Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Gas/Oil Premix Thread

Old Jan 22, 2010 | 09:13 AM
  #2176  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by jmc23200
haha BG 44K ad at the bottom of the thread. Epic win for BG 44K, good product

Anyway, I wonder what the minimum amount of cleaner(MMO, FP+, UCL) is that you can add to the gas and still have it work. Since they are all primarily solvents/cleaners, less may be more in this case. Would mixing 1-3oz of MMO/FP+/UCL with 5-7oz Idemitsu actually do anything? Hmmmm, where can I find some carbon covered parts to test? Any thoughts?
I don't use much FP+, the manufacturer only recommends 1 oz per 10 gallons of gas. Part of the reason Jax recommended it was because of the unique cyclohexanone ingredient that is said to convert carbon into a colloidal graphite lubricant, which should not attack your oil films like more aggresive solvents while also providing additional lubrication properties. Sounds like a neat idea but of course there are no double-blind, placebo-controlled experimental data in thousands of Renesis engines, just experience by seemingly knowledgable people who also drive pick-ups.

Last edited by robrecht; Jan 22, 2010 at 09:38 AM.
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #2177  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
In order to test it based off of the spark plugs(which isn't 100% of everything that is going on in your engine) you would need to:

1) Buy new plugs and replace the ones you have
2) Drive for 3 months/3,000 miles with NO premixes of any kind making sure to only use the same gas station or gas company ie Mobile, Shell, etc.
3) Pull the plugs, take pics, and write a few sentences describing the plugs
4) Either completely clean or buy new spark plugs, and repeat the process using premixes.

It would take you about 4-6 months to gather data and you would need to be **** about it as to not contaminate your data(like using random cheap gas from freds gas for example). This would not conclude 100% what is going on in the entire engine, but it may provide some insight for the products if the buildup on the plugs were very different.
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #2178  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by robrecht
I don't use much FP+, the manufacturer only recommends 1 oz per 10 gallons of gas. Part of the reason Jax recommended it because of the unique cyclohexanone ingredient that is said to convert carbon into a colloidal graphite lubricant, which should not attack your fuel films like more aggresive solvents while also providing additional lubrication properties. Sounds like a neat idea but of course there is no experimental data in Renesis engines, just experience by seemingly knowledgable people who also drive pick-ups.
^ Same thing for MMO. Not actual experimental data, just he say.

We should try to get some really carboned up chains, cut the chains into say 4-6 inch pieces and only expose half of the chain to a gas and premix cocktail we are using for a specific period of time. This way we can compare the before and after of the chain and see what effects the premixes have as a lubricator and as a solvent. We would be able to see how aggressive of a cleaner the premix is. I know this isnt a 100%, but it would be interesting to find the results
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #2179  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by jmc23200
^ Same thing for MMO. Not actual experimental data, just he say.

We should try to get some really carboned up chains, cut the chains into say 4-6 inch pieces and only expose half of the chain to a gas and premix cocktail we are using for a specific period of time. This way we can compare the before and after of the chain and see what effects the premixes have as a lubricator and as a solvent. We would be able to see how aggressive of a cleaner the premix is. I know this isnt a 100%, but it would be interesting to find the results
People have sort of done that informally for years when performing piston soaks, either when rebuilding or just cleaning old engines. But I would never choose the more aggressive cleaners as a premix in a rotary (or other engines) as such tests tell you nothing about the lubrication properties at combustion temps, interference with oil films, effects on seals, etc. Still, it's always fun to do experiments and post pics!

Last edited by robrecht; Jan 24, 2010 at 08:24 AM.
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #2180  
SpIcEz's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Montreal,QC
You guys know that Amsoil premixes (Saber Pro and Interceptor) both have detergents and cleaners in them.

Might be a good idea to look into what the details are and see if its even worth adding cleaners separately at all.
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 11:02 PM
  #2181  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
The cleaners may not be specifically for carbon were as fp+ is specifically for carbon. I would prefer a high quality lube and a carbon specific cleaner premix. FP+ and idumitsu sounds about right
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 12:37 AM
  #2182  
MTspeeds1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Ok, I thought reading this thread would help me understand pre mixing better, but Im still pretty confused. What exactly is pre-mixing and how does it benefit our engines?
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 01:47 AM
  #2183  
always.anthony's Avatar
is looking for his torque
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MTspeeds1
Ok, I thought reading this thread would help me understand pre mixing better, but Im still pretty confused. What exactly is pre-mixing and how does it benefit our engines?
sorry, but you didnt read.

premix, mixing in "stuff" with gas

why:to lubricate MORE, our omp doesnt get everything

the debate is how much and what to use

general idea: you want good, clean burning lube/cleaner

most either use mmo or 2 stroke oil and a cleaner.

i use just mmo atm, but if i could i would use a 2stroke oil and a cleaner
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 01:49 AM
  #2184  
MTspeeds1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
ok Mr. specific, what is that stuff? I read something about chainsaw oil. Is that it?
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 06:02 AM
  #2185  
SpIcEz's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Montreal,QC
I'm usually not the "SEARCH" type, but if after 88 pages you dont understand and are making snyde comments, I dont see how we can help you.

There are dozens of products mentioned. Mostly all ok. Look them up.

Here is one hint: 2 cycle oil.


-----------------------------------------------------

On another note:

jmc23200

I just looked it up,

http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/atp.aspx

Seems ATP's detergents target "hard-carbon deposits".

and

http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/ait.aspx

Surprisingly Interceptor might be the better product for us here, it has even more detergents for carbon.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 09:53 AM
  #2186  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
FP+ uses a chemical that converts carbon into a graphite lubricator I believe. FP+ seems to have the best method of cleaning as it doesnt seem to be as aggressive as some of the other cleaners. Even with Amsoil products, I am wondering if the cleaners(because they are there for Hard Carbon Deposits) are too aggressive and attack the oil film.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #2187  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by MTspeeds1
ok Mr. specific, what is that stuff? I read something about chainsaw oil. Is that it?
I encourage you to read the thread. It really does answer your questions.


Old Jan 25, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #2188  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
A little off topic and even translated it is hard to understand but the picture says it all. http://www.mazda.co.jp/service/parts...e_renesis.html
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #2189  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Old news.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #2190  
MTspeeds1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Nubo
I encourage you to read the thread. It really does answer your questions.


as far as reading it to know if it is safe for our engines this thread contains pretty much opinions. I want to know if it really does help our engines but people have different opinions on pre-mixing.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 02:20 PM
  #2191  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Old news.
Says the guy using amsoil saber pro pffffffffffffffft lol

First time I have seen it

Amsoil Interceptor has intrigued me but if I am going to buy something online, I will buy Idemitsu.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #2192  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by jmc23200
Says the guy using amsoil saber pro pffffffffffffffft lol

First time I have seen it

Amsoil Interceptor has intrigued me but if I am going to buy something online, I will buy Idemitsu.
We have know n about the Renesis only synthetic oil for some time now, what does that have to do with Amsoil?
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #2193  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Nothing wrong with amsoil saber pro
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 02:44 PM
  #2194  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
It was a joke
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #2195  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I don't get it.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #2196  
ganseg's Avatar
Nature vs. Nurture
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Maple Grove, MN
Originally Posted by SpIcEz
I just looked it up,

http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/atp.aspx

Seems ATP's detergents target "hard-carbon deposits".

and

http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/ait.aspx

Surprisingly Interceptor might be the better product for us here, it has even more detergents for carbon.
I wonder what some of the technical specs mean for our application:

Pour point, flash point and fire point are lower on Interceptor. Good or bad for us?

Last edited by ganseg; Jan 25, 2010 at 06:12 PM.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #2197  
the1jesster's Avatar
Trained true Killers
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Triad NC
MO This form has been a god send

Thanks for all the help from the deadicated people in this club to date I have solved my sticky 4th gear by adding just a touch more tranny fluid through the stick shift installed a flow master super 44 muffler and now no more rough idle thanks to the pre mix just went to the auto store 30min ago and boom no more crapy idle yet agian thanks to all how take time to support our fight against what the EPA has done to these wounderfull cars
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 10:27 PM
  #2198  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Punctuation is your friend.
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 10:43 PM
  #2199  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Originally Posted by the1jesster
Thanks for all the help from the deadicated people in this club. To date I have solved my sticky 4th gear by adding just a touch more tranny fluid through the stick shift. Installed a flow master super 44 muffler and now no more rough idle. Thanks to the pre mix. Just went to the auto store 30min ago and boom no more crapy idle. Yet agian thanks to all how take time to support our fight against what the EPA has done to these wounderfull cars
uh fixed
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 09:16 AM
  #2200  
jmc23200's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
7H3r3 15 n07H1n6 wr0n6 w17H 1nC0rr3C7 0r M1551n6 pUnC7U4710n 0n 7H3 1n73r 7U835 45 L0n6 45 y0U 4r3 7yp1n6 1n 4 r34LLy L0n6 4nd C0nfU51n6 w4y

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.