Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Shifting without the clutch?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-14-2007, 05:13 PM
  #1  
Destroying Threads
Thread Starter
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Shifting without the clutch?

Hey guys, I know this has been discussed before in another thread (which I can't find with the search function)

but I have a quick question, I am not trying to do it, but today driving back from getting nitrous refill, I was getting ready to go into 2nd gear (didn't press clutch yet) suddenly, I heard the whining of the synchro die down, and at about 3k rpm, I was in gear...........then suddenly the car stalled.............even though my car was moving at about 20mph..............

should I be worried? what the hell is going on?
Old 11-14-2007, 05:16 PM
  #2  
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Jedi54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 22,396
Received 2,631 Likes on 1,881 Posts
yes, it's possible.
No, you shouldn't be worried about stalling.

Use the clutch, your car will thank you
Old 11-14-2007, 05:43 PM
  #3  
Destroying Threads
Thread Starter
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
No, I mean I didn't mean to do it, it just happened because I was leaning the stick on 2nd gear, suddenly it winded down and slipped in to gear, and then died.........
Old 11-14-2007, 07:26 PM
  #4  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,721
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
It won't restart or you don't understand why it died?

Either way, it should have nothing to do with it going into gear.
Old 12-26-2007, 07:10 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
bd32322's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Posting in this thread - since the topic title seems to match although I dont have a problem as described by the parent poster.

Do you guys shift without the clutch or preload the shifter? It actually seems to shift faster but I am not sure if its going to damage the transmission. Apparently its a common practice on street motorcycles, but of course, they could have a different transmission.

The process I am describing is this:
Method 1)
Get to a high rpm, say in 1st. Apply pressure on the shifter to go to 2 (It will stick in 1 at this point). Let out the gas and the shifter will slide through to 2 as soon as it matches the rpm for 2nd gear at that speed and hit the gas immediately.

A slightly smoother way seems to be to use the clutch to help move the shifter easier. So get the rpms up, preload the shifter to switch to 2nd gear, let up on the gas. As the shifter starts sliding from 1 to neutral, press the clutch lightly and shift into 2 quickly - hit the gas.

I have no idea about the mechanics of transmissions - I could read up on sites - but until I see one in action I wont understand So hoping some of you guys know whether this is damaging.

Thx,
Bodi
Old 12-26-2007, 08:21 PM
  #6  
rotorized!!!
 
daisuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
putting pressure on the stick while waiting for the sound of the synchros to die down means that you're stressing the synchros a bit. The way to shift it without the clutch (so to speak) is to pull the gear out of where it was (prefferably with the clutch) and then blip the throttle, wait for the revs to match and slip it into gear with no grinding at the sweet spot, the catch is that you have to know from experience at what speeds and revs the cogs are going to mesh.

double clutching to shift is actually faster than a normal shift if you know how to do it and older race cars tended to have un-synched clutches for this exact reason, of course it takes an expert to shift them right and make them last.

I'm no expert, but motorcycles are different because they have a wet clutch and I believe most bike transmissions aren't synchronized because they don't have to be.
Old 12-26-2007, 08:56 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
bd32322's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with you on double clutching and rev matching in neutral for downshifts - I do that myself. But I was talking about shifting up from a lower gear to a higher gear. Maybe you were talking about double clutching on upshifts also?

Also I think double clutching on an upshift will be slower than even normal upshifts - in my opinion - I never tried it since a normal shift with clutch is smooth enough - except that normal shifting just doesnt seem fast.
Old 12-26-2007, 10:09 PM
  #8  
The Professor
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I wouldn't recommend this.

If you want to shift without the clutch, then buy an automatic transmission
Old 12-27-2007, 03:56 AM
  #9  
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to all of the process' above, here's a refined version or maybe the correct version of doing it. and in fact, once the car is moving you don't really need the clutch anymore.

1) any gear accel. let off gas and simultaneously pull gear out and (with slight pressure) put the shifter into the next gear.
2)then accel as usual.

testing step. example.
to know what gear/speed/rpm are the synchro's match it, try
1) about 20mph, let ur car be in neuutral
2)rev the engine a bit...maybe around 3k,then let it settle (blip the throttle)
3)with shifter going into 2nd, let it drop into gear.

its harder to explain this then to show in person. but all it is is matching the synchronizer's speed. and if you can remember exactly what mph in what gear at what rpm's...you'lll have better chance at getting right after the first few tries.

this is not a recommended technique to use on daily driving. and this technique is a must for a situation when you're stranded and your clutch line blew...which in our case, its really bad since clutch and brake share the same reservoir.
Old 12-27-2007, 12:22 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
bd32322's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Double-clutching refers to the process of pushing the clutch pedal in to release the tranny from one gear, letting out the pedal, then releasing the clutch again to shift to the next gear. This was why synchronized transmissions were invented and double-clutching is no longer necessary.
Yes - but if you try double clutching - you will find that its much much smoother than simply rev matching and shifting and it doesn't work your synchros. Try it sometime - it will need quite a bit of practice but the downshifts will be teh smoothest ever.

Anyway I digress from the topic - which is to find out whether up-shifting quicker without the clutch is causing my transmission harm.

TrochoidMagic's reply seems to indicate that it could be okay - although not completely sure.
Old 12-27-2007, 12:35 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
New2u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by staticlag
I wouldn't recommend this.

If you want to shift without the clutch, then buy an automatic transmission
+1 Agreed
Old 12-27-2007, 01:45 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
ken-x8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
... I am not sure what the purpose of double clutching would be in a synchronized transmission. It doesn't reduce the load placed on the synchros because they will need to spin up just the same no matter what...
Double clutching on downshifts saves wear on the synchros. Instead of the synchros spinning the input shaft up to speed, the engine does most of the work. Also easier on the shift linkage because if you get the matching close you don't have to push as hard or as long.

Double clutching upshifts is a different deal. As near as I can tell, it lets you granny shift in a way that gives the illusion of knowing something rather than looking like a granny shifting wus.

Ken
Old 12-27-2007, 02:19 PM
  #13  
The Professor
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ken-x8
Double clutching on downshifts saves wear on the synchros. Instead of the synchros spinning the input shaft up to speed, the engine does most of the work. Also easier on the shift linkage because if you get the matching close you don't have to push as hard or as long.

Double clutching upshifts is a different deal. As near as I can tell, it lets you granny shift in a way that gives the illusion of knowing something rather than looking like a granny shifting wus.

Ken
Yes, double clutching on downshifts does save wear on the syncros.

No, the technique described in this thread about not pushing in the clutch "the thing that takes the load off the transmission aka, the thing that takes the load off the syncros" is not double clutching, and it is directly putting too much pressure on the syncros.

If you ever put any pressure at all on the shifter while the clutch is still connected, then you are wearing out your syncros!!!

Pretend like the shifter and the clutch pedal are red hot, only touch them for the minimum amount of time to sucessfully complete a shift, then hands off
Old 12-27-2007, 02:19 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
prozach007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Waco,TX
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The process being described, floating or speed shifting, is not using the clutch to shift. That is how big trucks (18 wheelers) are shifted. By matching the rpm of the trans with the engine rpm, and applying slight pressure to the stick it will fall into the next higher or lower gear. However those transmissions are designed to be either double clutched, or floated. They also require the clutch to be engaged to start the truck from a stop, or stop with the trans in gear. I don't shift my 8 that way!!! Use the clutch!
Old 12-27-2007, 11:46 PM
  #15  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
so whats an appropriate non-granny upshift?

i assume heel-toeing counts as a non-granny downshift.
Old 12-28-2007, 12:20 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
ken-x8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by kersh4w
so whats an appropriate non-granny upshift?
That's entirely between you, your transmission, and your mood.

Originally Posted by kersh4w
i assume heel-toeing counts as a non-granny downshift.
Heel-toe is separate from granny. One can also argue that a true granny shifter never downshifts, except to put it back in first after coming to a stop.

Ken
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
10-04-2023 05:24 PM
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
4
05-31-2022 07:51 AM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 01:53 PM
XianUnix
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
09-29-2015 03:48 PM
tommy26Germany
Series I Trouble Shooting
11
09-29-2015 10:33 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Shifting without the clutch?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.