Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

Yet another Low Compression Results Thread...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-07-2011, 08:46 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Methanoxide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Yet another Low Compression Results Thread...

tested at Mazda.

Rotor 1: 6.5, 6.3, 6.7 @ 291 RPM
Rotor 2: 6.5, 6.2, 6.4 @ 293 RPM
They've listed as a pass??

When I look at the charts, I come to the conclusion it's a terrible fail... Am I doing it wrong?
Looking for some feedback before I bring this chart into them.
Attached Thumbnails Yet another Low Compression Results Thread...-cci09072011_00001.jpg  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:50 AM
  #2  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
They're doing it wrong.
Old 09-07-2011, 08:52 AM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Methanoxide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse my ignorance, but they're doing what wrong? The test?
Old 09-07-2011, 08:53 AM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Methanoxide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is what I've plotted in the chart correct?
Old 09-07-2011, 08:55 AM
  #5  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
They didn't normalize the results as they should. You're completely right and should show them the chart.
I don't know at what altitude you live though, too lazy to search that
Old 09-07-2011, 09:02 AM
  #6  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Methanoxide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Bad, from all the other posts I should have known to include that.
Altitude: 195 m (640 ft)

Still bad, isn't it? ugh....
Old 09-07-2011, 09:05 AM
  #7  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
It still looks bad, go get that reman engine!
Old 09-07-2011, 09:25 AM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Methanoxide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your help, much appreciated!

Now I have to go through de-carb and then vacuum test and they submit to Mazda to see if it gets replaced...
Old 09-07-2011, 09:16 PM
  #9  
40th anniversary Edition
 
gwilliams6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grapevine, Texas
Posts: 2,926
Received 133 Likes on 114 Posts
Mazda wont replace engine unless it tesst 6.0 or lower (or adjusted number from 6.0 kcps at sea level and 250 rpm) . Mazda considers 6.0 and higher as in the acceptable range. (I have this from my Mazda service manager, who is a honest straight shooter).
Old 09-08-2011, 02:15 AM
  #10  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by gwilliams6
Mazda wont replace engine unless it tesst 6.0 or lower (or adjusted number from 6.0 kcps at sea level and 250 rpm) . Mazda considers 6.0 and higher as in the acceptable range. (I have this from my Mazda service manager, who is a honest straight shooter).
Mazda says otherwise. 680kpa@250rpm. Read the service manual!
Old 09-08-2011, 06:44 AM
  #11  
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
paimon.soror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Between Cones
Posts: 7,560
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
dont argue with him or hes gunna tell us about his 7 different rotaries he owned in the last 40 years and the compression values on each one
Old 09-08-2011, 06:44 AM
  #12  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Methanoxide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gwilliams6
Mazda wont replace engine unless it tesst 6.0 or lower (or adjusted number from 6.0 kcps at sea level and 250 rpm) . Mazda considers 6.0 and higher as in the acceptable range. (I have this from my Mazda service manager, who is a honest straight shooter).
It's funny because my service manager said the same thing!
But I quickly pointed out that it's for 250rpm, mine tested @ 290's. Surely once corrected to 250 I would produce well below 6.0. (I don't do math...)
Old 09-08-2011, 07:20 AM
  #13  
40th anniversary Edition
 
gwilliams6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grapevine, Texas
Posts: 2,926
Received 133 Likes on 114 Posts
Hmmm two Mazda service managers, one in Canada, one in the U.S. said the same thing, I wonder how that happened bse50 ! Hey if the OP can get them to agree to replace the engine fine, it just wouldn't happen at my Mazda dealership with compression numbers above 6.0 kps at 250rpm and sea level.

BTW paimon soror, so kind of you to remember about my cars.

Last edited by gwilliams6; 09-08-2011 at 07:25 AM.
Old 09-08-2011, 07:23 AM
  #14  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I don't know. Words mean nothing when there's something else written on paper. At least here even the latest service manual says 680kpa@250rpms.

If Mazda said otherwise then it's up to the techs\managers to show you where that is written.
Old 09-09-2011, 09:19 AM
  #15  
40th anniversary Edition
 
gwilliams6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grapevine, Texas
Posts: 2,926
Received 133 Likes on 114 Posts
What year service manual are you quoting? My service manager says his new service manual says 6.0 at 250rpm. This mazda dealership is one of the biggest on the east coast with multiple dealerships, and they won't do an engine replacement if the compression numbers are 6.0 or higher. hasn't happened, and they won't do it. So if the OP can get it done with his numbers, great Just won't happen at my dealership,end of story
Old 09-09-2011, 11:31 AM
  #16  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Methanoxide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's true, they raised the minimum. Dirty move if you ask me.

Just to update:
Decarb didn't change numbers, failed vacuum test.
Submitted receipts for past 2 years and received approval.
No engines available in north america right now, so we don't know when it will happen.

I have to pay for consumables, which is a drag because I just had an oil change and had all fluids replaced beginning of summer... ugh...
Oh well, good time to check clutch and replace my rattling clutch release bearing!

Any other recommendations while the engine is out?
I already changed all the hoses, water pump and thermostat housing.

Thanks for all your help guys!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
30
06-07-2020 12:21 PM
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
SBGarage
Group Buy Center
1
09-12-2015 08:18 PM
TJSiegrist
New Member Forum
9
09-10-2015 09:29 AM
rxwilly8
New Member Forum
1
09-02-2015 02:42 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Yet another Low Compression Results Thread...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.