Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Aggressive Wheel Fitment Thread

Old Feb 17, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #2251  
alz0rz's Avatar
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 3
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Vlaze
^ Nice, what drop is that from stock there? I like the drop, not hugging it right on the tire like so many are but is low enough to look good.
Tanabe GF210's, supposed to be a 1.4" & 1.2" drop on the front and rear, respectively.
As you can see my front is noticeably higher.. my front never settled correctly.
I've seen plenty of local people with the same springs and their fronts are definitely lower then mine.
Rears settled nice though.
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #2252  
yomomspimp06's Avatar
El Jefe
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 7
is there a huge difference in performance when going with 18s over 17s? wrong thread but I've always wanted a 17in wheel but the 18s just look sooo amazing
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #2253  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by yomomspimp06
is there a huge difference in performance when going with 18s over 17s? wrong thread but I've always wanted a 17in wheel but the 18s just look sooo amazing
Not really depending on weight, I believe the speedsource rX8 runs 18" Racing Hart wheels.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 04:06 AM
  #2254  
bowser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by alz0rz
Oh yay.. I can play now!

18 x 9 +30 with 265/35/18 tires. Fenders must be rolled.. to say the least!

are they Rota g-force rims?
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #2255  
thebiggdaddy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
looks like rota center caps to me.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #2256  
imput1234's Avatar
I ♥ Drifting!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 5
From: Lexington, KY
looks good man, just lower the car!
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #2257  
HockeyRX-8's Avatar
TNC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
From: Shaolin, NY
Looks good Al!
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 02:17 PM
  #2258  
alz0rz's Avatar
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 3
From: NYC
Originally Posted by thebiggdaddy
looks like rota center caps to me.
Rota GForce 18x9 +30 with 265/35/18 tires.

Originally Posted by imput1234
looks good man, just lower the car!
thanks! the car is lowered with tanable gf210 springs!

Originally Posted by HockeyRX-8
Looks good Al!
hey thx man

Here are some better pics I took today:






Last edited by alz0rz; Feb 18, 2010 at 02:34 PM.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 05:12 PM
  #2259  
khronus79's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Guys I NEED this question answered please.
I have 2 set ups in mind but just found out that I can get a great deal on a custom setup.
My question is in a 18x9 wheel, what offset is needed to achieve flushness???? and when I say flush I mean 0(zero camber) and lip of wheel exactly on the edge of the fender.

Please note the setups I'm going for have nothing to do with those sized, but I NEED the offset information.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 05:17 PM
  #2260  
alz0rz's Avatar
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 3
From: NYC
Well look at the pics right about your post.. do you consider that flush? Because if you do.. I'll have you know my wheels are 18x9 +30.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #2261  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
Uhhh. 1 post up....

Rota GForce 18x9 +30 with 265/35/18 tires.
Looks flush to me.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #2262  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
Dammit alz0rz..... type slower next time.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #2263  
khronus79's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
LOL @ Kane.

so do the 18x9.5 +15 a few pages back, and notice that your tires are flush with the fender, not your rim, I achieve this same type of "flushness" with 17x9 +35 and 275 tires, 0 camber.

But I believe the ones with the +15offset have some sort of neg. camber.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #2264  
khronus79's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
This is what I'm talking about, and NO, my setup won't look like that, I just need to know the offset.....................

Old Feb 18, 2010 | 06:35 PM
  #2265  
tiltmode43's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
How "flush" a setup is depends on tire width, wheel width/offset, but what most people forget - ride-height. There are people on this forum that consider the typical 275/35 18x9.5 +45 rpf1 to be flush.

You won't get to where that FC is without any sort of stretch. 275 on a 9" wheel will bulge out forcing you to have the actual wheel itself pushed farther in.

I personally don't really consider 18x9 +30 to flush really. If you drop it down to around 0-1 finger gap, those will be pretty sunk in.

Best advice - find something you consider flush and convert it so the outer most edge sits the same - http://www.1010tires.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 06:56 PM
  #2266  
khronus79's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Yes tilt, like I told you before the problem is not really with the outside, is the inside that preoccupies me, that's why I must know WHEEL flushness at 0 camber, so that I can make the calculations.
I know you've tried lots of setups, what offset would make a 9" wide WHEEL flush with the fender at your current ride height???
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 06:59 PM
  #2267  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 12
From: Caca Cali
^yay! someone else referenced the offset calculator hehe.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #2268  
yomomspimp06's Avatar
El Jefe
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by tiltmode43
You won't get to where that FC is without any sort of stretch.
not an FC...
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #2269  
khronus79's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
car not important since we are talking about RX8s......................
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #2270  
tiltmode43's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Personal preference for myself would be around 18x9.5 +22 and that converts to about 18x9 +15... With little camber at a slight tire tuck-no gap I'd guess/estimate 18x9 +15 - +20.

I'd say this picture is a pretty good one to gauge your choice from. Here sits 18x9.5 +15 with a 265/35. You want no camber and my fenders are pulled out - compensating for those two things I'd say sink the wheel in about 10mm, give or take a few.



One problem you're overlooking is that when dropped to that ride height you are forced to run negative camber - even at full positive on the stock bolt you will be in the negatives.

Check out my www.flickr.com/photos/inghostcolours and you can compare the different setups and how far in/out they each sit. Keep in mind my fenders are pulled, tabs trimmed off or relocated, etc. Also, in order to run super aggressive you'll lose usability of the corners. I trimmed mine down to be just the lens and was able to mount them but decided I'd prefer my car without the hideous orange in the first place. You can make it "fit" with a trimmed down corner lens (you'll be hacking off everything but the clear lens itself, keep that in mind) but there will be no bulb (duh).

Good luck! Search and compare off of pictures, wheel fitment is 100% subjective so opinions will vary, thus so will advice.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:31 PM
  #2271  
tiltmode43's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Originally Posted by yomomspimp06
not an FC...
I saw it on my phone and the wheels made me think risky devil fc.

For what it's worth, you're right I should know though, I own an FC lol
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 08:03 PM
  #2272  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
FD with M5 wheels



Old Feb 18, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #2273  
khronus79's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tiltmode43
Personal preference for myself would be around 18x9.5 +22 and that converts to about 18x9 +15... With little camber at a slight tire tuck-no gap I'd guess/estimate 18x9 +15 - +20.

I'd say this picture is a pretty good one to gauge your choice from. Here sits 18x9.5 +15 with a 265/35. You want no camber and my fenders are pulled out - compensating for those two things I'd say sink the wheel in about 10mm, give or take a few.

One problem you're overlooking is that when dropped to that ride height you are forced to run negative camber - even at full positive on the stock bolt you will be in the negatives.

Check out my www.flickr.com/photos/inghostcolours and you can compare the different setups and how far in/out they each sit. Keep in mind my fenders are pulled, tabs trimmed off or relocated, etc. Also, in order to run super aggressive you'll lose usability of the corners. I trimmed mine down to be just the lens and was able to mount them but decided I'd prefer my car without the hideous orange in the first place. You can make it "fit" with a trimmed down corner lens (you'll be hacking off everything but the clear lens itself, keep that in mind) but there will be no bulb (duh).

Good luck! Search and compare off of pictures, wheel fitment is 100% subjective so opinions will vary, thus so will advice.
Tilt, once again, thank you, this is the information I was looking for.
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #2274  
tiltmode43's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Keep in mind the specs I gave you are for the wheel to be flush with perhaps a hair of poke. It's been a while since I've dealt with OEM fenders so its tough to say... If you're expecting to have some tire bulge raise those offsets a bit as well to compensate. When it comes to aggressive, sometimes its safer to go a bit higher - if it's too sunk in for your tastes, you can run some 3mm/5mm/6.5mm/8mm/10mm spacers for fine tuning, if you end up **** about it.

That FD is pretty cool. I'd never rock another car's OEM wheels on my own but the wheel design on the m5 is nice for OEM
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 11:51 PM
  #2275  
yomomspimp06's Avatar
El Jefe
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by tiltmode43
I own an FC
me too 88 vert.....sold my T2 setup in hopes of getting a white Rx8 faster but the one I was looking at turned out to be an Auto. The search continues.....

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.