Notices
Series I Engine Tuning Forum EMS (Flash Tuning, Interceptor, Piggy Back, Stand Alone)

Ignition timing for turbo or supercharged renesis - post your maps

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #51  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Why do timing threads turn into crapfests?

This was particularly non-enlightening.

The way I see it, if the experts want to keep all the secrets to themselves, I am COMPLETELY ok with that. They deserve that and our respect. But us bumblefucks want to figure some of this **** out for ourselves. I suggest that be respected as well and leave the misdirection, intentional or otherwise, out of the discussion.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 10:12 AM
  #52  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by Flashwing
Kane, it will probably be around 24 hours before I can get any information back to you but here's something for you to consider.

At first, I recall that we used a broad 30% increase in the AP values just to see if the issues we were experiencing were in fact dwell related. We kept everything else the same as our control. A 30% increase did seem to correct any spark blow out on the turbo RX8. I have been using an adapted version of those settings with adjustments made to back the dwell off in the lower and upper RPM range where a stronger spark isn't needed.
30% increase by multiplying the map by 1.3 or .7?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #53  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
Originally Posted by r0tor
30% increase by multiplying the map by 1.3 or .7?
I am pretty sure it would be 130%.

Interestingly enough - Flashwings post is the first truly concise post here that actually answers my question exactly!

Add some validation and life would be good.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #54  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by Kane
I am pretty sure it would be 130%.

Interestingly enough - Flashwings post is the first truly concise post here that actually answers my question exactly!

Add some validation and life would be good.
i thought so as well, however bothered by Jeff's "fundemental misunderstanding of the factory dwell table" quote, I scared myself by finding out the OEM map numbers could be represented basically by the crank angle charging needs to start at multiplied by a scalar


but i'll just make it "5" and be done with it
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:36 AM
  #55  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
kane i swept up a little. let me know if ive missed a spot. bhr and fluid- unless you have facts to add to the search these folk are on stfu the lot of you
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #56  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,836
Likes: 1,789
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Interestingly this thread was supposed to be about timing and not Dwell . Not that i'm bothered with that as at least SOME information has come out of the ensuing crapfest ....
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #57  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
all apologies to brettus- let me know if there is anything else i can sweep up for you.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 06:47 AM
  #58  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Fortunately, since I'm not financially tied to any of the coil solutions at this point ...
Don't you and Ray hold some kind of patent, or have at least applied for one?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #59  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 27
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by robrecht
Don't you and Ray hold some kind of patent, or have at least applied for one?
Yes. I have patents, trademarks and copyrights on MANY things.
Very few of them make me any money.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #60  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Originally Posted by Brettus
From another thread - posting it here for future ref.

I had asked Kane if the factory dwell of 595 = 5.95 ms ...
This seems logical and would be my guess.

So then, the BHR coil dwell is too high for peak performance?

Last edited by Razz1; Apr 28, 2009 at 12:35 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #61  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 27
From: Under my car
Ugh.

Take a look at the OE dwell table. You will see that the value for idle is around 1100.
Do you really believe the OE dwell request is for 1.1 seconds at idle?
If your alternator output is low, it jumps to 1.4 seconds!!!!
Do the math.
The dwell table is not in milliseconds.
The OE coils are special.
The LS2s have the widest dwell range imaginable.
However, this is not rocket science and all you Secret Squirrel nut cases need to get your heads out of your asses and stop acting like I owe it to you to spoon feed you.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #62  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,593
Likes: 3,432
From: The Dark Side
THAT'S IT!!! Screw you guys, I'm reinstalling my Mazsport Coils since it's the best system EVAR!!!
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:19 PM
  #63  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
So I guess that was a "no" on the diversification of labor idea...
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:21 PM
  #64  
Phil's 8's Avatar
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 2
From: Sin City, Nevada
Originally Posted by Jedi54
THAT'S IT!!! Screw you guys, I'm reinstalling my Mazsport Coils since it's the best system EVAR!!!
Dummy, you never owned a Mazport coil set
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #65  
Roariee's Avatar
It was this big! No lie!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Disneyland!
Originally Posted by Brettus
Interestingly this thread was supposed to be about timing and not Dwell . Not that i'm bothered with that as at least SOME information has come out of the ensuing crapfest ....
poor timing...to watch

dwelling on my poor timing...

hah
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #66  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 27
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Kane
So I guess that was a "no" on the diversification of labor idea...
What do you mean? That I do all the labor and you read about it?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #67  
Roariee's Avatar
It was this big! No lie!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Disneyland!
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Yes. I have patents, trademarks and copyrights on MANY things.
Very few of them make me any money.
Funny how that works...moar money to get the damned things most of the time...

And if anyone gets anything outta the whole thing...its the attys...

I got into the wrong profession...



Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
However, this is not rocket science and all you Secret Squirrel nut cases need to get your heads out of your asses and stop acting like I owe it to you to spoon feed you.
Its certainly is not rocket science...more a touch electrical engineering, stabbing and poking charged terminals with conductive objects...and playing with fire...

Oh...and nuts...cant do any of that without your nuts handy...
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #68  
Roariee's Avatar
It was this big! No lie!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Disneyland!
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
What do you mean? That I do all the labor and you read about it?

Or release time-lapse videos...your damn right thats what i want! Get back into your dungeon and get to blowing your **** up for my amusement and knowledge...

Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 04:45 AM
  #69  
a_ahlan's Avatar
Anji
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Dwell

Kane,

I work with Ignition computers as I'm involved in conversion of Diesel engines in to NGV (Natural Gas). In the software I use to program the stand alone ignition computer, the dwell value can be adjusted in - % percentage. Basically 100% would mean dwell will be same duration as the spark duration. 110% means the coil will take 10% longer to charge and then provide spark with the same duration.

Looking at my SPT dwell map, could the map be battery voltage vs % time of dwell? That would mean 1208 might be 120.8% and 395 might be 39.5% of spark duration.
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #70  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
Hmmm - could be. But the scale on the 3D graph would be off....I am kinda at the point where I don't know what it is - I just know how to make it better...... not the best plan but it does work.
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #71  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 27
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by a_ahlan
Kane,

I work with Ignition computers as I'm involved in conversion of Diesel engines in to NGV (Natural Gas). In the software I use to program the stand alone ignition computer, the dwell value can be adjusted in - % percentage. Basically 100% would mean dwell will be same duration as the spark duration. 110% means the coil will take 10% longer to charge and then provide spark with the same duration.

Looking at my SPT dwell map, could the map be battery voltage vs % time of dwell? That would mean 1208 might be 120.8% and 395 might be 39.5% of spark duration.
Wow. There it is. (EDIT - Sorta. Its not a direct % of available spark time, but crank rotation time.)

So after months of speculating and even erroneous input from people who are actively involved in RX-8 calibration testing and development, it took a professional ignition calibrator's input to figure out what I managed to figure out in my garage in 10 minutes with a cheap scope meter.

I'm not picking on you, a_ahlan. You are just sharing what you know.
But its just sad that all of the whiners in this thread just couldn't be bothered with the R&D, just because they knew someone had already figured it out.
It was more worthwhile to complain about it.

Last edited by MazdaManiac; May 22, 2009 at 01:29 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #72  
RK's Avatar
RK
It's Not Easy Being Green
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 0
From: Akron, OH
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
So after months of speculating and even erroneous input from people who are actively involved in RX-8 calibration testing and development, it took a professional ignition calibrator's input to figure out what I managed to figure out in my garage in 10 minutes with a cheap scope meter.
Always nice to remind people that you knew the information and kept that knowledge away from BHR customers who hadn't subscribed to your service for months. All your claims of not being able to share your hard work turns out to mean 10 minutes alone with a scope meter.

You've made your point. I'm sure the relatively small hit to BHR's rep as a company that exhanged information freely with the RX-8 community about products was well worth it. Hard to put a value on that.

Not quite as hard to put a value on the subscriptions you picked up.
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 03:51 PM
  #73  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
Um you guys do realize this thread is about IGNITION TIMING MAPS right? Why is there far more arguming on dwell than there is on timing maps? Get it on track or start a new thread.
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #74  
Mawnee's Avatar
I divide by zero
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
From: Spring Hill, FL
Originally Posted by Kane
I will still pay a few hundred bucks for the electronic guy who can get my RPM "BEEEP" to change to "SHIFT ************!!!!" In Samuel Jacksons voice.
LMAO best post in the thread
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #75  
outinnowhere3193's Avatar
outinnowhere3193
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 1
From: Hymera, Indiana
It cracks me up the **** I read and hear people talk about.. I mean don't get me wrong I've done a lot of stupid ****. As far as the LS2 coils I did my own setup with them and I'm thinking I'm set at 3.5ms.

When I set at a idle and rev my car it misses at like 4k and 5k but when you drive it...there is no miss.. I've turned and boost a few dozen times to 14psi and those coils have no misses what so ever when I'm driving.. I can cruise at the 4k or 5k without a miss but can't no load rev that high...stead that high. If I just hit the throttle and rap it out for the sound there is no miss.

By far I like the LS2 coils way over the OEM...it only took me 2 weeks till I had miss fires like no other on OEM that is.

Last edited by outinnowhere3193; Jul 5, 2009 at 03:31 PM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.