Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Aggressive Wheel Fitment Thread

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old May 6, 2010 | 12:43 PM
  #2701  
The Reverend's Avatar
That's a lie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 1
From: I don't wear panties
just trying to help a brotha out and I learn that I'm color blind.

Thanks RX8club.com!
Old May 6, 2010 | 12:44 PM
  #2702  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
always measure from the bottom (or top) of the rim lip to the fender....not ground.
Old May 6, 2010 | 12:54 PM
  #2703  
Vlaze's Avatar
The Angry Wheelchair
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 1
From: In da woodz, lurking after you
Originally Posted by Im_DANomite
always measure from the bottom (or top) of the rim lip to the fender....not ground.
Uh...if you're on flat, level ground, I don't see how that is anymore accurate The way most professionals do it is from the fender lip to the wheel center or even the ground or flat level point where the car is resting, not the rim lip. Essentially it's the same thing.

Either way, you do realize when the tire is on the car and you measure it from the ground or the rim itself whether center or lip, they're no more accurate to one another in theory from what I see; this is because the tire is setting the wheel height and your suspension setting along with your tire sets your ride height. If you let air out of your tire, it will measure the same difference between before and after you let the air out from the fender to the ground and between the fender and the rim unless the ground is uneven to check between front and rear.

If someone else has some points as to why they should vary in difference between adjustments then please do tell.

Last edited by Vlaze; May 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM.
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #2704  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
Originally Posted by Vlaze
Uh...if you're on flat, level ground, I don't see how that is anymore accurate The way most professionals do it is from the fender lip to the wheel center or even the ground or flat level point where the car is resting, not the rim lip. Essentially it's the same thing.

Either way, you do realize when the tire is on the car and you measure it from the ground or the rim itself whether center or lip, they're no more accurate to one another in theory from what I see; this is because the tire is setting the wheel height and your suspension setting along with your tire sets your ride height. If you let air out of your tire, it will measure the same difference between before and after you let the air out from the fender to the ground and between the fender and the rim unless the ground is uneven to check between front and rear.

If someone else has some points as to why they should vary in difference between adjustments then please do tell.
no, top/bottom/center of rim only. never to the ground. you can see it however you like. but it's always from the fender to the rim...not to the ground.
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #2705  
Vlaze's Avatar
The Angry Wheelchair
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 1
From: In da woodz, lurking after you
Originally Posted by Im_DANomite
no, top/bottom/center of rim only. never to the ground. you can see it however you like. but it's always from the fender to the rim...not to the ground.
Tell me this; if your ground is level for front and rear, how does it matter measuring it to the ground?

http://www.aa1car.com/library/ride2h.htm

There should be no difference. I'm not trying to see it how I like, I'm trying to realistically see how it matters.
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:32 PM
  #2706  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
because, the rim is bolted to the hub assembly, which is a constant. there isn't a variation. when you measure to the ground, how flat do you think the ground is?? tire diameter also comes into play. when you measure to the ground, that's more of vehicle ground clearance, great, but this is a the aggressive wheel fitment thread. we're more concerned of the wheels. i'm not saying you're wrong, but for this thread, measuring from the wheel to the fender is your best bet.
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #2707  
Vlaze's Avatar
The Angry Wheelchair
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 1
From: In da woodz, lurking after you
Originally Posted by Im_DANomite
because, the rim is bolted to the hub assembly, which is a constant. there isn't a variation. when you measure to the ground, how flat do you think the ground is??
Which is why I said when the ground is level. The ground is constant also and if you measure from fender to wheel and fender to ground when the ground is level, you will see between adjustments the difference is the same.

Originally Posted by Im_DANomite
tire diameter also comes into play. when you measure to the ground, that's more of vehicle ground clearance, great, but this is a the aggressive wheel fitment thread. we're more concerned of the wheels.
Um...the diameter effects the rim position, and it also effects the ride height. Thus when you change it, it equally changes the distance between the fender to rim and fender to ground since it's only changing it by radius values, not diameter. From the hub to its contact point which is, the ground hence radius.

This technical talk was about people saying it should be one way of measuring without questioning it and is why I brought it up since there are multiple ways to measure it properly.

Originally Posted by Im_DANomite
but for this thread, measuring from the wheel to the fender is your best bet.
Actually for this thread they don't care how you measure it. They want pics and not technical mumbo jumbo as I've been going into details on so I'll stop talking about it Sorry for the derail.
Old May 6, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #2708  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
Nicely done. Good to see some new additions to this thread.
Old May 6, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #2709  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
hahaha, ok fine fine. whatever works for you then. some dudes like to sit down to ****, i prefer standing up...works either way, right? :D
Old May 6, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #2710  
thejew89's Avatar
another broken syncro
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Mansfield, TX
now that the argument is outta the way i measured from the ground to the fender and the fronts are 25 1/4 inches and the rears are 25 1/2 inches
Old May 6, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #2711  
coneninja's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
I've got a 2 inch drop in the back and 2.5 inch drop in the front. What would I have to do to get 18x10's to fit all the way around?
Thanks in advance!
Old May 6, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #2712  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
You skipped the whole part of tire size, offset, camber, rolling fenders, and/or pulling fenders.
Old May 6, 2010 | 10:43 PM
  #2713  
Fate710's Avatar
Super Low & Super Slow
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 429
Likes: 1
From: Arizona City, AZ
18x10 +25 with a 255/35 fits with a 2" drop all around with a slight roll in the rear and no roll in the front. major camber though.
Old May 7, 2010 | 12:38 AM
  #2714  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
Originally Posted by j8635621
You skipped the whole part of tire size, offset, camber, rolling fenders, and/or pulling fenders.
basically everything that was needed to form a legitimate question...
Old May 7, 2010 | 01:27 AM
  #2715  
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 1
From: Bend, OR
Originally Posted by Fate710
18x10 +25 with a 255/35 fits with a 2" drop all around with a slight roll in the rear and no roll in the front. major camber though.
What're your camber specs F/R?
Old May 7, 2010 | 01:57 AM
  #2716  
Fate710's Avatar
Super Low & Super Slow
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 429
Likes: 1
From: Arizona City, AZ
-3 front and -3.5 rear. Going to roll the rear some more and roll the front. When I get my coilovers and drop it another inch to inch and a half, I'll get it realigned and should end up around -2.5 up front and -2.75 to -3 in the rear.
Old May 9, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #2717  
djlaundry2000's Avatar
No cylinders allowed
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute IN.
I get to post on here for once haha 18X9 +20
Attached Thumbnails Aggressive Wheel Fitment Thread-100_1765.jpg  
Old May 10, 2010 | 03:28 AM
  #2718  
tiltmode43's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Yes, enough of the pointless arguing, finally another pic

Now lower-r!
Old May 10, 2010 | 06:04 PM
  #2719  
imput1234's Avatar
I ♥ Drifting!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 5
From: Lexington, KY
Seriously ^ +1. Majority of the cars in this thread will look 100x better if it was lower.
Old May 11, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #2720  
coneninja's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
A Fate, got the rotas ordered from your guys! Thanks for the input! Best bang for the buck (knock on wood) Too bad they're on back order. These are gonna be the longest 30 days! Flat Black baby!
Old May 11, 2010 | 11:31 PM
  #2721  
Fate710's Avatar
Super Low & Super Slow
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 429
Likes: 1
From: Arizona City, AZ
Yeah I had to wait almost a month for the GT Orange's. I caught them right as they got ready to order the wheels from overseas
Old May 19, 2010 | 06:46 PM
  #2722  
THmotorsports.com's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by imput1234
Seriously ^ +1. Majority of the cars in this thread will look 100x better if it was lower.
Lowerd RX8's huh????

Name:  rx8miataautox5-16jpg4.jpg
Views: 169
Size:  58.7 KB
Name:  rx8miataautox5-16jpg5.jpg
Views: 176
Size:  53.4 KB
Name:  rx8miataautox5-16jpg3.jpg
Views: 158
Size:  51.5 KB
Old May 19, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #2723  
yomomspimp06's Avatar
El Jefe
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 7
yup it's low alright
Old May 19, 2010 | 06:54 PM
  #2724  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
way too low. something happen?
Old May 19, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #2725  
TopGear8's Avatar
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Yeah your suspension geometry is completely fucked being that low..


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.