Ford V-6
05-06-2005, 09:06 AM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm super-confused as to this topic..are you saying the RX should be piston powered? Or are you saying that you thought it had a Ford V6. If it had a V6 it would essentially be a MX6 replacement--and have a wierd front biased weight balance.
05-06-2005, 12:07 PM
#13
Mazda Mole
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a NA 1.3L engine! What else do you want from a NA 1.3L engine?
Yeah yeah you can argue all you want that it's really a 2.6L because of the special nature of the rotary, but even in rotaries displacement matter. I don't need to tell anyone about the 2.0L 3 rotor engine.
Yeah yeah you can argue all you want that it's really a 2.6L because of the special nature of the rotary, but even in rotaries displacement matter. I don't need to tell anyone about the 2.0L 3 rotor engine.
05-06-2005, 12:28 PM
#14
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverx8
The Ford V-6 gets 220 HP in the 6, why not the RX8? 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vancouver
RX-8 Media News
0
04-24-2003 09:01 AM