Ford V-6
 

The Ford V-6 gets 220 HP in the 6, why not the RX8? :confused:

The RX-8 is a rotary...and not a v6?

Ford couldn't figure out how to fit the 6 micro-gerbils in the rotary without adverse side effects. Something about spinning rotors of death and headless gerbils.

What the hell is wrong with you?

^^^ That Is The Funniest Thing I"ve Heard In Quite A While!! Woooo!!

Putting pistons in the car would destroy the purpose of it, at least in my opinion.

I'm super-confused as to this topic..are you saying the RX should be piston powered? Or are you saying that you thought it had a Ford V6. If it had a V6 it would essentially be a MX6 replacement--and have a wierd front biased weight balance.

well he apparently has a silver rx-8, so maybe the curse has spread to his brain

bwhahahahahhahahahahaha--yeah the curse of the silver8 is viscious

^hehe he should listen to the govenor of California:D

ROTF :D

It's a NA 1.3L engine! What else do you want from a NA 1.3L engine?

Yeah yeah you can argue all you want that it's really a 2.6L because of the special nature of the rotary, but even in rotaries displacement matter. I don't need to tell anyone about the 2.0L 3 rotor engine.

Actually the Mazda version V6 gets 220hp in the 6 and the Ford version V6 gets 202hp in the 500/Fusion/Milan/Zephyr...