Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Aftermarket air filter necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-19-2010, 03:50 PM
  #51  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
No correlation at all...

But, oil did make its way into intake bellows..Early models..
Old 10-20-2010, 09:29 AM
  #52  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
off topic : Im thinking I should get the Mazda's ventilation kit to get rid of the oil in take problem.

Im not afraid of milky oil, problem is that kit cost an arm and leg. (like 200 bux yo!)

argh ...

on topic : Im using stock filters, reason i use it because I can get it cheap. if not, I probably gonna go back to K&N.
Old 10-20-2010, 09:32 AM
  #53  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
By ventilation kit do you mean the change they mode to the PCV system?
Old 10-20-2010, 09:36 AM
  #54  
Extraordinary Engineering
 
DarkBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burls On
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
off topic : I'm thinking I should get the Mazda's ventilation kit to get rid of the oil in take problem.

I'm not afraid of milky oil, problem is that kit cost an arm and leg. (like 200 bux yo!)
Yeah, I did a catch can to try to keep liquid out of the intake but it still accumulates...
Either the catch can is junk (it never catches anything) or the residue isn't liquid until it gets to the intake.... Or it's coming from somewhere else.

Does the new vent use the LIM vacuum nipples?

Oh yeah, the topic!... I use standard paper filters, stock air box, RB ram air.
Old 10-20-2010, 10:01 AM
  #55  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkBrew
Yeah, I did a catch can to try to keep liquid out of the intake but it still accumulates...
Either the catch can is junk (it never catches anything) or the residue isn't liquid until it gets to the intake.... Or it's coming from somewhere else.

Does the new vent use the LIM vacuum nipples?

Oh yeah, the topic!... I use standard paper filters, stock air box, RB ram air.
yea the vent kit use LIM nipples.

but 200 bux a pop ... argh ... not sure if I want it. it has all new hose/tubes/intake manifold gasket/etc. but still ... grrr ...
Old 10-20-2010, 10:16 AM
  #56  
Extraordinary Engineering
 
DarkBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burls On
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
yea the vent kit use LIM nipples.

but 200 bux a pop ... argh ... not sure if I want it. it has all new hose/tubes/intake manifold gasket/etc. but still ... grrr ...
Can't you just plug the intake accordion tube fitting and run some vacuum line through your catch can over to the LIM nipple? What did they change on the oil fill pipe?
Old 10-20-2010, 10:44 AM
  #57  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkBrew
Can't you just plug the intake accordion tube fitting and run some vacuum line through your catch can over to the LIM nipple? What did they change on the oil fill pipe?
the new tube will split the tube into 2, it goes into both nipples.

then another tube will be added to the solenoid behind the intake manifold to the intake.

this is also why the vent kit has new manifold gaskets, you need to take a lot of **** out to do this (probably 2-3 hours of labor)
Old 10-20-2010, 11:12 AM
  #58  
Extraordinary Engineering
 
DarkBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burls On
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
the new tube will split the tube into 2, it goes into both nipples.

then another tube will be added to the solenoid behind the intake manifold to the intake.

this is also why the vent kit has new manifold gaskets, you need to take a lot of **** out to do this (probably 2-3 hours of labor)
You can make the new split tube with stuff from the auto shop
The solenoids under the UIM are for air pump, VDI and SSV
They change out the oil filler for some reason I don't understand, probably to keep oil techs from filling the vacuum tube with oil.
Then they add another hose extension to change the location of one hose on the accordion tube. For reference this is step 28 of the TSB It isn't clear to me what they do with the left over hole on the tube since they seem to be using 2 of the 3. One for OMP and one for intake port air jet, the oil tube vent was moved to LIM.

Other than the new oil filler I see no reason to remove all the other stuff.


Last edited by DarkBrew; 10-20-2010 at 11:33 AM.
Old 10-20-2010, 11:25 AM
  #59  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
No idea.
Old 05-11-2011, 04:52 PM
  #60  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Bump.
Old 09-26-2011, 10:26 PM
  #61  
Registered
 
Rei-teki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K& N versus paper

You guys talk about how which one flows better and which one traps more particles. The paper one is great for filtration and yes it is what auto designers build into the equation. But it does restrict airflow at a point. Some of you have said that put the k&n up to the light and see how big the pores are, but when properly oiled, which is just enough to get the fibers pink to slightly red, those pores seal right up. The oil collects the sand and smaller particles, and will do so until all the oil is soaked up. I have seen those filters caked with dirt, sand, and mud and the motor still breathes fire. Personally, the k &n is better for rotaries because any sand that gets in will do more damage than a normal piston engine.
Old 09-26-2011, 11:06 PM
  #62  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by Rei-teki
You guys talk about how which one flows better and which one traps more particles. The paper one is great for filtration and yes it is what auto designers build into the equation. But it does restrict airflow at a point. Some of you have said that put the k&n up to the light and see how big the pores are, but when properly oiled, which is just enough to get the fibers pink to slightly red, those pores seal right up. The oil collects the sand and smaller particles, and will do so until all the oil is soaked up. I have seen those filters caked with dirt, sand, and mud and the motor still breathes fire. Personally, the k &n is better for rotaries because any sand that gets in will do more damage than a normal piston engine.
The RX8 race teams went back to paper filters because they were finding sand in the oil pans. The Renesis has enough issues, adding a filter that allows more dirt into the engine just seems dumb to me.

You state a paper filter restricts flow yet the numerous dyno sheets prove otherwise. Look at Shadycrews last dyno results for instance.
Old 09-26-2011, 11:07 PM
  #63  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
No and Wrong....

Not you 9K

What part of what is written don't you get....

Mazda Japan spent a lot of time and a small fortune getting the Intake and Air Box and Accordion Tube-MAF Sensor at it's optimum design, performance and efficiency.

Every US and Europe RX-8 racers say stay with the OEM Air Filter Element at the very least...

WHY, because as said before it flows the best, filters the best and lasts the longest and most importantly protects the Engine internals from ultra fine abrasive dirt/dust.
Old 09-27-2011, 12:49 AM
  #64  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by ASH8
No and Wrong....

Not you 9K

What part of what is written don't you get....

Mazda Japan spent a lot of time and a small fortune getting the Intake and Air Box and Accordion Tube-MAF Sensor at it's optimum design, performance and efficiency.

Every US and Europe RX-8 racers say stay with the OEM Air Filter Element at the very least...

WHY, because as said before it flows the best, filters the best and lasts the longest and most importantly protects the Engine internals from ultra fine abrasive dirt/dust.
<---- using stock filter + got 2 extra stock filter, replace every 10-15K miles
Old 10-22-2011, 01:40 AM
  #65  
Registered
 
Rei-teki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ASH8
No and Wrong....

Not you 9K

What part of what is written don't you get....

Mazda Japan spent a lot of time and a small fortune getting the Intake and Air Box and Accordion Tube-MAF Sensor at it's optimum design, performance and efficiency.

Every US and Europe RX-8 racers say stay with the OEM Air Filter Element at the very least...

WHY, because as said before it flows the best, filters the best and lasts the longest and most importantly protects the Engine internals from ultra fine abrasive dirt/dust.
And what part of what I wrote did you not understand. Go back and read through every word I wrote instead picking and choosing the ones you like most. And before you make blanket statements such as "Every US and Europe RX-8 racers say stay with the OEM Air Filter Element at the very least..." why don't you talk to them. How many of these race cars actually have the stock Renesis motor, and the ones that do, how many actually run the OEM airbox, with OEM filter element?
Old 10-22-2011, 03:29 AM
  #66  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by Rei-teki
How many of these race cars actually have the stock Renesis motor, and the ones that do, how many actually run the OEM airbox, with OEM filter element?
I don't care what Rotary version of engine they use, the simple fact is the US RX-8 racers used the OEM Filter...they have found it to be the best.

Eric Meyer for one...
From memory Speedsource Racing...

I don't need to do the re-search...you can do the Searching.
Old 10-22-2011, 03:35 AM
  #67  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
BTW..I suggest YOU go back and RE-Read this thread.....
Old 10-22-2011, 10:14 AM
  #68  
Registered
 
Rei-teki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, so instead of basing your generalized statements on fact, you not only become insulting to someone who's actually done their research, you, once again, don't read the whole statement, and just highlight whatever you want.
Oh, and yes, it does make a difference what kind of motor you run, since we're talking about the oem filter versus aftermarket in the renesis motor. So make sure that you do your research on your dumb, generalized statements, so you don't sound like some know-it-all who actually doesn't know anything. And instead of being a stubborn, prideful person, who can't think outside the box, look at all the options before saying which one is the best. Because, let's be honest, I doubt you've actually used anything different in your vehicle.
Old 10-22-2011, 11:45 AM
  #69  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by Rei-teki
Personally, the k &n is better for rotaries because any sand that gets in will do more damage than a normal piston engine.
In your opinion...we all have one of those.

YOU have put up no facts or data to support your statement, just opinion.
Do some more reading if you like..

https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...7&postcount=24

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/k-n-air-filter-177971/#post3849277

Last edited by ASH8; 10-22-2011 at 11:50 AM.
Old 10-22-2011, 03:59 PM
  #70  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by Rei-teki
Wow, so instead of basing your generalized statements on fact, you not only become insulting to someone who's actually done their research, you, once again, don't read the whole statement, and just highlight whatever you want.
Oh, and yes, it does make a difference what kind of motor you run, since we're talking about the oem filter versus aftermarket in the renesis motor. So make sure that you do your research on your dumb, generalized statements, so you don't sound like some know-it-all who actually doesn't know anything. And instead of being a stubborn, prideful person, who can't think outside the box, look at all the options before saying which one is the best. Because, let's be honest, I doubt you've actually used anything different in your vehicle.

Have you torn apart a Renesis? Have you seen how dirty the intake tract can get even when a top notch paper filter was used? I have, and I have run plenty of aftermarket filters as well. I am actually on the hunt right now for the best filter for my Turbo setup. There is no doubt that a K&N flows slightly better than most paper filters but it has also been proven that they do not really add any usable wheel horsepower either and a few dyno runs have actually shown the K&N intake to lose horsepower. The Renesis is firsa fickle beast and even race teams and race builders are not making huge amounts of horsepower naturally aspirated over highly modified naturally aspirated street RX-8's. So which filter they run likely plays little into their search for horsepower which is why running a filter that actually filters well is top priority.

A filter should filter well.
Old 10-22-2011, 05:01 PM
  #71  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
i hate to do it but the k&N has the potential of helping the engine make a little more power. Intake restriction is a real deal but, the airfiter is only a small part of it. K&N has a more open design--meaning it doesnt filter as well. Whether it filters good enough--well that has caused many of a discussion.
Paper is the best filter--AEM makes a good one. One of the most important factors is getting one that has enough flow capacity. You need over capacity so when the filter gets a little dirty it still has enough left to do the job.
When you add FI to this engine you need a bigger airfilter. i did the math one time, but its buried in the Pettit thread somewhere. The size of the filter gets complicated because of the pleatting and different shapes.
Some good reading about the benefits of a huge pre maf pipe and airfilter can be found on Kenne Bells site. Check it out.
Old 10-22-2011, 09:07 PM
  #72  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Yeah for a forced induction setup a bigger free flowing filter is needed so a stock style filter will not work but I am playing with the idea of using a huge OEM paper filter designed for a 6.0 Liter turbo diesel. Now if i can just find a place to put it then I will be set.
Old 10-23-2011, 04:47 AM
  #73  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
No I'm not. Facts are the K&N (and all the other aftermarket filters) does not filter as well as the OEM types regardless of the amount of air passing through.
Yes you ARE, NO it does not...what do you know, you are just a noob



Old 10-23-2011, 08:02 AM
  #74  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
lol--Ash is feeling frisky!
Old 10-23-2011, 10:25 AM
  #75  
Relax baby!
iTrader: (3)
 
rx 8speciale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nurburgring driver, Germany
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i use to have kn but not notice any improvement, now i buy a new oem filter every year, the car run the same.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Aftermarket air filter necessary?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.