Highest Horsepower dynos for SC Turbo and nitrous - post them here
08-11-2009, 04:56 PM
#28
Eitherway, My engine is a renesis...ported or not...however, I will make sure and specify the extent of the modifications it has undergone to reach whatever level I reach in the next couple of weeks
.Chris
08-14-2009, 03:27 AM
#31
Work hard Drive Hard!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south texas
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
es lo que es, gracias! te vamos a ver el fin de septiembre si vas al puerto para el mazda festival. Que core el gua gua!!!! suay AKA Josue. esta gente no conosen lo que el renesis puede corer! Brettus respect the boricua!!!! people don't know that puerto ricans know best!
Last edited by suay; 08-14-2009 at 03:30 AM.
08-14-2009, 08:37 AM
#34
Hey Brettus,
I would almost rather you plot the 366whp run on your comparison chart. In the 414 the E-boost2 controller was dropping the boost to wastegate spring pressure(10-11psi) on the top end because of a parameter that was set up incorrectly. In the 366whp dyno the car held the boost fine(there was no boost controller) so it is more indicative of the power band with our kit.
Its just a suggestion...as much as its nice to have a 400whp chart up there when no one else has it, I would like people to see what the powerband should actually look like...not to mention that pretty soon I will have a dyno of the entire power band at higher numbers anyways and I will forward that to you asap.
Thanks.
Chris
I would almost rather you plot the 366whp run on your comparison chart. In the 414 the E-boost2 controller was dropping the boost to wastegate spring pressure(10-11psi) on the top end because of a parameter that was set up incorrectly. In the 366whp dyno the car held the boost fine(there was no boost controller
) so it is more indicative of the power band with our kit.Its just a suggestion...as much as its nice to have a 400whp chart up there when no one else has it, I would like people to see what the powerband should actually look like...not to mention that pretty soon I will have a dyno of the entire power band at higher numbers anyways and I will forward that to you asap.
Thanks.
Chris
08-14-2009, 03:14 PM
#36
Hey Brettus,
I would almost rather you plot the 366whp run on your comparison chart. In the 414 the E-boost2 controller was dropping the boost to wastegate spring pressure(10-11psi) on the top end because of a parameter that was set up incorrectly. In the 366whp dyno the car held the boost fine(there was no boost controller) so it is more indicative of the power band with our kit.
Its just a suggestion...as much as its nice to have a 400whp chart up there when no one else has it, I would like people to see what the powerband should actually look like...not to mention that pretty soon I will have a dyno of the entire power band at higher numbers anyways and I will forward that to you asap.
Thanks.
Chris
I would almost rather you plot the 366whp run on your comparison chart. In the 414 the E-boost2 controller was dropping the boost to wastegate spring pressure(10-11psi) on the top end because of a parameter that was set up incorrectly. In the 366whp dyno the car held the boost fine(there was no boost controller
) so it is more indicative of the power band with our kit.Its just a suggestion...as much as its nice to have a 400whp chart up there when no one else has it, I would like people to see what the powerband should actually look like...not to mention that pretty soon I will have a dyno of the entire power band at higher numbers anyways and I will forward that to you asap.
Thanks.
Chris
08-14-2009, 03:57 PM
#39
I divide by zero
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last edited by Mawnee; 08-14-2009 at 10:44 PM.
08-14-2009, 04:33 PM
#40
Look at the graph any RPM where HP is higher than another kit - that car would be accelerating FASTER than the one with the lower HP.
Compare the 3071 to the Esmeril and it can be clearly seen that the 3071 would pull down low and then the Esmeril would walk the 3071 past 5500 RPM's - no torque required.
08-14-2009, 04:53 PM
#41
Also : compare the SC dyno to either of the UG greddy or 3071 and you can see the 310ish whp turbos will out accelerate the 330whp SC
Last edited by Brettus; 08-14-2009 at 05:00 PM.
08-14-2009, 05:28 PM
#42
Exactly , and for that reason I don't think a torque chart is necessary . Aside from the fact that it is a whole lot more work to do and keep updated ....
Also : compare the SC dyno to either of the UG greddy or 3071 and you can see the 310ish whp turbos will out accelerate the 330whp SC
Also : compare the SC dyno to either of the UG greddy or 3071 and you can see the 310ish whp turbos will out accelerate the 330whp SC
08-14-2009, 05:32 PM
#43
Life begins @ 30 psi
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-14-2009, 07:20 PM
#47
To the BATMOBILE!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1 on that. Thank you very much. Luckily mine was caught before it went BOOM completely. As it stands when I am done I will look at posting my charts here. I will have a Esmeril kit running a TO4e 60 trim garrett instead of the chinese Snail Bomb that it had.
08-14-2009, 07:26 PM
#48
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
08-14-2009, 07:39 PM
#49
Yeah.
I'm excited, too! I found a dyno in town that will cut me a good rate for self tuning.
I'll have my water/meth spraying at full tilt with Snow Boost juice (half water/half meth) and a splash or so of CP116 in the tank for protection. Since this is "All out" ya know, haha!
I'm excited, too! I found a dyno in town that will cut me a good rate for self tuning.
I'll have my water/meth spraying at full tilt with Snow Boost juice (half water/half meth) and a splash or so of CP116 in the tank for protection. Since this is "All out" ya know, haha!
08-14-2009, 07:41 PM
#50
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
go Big or go Home...