BMW working on Gasoline-Steam Hybrid
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW working on Gasoline-Steam Hybrid
Check out the latest Popular Science magazine - unfortunately not on website yet.
System uses waste heat from exhaust and cooling system in two separate systems to generate steam in closed loop to run turbines to hybrid with standard piston engine.
Seems to me that such a system - with a weight of less than 250 lbs - would work in a rotary based system.
Posted this in a couple of hydrogen-based discussions - but no reaction.
System uses waste heat from exhaust and cooling system in two separate systems to generate steam in closed loop to run turbines to hybrid with standard piston engine.
Seems to me that such a system - with a weight of less than 250 lbs - would work in a rotary based system.
Posted this in a couple of hydrogen-based discussions - but no reaction.
#3
i pwn therefore i am
All I can think about when I read about this steam technology is a drag race where all the other cars are cruising with their high-pitched whines and turbo whirring and then having this car coming up from behind out of nowhere with a distinct "chugga-chugga-chugga-CHOOOO-CHOOO" sound with all this smoke billowing out of the top of the smoke stack situated right smack dab in the middle of the hood. That would be sweet.
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry Guys:
Closed systems - no steam whistles or venting.
System - like gasoline-electric hybrids - recovers waste energy from the gasoline engine. A lot simpler way to make our fossil fuels last longer than hydrogen, etc.
The development time would be 'short' like the gasoline-electric hybrids of today.
Any engineers out these to comment - hopefully after checking out the article.
Closed systems - no steam whistles or venting.
System - like gasoline-electric hybrids - recovers waste energy from the gasoline engine. A lot simpler way to make our fossil fuels last longer than hydrogen, etc.
The development time would be 'short' like the gasoline-electric hybrids of today.
Any engineers out these to comment - hopefully after checking out the article.
#5
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I allways wonder why people dint use a system like this, and the rotary has a clear avantage with its exhaust system
Last edited by rotary crazy; 02-16-2006 at 01:20 PM.
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rotary Engine is known to be major waster of heat . The cooling system and exhaust system vent a lot of heat. Part of the reason for the poor MPG of the car.
Most of the components of such a system would mount both in front of the engine - where there is lots of room and in the rear part of the exhaust sytem - thus the 50 / 50 weight ratio would be maintained. The system weighs less than 225 lbs - per the article - a very resonable extra load. No major HAZMAT issues - unlike the gasoline-hybrid engines - come to mind.
Most of the components of such a system would mount both in front of the engine - where there is lots of room and in the rear part of the exhaust sytem - thus the 50 / 50 weight ratio would be maintained. The system weighs less than 225 lbs - per the article - a very resonable extra load. No major HAZMAT issues - unlike the gasoline-hybrid engines - come to mind.
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re-post yes - but newly published in Popular Science.
Still seems very do-able - especially with all the waste heat of the rotary. Weight quoted in popular science is less than 225 lbs. I think that's less than in a gasoline-electric hybrid.
In fact no reason why a gasoline-steam-electric hybrid is not possible. Maximing the IC engine is a short term but quick to reduce fossil fuel use.
John
Still seems very do-able - especially with all the waste heat of the rotary. Weight quoted in popular science is less than 225 lbs. I think that's less than in a gasoline-electric hybrid.
In fact no reason why a gasoline-steam-electric hybrid is not possible. Maximing the IC engine is a short term but quick to reduce fossil fuel use.
John
#13
rotorized!!!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
forced induction (turbocharging) is free power, however even after exiting the turbocharger the exhaust gases are still very hot.
the whole point of this system is to recover all of the waste heat in the exhaust thus achieving as high a thermal efficiency as possible. It reduces emmisions by getting more useful energy out of the fuel and thus you use less fuel and reduce emissions.
I believe the system actually does envision a turbocharger on the engine as well. if you couple them all together and replace the steel in a car with large amounts of aluminum and magnesium you get a car that weighs the same as the one without the steam system but is more efficient.
the whole point of this system is to recover all of the waste heat in the exhaust thus achieving as high a thermal efficiency as possible. It reduces emmisions by getting more useful energy out of the fuel and thus you use less fuel and reduce emissions.
I believe the system actually does envision a turbocharger on the engine as well. if you couple them all together and replace the steel in a car with large amounts of aluminum and magnesium you get a car that weighs the same as the one without the steam system but is more efficient.
#14
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
true.
but most of our emissions problems are at the beginning of start up. air pumps, egr, heat o2 sensors, etc. etc. for the steam system to even operate the car has to reach optimal heat. so it still doesn't really solve the emissions point 100%. but yes, i do agree with everything you have said. hence all the questions on the other thread. it's a very neat concept, but i wouldn't want it in my car.
but most of our emissions problems are at the beginning of start up. air pumps, egr, heat o2 sensors, etc. etc. for the steam system to even operate the car has to reach optimal heat. so it still doesn't really solve the emissions point 100%. but yes, i do agree with everything you have said. hence all the questions on the other thread. it's a very neat concept, but i wouldn't want it in my car.
#15
Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: N 01°21' E 103°59'
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nah, FI isn't free.. it requires more fuel.
But I do like the idea, cos once the system is up to running temp (pretty quickly, IMO, cos volume of water used in the closed system is small, not much latent heat required), it would start increasing efficiency. I don't expect more power, actually, it's more for fuel economy and saving the earth and all that. I figure if BMW can get it to be feasible (ie save more fuel than it uses to haul its own weight around) in a piston engine, it would be even more feasible in a heat-wasting rotary.
Not sure about this, but i think there isn't a efficient way to convert heat energy directly to electricity yet.. mostly heat->motion->electricity, from what i know.
But I do like the idea, cos once the system is up to running temp (pretty quickly, IMO, cos volume of water used in the closed system is small, not much latent heat required), it would start increasing efficiency. I don't expect more power, actually, it's more for fuel economy and saving the earth and all that. I figure if BMW can get it to be feasible (ie save more fuel than it uses to haul its own weight around) in a piston engine, it would be even more feasible in a heat-wasting rotary.
Originally Posted by s13lover
So what would the advantage be of using heat to create steam power instead of electric power?
oh, and how many mpg would that tank of water get?
oh, and how many mpg would that tank of water get?
#16
I agree too, FI is certainly not free. IOverall efficiency always goes down due to ignition retarded from MBT and/or reduction in compression ratio.
Re the steam stuff by BMW, it looks like the Quandt familly does not want to pay Toyota for an electric Hybrid license... So they try other routes.
However, it looks like a good idea t recover some wasted energy, and also to cool down catalyst bricks, instead of throwing buckets of fuel in the exhaust.
Re the steam stuff by BMW, it looks like the Quandt familly does not want to pay Toyota for an electric Hybrid license... So they try other routes.
However, it looks like a good idea t recover some wasted energy, and also to cool down catalyst bricks, instead of throwing buckets of fuel in the exhaust.
#17
Originally Posted by s13lover
So what would the advantage be of using heat to create steam power instead of electric power?
oh, and how many mpg would that tank of water get?
oh, and how many mpg would that tank of water get?
Speaking of which, that's why we don't have steam cars anymore. They are too bulky and heavy, and apparently the throttle response is poor. I seem to remember reading about a stirling engine Ford developed in the 70's...after much development, they had one that was capable of moving a car after "only" 5 minutes of warmup. I guess if gas gets catastrophically expensive, something like that would make sense. It's also a retardedly simple external combustion engine, so you can burn basically anything. Maybe someone could stick one of these in a hybrid car:
http://www.whispergen.com/
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steam engines in a closed system might be slow to produce power - but if powered by waste heat would 'cost' nothing. Powered by waste heat - they would produce no added emissions.
In the BMW hybrid engine - the steam engine would be additive to gasoline engine which of course can go when started. The reason for two circuits - one low temperature and one high temperature - is to recover heat from both the cooling system and exhaust - both of which are rapidly heated in a rotary engine. Power would be produced quickly - perhaps never enough to move a car on its own - but enough to add into the gasoline engine - thus more torque - something a rotary itself could use.
In the BMW hybrid engine - the steam engine would be additive to gasoline engine which of course can go when started. The reason for two circuits - one low temperature and one high temperature - is to recover heat from both the cooling system and exhaust - both of which are rapidly heated in a rotary engine. Power would be produced quickly - perhaps never enough to move a car on its own - but enough to add into the gasoline engine - thus more torque - something a rotary itself could use.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TeslaMSI
New Member Forum
11
12-10-2015 01:10 AM
badinfluence
Series II Aftermarket Performance Modifications
6
08-31-2015 11:51 AM