Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Why is forced induction always mechanical?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-16-2010, 07:39 AM
  #51  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spin9k
(from howstuff works)

A gallon of gasoline contains about 132x106 joules of energy, which is equivalent to 125,000 BTU or 36,650 watt-hours, so...

•If you took a 1,500-watt space heater and left it on full blast for a full 24-hour day, that's about how much heat (electrical energy) is in a gallon of gas.

....

Think how much battery mass to even get a fraction of that power stored! That's the problem with battery energy - it's impossible yet to store enough to do much useful for any length of time. What is needed is superior storage technology that doesn't yet exist.
Though that is true, a combustion engine is only about 40% efficient in the work it applies.
Old 08-16-2010, 07:48 AM
  #52  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by dillsrotary
Though that is true, a combustion engine is only about 40% efficient in the work it applies.
and the fact that it is actually no direct comparison to anything useful lol

BUT hey, its a good enough example to make ppl think, and hopefully enough to stop the herds, i mean masses, from starting another 47 threads like this about any potential REAL use of elec. SCs
Old 08-16-2010, 07:56 AM
  #53  
Registered
 
Rote8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boosted...
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
While electrical S/C is not ready yet, you can always go chemical S/C....

/Call Charles Hill for that one.
Old 08-16-2010, 10:04 AM
  #54  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by alnielsen
There are good electrical superchargers out there. The Thomas Knight company is one of them.
ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Thomas Knight is a complete shyster and a crook.
His fab skills are questionable at best and his systems and designs are complete ****.
I wouldn't buy a used hot-air popcorn popper from him and that is, essentially, all his stuff can do.

As to the OP's question, it is simple: Energy is neither created or destroyed.
If you want another 150 hp out of the motor, you have to put it into the motor in another form first.
150 HP of electricity is nothing to be trifled with.
Old 08-16-2010, 10:12 AM
  #55  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
holy smokes batman, 150 horses would be over 100KW!
Old 08-16-2010, 10:38 AM
  #56  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Thomas Knight is a complete shyster and a crook.
His fab skills are questionable at best and his systems and designs are complete ****.
I wouldn't buy a used hot-air popcorn popper from him and that is, essentially, all his stuff can do.

As to the OP's question, it is simple: Energy is neither created or destroyed.
If you want another 150 hp out of the motor, you have to put it into the motor in another form first.
150 HP of electricity is nothing to be trifled with.
I was actually thinking of taking another approach with all this, one that might prove several points and illuminate several different things for both those directly involved and on-lookers, equally.
Old 08-16-2010, 10:42 AM
  #57  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do the balloon test!

Old 08-16-2010, 10:50 AM
  #58  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
How much airflow do we want said electric supercharger to flow? I think 300-330 gms./sec. would be a good target. Whomever agrees with that target and wants to be involved in new product development, please find an electric blower motor unit with those flow ratings and list the physical dimensions and electrical specifications for the units you find.

Once we have that, the rest will be easy.
Old 08-16-2010, 10:54 AM
  #59  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heres one that will let me do 235MPH!

http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_1...2&blockType=G2



Old 08-16-2010, 11:02 AM
  #60  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Mawnee
Heres one that will let me do 235MPH!

http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_1...2&blockType=G2
Thx, you've been quite helpful.
You are hereby dismissed.
NEXT!
Old 08-16-2010, 11:03 AM
  #61  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ LOL
Old 08-16-2010, 11:05 AM
  #62  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
well a cubic foot of air is about .08lbs so you're looking for a 500cfm BLOWER/FAN
Old 08-16-2010, 11:07 AM
  #63  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
well a cubic foot of air is about .08lbs so you're looking for a 500cfm BLOWER/FAN
If that number is correct, the next step is to source such a motor.
Old 08-16-2010, 11:10 AM
  #64  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
the BROAN RM325H is a 600CFM unit which is 362g/s


all your specs are here in datasheet: go to town
http://www.broan.com/ImageLibrary/br...s/99043135.pdf
Old 08-16-2010, 11:12 AM
  #65  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
If that number is correct, the next step is to source such a motor.
all the work is here:http://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae650.cfm
i did check a couple pieces of the math against ideal gas law, its all right


i know where your going(or at least will reach) the problem isnt a fan that will flow that much air, or powering it. the problem is a fan and powering it that will flow tht much air under load(pressure differential)

Last edited by paulmasoner; 08-16-2010 at 11:14 AM.
Old 08-16-2010, 11:14 AM
  #66  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heres one 500cfm

size is 10 1/2" X 3 1/2"

needs 230vac at 0.4 amps(thats ALOT of juice)

http://www.surpluscenter.com/item.as...&item=16-958-A


One thing though. Even if it can move 500cfm...That doesnt mean it can move that when pressurized right? Once you apply resistance it wouldnt build much boost would it?
-Edit ^ I see Paul and I are on the same train of thought :P

Take that fan, duct it down to 3" pipe and see if you can get a reading with a boost guage...even with the end capped. Then try to get a reading with an engine sucking all the air out of the end.
I think best case..if it can flow 330g/sec is simply wouldnt be a restriction to the intake. but its not going to force that much air into the engine.

Last edited by Mawnee; 08-16-2010 at 11:36 AM.
Old 08-16-2010, 11:41 AM
  #67  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
and the fact that it is actually no direct comparison to anything useful lol

BUT hey, its a good enough example to make ppl think, and hopefully enough to stop the herds, i mean masses, from starting another 47 threads like this about any potential REAL use of elec. SCs
True i was off the beatin path, i was trying to say that though he quoted that batteries cannot compete with gasoline currently in chemical energy, i didn't want him to think that engines convert anything near those numbers.
Old 08-16-2010, 12:21 PM
  #68  
New Member
 
hoosgow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by isays
It just baffles my mind that a little turbine sitting in your exhust can generate enough power to run the compressor (and still allow enough flow), but you need an enormus electric motor that drains your battery to run it electrically.
For their size and weight turbines are better that just about anything in converting the kinetic energy of a moving fluid to and from another form of energy. There is a reason why machines that require REALLY HIGH power to weight ie. helicopters and fighter planes have been using them nearly exclusively for quite some time now.
Old 08-16-2010, 12:29 PM
  #69  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Mawnee
One thing though. Even if it can move 500cfm...That doesnt mean it can move that when pressurized right? Once you apply resistance it wouldnt build much boost would it?
-Edit ^ I see Paul and I are on the same train of thought :P
thats a big part of it look at page 2 charts of the datasheet i linked for the blower...

Originally Posted by hoosgow
For their size and weight turbines are better that just about anything in converting the kinetic energy of a moving fluid to and from another form of energy. There is a reason why machines that require REALLY HIGH power to weight ie. helicopters and fighter planes have been using them nearly exclusively for quite some time now.
aircraft use axial compressors and small engine stuff uses turbos because they simply cannot get enough air into the motor at altitude to make the power to stay aloft.

turbines are great in the right application. but powering them is the topic here.
Old 08-16-2010, 01:22 PM
  #70  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,011 Likes on 1,639 Posts
an electric blower is just as mechanical as anything else, at least until GOD or alien technology intervenes with an ionic air propulsion system ....
Old 08-16-2010, 01:58 PM
  #71  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
I am not advocating for any particular position with regard to the viability/efficacy of an electrically-based F/I system. What I am doing is demonstrating the process by which I lead the BHR team in developing our product line. The first thing we do is set targets/goals, examine the available hardware and specs, and go from there.

In esoteric cases such as these, I also have those making the pitch(es) discuss the specs they find rather than simply send me the files to open as I do not typically have the time. (Although I will read the files in this case, only.)

Since this is developing into the "design by committee" that I had hoped it would (which also almost always fail), I would like PaulMasoner and Mawnee to discuss the specs they have discovered rather than have each of us open files and examine them, and exaplin why each motor they have presented would be the best for this particular application.

Boil down the specs and tell the rest of us why you bothered to even mention those blower motors, please.

By the time we are done wrangling with this matter all of you will come away with a completely different view of everything about this industry.

Last edited by Charles R. Hill; 08-16-2010 at 02:02 PM.
Old 08-16-2010, 02:02 PM
  #72  
New Member
 
hoosgow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
turbines are great in the right application. but powering them is the topic here.
I agree with everything you said. My point was in in response to isays wondering about how such a tiny turbine can do so much.
Lets deal with the 2 halves of the turbo as seperate machines. The compressor side can be the same regardless of what is driving it; an electric motor or the exhaust turbine. For a given amount of power needed by the compressor to compress x lbs/min to y psi, the exhaust turbine will be able to deliver that in a MUCH smaller, lighter and simpler package than an electric motor, controller and battery.
That is all.
Old 08-16-2010, 02:10 PM
  #73  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by hoosgow
Lets deal with the 2 halves of the turbo as seperate machines.
Please, let's not as that will veer the thread off-topic and we will end up arguing over things that have been well-argued for the past 6 years.

The OP wanted to know why there are not electrically-driven F/I systems and we shall examine the issue to the extent that those contributing to this thread are willing.
Old 08-16-2010, 02:18 PM
  #74  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill

Boil down the specs and tell the rest of us why you bothered to even mention those blower motors, please.
I mentioned it just to throw out an electric motor that created 500cfm for the sake of fun.

The fact is that it wouldnt work AT ALL. Its not designed to force air and combat reversion. as soon as the "500cfm" coming out of that fan met resistance the air would simply escape back through the blades.
Old 08-16-2010, 02:26 PM
  #75  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,011 Likes on 1,639 Posts
You're going about it all wrong .....

http://www.dyson.com/fans/


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Why is forced induction always mechanical?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.