Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Will It Fit Thread

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 06:55 PM
  #4176  
goose guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by riches1
18x9 +30 w/ 255/35/18?




Originally Posted by j8635621
Like Topgear8 said, it will rub in the rear without a roll. 245/40/18 works great though.
U guys r the best. Ok, I trust u guys so I'm going to order my wheels and tires now.

18x9 +30 with 245/40/18 tires


2009 gt stock everything. Half of the time lowered cause of 3 passengers.
If it'll rub and I have to roll my new fenders, please let me know now. Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 07:19 PM
  #4177  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
It shouldn't.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 07:31 PM
  #4178  
goose guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by j8635621
It shouldn't.
It shouldn't rub?
It will fit, no prob?

yes? yes?

Right on! thx!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 07:54 PM
  #4179  
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 1
From: Bend, OR
unless the tire manufacturer makes them wider than a normal 245, youll be fine; no rubbing
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #4180  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Yea that's what I meant.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 11:13 PM
  #4181  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
Basically don't get kdw's because they run a lil' fatter. There are a couple other tires that are similar but just from personal experience the 245/40's on a kdw seem to run on the 'thick' side
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 11:15 PM
  #4182  
mike[piston eater]'s Avatar
O' Let's do it.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 2
From: riverside, cali
yeah dude your kdws bulge on your 8.5, while my fk452s are square on the 8 inch rim lol and its the same size
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 11:18 PM
  #4183  
TopGear8's Avatar
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
That is the reason somebody with an 18x9 +35 rocking a 265 will rub, and the other with the same exact wheel and tire size may not rub, different model tires..

Last edited by TopGear8; Mar 3, 2010 at 11:56 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 11:20 PM
  #4184  
Shijin-Kun's Avatar
Rotary Power!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
like my problem with the nitto invos
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 02:43 AM
  #4185  
goose guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
was thinking of getting Dunlop Direzza Z1 245/40/18. Will that tire rub?
Any other tires u guys would recommend?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:50 AM
  #4186  
THmotorsports.com's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by goose guy
was thinking of getting Dunlop Direzza Z1 245/40/18. Will that tire rub?
Any other tires u guys would recommend?

it should be ok...may have to roll a tiny bit if you are lowered aggressively and do some aggressive turning and such. Mine did. And the Direzzas run a little wider than a usual 245 tire.

Hope that helps
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #4187  
tiltmode43's Avatar
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Does anyone know a website/vendor that lists actual face size of specific tires rather than converting 245 -> inches, and so on and so forth? I think it was J that once PMd me with info on a few tires but I don't know where he got it from...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #4188  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
I just went to the manufacturer's websites and looked at the sizes they gave. Nitto gives inflated height and width dimensions to the hundredth of an inch for example. I hope those measurements are more telling than the 245 part.

Last edited by J8635621; Mar 4, 2010 at 03:30 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #4190  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
^try - this is a VERY COMMON setup.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 05:48 PM
  #4191  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Hi all,

I currently have a set of Sportmaxx Rims installed on my RX8.

Front: 18x8.5 +35mm offset w/ Falken FK452 245-40s
Rear: 18x9.5 +35mm offset w/ Falken FK452 275-30s

Suspension: Racing Beat Springs w/ Tokico D-Specs (though may upgrade to KW Variant Coilovers) and Agency Racing Sway Bars

The previous owner of my car had rolled the rear fenders pretty aggressively which makes things easier for me. With this setup, the rear tucks in nicely when compressed with at least 3-4mm to spare. Fortunately no rubbing issues for me with this setup.

Photo of when they were just installed (Suspension and wheels were done at the same time, the rear squats much lower now. )


Here's an updated photo with how it looks now:


I'm considering upgrading to a set of 19" rims. The one I've had my eye on are the New Rota Spectrum.

http://www.wheeldude.com/catalog/pro...oducts_id=5879

19x9 +20mm
19x10 +20mm

Wheel offsets always have been confusing for me, and my math is even worse... Any idea if I can fit these without rubbing inside or the fender using 265-275 width in the rear and 245-255s up front?

Thanks in advance!

Last edited by InfiniFC; Mar 5, 2010 at 11:38 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:14 PM
  #4192  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
Ok now that's a good question.

I'm going to go on a limb and say 255's should work w/some 'creative' camber and possibly a slight pull.

Then again this is not my expertise in fitting as this falls under more of the Aggressive Fitment Thread. Good luck to you tho.

Last edited by Atilla; Mar 4, 2010 at 06:18 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:17 PM
  #4193  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
btw, no way in hell are you going to fit 275's in the rear. That is unless you're willing to flare the fender and raise the car.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:33 PM
  #4195  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Originally Posted by Atilla
Ok now that's a good question.

I'm going to go on a limb and say 255's should work w/some 'creative' camber and possibly a slight pull.

Then again this is not my expertise in fitting as this falls under more of the Aggressive Fitment Thread. Good luck to you tho.
Thanks for the feedback Atilla, I totally forgot that there was an aggressive fitment thread.

Originally Posted by Atilla
btw, no way in hell are you going to fit 275's in the rear. That is unless you're willing to flare the fender and raise the car.
Just to clarify, you're saying "275s in the rear using the 19x10 +22mm offset will not fit without flaring the fender/raise the car." Right?

I'm running 275s on the rears right now with my current setup which clears the fenders with room to spare. Forgot to mention above that I'm running OE stock alignment as well, no crazy camber or anything. Maybe the previous owner had done a great job pulling the rear fenders? I've never compared my fenders with another stock RX8.

Regards,
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #4196  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
InfiniFC: 9.5 +30 is approximately 16mm farther in than 10 +20 which is why he said that.

Jupzee: I have that wheel size, and I'd say 255/40 though some people have run into a problem with that size tire being too tall for a lowered car. 245/40 will definitely work as I have that with a car that's lower than s-tech.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:42 PM
  #4197  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Originally Posted by j8635621
InfiniFC: 9.5 +30 is approximately 16mm farther in than 10 +20 which is why he said that.
Ah... That's what I was guessing, but wanted to be sure. Thanks for doing the math j8635621, mine sucks. That was one of the things I was trying to figure out.

Thanks everyone.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #4198  
InfiniFC's Avatar
Rotarydude
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
Originally Posted by Jupzee
looked through 30 pages so far and didn't find anything about the setup, but i did find IM DANOMITE's post where he says he had 265/35 on the same wheels with no issues. is this the right setup?
Yeah pretty much the same thing except my 275 tires in the rear. I starting to think the previous owner of my car had done some serious pulling on the rear fenders that make my rears look somewhat roomy.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:20 PM
  #4199  
medvr8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
18x8.5 +30
225/40/18

all around?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #4200  
TopGear8's Avatar
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
^Yes it will fit..Can you not search?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.