Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Gas/Oil Premix Thread

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #1376  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
[QUOTE=Delmeister;2570383]Don't knock the math --- the assumptions for sure. Garbage in, garbage out.QUOTE]

My math is a lot simpler. On the highway I use about 1 quart per 3000 miles. Comes down to roughly 1 drop per minute. Hard to imagine that happening in forceful spurts, but I don't know what the duty cycle is. Maybe it "saves it up".

But in any case I normally bring it up when people talk about the oil being "injected into the combustion chamber", because that conjures visions of something working similarly and in parallel with the fuel injectors. I.e., one would imagine some constant cloud of oil droplets. The 1 drop per minute visualization is a useful antidote to that concept. This engine is very miserly with oil. In operation I'd still wager it most often resembles a dribble, just on principle. The engineers would want to minimize the amount of oil "wasted" in the combustion flow.
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #1377  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by robrecht
What is this gummy 4-stroke oil like that is left in the combustion chamber? Does it have any lubricating beneft at all? I suppose it ultimately enters the cat or contributes to carbon deposits within the engine. I'm really just wondering if any Mazda engineers could see any technical advantages of the use of 4-stroke oil by the OMP. Otherwise, I cannot understand why they have not implemented a Sohn-type slution. Has this approach never been tried by Mazda? I know that some speculate that the OMP using engine oil is suppoedly seen as a more consumer friendly solution. But I'm just trying to question if anyone could see any technical merit here. If not, shame on Mazda!

"The perfect is the enemy of the good" -- Voltaire
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #1378  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by Nubo
"The perfect is the enemy of the good" -- Voltaire
Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien, mais ...
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #1379  
Delmeister's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 3
From: Eastern Ontario
[QUOTE=Nubo;2570915]
Originally Posted by Delmeister
Don't knock the math --- the assumptions for sure. Garbage in, garbage out.QUOTE]

My math is a lot simpler. On the highway I use about 1 quart per 3000 miles. Comes down to roughly 1 drop per minute. Hard to imagine that happening in forceful spurts, but I don't know what the duty cycle is. Maybe it "saves it up".

But in any case I normally bring it up when people talk about the oil being "injected into the combustion chamber", because that conjures visions of something working similarly and in parallel with the fuel injectors. I.e., one would imagine some constant cloud of oil droplets. The 1 drop per minute visualization is a useful antidote to that concept. This engine is very miserly with oil. In operation I'd still wager it most often resembles a dribble, just on principle. The engineers would want to minimize the amount of oil "wasted" in the combustion flow.
You can divide that drop into 50 parts or so for the volume/injection.
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #1380  
07rx8gtblack's Avatar
Leave our Dok-do alone!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Porter Ranch, Ca
Did anyone ever have to replace their catalytic converter from using the MMO or Idemitsu?

I stopped using the premix for about 3000 miles, which in the beginning I didn't notice much difference, but I just started back using the MMO. Not only it feels smoother, I do get a little better gas mileage. I think, though, the Idemitsu Premix feels smoother than the MMO. I want to definitely keep using the premix if it won't mess up the catalytic converter.
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 01:00 PM
  #1381  
Jax_RX8's Avatar
Got Another Rotary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
Likes: 2
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by 07rx8gtblack
Did anyone ever have to replace their catalytic converter from using the MMO or Idemitsu?

I stopped using the premix for about 3000 miles, which in the beginning I didn't notice much difference, but I just started back using the MMO. Not only it feels smoother, I do get a little better gas mileage. I think, though, the Idemitsu Premix feels smoother than the MMO. I want to definitely keep using the premix if it won't mess up the catalytic converter.
While I prefer straight MMO as my premix, you could try a 50/50 mix of MMO and Idemitsu if you like the "smoother" feel.

As for Catalyst affects for MMO, I know of MANY that have used MMO 100-300k miles and never replaced their catalyst, with one that has to pass a smog sniffer test each year and has 250k on his Ford van and still passes (which shows the catalyst is still working). I have never heard of a cat failure using MMO.

As for Idemitsu, I think it is one of the safest of the 2-cycles I know of and am confident that it would not do any harm unless used in excess. This cannot necessarily be said of all 2-cycles, as many are designed for use in motorcycles/snowmobiles/boats that do not have catalysts to worry about, so make sure any others you use are cat-safe.

I do know that AMSOIL Saber Pro and Bel-Ray SI-7 (not the other Bel-Ray Products) are safe. TCW3 2-cycles are required to be ashless by specification, so most should be safe as the metallic additives (that cause the ash) are the usual culprits in harming the cats (usually though ash/deposit build-up).

Last edited by Jax_RX8; Aug 8, 2008 at 01:02 PM.
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #1382  
danielk015's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Aliso Viejo, ca
^as jax mentioned, i use bel ray SI-7 and it is safe and really good synthetic... Do not use the other Bel-Ray stuff, probably will mess up the cat... I ust 6-7 ounces per full tank and that is close to the 1/2 oz per gal that Old Dragger mentions.. car runnign good so far (fingers crossed)..
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 10:46 AM
  #1383  
StealthTL's Avatar
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,286
Likes: 184
From: A Pacific Island.
TCW3 2-cycles are required to be ashless by specification

TCW -III oils only provide protection to metal up to about 300 degrees F, the temp that boat motor piston rings reach, due to the enormous cooling on marine engines.

They are vapor at the temps on a rotor face.

TC rated oils are much more suitable.

TCW oils don't usually have the stability to pass the JASO or EG-D specs, they are cheap junk - but feel free to use them, the vapor they degrade to won't lubricate, but it won't do any harm either......
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #1384  
Jax_RX8's Avatar
Got Another Rotary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
Likes: 2
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by StealthTL
TCW3 2-cycles are required to be ashless by specification

TCW -III oils only provide protection to metal up to about 300 degrees F, the temp that boat motor piston rings reach, due to the enormous cooling on marine engines.

They are vapor at the temps on a rotor face.

TC rated oils are much more suitable.

TCW oils don't usually have the stability to pass the JASO or EG-D specs, they are cheap junk - but feel free to use them, the vapor they degrade to won't lubricate, but it won't do any harm either......

Stealth is correct and I totally agree that TCW (for the marine specifications) oils protect better and handle heat better than TCW3 oils - but they do produce more ash and other deposits in the process. I would not agree that TCW3 provide no protection, but it is less than a TCW oil.

Essentially you have the trade-off in 2-cycles oils of "Better Protection with more deposits/ash" or " Less Protection with less deposits/ash".


That is why I think so many use Idemitsu Rotary Premix - it is a pretty good trade-off among 2-cycles. It is NOT TCW3 rated because it is low-ash oil (not no ash) so it does not leave behind too many deposits, but does protect very well as it is JASO FC+ rated (has not been tested for JASO FD last I checked, but would likely pass and thus why the + on the rating).

You really are better off looking for a JASO FC or FD, or Euro spec EGD rated oils for the best assurance of protection

Last edited by Jax_RX8; Sep 11, 2008 at 12:42 PM.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #1385  
kennyfrc1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
This has worked well for me:

http://www.pettitracing.com/rx8/index_faq.htm
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #1386  
StealthTL's Avatar
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,286
Likes: 184
From: A Pacific Island.
Good stuff - made for the job.

S
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #1387  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by StealthTL
Good stuff - made for the job.

S
Earlier in this serpentine thread some people had pictures of some kind of flaking or distillate settling out of this Protek stuff. Didn't look good. Anyone ever figure that out?
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 05:40 PM
  #1388  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
I've just finished working my way through my first big jug of MMO. I should probably pull the plugs just to take a look...

A friend of ours is going to have a test where she swallows a pill and it takes pictures all the way through her gut. Wonder if I could bribe her to let me send that pill for a 1-revolution ride on each rotor.

Is there anything to be gained from a borescope examination of a rotary?
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #1389  
GaMEChld's Avatar
Registered Noob
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Long Island (Suffolk), NY
Originally Posted by robrecht
Earlier in this serpentine thread some people had pictures of some kind of flaking or distillate settling out of this Protek stuff. Didn't look good. Anyone ever figure that out?
So what's the verdict? Any adverse effects seen from Protek? Or is it solid? I am considering starting to premix soon, and am between Idemitsu (for being generally well spoken of constantly) and Protek (I am running FI and it seems made for the job).

And quick question I bet has been covered, does premixing in general clog up the fuel filter faster? Do some clog it up worse than others?

Also, people talk about ash and all. How big of a deal is the added ash anyway? Will a treatment of a cleaner like BG44K etc every once in a while keep it in check? We should all probably give our engine a periodic cleaning with the mazda cleaner or seafoam, etc. anyway. I'll be doing that for the first time next month.
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #1390  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
premix doesn't clog anything.

I use 4oz of idemitsu and 2oz of fp+

and for sohn adapter, I use half a quart of idemitsu, and half a quart of 5w20 or 5w30 dino oil.
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #1391  
GaMEChld's Avatar
Registered Noob
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Long Island (Suffolk), NY
hmm... along with the price/quantity I can get through Mazdatrix I think that Idemitsu is the smart way to go. Even on my car as a daily driver being as wasteful as possible, this would last me well over a year for a case! Where's the best place to get FP+? (That is a detergent type additive right? Helps keep it clean?)
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #1392  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
http://lubecontrol.com/products_fuel_power.php

it lasts a long time.

i also sometimes add lc20 to crank case oil.
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #1393  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by GaMEChld
And quick question I bet has been covered, does premixing in general clog up the fuel filter faster? Do some clog it up worse than others?
All of these products are miscible in gasoline. But, imho, the more products you mix together, the greater the chance of forming gels/gums/waxes. I'd stick to a single product instead of trying to concoct a pre-mix cocktail.
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #1394  
LPCOKIE's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 1
From: hot dusty oklahoma city
i traded in my 05 for an 09. what are the thoughts about continuing with pre mixing? i traded at 62000 and didn't have any problems except with the trany. I was puting in 5 oz per tank.
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #1395  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by LPCOKIE
i traded in my 05 for an 09. what are the thoughts about continuing with pre mixing? i traded at 62000 and didn't have any problems except with the trany. I was puting in 5 oz per tank.
If I had an '09, I would be less concerned about using a 2-cycle oil since there i
s a third oil 'injector' for the center of each apex seal.

However, I would still add about 1 oz of FP+ per 10 gal of gas at each fill-up to help prevent carbon build-up.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #1396  
i.s.d_se3p's Avatar
insidious
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
i understand the thread but im having troubles figuring out the numbers, so say for a full tank of gas on my car (04' rx8) how much 2 stroke should i add.... of what would be the best combination of 2 stroke and gas!
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #1397  
I8U's Avatar
I8U
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: Carolina Beach, NC
Most companies like Pettit Racing, recommend 4oz per tank for a daily driving car. Now some of us run more depending on what the car is being used for...now in our race cars we run 1oz per gallon of gas. Strictly because the motor stays around the 7-9000 rpm range for nearly 3 hrs at a time.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #1398  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,844
Likes: 1,798
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by I8U
Most companies like Pettit Racing, recommend 4oz per tank for a daily driving car. Now some of us run more depending on what the car is being used for...now in our race cars we run 1oz per gallon of gas. Strictly because the motor stays around the 7-9000 rpm range for nearly 3 hrs at a time.

are your engines lasting longer that your piston engined competitors ?
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #1399  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
yall are still running the mop arent ya? I cant remember
OD
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 05:45 AM
  #1400  
Rote8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 2
From: Boosted...
New Premix thread? (In "Major HP"?) :)

I'll just throw this out here:

http://www.shop.pricechemical.com/pr...6&productId=24

This will lean out a rich mixture and increase octane with no changes to the ECU flash, and when that tank of gas is gone, you are back to the original A/F ratio.

PS: I am already spraying Nitromethane in the Methanol cooling.....


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.