Notices
Series I AT-Specific Performance Mods Discuss engine and transmission modifications for your AT equipped RX-8

We are hopeless!!!!

Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #1  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
We are hopeless!!!!

We are so hopeless........there is no way we gonna be any fast at all......I can just feel it......even if we buy supercharger/turbo, interceptor-X/tranny cooler/exhaust/intake/blahblah

we still run crappy.......not even nearing 280hp!!!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #2  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
You are hopeless, yes sir.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #3  
Wanganrx8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Port Charlotte FL
i thought that the Re-amemiya Rx-8 was an auto and it pulled like 275whp and somewhere around 320ft/lbs.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #4  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
www.mazsport.com

https://www.rx8club.com/mazsport-104/

Last edited by shaunv74; Apr 11, 2007 at 10:49 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #5  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
yea.....but we still never gonna be as fast as the manuals.....and has someone found out a way to unlock the rev and speed governor?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #6  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
oh...you have an auto....

Sorry about your luck...
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #7  
SmokeyTheBalrog's Avatar
Thread Pirate, Ahhrrrrr
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Trade in your 8 get a Mazdaspeed 6 or STI or an American car.

If stoplight racing is for you the 8 isn't.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #8  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBalrog
Trade in your 8 get a Mazdaspeed 6 or STI or an American car.

If stoplight racing is for you the 8 isn't.

I think its actually perfect......and no.....STI sucks worse than us......all I'm actually complaining is probably that so many things are for manuals and they can mod so much to get out of their cars.....but we are.....??????
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #9  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
STI sucks worse than us
Yes sir, hopeless.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #10  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
I guess
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #11  
Easy_E1's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,675
Likes: 5
From: Bellevue WA
I love the way the car handles. It would be nice to have more power, but it is the AT. Ya got at your disposal,,, a turbo, a supercharger, and nitrous.
So what are you whining about?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 07:06 AM
  #12  
Phil's 8's Avatar
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 2
From: Sin City, Nevada
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
yea.....but we still never gonna be as fast as the manuals.....and has someone found out a way to unlock the rev and speed governor?
If you did a little searching you would find a world of information on both subjects. A little more straight line speed - see Pettit supercharger thread - Think that your 8 AT can't perform? See Moon's posting in the Pettit thread.

Why did you get an AT??? If you test drove you should have felt the difference.

I'm in line for a Pettit s/c on the first batch and have an appointment with Steve Kan for tuning. I'll post my Dyno runs and feelings sometime after May 6th.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 07:09 AM
  #13  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
I think its actually perfect......and no.....STI sucks worse than us......all I'm actually complaining is probably that so many things are for manuals and they can mod so much to get out of their cars.....but we are.....??????
Did you get a auto because of traffic reasons, or just too lazy to drive/learn manual? Most auto owners know from the get go that they are not buying their car for speed, but perhaps you were under a different impression.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 07:32 AM
  #14  
sldrmr21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: around orlando
i got mine in manual because my dad wouldnt let me get a manual, oh well the car still handles AMAZINGLY i think thats what people forget! yes our cars are a little slow in the acceleration but still, there are still many things that people can do to the car. the limiter? if you want it gone that much then just by an int-x and take it to a performance shop and ask them to readjust the redline so that your car doesnt blow up while your pushing it. Pettits SC is on its way and should deliver more power and torque. not very much but, still more power. by the way, i wouldnt say that the STI is worse than us, maybe the impreza and MAYBE the WRX but not the STI. and if im wrong then tell that to the guy who owns both cars who kicked my *** in racing.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #15  
Mspeedpro's Avatar
Registered Abuser
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Waco, TX
i dont even know why they make the rx8 in an auto, i really dont.

it totally goes against the essence of the rx8.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 09:17 AM
  #16  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Why does anyone feel it's necessary to go above 125mph? Even on most tracks, at the modified power levels we're looking at, 125 is about as fast as you'll get. Besides, 4spds must shift to 4th to get above that, and acceleration dies off severely. I'm more concerned with how fast I can get to 125, than whether or not I can go higher. And remember to keep those triple digits off the public streets.

Just because the car will never be as fast as an equally modified MT, doesn't mean it's hopeless. Most people will never modify their car, so you'll be faster than them, if that really matters to you. Even a mere 200rwhp on FI makes the 4AT much faster than it is stock. If you need to beat on Evo's and such, buy a different car.

Some will say it's pointless to modify the ATs because they'll never be as fast as the MT is capable of. I say...there are people out there who modify 1970 4cyl Volvo's. Those are the true enthusiasts. $4000 on the AT will net you higher straight line gains than the same $4000 on the MT. So up to a point, it makes more sense to spend the money on the AT.

Last edited by therm8; Apr 12, 2007 at 09:25 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #17  
sldrmr21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: around orlando
true, very true.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #18  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
Originally Posted by Moostafa29
Did you get a auto because of traffic reasons, or just too lazy to drive/learn manual? Most auto owners know from the get go that they are not buying their car for speed, but perhaps you were under a different impression.
I bought auto because this car I got for 23k out the door, for the manual I would have to pay 29k out the door....and this one was a new 07, not even a demo @.@
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 12:21 PM
  #19  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
and thankyou all, I see the light now, when's that S/C coming out?

I do love speed, but I love my car also, the reason for not turbo is because I dont want to blow my engine, same with NO2
I just feel a bit trapped cus I drove manual for the last 4 cars, and I miss the clutch, and seeing that AT rx-8 sucks alot worse than MT just makes me wanna.........
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #20  
09Factor's Avatar
Original Turbo 'd Auto !!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 5
From: Surprise, Arizona
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
and thankyou all, I see the light now, when's that S/C coming out?

I do love speed, but I love my car also, the reason for not turbo is because I dont want to blow my engine, same with NO2
I just feel a bit trapped cus I drove manual for the last 4 cars, and I miss the clutch, and seeing that AT rx-8 sucks alot worse than MT just makes me wanna.........
I hear a lot of " I don't want a turbo. It will blow up" This isn't aimed at you, just the stigmata that turbos are bad for Rx-8's

A bad tune on either a SC or TC will blow anything up.
I was very diligent on what I needed to do to the greddy kit before it was installed. Also after it was installed it was tuned right away. I don't have extra money to buy the rebuild kit if i blew up the motor.

Right now I'm running 8 psi and the 8 is a totally different drive now.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #21  
canaryrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 2
I'm of the opinion no car is hopeless, you can make anything fast, it's all just a matter of how hard you want to work and more realistically, how much $$$ you have to spend
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #22  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
09factor, thankyou for the info, so basically what is better for the rx-8 auto? because I saw most of the turbos are tuned for the MT, and the supercharger(Blitz) is the only one that has an auto option?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #23  
bch3779's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Johnstown, PA
I too bought an AT ($18,000 for a 2004 GT with 16,000 miles) because I couldn't pass up the deal. I always loved the 8's styling and handling. It always amuses me to hear people talk of the A/T as being a whole different car and hearing that it's not "true" 8. I thought we bought these cars for their great handling, styling, and smooth rotary power. Both the M/T and A/T will deliver this experience. Yes...if I could have found a M/T for the same price and options I would have bought it because I do prefer the M/T. But...I don't regret my purchase decision and still enjoy owning and driving the car. As for modding an A/T......
Attached Thumbnails We are hopeless!!!!-2.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 12:52 AM
  #24  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
@.@ hows the power??
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 12:59 AM
  #25  
Phantom Menace's Avatar
II SOCIETY
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: The Bay Area
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
I think its actually perfect......and no.....STI sucks worse than us......all I'm actually complaining is probably that so many things are for manuals and they can mod so much to get out of their cars.....but we are.....??????
Brah,
The reason for that is because the most people who buy autos are not the "modding" type. Most of the people who buy them are usually older or prefer a smoother ride with less hassles. If you want more juice outta your AT, get a turbo with a NO2 kit and change the ratio on your rear diff. That'd make you pee yourself!
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.