Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2010 Mustang unveiled...

Old Nov 18, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #51  
dynamho's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 7
From: Norwood, NJ
Originally Posted by zoom44
However like i said in my last post- that black on the bottom kills it.
I agree that the black on the bottom is not the best treatment, but I think the stylist added that to suppress the boorish thickness and to prevent the car from looking too tall like the current version.

It's a drastic solution for sure. I'd have opted for a darker tone of the body color to achieve a similar effect but I guess that would be an expensive solution.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #52  
snipaz2420's Avatar
the bukkake master!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 1
From: Staten Island, NY
don't know if this link was posted yet

http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-...ang-ab-la2008/
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #53  
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 1
From: Bend, OR
Wow it looks almost the exact same as the other years... still a POS
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #54  
HockeyRX-8's Avatar
TNC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
From: Shaolin, NY
I still don't like it
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #55  
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
From: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
its ok!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 07:25 AM
  #56  
Rhawb's Avatar
Has the whole shit.
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Watching the special on Speed channel, I found it interesting when the performance engineer came up on the stage. He said they worked to improve both performance and vehicle dynamics and he went on talking about the horsepower. Then he began mentioning "we've worked hard to give the fans what they've been asking for" and I thought surely they must be clamoring for lighter weight and better handling. Nope, power mods. Though, to be fair, I think he mentioned a FRT (giggle) suspension setup as an aside right before he left the stage.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 08:15 AM
  #57  
risky business's Avatar
IRC Founder
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville Beach, FL
looks slightly better then the one that out currently out.... but that isn't saying much
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 08:19 AM
  #58  
Potentiated's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
I've always hated every Mustang that's come out but this one is much better than the previous one. The rear is cleaned up and tucked in. Taillights look much better, much more aggressive. Front end more aggressive. Interior is surprisingly nice looking now. Everything that's changed is better, which equates to a good redesign.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #59  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by dynamho
I agree that the black on the bottom is not the best treatment, but I think the stylist added that to suppress the boorish thickness and to prevent the car from looking too tall like the current version.

It's a drastic solution for sure. I'd have opted for a darker tone of the body color to achieve a similar effect but I guess that would be an expensive solution.
yeah thats what i find wrong in general the height of the side of the car from sill to top of door. I know that safety regs nearly require this high shoulder line but it makes the car look dis-proportionate

look at the 2 side views of the new one and a 60s version posted earlier





the older ones green house vs body side height is much more balanced than the newer ones.

there must be a way to design around this
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #60  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
maybe they should make a notchback version instead of the fastback give the green house a little more height and improve the rear seat head room




wish i still had mine- i loved that color
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 10:05 AM
  #61  
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Looks better especially the interior but seriously fails against the Camaro. 300-400lbs lighter than the Camaro but over 100hp less and of course it still has a LRA.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #62  
alienRX8's Avatar
Boosted!!!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rïco
Id still take a camaro over this any day
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #63  
JRichter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Void Where Prohibited
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
From: Mineola, TX
Originally Posted by zoom44
yeah thats what i find wrong in general the height of the side of the car from sill to top of door. I know that safety regs nearly require this high shoulder line but it makes the car look dis-proportionate

look at the 2 side views of the new one and a 60s version posted earlier

the older ones green house vs body side height is much more balanced than the newer ones.

there must be a way to design around this
Agreed, it's like a brick w/ a hump in the middle.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 08:22 PM
  #64  
JRichter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Void Where Prohibited
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
From: Mineola, TX

Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #65  
G3tR3DDY2GR3DDY's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
you know its full of fail when the racecar version still looks like *******.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #66  
Brian Major's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
still ugly... the plastic rocker panels make the side panels look less bulky but they look really cheap. I can't really imagine a muscle car with black plastic trim, wheres the chrome?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #67  
nmarz77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 2
From: Schaumburg, IL
Kind of like the back and front of the 8???
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 08:03 PM
  #68  
SlayerRX8's Avatar
'03 Dodge Viper
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 842
Likes: 2
From: University of Maryland
Only 315 hp? Fail.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 01:09 AM
  #69  
yokohamaboi's Avatar
Tea?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 1
From: shit hole south TX
looking at a side view it looks like a wannabe ***-less GTR, from the back it looks like a wannabe ghey version of a challenger.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #70  
JRichter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Void Where Prohibited
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
From: Mineola, TX
^ Altogether it looks like a wannabe 60's muscle car. How about something new and fresh.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 08:03 PM
  #71  
MotoGeno's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Wheels are fugly, and I can't understand why any of the american manufacturers have to make cars that are sooooo freaking big, heavy, unaerodynamic, and under-focused on quality suspension and handling characteristics. The retro look, feel, and size of american vehicles in general speaks volumes for why the big three are in danger of going under - while other manufacturers offer smaller, lighterweight, more fuel efficient (except for our RX8's) and aerodynamic vehicles with great reliability in a time of rising gas and oil prices and economic downturn the americans keep making bricks!

What a shame, because I'd rather buy american if the choice were easier - and a nice american V8 is an awesome sound.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 02:30 AM
  #72  
kvndoom's Avatar
The Slow and the Serious
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Communistwealth of Virginia
Originally Posted by MotoGeno
Wheels are fugly, and I can't understand why any of the american manufacturers have to make cars that are sooooo freaking big, heavy, unaerodynamic, and under-focused on quality suspension and handling characteristics. The retro look, feel, and size of american vehicles in general speaks volumes for why the big three are in danger of going under - while other manufacturers offer smaller, lighterweight, more fuel efficient (except for our RX8's) and aerodynamic vehicles with great reliability in a time of rising gas and oil prices and economic downturn the americans keep making bricks!

What a shame, because I'd rather buy american if the choice were easier - and a nice american V8 is an awesome sound.
Grog want big car! Grog want MORE POWER! It's an American tradition, and one that's not gonna change anytime soon. Most of our population thinks it's our god-given right to have nearly-free gas, and that it's going to last forever and be cheap forever. Our buying habits reflect that. Even after suffering through 4$ gas all summer, truck and SUV sales went back up as soon as gas prices dropped. It's as if nobody remembered how bad it was just a few freaking months ago. Detroit is just catering to what Joe Public has shown time and again he will buy.

No matter how much criticism is thrown upon the new Pony Car, Ford knows that Grog will see it, say "New Mustang! Grog LIKE!" and they'll still sell a bazillion of them.

Originally Posted by G3tR3DDY2GR3DDY
you know its full of fail when the racecar version still looks like *******.
I should Falken Punch you for speaking such blasphemy.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #73  
PotatoSoup's Avatar
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by SlayerRX8
Only 315 hp? Fail.
The '10 GT is basically the same mechanically as the '08-'09 Bullitt.

Which means it should do 0-60 in 5.0 seconds. For $30K, I hardly call that fail.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 01:00 AM
  #74  
Brian Major's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
i saw that car this weekend at the la auto show... not impressive at all. typical mustang but the plastic bits make the current gen look cheap. the interior is poor and the suspension is still prehistoric. the rear tails look disgusting in person btw.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #75  
Brian Major's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by nmarz77
Kind of like the back and front of the 8???
no, the plastic bits on the 04-08 rx8 don't look like they were thrown onto an existing bumper as garnish. the mustang basically refreshed the current model by adding black bits of plastic to shorten the height of the car, a trend that a lot of auto makers are moving towards.
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 AM.