Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Renesis OIL PRESSURE Discussion with Dealer Tech

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #401  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
oil pressure gauge ordered---should have never sold mine to begin with.
OD
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #402  
RenKat's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Bypass Info

The front bypass is to keep your oil coolers and lines from poping.
The rear one is the oil press reg.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #403  
PhillipM's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: UK
The only thing I'm not keen on with Filtermags is that a lot of the better quality oils are using slightly magnetic dry-lubricant films, to get them to 'stick' to the engine internals and provide more protection on startup - depending on the particle size, there is a slight possibility of the FilterMag pulling it out of suspension.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #404  
rotarymike's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Charleston, SC
Was there ever a consensus? There are 17 pages of speculating and winnowing the good info out just doesn't seem to be working for me today.

I remember my 90 RX7s (NA and T2) called for different oils between certain temp ranges, but 10w40 and 20w50 were almost universal.

Personally, I use 15W40 diesel oil in my '88 T2 engine, but it's got less than 5k miles on it so I have no idea of the wear. It's pretty heavily modded so I can't say how the thicker oil increases pressure or reduces MPG. It has a bypass pellet in the eshaft.

Here's a thought - Racing beat offers a racing oil pres. regulator for rotaries. It consists of a new rear regulator and a couple of shim washers for the front regulator. On a S4/S5 NA motor, 90 PSI. The thing was cheap and easy too - drop oil pan and install it.

I wonder why Mazda didn't use the FD e-shaft bearings. I've used those in building uprated FC engines. It's not like they're any more expensive than the earlier ones.

Last data point - I use an oil filter for a 72 RX2 on pretty much everything rotary. They're huge, Fram # 2849. I use a Purolator version of same, can't remember the # off the top of my head.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #405  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
As Renkat stated, the front is for the purpose of protecting coolers and hoses, whereas the rear regulates system pressure. That spring being altered on Mazdas part is not a culprit here with bearing wear.

When we increase the pressure by changing the rear regulator we modify that front spring as well.

Paul.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #406  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
So someone make a DIY already!
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #407  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
dont rush in to do this yet--little more homework is required. It does look to be something worthwhile to look into and it may end up being a really good thing to do--but just a little more work is required.
ODe
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 09:41 PM
  #408  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Sorry I am inpatient.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 10:45 PM
  #409  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
Originally Posted by rotarymike
I wonder why Mazda didn't use the FD e-shaft bearings. I've used those in building uprated FC engines. It's not like they're any more expensive than the earlier ones.
.
They do use the FD Stationary Gear Bearings on all RX-8 6 Port (high power engines) with the Bearing "Stopper Pin".

It was the 4 port (used in early RX-8 Automatics and some UK sticks), that had the FC Bearings, 0820-10-502B, also used in the R100, RX-2,3,4,5 12A 7, NA FC)

And yes the FD or 'High Power' Bearings are being used in the US Re-man 4 port Auto's.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 10:50 PM
  #410  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Mazmart
As Renkat stated, the front is for the purpose of protecting coolers and hoses, whereas the rear regulates system pressure. That spring being altered on Mazdas part is not a culprit here with bearing wear.

When we increase the pressure by changing the rear regulator we modify that front spring as well.

Paul.
Yes, so do you believe the Modded Rear Valve will help prevent this Bearing Wear in earlier RX-8's, Paul??

It appears the Mod increases oil pressure by about 20-25 PSI, has to be a good move.

The 09's don't have the rear valve any longer.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 10:53 PM
  #411  
longpath's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 631
Likes: 3
From: Stamford, CT
Since a consensus still seems to be a fair time off, I'm waiting for more information. Ideally, I'm hoping this is something that can be fixed without having to pull the front cover from the engine; but if not, then I'll put it on my to-do list for the eventual rebuild.

Either way, sincere thanks for those who have posted already and are still working at getting to the bottom of this issue.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 11:03 PM
  #412  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
Originally Posted by longpath
Since a consensus still seems to be a fair time off, I'm waiting for more information. Ideally, I'm hoping this is something that can be fixed without having to pull the front cover from the engine; but if not, then I'll put it on my to-do list for the eventual rebuild.

Either way, sincere thanks for those who have posted already and are still working at getting to the bottom of this issue.
From looking at my 09 (different Sump pan) I am sure you can remove your Sump pan freely and Mod these Valves, you just need you car up high enough to work on.

I would like to think any concerned RX-8 owner or enthusiast could get this Mod done, why wait until an engine rebuild?

But yes, this Mod is nothing new, what is "new" is this bearing wear for any rotary at low mileage, one thing I don't understand is why Mazda US are not modding their re-man engines to improve OP.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #413  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
I wonder if the internal part of the 09 sump (oil pan in the states mate!) design has changed?
Any more baffles, oil screen change or deeper pickup area to handle the increased flow?
Just asking all the questions I can before actually doing this mod.
OD
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 03:54 PM
  #414  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
Originally Posted by olddragger
I wonder if the internal part of the 09 sump (oil pan in the states mate!) design has changed?
Any more baffles, oil screen change or deeper pickup area to handle the increased flow?
Just asking all the questions I can before actually doing this mod.
OD
The OIL Pan has Changed, yes there are new baffles and the "extended" part which goes under the exhaust manifold (Larger Capacity), and YES I have heard it will fit S1's, but I can't confirm.

Not sure on the Oil pick up as is it different Part Number and Slightly different looking for new oil pump design.?

Last edited by ASH8; Oct 28, 2009 at 03:56 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #415  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
There's nothing wrong with some increase in oil pressure but make sure we all know why we seek it prior to doing it.

Paul.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #416  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
*still hugging my 20w50 oil*
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #417  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Originally Posted by nycgps
*still hugging my 20w50 oil*
HA ha! Your 20w50 loves you too I'm sure.

Paul.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 06:37 PM
  #418  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
Originally Posted by nycgps
*still hugging my 20w50 oil*
Isn't it too much though? as stated in the other thread we may want to find a compromise between your 5w20 (which is like ****, we use 5w30 at least) and extreme grades. I use a 10w40 and Rome never goes below -2\-3°C. My box usually sees temps around 15°C.
I'm just making it a bit more practical than theoretical. What do you think?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #419  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by bse50
Isn't it too much though? as stated in the other thread we may want to find a compromise between your 5w20 (which is like ****, we use 5w30 at least) and extreme grades. I use a 10w40 and Rome never goes below -2\-3°C. My box usually sees temps around 15°C.
I'm just making it a bit more practical than theoretical. What do you think?
my "personal" opinion is that, a good "Synthetic" 20wXX oil will not freeze at 20f/-6.6 C (a good one usually be able to flow good even at -20f)

it did hit like 16 or 15f last year. Thats the coldest outside temp In NYC. so that means 20w50 will be good for me "all year long"

and there is no doubt that w50 will protect parts better at operating temperature than, say, w20 oil.

I dont really see the point of arguing which oil is better, just use it for certain amount of miles, open the engine up. see who is the winner.

so far we have been seeing "bad" results from 5w20 and 5w30, and it came from person who probably build more engines in a month than our whole life will ever be.

Some has pointed that 13b-msp has highest rpm in the whole 13B/12A family. I mean, Oh yes I know that. I have a FC remember? but seriously speaking, most people will not keep their engines running at 8K+ for extended period of time for no reason. so that means most engine spend "most of its life" running below 8K mark. which is the same as my FC. FC engines never got the same wear as FE(at least not 50K miles!)

no one did 20w50 all the way on this engine yet. Im doing that right now, but results wont be in for "quite a while", and I have a Reman engine so god knows what part has been re-use which one is brand new. Barrrrhhh I dont care, I just gonna do it.

Last edited by nycgps; Oct 28, 2009 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #420  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
We have also seen good results with 5w20 and 5w30.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 07:04 PM
  #421  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
That's a good point nycgps but i still think that the higher viscosity might cause some reduced flow issues, at least when too cold. That's why i'm sticking with the 10w40. In the end it is not too thin compared to a 20w50 when hot.
Wonder how the OMP takes these heavy oils though... that's not a problem for me since i do premix

EDIT:
Anyway our manuals contains a diagram for temperatures\oil weights... at least here in Europe!
Re-edit:
I checked my manual and it states the different oil grades to use in certain temperatures ranges. You manual (usa\canada) has got a similar chart for different temperatures but only says 5w20 (section 8, page 9). Since ours says that we can use different viscosities i don't think that oil pressure should be affected too much.
If you want i can snap a pic and post it both here and in the other oil thread.

Last edited by bse50; Oct 28, 2009 at 07:38 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 07:43 PM
  #422  
PhillipM's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: UK
Originally Posted by nycgps
my "personal" opinion is that, a good "Synthetic" 20wXX oil will not freeze at 20f/-6.6 C (a good one usually be able to flow good even at -20f)
It doesn't need to freeze, it'll flow like molasses at that temperature anyway, what it can flow at, and what it's useful at, are two seperate things.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #423  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by bse50
That's a good point nycgps but i still think that the higher viscosity might cause some reduced flow issues, at least when too cold. That's why i'm sticking with the 10w40. In the end it is not too thin compared to a 20w50 when hot.
Wonder how the OMP takes these heavy oils though... that's not a problem for me since i do premix

EDIT:
Anyway our manuals contains a diagram for temperatures\oil weights... at least here in Europe!
Re-edit:
I checked my manual and it states the different oil grades to use in certain temperatures ranges. You manual (usa\canada) has got a similar chart for different temperatures but only says 5w20 (section 8, page 9). Since ours says that we can use different viscosities i don't think that oil pressure should be affected too much.
If you want i can snap a pic and post it both here and in the other oil thread.
no chart for my manual, they just "recommend" 5w20 and call it a day -_-

Originally Posted by PhillipM
It doesn't need to freeze, it'll flow like molasses at that temperature anyway, what it can flow at, and what it's useful at, are two seperate things.
Freeze is already too late.

What I meant was that, a good synthetic oil will still flow ok even at bloody cold temperature like 15f. so its ok to use them.

I actually put a bottle of new 20w50 RP into my freezer the other day, my mom thought I was crazy, then I pour it, it still pours fine, just a bit slower than usual.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #424  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
lets dont turn this into a oil thread .....God forbid.

Ash appreciate the international cooperation mate Asking about the "oil pan" because I am wondering about possible oil pump cavitation issues-- if that is a possibility. If the pan is interchangeable that would be cool. I will ask my parts man to do some research also and a good Mazda buddy mechanic to look at it.
Paul I am thinking since I have upped my power output a good bit --I may want a little more pressure, especially at cruise, and on the track. Not much i can do about the idle pressure except upping the viscosity as I have done.
Now what oil filter would we use--the 09 one--right?
OD
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 09:32 PM
  #425  
longpath's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 631
Likes: 3
From: Stamford, CT
Originally Posted by ASH8
From looking at my 09 (different Sump pan) I am sure you can remove your Sump pan freely and Mod these Valves, you just need you car up high enough to work on.

I would like to think any concerned RX-8 owner or enthusiast could get this Mod done, why wait until an engine rebuild?

But yes, this Mod is nothing new, what is "new" is this bearing wear for any rotary at low mileage, one thing I don't understand is why Mazda US are not modding their re-man engines to improve OP.
Please forgive me if I missed this in reading over all the pages of this discussion; but from what I saw:
  1. the OEM regulator can be crushed as Pineapple Racing does (I don't have a hydraulic press or anything similar so that's pretty much a non-starter for me)
  2. A Street High Performance regulator such as Racing Beat offers can be used (http://www.racingbeat.com/resultset.asp?PartNumber=11810)
  3. or a "racing" regulator can be used (http://www.racingbeat.com/resultset.asp?PartNumber=11812)

If I understand correctly, the "racing" regulator would give a high RPM pressure level similar to the S2 RX-8, providing that the front regulator was shimmed accordingly and the Street High Performance regulator would still be a little low. Is that right, or did I manage to confuse myself?

I don't have the benefit of a garage so I'm forced to do the work exposed to whatever the weather happens to be when I'm working on it, so I'm hoping to get this sorted out, parts ordered and time set aside before Winter sets in, in earnest (working on a car while lying in snow is not my idea of fun).

Last edited by longpath; Oct 28, 2009 at 09:35 PM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.