM
  #58  
Banned
 
Potentiated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've always hated every Mustang that's come out but this one is much better than the previous one. The rear is cleaned up and tucked in. Taillights look much better, much more aggressive. Front end more aggressive. Interior is surprisingly nice looking now. Everything that's changed is better, which equates to a good redesign.
Old 11-19-2008, 09:59 AM
  #59  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by dynamho
I agree that the black on the bottom is not the best treatment, but I think the stylist added that to suppress the boorish thickness and to prevent the car from looking too tall like the current version.

It's a drastic solution for sure. I'd have opted for a darker tone of the body color to achieve a similar effect but I guess that would be an expensive solution.
yeah thats what i find wrong in general the height of the side of the car from sill to top of door. I know that safety regs nearly require this high shoulder line but it makes the car look dis-proportionate

look at the 2 side views of the new one and a 60s version posted earlier





the older ones green house vs body side height is much more balanced than the newer ones.

there must be a way to design around this
Old 11-19-2008, 10:00 AM
  #60  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
maybe they should make a notchback version instead of the fastback give the green house a little more height and improve the rear seat head room




wish i still had mine- i loved that color
Old 11-19-2008, 10:05 AM
  #61  
Registered
 
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks better especially the interior but seriously fails against the Camaro. 300-400lbs lighter than the Camaro but over 100hp less and of course it still has a LRA.
Old 11-19-2008, 10:11 AM
  #62  
Boosted!!!
 
alienRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Puerto Rïco
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Id still take a camaro over this any day
Old 11-19-2008, 11:26 AM
  #63  
Void Where Prohibited
Thread Starter
 
JRichter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
yeah thats what i find wrong in general the height of the side of the car from sill to top of door. I know that safety regs nearly require this high shoulder line but it makes the car look dis-proportionate

look at the 2 side views of the new one and a 60s version posted earlier

the older ones green house vs body side height is much more balanced than the newer ones.

there must be a way to design around this
Agreed, it's like a brick w/ a hump in the middle.
Old 11-19-2008, 08:22 PM
  #64  
Void Where Prohibited
Thread Starter
 
JRichter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Old 11-19-2008, 08:48 PM
  #65  
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
G3tR3DDY2GR3DDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you know its full of fail when the racecar version still looks like *******.
Old 11-19-2008, 11:21 PM
  #66  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Brian Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
still ugly... the plastic rocker panels make the side panels look less bulky but they look really cheap. I can't really imagine a muscle car with black plastic trim, wheres the chrome?
Old 11-20-2008, 12:54 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
nmarz77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Kind of like the back and front of the 8???
Old 11-20-2008, 08:03 PM
  #68  
'03 Dodge Viper
 
SlayerRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Only 315 hp? Fail.
Old 11-21-2008, 01:09 AM
  #69  
Tea?
iTrader: (1)
 
yokohamaboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: shit hole south TX
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
looking at a side view it looks like a wannabe ***-less GTR, from the back it looks like a wannabe ghey version of a challenger.
Old 11-21-2008, 08:41 AM
  #70  
Void Where Prohibited
Thread Starter
 
JRichter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ Altogether it looks like a wannabe 60's muscle car. How about something new and fresh.
Old 11-22-2008, 08:03 PM
  #71  
Registered User
 
MotoGeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheels are fugly, and I can't understand why any of the american manufacturers have to make cars that are sooooo freaking big, heavy, unaerodynamic, and under-focused on quality suspension and handling characteristics. The retro look, feel, and size of american vehicles in general speaks volumes for why the big three are in danger of going under - while other manufacturers offer smaller, lighterweight, more fuel efficient (except for our RX8's) and aerodynamic vehicles with great reliability in a time of rising gas and oil prices and economic downturn the americans keep making bricks!

What a shame, because I'd rather buy american if the choice were easier - and a nice american V8 is an awesome sound.
Old 11-23-2008, 02:30 AM
  #72  
The Slow and the Serious
 
kvndoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MotoGeno
Wheels are fugly, and I can't understand why any of the american manufacturers have to make cars that are sooooo freaking big, heavy, unaerodynamic, and under-focused on quality suspension and handling characteristics. The retro look, feel, and size of american vehicles in general speaks volumes for why the big three are in danger of going under - while other manufacturers offer smaller, lighterweight, more fuel efficient (except for our RX8's) and aerodynamic vehicles with great reliability in a time of rising gas and oil prices and economic downturn the americans keep making bricks!

What a shame, because I'd rather buy american if the choice were easier - and a nice american V8 is an awesome sound.
Grog want big car! Grog want MORE POWER! It's an American tradition, and one that's not gonna change anytime soon. Most of our population thinks it's our god-given right to have nearly-free gas, and that it's going to last forever and be cheap forever. Our buying habits reflect that. Even after suffering through 4$ gas all summer, truck and SUV sales went back up as soon as gas prices dropped. It's as if nobody remembered how bad it was just a few freaking months ago. Detroit is just catering to what Joe Public has shown time and again he will buy.

No matter how much criticism is thrown upon the new Pony Car, Ford knows that Grog will see it, say "New Mustang! Grog LIKE!" and they'll still sell a bazillion of them.

Originally Posted by G3tR3DDY2GR3DDY
you know its full of fail when the racecar version still looks like *******.
I should Falken Punch you for speaking such blasphemy.
Old 11-23-2008, 08:26 AM
  #73  
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
PotatoSoup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlayerRX8
Only 315 hp? Fail.
The '10 GT is basically the same mechanically as the '08-'09 Bullitt.

Which means it should do 0-60 in 5.0 seconds. For $30K, I hardly call that fail.
Old 11-24-2008, 01:00 AM
  #74  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Brian Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i saw that car this weekend at the la auto show... not impressive at all. typical mustang but the plastic bits make the current gen look cheap. the interior is poor and the suspension is still prehistoric. the rear tails look disgusting in person btw.
Old 11-24-2008, 01:02 AM
  #75  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Brian Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nmarz77
Kind of like the back and front of the 8???
no, the plastic bits on the 04-08 rx8 don't look like they were thrown onto an existing bumper as garnish. the mustang basically refreshed the current model by adding black bits of plastic to shorten the height of the car, a trend that a lot of auto makers are moving towards.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2010 Mustang unveiled...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.