Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Pulleys.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-20-2005, 09:46 PM
  #26  
Shock and Awe
 
NoTears316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Fanman
you would also need to get a new belt as it would fall off otherwise, which I don't think the kit has
I thought you had the SR kit. I know mine came with belts.
Old 12-20-2005, 10:29 PM
  #27  
mine's better
 
zaglo6204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im a wee bit confused. from wat i understand, or thought i understood, the weight savings would simply allow the engine to rev more quickly, which would thus allow for quicker acceleration because of the celerity with which you would reach the 'powerband'. but under load, ie the engine making the tires turn on the ground (with traction), that would set a far lower limit on rev speed than the mass of the pulleys.....im so unbelievably confused.....AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH i just gave myself a headache
Old 12-20-2005, 10:43 PM
  #28  
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
carbonRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by zaglo6204
im a wee bit confused. from wat i understand, or thought i understood, the weight savings would simply allow the engine to rev more quickly, which would thus allow for quicker acceleration
if you were talking about a lightweight flywheel, that would be measurably true. It is also true with the pulleys, but the difference is so minisule, it is unmeasurable by any practical means. Now, I contend (and this is somewhat disagreed upon) that you could measure, on a dyno, a hp increase with underdriven pulleys with an underdrive ratio greater than 20% over stock (about 2-8hp, big range for flame safety).
Old 12-20-2005, 10:48 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
AlexCisneros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post


...get the UR pullies. They're good, mkay...
Old 12-20-2005, 11:23 PM
  #30  
mine's better
 
zaglo6204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, thats wat i thought. i just confused myself for a moment there......happens way too often. i think my parents dropped me on my head when i was little, but thats okay. i still love them for helping with car funding....hehehehehehehe. thanks for clearin it up carbon.
Old 12-20-2005, 11:37 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had to adjust my belts as well, still won't justify substantial increases. In the beginning of the post, the difference is only a few % of underdrive.
Old 12-20-2005, 11:42 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
I've had underdrive pullies for RX-7s for years. I can't feel a thing different. It's not saying there isn't a difference. It's just not big enough for the human body to feel with any degree of accuracy. A dyno might see it though. The weight differences between pullies is a nothing more than advertising as people believe it makes a difference. As has been stated earlier, it's the location of the weight to the rotational centerline that makes the big difference. The pullies concentrate this weight close in. I could care less what a big V8 has as far as pullies go. We aren't talking about a V8 and their harmonic balancers weigh more than all the pullies combined anyways. The power gain comes from being under driven. Period. If and that's a big if, there is a power gain from weight loss on this car, it would be miniscule and probably smaller than the variation between 2 dyno runs so you'd never even prove it was there. I always find it funny that people swear by pullies and it's gains. A gain is a gain yes but don't expect to noticably feel it. That would be a placebo effect. If you combine this with several other small gains, they could add up to something you would actually notice though so they aren't worthless.
Old 12-21-2005, 10:36 PM
  #33  
Air + Fuel + Spark = Boom
 
KJ238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brunei. Do u know where tht is?
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm using a pair of Trust (GReddy in states) pulleys for the SE3P... I'll take a couple of pics later...
Old 12-22-2005, 06:45 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Jaguar_MBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the SR Motorsports pullies on my RX-8. If you must get Pullies, I would suggest UR ones and save yourself a couple of hundred dollars.

On a regular piston car these work just fine because they have a heavy harmonic balancer. The RX-8 does not. Reducing weight on the crank shaft increases HP to the rear wheels...or reduces inefficiencies that reduce HP from the Rear Wheels. A standard harmonic balance on my 1992 300zx must have weighed ~ 20lbs and I replaced that with an aluminum unit that weighed ~ 4-5lbs or so. That is where the performance gain is to be had. RX8's underdrive crank pulley must weight ~ 1.25lb stock.

Last edited by Jaguar_MBA; 12-22-2005 at 06:49 AM.
Old 12-22-2005, 05:55 PM
  #35  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
BoosTED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Anyone factor in RPM's?

The majority of gains, if not all, are after 4,000 RPM's. It is there for me and even if you barely pay attention to how your car feels you will notice a difference.

Since we have a higher revving engine the weight being less will make more of a difference with even small underdrive since it is spinning that many more revolutions per minute.
Old 06-23-2006, 04:40 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Jaguar_MBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right..all the gain is due to less parasitic drag....very limited gain from weight reduction....jump for joy +1HP
Old 10-23-2016, 04:30 PM
  #37  
New Member
 
Riogrande's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody knows how to unscrew the main harmonic bolt? Is it clockwise or normal counterclock???
Old 10-23-2016, 04:46 PM
  #38  
New Member
 
Riogrande's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trying to remove the crankshaft main bolt harmonic balancer. Is it counter or clockwise?
Old 10-23-2016, 06:10 PM
  #39  
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
StealthTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A Pacific Island.
Posts: 7,280
Received 173 Likes on 130 Posts
It's a 'normal' lefty-loosey bolt.
Try using an extension and letting it lay on the ground, and use the starter to break the torque.
Old 11-04-2016, 03:51 PM
  #40  
New Member
 
Riogrande's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trying to change the main oil seal. I will try using the engine itself to loosen it up with a 1/2 inch ratchet against the ground with the Computer fuse off.

Last edited by Riogrande; 11-04-2016 at 03:54 PM. Reason: added letter
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikeferrell
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
05-27-2015 03:49 PM
I-luv-Doritos
New Member Forum
8
10-27-2014 05:42 AM
jasonrxeight
RX-8 Multimedia/Photo Gallery
11
11-10-2011 10:37 AM
JOLIET WANKEL
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
21
04-29-2008 09:20 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Pulleys.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM.