Aftermarket air filter necessary?
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Dam good point Brettus. In this case we can not take one point or fact and run with it. Fact is all filters let dirt in when they are sucking in air, thats why we change them and change our oil to keep the deposits from building up. Be it dirt or metals. On thing I have noticed is; even with all the dirt in Vegass the stock filter and box only needed to be cleaned about every 6 months. My K&Nv2 intake needs to be charged about every 3 months. How ever my oil is still dirty as fruck when I change it lol
Brettus, as always, makes a very valid point. We do tend to be overly concerned with some of these maintenance items, given the relative longevity of the engine/vehicle in the first place. But such is the Way of the Enthusiast.
There is a good link on the forum to a Construction owner who tested KN filter verses stcok filters on Catapillar dump trucks bull dozers ect..
His results were K&N you die, stock filter for the win!
More power but more dirt in the engine lead to failures.
there is always a compromise.
His results were K&N you die, stock filter for the win!
More power but more dirt in the engine lead to failures.
there is always a compromise.
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Okay, check out this article out. Found it in another thread.
http://www.nicoclub.com/articles.php?id=180100
http://www.nicoclub.com/articles.php?id=180100
Registered
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
But, if not that, what about MAF and SSF issues?
In my research and experience the K&N does pass more air, but also better filters thanks to its material, construction and thin layer of oil that naturally attracts more airborne contaminants. Of course you need to clean it periodically. There's not enough oil to pass on to the MAF if recharged properly - as Jedi said "less is more."
no but i am making over 300hp to the wheels with a pull through fi system and i use a paper filter. I dont have the oem airbox but i do have an aem paper filter.
If you think a paper filter is restrictive--just increase the size over oem a little.
I will never run a K&N again with a rotary engine.
If you think a paper filter is restrictive--just increase the size over oem a little.
I will never run a K&N again with a rotary engine.
I want to by a induction filter for my Rex I don't want to pay to much green filter works out cheaper the k&n sounds nice but to expensive where's the cheapest place to get one I would consider a secondhand one as well need help....
Does anyone have any independent data showing the real world difference between the stock filter replacements vs. the K&N?
I seriously doubt it makes any significant difference in power. Maybe with other supporting mods?
My only data point was with Cobb datalogs between a dirty stock filter and a replacement filter. No significant difference in airflow at all
Of course my intake had other issues.
I seriously doubt it makes any significant difference in power. Maybe with other supporting mods?
My only data point was with Cobb datalogs between a dirty stock filter and a replacement filter. No significant difference in airflow at all
Of course my intake had other issues.
Last edited by DarkBrew; Oct 18, 2010 at 08:01 PM.
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Is or did?
Thanks for the link
I wish they had tested those aftermarket filters against a good OEM paper filter. The K&N may have done okay in that test but I doubt it would be better than an OEM paper filter.
Thanks for the link
I wish they had tested those aftermarket filters against a good OEM paper filter. The K&N may have done okay in that test but I doubt it would be better than an OEM paper filter.
Last edited by 9krpmrx8; Oct 19, 2010 at 10:46 AM.
This is what I don't understand with some of you guys, Mazda spent a fortune and time experimenting with Filter material, Box, etc...the compete INTAKE System in fact.
Everyone who "thought" they knew better (including Racing 'Experts') have reverted back to the OEM Filter...as it is the best filter.
So if all these cone and dome shaped filters are "so good", why did Mazda not go down that path?
They could have saved a lot of money..
But hey..what do they know.
Everyone who "thought" they knew better (including Racing 'Experts') have reverted back to the OEM Filter...as it is the best filter.
So if all these cone and dome shaped filters are "so good", why did Mazda not go down that path?
They could have saved a lot of money..
But hey..what do they know.
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
This is what I don't understand with some of you guys, Mazda spent a fortune and time experimenting with Filter material, Box, etc...the compete INTAKE System in fact.
Everyone who "thought" they knew better (including Racing 'Experts') have reverted back to the OEM Filter...as it is the best filter.
So if all these cone and dome shaped filters are "so good", why did Mazda not go down that path?
They could have saved a lot of money..
But hey..what do they know.
Everyone who "thought" they knew better (including Racing 'Experts') have reverted back to the OEM Filter...as it is the best filter.
So if all these cone and dome shaped filters are "so good", why did Mazda not go down that path?
They could have saved a lot of money..
But hey..what do they know.



on a side note I said do it