Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Confirmed : NYCGPS's Motor is dead~

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-02-2009, 07:03 PM
  #26  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by alz0rz
dum dum dum
rofl.

*sigh*

Originally Posted by cjkim
bout time, congrats!
starting to wonder if mine is destined for this route
I mean, Sooner or later All motor will go this route.

Just the matter of time ... mine is a bit sooner thats all ...

Originally Posted by shaunv74
It would be good to see if the side seal springs are failing like they are on the race motors. It would be really great for all involved if Mazda could start breaking down the failure modes and causes so the community could do the right thing to preserve our motors.

Premix will help the apex seal issues but not the side seal spring failures. Only a new part number will help that.
No way to tell, unless ...

Originally Posted by ZoomZoomH
wow i woulda gone ape nuts if i got 120 miles per tank, that is NOT normal

for reference, my '04 with 89700 miles usually gets 240 miles before the fuel light comes on in mixed 50-50 driving

at least you're patient about the car, i'll give you that, lol

best of luck with the new motor, and tranny too!
Thx.
Old 04-02-2009, 07:15 PM
  #27  
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Jedi54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 22,396
Received 2,638 Likes on 1,888 Posts
well, better now then a few years down the road when the warranty is gone. Fortunately it seems as though the remans coming to us these days are pretty damn good.

I'm actually happy for you man, it'll be nice to get you a solid engine!
Old 04-02-2009, 07:49 PM
  #28  
Certified Mazda Tech
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
as a note BTW, we comp. tested his motor not too long ago, front rotor was weaker then rear but still good. Things seem to have gone downhill somewhat fast at least on the front rotor, rear rotor hasnt budged nearly as much.

None of the signs of a sideseal failure.

The lean condition leads me towards apex seals and charge contamination causing excess air in the mixture in the combustion chamber, just enough air to be compensated for without being too lean.

Looking at the face numbers obviously one face is a lot worse then the other 2, altho theyre not too far behind.

I'll try to take the best pics i can inside the exhaust ports, i have a video snake i can slide thru the spark plug holes too so we can check carbon conditions but she's been decarbed at least once, maybe more, i was hoping for just a stuck seal but went old school after the comp test (ATF and a steam bath if you must know lol) and nothing improved.

kevin.

Last edited by teknics; 04-02-2009 at 07:51 PM.
Old 04-02-2009, 07:56 PM
  #29  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks for the input Kevin. It's great to have someone that is hands on and knows what's happening. The fact that you mention the motor went down hill fast suggests a catastrophic failure as opposed to something wearing out. Just my $0.02

Also you mention 1 face being worse than the rest. IMHO That seems like it would be side seal related rather than apex to me. I would think if it's apex you would see 2 faces low since they share an apex seal.

I can't wait to see your video and pics.

A picture will speak more than thousands if internet theories.

-Shaun
Old 04-02-2009, 07:56 PM
  #30  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Motomouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
when I asked last time about alligment for my new coilovers in Wayne they told me you not work there anymore Kevin

Good that you still there!
Old 04-02-2009, 07:56 PM
  #31  
Registered
 
bryanl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is the oil crusade over nycgps???
Old 04-02-2009, 07:58 PM
  #32  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Motomouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
and Iam start to worry about my 05
Old 04-02-2009, 08:22 PM
  #33  
Certified Mazda Tech
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by shaunv74
Thanks for the input Kevin. It's great to have someone that is hands on and knows what's happening. The fact that you mention the motor went down hill fast suggests a catastrophic failure as opposed to something wearing out. Just my $0.02

Also you mention 1 face being worse than the rest. IMHO That seems like it would be side seal related rather than apex to me. I would think if it's apex you would see 2 faces low since they share an apex seal.

I can't wait to see your video and pics.

A picture will speak more than thousands if internet theories.

-Shaun
Catastrophic failure would be like falling off a cliff, going downhill fast (span of months) was perhaps a bad choice of words. It's got lots of "wear out" signs in the story, especially how the problem started slow. Also IIRC he stated he originally had a stalling problem once in a blue moon when he first got the car so it could lead all the way back to a bad/barely faulty part used during assembly.

With the way combustion happens in the rotary and the direction of the flame front typically the front apex seal has the greatest effect on a "chamber's" compression. Aka each face has a leading and trailing apex (just like your plugs lead is bottom, trail is top) The "leading" apex seal is more important for compression of each face because the flame front begins, and is strongest, at the leading edge of the rotor face, as it expands upward it slows and loses force. Also the trailing edge of the rotor face is less involved in "spinning" the leading face however is where all the force of combustion is focused on as it spins the rotor to get to the next face.

So typically lets say that Rotor Face 1 one worn/bad apex seal on the leading tip and all other apex seals are fine. Rotor Face 1 will have low compression, the next face will be fine, the 3rd face will generally have a compression number in the middle of Face 1 and 2, since it's trailing apex seal (face 1's leading) is bad and losing what you could call waste compression/combustion (most force exerted on trailing side of rotor is weak so the rotor can spin the right direction with no force acting against it.

Probably best if i drew a pic to explain.

As for sideseal failure, generally you'll have blowby into the oil/exhaust etc and only 1 face will be low with the other 2 being normal.

motomouse: did you go on a saturday? If so thats probably why, otherwise, it's probably because I was involved in something serious and they didnt want you to leave and comeback another time so they just said i wasn't there.

as for oil, in my rotarys i run 10w30 castrol gtx in winter (my cars dont ever see winter tho) and 20w50 in summer. thats in a 13bt and 13brew.

kevin.
Old 04-03-2009, 12:18 AM
  #34  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by teknics
as a note BTW, we comp. tested his motor not too long ago, front rotor was weaker then rear but still good. Things seem to have gone downhill somewhat fast at least on the front rotor, rear rotor hasnt budged nearly as much.

None of the signs of a sideseal failure.

The lean condition leads me towards apex seals and charge contamination causing excess air in the mixture in the combustion chamber, just enough air to be compensated for without being too lean.

Looking at the face numbers obviously one face is a lot worse then the other 2, altho theyre not too far behind.

I'll try to take the best pics i can inside the exhaust ports, i have a video snake i can slide thru the spark plug holes too so we can check carbon conditions but she's been decarbed at least once, maybe more, i was hoping for just a stuck seal but went old school after the comp test (ATF and a steam bath if you must know lol) and nothing improved.

kevin.
Yep. it was last tested on Sept 05, 2008 (have the invoice in front of me, lol)

numbers were :

Front 7.1 , 7.3, 7.1
Rear 7.5 7.6 7.8

The very first *engine stall* happen around 2-3 months after I got my car. I was going thru Williamsburg bridge, was trying to switch gears, as soon as I press the clutch in ------ Beeeeeeeeeeeep ----- engine just died. I was like "wtf just happened?" It was the first time thats why I still remember

It might be just some faulty parts in the first place.

*I miss my car *
Old 04-03-2009, 12:22 AM
  #35  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i miss mine more
Old 04-03-2009, 12:30 AM
  #36  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by alz0rz
i miss mine more
Your motor probably have better compression than mine !

Hey, when will u buy another 8 ? Do u still owe any money to the banks? (cuz u said u have no gap insurance so ...)
Old 04-03-2009, 12:34 AM
  #37  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
my motor felt extremely strong.. and in "spirited comparison" runs against others it was never let me down.

probably not another 8 though..

yeah I still had car payments but the insurance company gave me a decent settlement so I paid it all off and I have money to spare.. I may get a toy.. *cough* FD *cough*
Old 04-03-2009, 12:36 AM
  #38  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
FD ... I HATE YOU !!!!

Hey its good that u got some extra cash left. We can both go to Wayne and get our next ride ! (I get the 3, u get the R3, both leaving dealership happily, lol)
Old 04-03-2009, 03:53 AM
  #39  
a.k.a. WhITeRE8
iTrader: (8)
 
SiLVeRE8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nor Cal *
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
Its a 2005



There were no CEL

But from time to time my motor just stalled at red light or when I try to hot-start it (meaning a driving it for a while, turn it off at gas station or something, come back and start it, it starts but then it stalls right away),

and of course, I get rough idle all the time (dropping below 700rpm)
Sounds pretty much the same issues I been having lately and mine is at 45k miles. My 8 stalled 4 times in the past 2 weeks due to shifting it to neutral while it was rolling at around 30 mph and CEL never came on. I am also experiencing rough idle and frequent hard starts (cranks for a while before it starts up at times)... But I am not sure if my mods are causing this or the motor.

Last edited by SiLVeRE8; 04-03-2009 at 03:55 AM.
Old 04-03-2009, 04:47 AM
  #40  
Enthusiast
 
AJ's Shinka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by teknics

As for a "mark" on the motor....it has a serial number I can write it down and post it when i pull it out.

kevin.
Where is the engine serial number located at? Is there a way of checking that serial number to see if it was the original motor that came with the car?
Old 04-03-2009, 07:16 AM
  #41  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by teknics
as a note BTW, we comp. tested his motor not too long ago, front rotor was weaker then rear but still good. Things seem to have gone downhill somewhat fast at least on the front rotor, rear rotor hasnt budged nearly as much.
Could you please tell me where Mazda is currently drawing the line on bad compression? My front rotor pulled a 6.9 / 6.9/ 7.0 and my dealer (who I don't trust at all) said the Mazda tech support rated my engine as a "8 out of 10"

... the numbers seemed awefully low to me for an "8 out of 10"
Old 04-03-2009, 09:09 AM
  #42  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by AJ's Shinka
Where is the engine serial number located at? Is there a way of checking that serial number to see if it was the original motor that came with the car?
I dunno how to say it. I just know where it is

You should be able to find out if its the original engine. but u need to have a "Good" dealership.

Originally Posted by r0tor
Could you please tell me where Mazda is currently drawing the line on bad compression? My front rotor pulled a 6.9 / 6.9/ 7.0 and my dealer (who I don't trust at all) said the Mazda tech support rated my engine as a "8 out of 10"

... the numbers seemed awefully low to me for an "8 out of 10"
I think Mazda has update the requirements To something even lower.

but in Service manual ---

Standard - 830 kPa (120 psi) @ 250 rpm
Minimum - 680 kPa (98.6 psi) @ 250 rpm (I think they updated this part to 650 kPa, not so sure)
Standard difference in chambers - Within 150 kPa (21.8 psi) ( I think they updated this part to something less, cuz 150 kPa apart from each other is pretty huge difference)
Standard difference in rotors (between front and rear - Within 100 kPa (14.5 psi)

Last edited by nycgps; 04-03-2009 at 09:16 AM.
Old 04-03-2009, 10:22 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
hackdss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get about 120 miles per tank all city driving on an 05 rx8 auto 41000km. Could it be the engine or is it my spark plugs and coils that is giving me such bad gas mileage?


thanks
Old 04-03-2009, 10:29 AM
  #44  
Registered
 
dynamho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwood, NJ
Posts: 1,963
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by teknics
motor had 8.5 all around on rear rotor, front rotor was 7.0, 6.4, 5.4
(IIRC i just pmed him the right #'s and already forgot them)

Basically he had come in a few times for stalling concerns and other things. We had already decarbed and all. No CEL's. Car was running lean (about 11-12% LFT, normal SFT) just not enough to set off a CEL. Couple other data points I noticed that wouldn't be useful for you guys lol but there were small signs. Noticed a quick short start when warm would throw it to 750rpm, stumble down to 500 sometimes stall, then catch itself and idle at 700. Test drove it and it felt off to me, not too bad but something was missing down low, to me it was more noticeable in the "i have to pass this guy real quick and get over" power range.

As for what actually failed internally, nothing broken it seems. Personally I doubt it had anything to do with oil, generally we see rear rotor failures because the rear rotor always runs hotter internally. I'm thinking simply abnormal excessive wear of combustion surface and apex seals, most likely not really traceable to a specific reason.

i'll see if i find anything when replacing it.

As for a "mark" on the motor....it has a serial number I can write it down and post it when i pull it out.

Also, yes your car will be down for a while due to timing and the trans. Basically authorization and shipment of the motor can't start until I can fully diag the trans which takes a lot of back and forth between me and mazda.

About the trans, forgot to PM you this question, have you ever replaced your clutch? your pedal is very soft and the clutch grabs when its like 1mm off the ground which is abnormal. If you havent replaced the clutch, are you sure the clutch line was bled properly when the braided line was installed? In all honesty a pedal like this could cause hard shifting, since you have no problem with the other gears it's not going to be the cause of your reverse problem but just wondering whats up with the clutch.

kevin.
Very cool that a Mazda technician cares enough to post details here.
Thanks.
Old 04-03-2009, 10:30 AM
  #45  
Registered
 
dynamho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwood, NJ
Posts: 1,963
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Sorry about your engine nycgps.
Old 04-03-2009, 10:39 AM
  #46  
Life begins @ 30 psi
 
blackenedwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
Yep. it was last tested on Sept 05, 2008 (have the invoice in front of me, lol)

numbers were :

Front 7.1 , 7.3, 7.1
Rear 7.5 7.6 7.8

The very first *engine stall* happen around 2-3 months after I got my car. I was going thru Williamsburg bridge, was trying to switch gears, as soon as I press the clutch in ------ Beeeeeeeeeeeep ----- engine just died. I was like "wtf just happened?" It was the first time thats why I still remember

It might be just some faulty parts in the first place.

*I miss my car *
Those compression numbers don't sound bad, if it was degrading that fast from September 2008 to now down to a 5.5 on the front rotor something is pretty seriously wrong. That doesn't sound like long term wear to me, although admittedly I'm no expert. I just got a compression test a couple of months ago and had 7.8 on pretty much all faces and my engine is running great so your numbers as of September sound fine? Very curious what happened...

In any case, getting a new motor under warranty is not a bad thing. You will have a nice shiny new engine and hopefully a lot more miles of use out of it.
Old 04-03-2009, 12:31 PM
  #47  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by dynamho
Sorry about your engine nycgps.
thx.



Originally Posted by blackenedwings
Those compression numbers don't sound bad, if it was degrading that fast from September 2008 to now down to a 5.5 on the front rotor something is pretty seriously wrong. That doesn't sound like long term wear to me, although admittedly I'm no expert. I just got a compression test a couple of months ago and had 7.8 on pretty much all faces and my engine is running great so your numbers as of September sound fine? Very curious what happened...

In any case, getting a new motor under warranty is not a bad thing. You will have a nice shiny new engine and hopefully a lot more miles of use out of it.
i will get a reman from VA, just like most other ppl.
I have no idea what happened. i just drive regulary

maybe faulty parts ?
Old 04-03-2009, 12:48 PM
  #48  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something has to be wrong with Mazda's diagnostic criteria if they couldn't confirm there was a serious engine problem until now. 10 mpg should be a pretty good clue. Maybe you were masking the problem a little bit with premix, but your mileage over the last few years just suck too much to ignore.
Old 04-03-2009, 01:28 PM
  #49  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
You were definitely the maintenance ***** of rx8club, but sadly your engine is still gone. I don't think it has anything to do with you though. Good luck with the new one!
Old 04-03-2009, 01:36 PM
  #50  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by teknics
Catastrophic failure would be like falling off a cliff, going downhill fast (span of months) was perhaps a bad choice of words. It's got lots of "wear out" signs in the story, especially how the problem started slow. Also IIRC he stated he originally had a stalling problem once in a blue moon when he first got the car so it could lead all the way back to a bad/barely faulty part used during assembly.

With the way combustion happens in the rotary and the direction of the flame front typically the front apex seal has the greatest effect on a "chamber's" compression. Aka each face has a leading and trailing apex (just like your plugs lead is bottom, trail is top) The "leading" apex seal is more important for compression of each face because the flame front begins, and is strongest, at the leading edge of the rotor face, as it expands upward it slows and loses force. Also the trailing edge of the rotor face is less involved in "spinning" the leading face however is where all the force of combustion is focused on as it spins the rotor to get to the next face.

So typically lets say that Rotor Face 1 one worn/bad apex seal on the leading tip and all other apex seals are fine. Rotor Face 1 will have low compression, the next face will be fine, the 3rd face will generally have a compression number in the middle of Face 1 and 2, since it's trailing apex seal (face 1's leading) is bad and losing what you could call waste compression/combustion (most force exerted on trailing side of rotor is weak so the rotor can spin the right direction with no force acting against it.

Probably best if i drew a pic to explain.

As for sideseal failure, generally you'll have blowby into the oil/exhaust etc and only 1 face will be low with the other 2 being normal.

motomouse: did you go on a saturday? If so thats probably why, otherwise, it's probably because I was involved in something serious and they didnt want you to leave and comeback another time so they just said i wasn't there.

as for oil, in my rotarys i run 10w30 castrol gtx in winter (my cars dont ever see winter tho) and 20w50 in summer. thats in a 13bt and 13brew.

kevin.
Thanks Kevin! That's good stuff. Good to know that you'd see a different effect on compression if it's a leading face vs. a trailing face. I never knew.

Also I am completely surprised that engine wear can happen so drastically over a short period of time with "nothing wrong."

I am now officially holding my breath to see what happens...

Last edited by shaunv74; 04-03-2009 at 01:38 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Confirmed : NYCGPS's Motor is dead~



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.