Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Turbo'd 8 keeps dying and/or misfiring

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
Turbo'd 8 keeps dying and/or misfiring

So I bought a turbo'd 8 and immediately flooded the thing. Long story short, I replaced plugs, coils, wires, starter, and the battery.

Now she cranks fine and warmup idle is pretty solid (it gets a little low sporadically, but not enough that it will die). I took the car for a test drive just now and it's smooth under 35mph. When I let her rip, I got misfires, the flashing CEL, and the engine would usually die shortly thereafter.

When I'm driving normally and press the clutch above 3500rpm, the car should find idle but doesn't... it just dies.

One other thing to note is that it backfires almost every time I left off the throttle.

Car has a greddy turbo and the previous owner tuned it with a Cobb.

What could be going on here? Being an something of a n00b when it comes to FI and the 8, I'm looking for some feedback and recommended troubleshooting steps.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 07:55 PM
  #2  
skc's Avatar
skc
rev it up
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 11
From: Brisbane Australia
Check for vacuum and boost and intake leaks
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 08:05 PM
  #3  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
As a n00b, what's the best/easiest way to check?
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 08:06 PM
  #4  
EviLStewie's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
RIWWP just posted a how to find a vacuum leak thread.
It's not exactly a DIY but it's good.
And maybe some data logs might help.

Can you post any of those?

Last edited by EviLStewie; Aug 11, 2013 at 08:26 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 08:06 PM
  #5  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
At idle, positive short term fuel trim and MAF g/s less than 5.0.

5.5g/s should be normal idle for most Renesis engines, plus or minus a few tenths. Once you get under 5.0, air is getting to the engine that isn't passing the MAF. The ECU is under fueling then, and the STFT goes positive as the ECU tries to correct.

Last edited by RIWWP; Aug 11, 2013 at 08:09 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 08:19 PM
  #6  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
... if I knew how to gather data logs. Remember, I threw up the n00b warning!
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 08:29 PM
  #7  
EviLStewie's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BigMikeATL
... if I knew how to gather data logs. Remember, I threw up the n00b warning!
Oh ummm
Mmmm maybe a boosted 8 might have been a bite more than you can chew.

Acquiring a data log using the Cobb AP is not hard, the option is right there in the list.
After gathering the log files use the AP Manager to transfer them to your computer.
(basically plug your AP in to your computer)
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2013 | 08:30 PM
  #8  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by RIWWP
At idle, positive short term fuel trim and MAF g/s less than 5.0.

5.5g/s should be normal idle for most Renesis engines, plus or minus a few tenths. Once you get under 5.0, air is getting to the engine that isn't passing the MAF. The ECU is under fueling then, and the STFT goes positive as the ECU tries to correct.
That's good to know. Let me fire the car up tomorrow and I'll see if the HKS Camp 2 displays this info.

I have a Cobb but haven't yet to turn it on. Guess I'll have to get on it!

Thanks,
Mike
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 04:45 AM
  #9  
WingleBeast's Avatar
HAVOC
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Afghanistan
I am 99% sure that when you press the clutch in while driving is a separate issue. most likely due to a non recirculation bov.

Posted From RX8Club.com Android App
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 07:16 AM
  #10  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
You can get that info without having to data log, just pull up the appropriate metric on the screen with the COBB plugged in. Data logging the main parameters during the problem points and posting it here would help people figure your issue out, so learn how to do that too.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 09:05 PM
  #11  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by RIWWP
At idle, positive short term fuel trim and MAF g/s less than 5.0.

5.5g/s should be normal idle for most Renesis engines, plus or minus a few tenths. Once you get under 5.0, air is getting to the engine that isn't passing the MAF. The ECU is under fueling then, and the STFT goes positive as the ECU tries to correct.
So I hooked up the Cobb and logged the data at idle and while revving the engine a bit.

At idle, MAF g/s hovers around 6.6 and short term FT bounces between positive and negative quite a bit. I attached the log if anyone wants to take a look.

Thoughts?
Attached Files
File Type: zip
datalog13.csv.zip (21.7 KB, 26 views)

Last edited by BigMikeATL; Aug 15, 2013 at 09:09 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 09:09 PM
  #12  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
As a side note, i swapped out the coils, cleaned the MAF, and tightened some of the couplers on the intake. The datalog was taken tonight after all of that was done. The car doesn't seem to misfire anymore and doesn't stall as easily, though it did stall a couple times if I pressed the clutch in after coming down from 3-4k revs.

It also seems to studder or gurgle (for lack of a better term) when I'm feathering the throttle and it still backfires like crazy.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 09:14 PM
  #13  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 345
From: Smallville
Better have it tuned...one good ping and you will be getting a new engine
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 09:23 PM
  #14  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by dannobre
Better have it tuned...one good ping and you will be getting a new engine
To the best of my knowledge, it has been running on the same map for a year and a half or more. The previous owner told me a guy on the boards here helped him, though I don't remember who...
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 11:35 PM
  #15  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 1,804
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by BigMikeATL
To the best of my knowledge, it has been running on the same map for a year and a half or more. The previous owner told me a guy on the boards here helped him, though I don't remember who...
Is your BOV VTA or Recirc ? IF VTA the backfires will be from that .

What are the other issues as of now ?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 08:10 AM
  #16  
yomomspimp06's Avatar
El Jefe
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 7
it must be vta from all the backfiring reports.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 08:52 AM
  #17  
Carbon8's Avatar
Yank My Wankel
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
OP I would beat on a vacuum leak, Stalling at idle after a cruise is almost always a vacuum leak as the car does not correct the fuel trims and will stall out.

Originally Posted by RIWWP
At idle, positive short term fuel trim and MAF g/s less than 5.0.

5.5g/s should be normal idle for most Renesis engines, plus or minus a few tenths. Once you get under 5.0, air is getting to the engine that isn't passing the MAF. The ECU is under fueling then, and the STFT goes positive as the ECU tries to correct.
So a positive STFT is always a vacuum leak? even if its only 1 or 2?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 08:54 AM
  #18  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Originally Posted by BigMikeATL
So I hooked up the Cobb and logged the data at idle and while revving the engine a bit.

At idle, MAF g/s hovers around 6.6 and short term FT bounces between positive and negative quite a bit. I attached the log if anyone wants to take a look.

Thoughts?
Your AFRs aren't steady, which is why your STFT flutters around. I'd expect it to be steadier than you have it. This could be a side effect of showing a higher g/s air flow than normal? The smarter tuners may have a better insight, but that doesn't look like a normal idle log to me.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:03 AM
  #19  
Carbon8's Avatar
Yank My Wankel
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Your AFRs aren't steady, which is why your STFT flutters around. I'd expect it to be steadier than you have it. This could be a side effect of showing a higher g/s air flow than normal? The smarter tuners may have a better insight, but that doesn't look like a normal idle log to me.
Agreed, It actually seems like your MAF is not scaled properly. STFT and A/F are very unstable.

Is your MAF the stock scaling? if not what is it adjusted by?

You really should log more to, it would be nice to see ign seperation and MAF voltage.

Intake temp seems high, but I am used to NA and buffalo weather mine rarely gets more than 2 degrees above ambient, hopefully one of the FI guys can lend a hand there.

BOV; Recirc of VTA?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:04 AM
  #20  
Carbon8's Avatar
Yank My Wankel
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
RIWWP; car to comment on my above question?


Originally Posted by Carbon8
So a positive STFT is always a vacuum leak? even if its only 1 or 2?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:11 AM
  #21  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
It's the HKS Super SQV. I believe it's VTA.

I'm hoping the engine can be tuned to reduce backfiring.

I'm trying to track down a pro in metro-Atlanta to tune it, else I'll reach out to MazdaManiac.

Last edited by BigMikeATL; Aug 16, 2013 at 09:14 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:15 AM
  #22  
Carbon8's Avatar
Yank My Wankel
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
Post a pic of the engine bay,

If its recirc you need to change that before you can do a proper tune.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:18 AM
  #23  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
No, since it can actually be trimmed there due to other factors. I would look for a positive STFT of at least +4% along with MAF below 5.0g/s.

It's been pretty consistent over the years that our engines take about 5.5g/s of air flow at idle, plus or minus a bit based on sensor variances, probably compression health, etc... If the MAF is recording under this, then it's not the engine miraculously running on far less of an air/fuel charge, it means that air is getting into the engine that isn't passing the MAF, i.e, a vacuum leak. A positive STFT would confirm it, as the O2 sensor would be seeing leaner AFRs than it would expect for ~4.5g/s or whatever, and has to add fuel.

I had a pinprick vacuum leak in a gasket between the UIM and LIM on the runner that sits against the firewall, and it generated a ~4.5-4.6g/s MAF and +5% STFT. I doubt a vacuum leak that produces a smaller gap is possible, but I wouldn't rule it out.

This doesn't really exist within his log.

I have only guesses as to what would generate a higher g/s than normal. Among them are: faulty MAF, MAF scaling messed up some weird way, different intake tube diameter at the MAF (and within several inches before and after it), or something getting onto the MAF to over-cool it consistently.

The presence of a turbocharger system adds complexity and fault points, but shouldn't have any impact on these points at idle.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:21 AM
  #24  
BigMikeATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Carbon8
Post a pic of the engine bay,

If its recirc you need to change that before you can do a proper tune.
Here's a pic... I'll post a better one tonight that focuses on the BoV and vacuum tubes.
Attached Thumbnails Turbo'd 8 keeps dying and/or misfiring-3ld3ic3q35sf5m65ted6bdbebc452f41f182f.jpg  

Last edited by BigMikeATL; Aug 16, 2013 at 09:29 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:23 AM
  #25  
Carbon8's Avatar
Yank My Wankel
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 7
From: Buffalo, NY
Originally Posted by RIWWP
No, since it can actually be trimmed there due to other factors. I would look for a positive STFT of at least +4% along with MAF below 5.0g/s.

It's been pretty consistent over the years that our engines take about 5.5g/s of air flow at idle, plus or minus a bit based on sensor variances, probably compression health, etc... If the MAF is recording under this, then it's not the engine miraculously running on far less of an air/fuel charge, it means that air is getting into the engine that isn't passing the MAF, i.e, a vacuum leak. A positive STFT would confirm it, as the O2 sensor would be seeing leaner AFRs than it would expect for ~4.5g/s or whatever, and has to add fuel.

I had a pinprick vacuum leak in a gasket between the UIM and LIM on the runner that sits against the firewall, and it generated a ~4.5-4.6g/s MAF and +5% STFT. I doubt a vacuum leak that produces a smaller gap is possible, but I wouldn't rule it out.

This doesn't really exist within his log.

I have only guesses as to what would generate a higher g/s than normal. Among them are: faulty MAF, MAF scaling messed up some weird way, different intake tube diameter at the MAF (and within several inches before and after it), or something getting onto the MAF to over-cool it consistently.

The presence of a turbocharger system adds complexity and fault points, but shouldn't have any impact on these points at idle.
Got it, rule of thumb is G/s below 5 and STFT positive can be considered a vacuum leak.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 PM.