Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc
View Poll Results: Where is best mounting location for a turbo
On the exhaust manifold
24
44.44%
In the engine bay - in front of engine
16
29.63%
Rear mounted
12
22.22%
other
2
3.70%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Turbo placement - where is best ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-19-2008, 02:39 PM
  #1  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,523
Received 1,490 Likes on 839 Posts
Turbo placement - where is best ?

Been looking at all the various kits available trying to analyse where is the best place to put a turbo on the 8 so I thought it would be worth discussing.
Some initial thoughts ......

On manifold :
pros
*stealth
*Lower centre of gravity
*less heat to the engine bay

cons
*size of turbo able to be fitted
*more prone to road damage (stones etc)
*no bling factor
*hard to get to to work on
*some suggestion that exhaust ports get overheated ?

In engine bay:
pros
*Bling - looks nice
*Easy to get to for repair and tweaking
*can fit any size turbo you want

cons
*excessive heat in the engine bay
*lots of extra exhaust pipework to crack and leak
*possibility of frying electrics close to turbo

Rear mounted:
pros
*takes heat away from engine area
*long pipework for extra cooling
*adds weight to rear - better than adding it to front

cons
*easily damaged pipework and turbo
*Difficulty running pipes of decent diameter
*not as efficient ?
*rare
*Intake air - difficulty getting clean/dry air

Last edited by Brettus; 01-20-2008 at 12:22 PM.
Old 01-19-2008, 03:14 PM
  #2  
Boost 4 Life
iTrader: (1)
 
turborx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The pros for the manifold mounted turbo are very important and the cons don't bother me.
Old 01-19-2008, 03:29 PM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
best is very relative. Lower center of gravity and balance would be the deal for most. I'd like an in ur face turbo though, lol. My car isn't set up to handle for the most part anyways...
Old 01-19-2008, 03:33 PM
  #4  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
From an installation point of view...there are advantages to the "in your face" installs. After putting in a Mazport Type 1 kit.....I realize the type 3 Kit would be a lot easier to fit the Turbo in
Old 01-19-2008, 04:37 PM
  #5  
The Professor
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I'm going to have to go with rear mounted.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/a...9000e3a63d.htm

Last edited by staticlag; 01-19-2008 at 04:49 PM.
Old 01-19-2008, 04:45 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
romycha1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio --> San Diego
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by staticlag
I'm going to have to go with rear mounted.

Setup up correctly you could have a ~95% efficient intercooler system and zero turbo lag. Ease of access to turbo and wastegate, and better balance.

I'm thinking one 3" pipe with a resonator going back to feed 2 stock greddy size turbos hung from the stock exhaust mounts in place of the muffler. With those two turbos there would be no need for a muffler, just in one end, and then a short 4" of tube and right out the stock exhaust ports.

Run some 1.5" inch tube from each turbo near the stock fuel rail area to an inter cooler then to the manifold.

Would put down some serious numbers.
Hmmmm... a twin remote turbo ....
Old 01-19-2008, 05:20 PM
  #7  
Nice !!!
iTrader: (5)
 
bsteimel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by staticlag
I'm going to have to go with rear mounted.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/a...9000e3a63d.htm
I didn't catch that episode before that setup was really cool. God they make it look so easy on that show. I highly doubt that tuning on an Rx8 could be as easy as that, haha.
Old 01-19-2008, 06:28 PM
  #8  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
i wonder who voted for rear mounted?????

beers
Old 01-19-2008, 08:50 PM
  #9  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
manifold. Only con is its hard to work on. The air is hotter there and will spool fastest.
Old 01-19-2008, 09:21 PM
  #10  
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think its logical to use a rear mounted turbo if a kit comes for the 8.
reason is the pros of that set-up will REALLY benefit the 8 in terms of heat and reliability... 8's can't run huge turbo's and are not meant to be boosted ****** high with stock high comp rotors anyways... so this is what will save the 8 from all those poorly tuned fi 8's from an early death...

i already know those with the current greddy kits or anything else thats manifold mounted may disagree... however, i don't have a turbo and i think somewhat my opinion are not biased.

so if they did come with a rear mounted turbo kit by the time my warranty is over...i just may consider one with that set-up. for the right price of courses.

i mean, whats so bad about the rear mounted??? longer tubes? drop of 1 psi?
from what i recall... the t18z or the small greddy turbo still has room left to be boosted higher, right? and speaking in all modesty, i would not run the 8 with boost to make the 8 over 300whp. so this may be good.

someone make a kit!
Old 01-19-2008, 09:47 PM
  #11  
The Professor
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by TrochoidMagic
i think its logical to use a rear mounted turbo if a kit comes for the 8.
reason is the pros of that set-up will REALLY benefit the 8 in terms of heat and reliability... 8's can't run huge turbo's and are not meant to be boosted ****** high with stock high comp rotors anyways... so this is what will save the 8 from all those poorly tuned fi 8's from an early death...

i already know those with the current greddy kits or anything else thats manifold mounted may disagree... however, i don't have a turbo and i think somewhat my opinion are not biased.

so if they did come with a rear mounted turbo kit by the time my warranty is over...i just may consider one with that set-up. for the right price of courses.

i mean, whats so bad about the rear mounted??? longer tubes? drop of 1 psi?
from what i recall... the t18z or the small greddy turbo still has room left to be boosted higher, right? and speaking in all modesty, i would not run the 8 with boost to make the 8 over 300whp. so this may be good.

someone make a kit!
someone is already making a kit https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-major-horsepower-upgrades-93/rotorocks-remote-turbo-stage-ii-126645/

the direct cons of a remote or rear mounted turbo setup is cost. Thats a lot of piping that you are going to have to pay to get fabricated.

And if you watched the video, lubrication is also a problem that needs to be addressed.
Old 01-19-2008, 10:23 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
romycha1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio --> San Diego
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummm.. his kit is already made.. just upgrading it...

But I like the whole top-mount action.. it's easy on the eyes and easy to get to.
Old 01-19-2008, 10:41 PM
  #13  
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
StealthTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A Pacific Island.
Posts: 7,280
Received 172 Likes on 130 Posts
Rear mounted has the additional con of having NO access to clean air for the intake - I've only seen bastardized efforts at locations, even the best of them is in a wheellwell - awful!


S
Old 01-19-2008, 11:33 PM
  #14  
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^how i felt... too bad there is "always" a trade-off.
Old 01-19-2008, 11:49 PM
  #15  
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StealthTL
Rear mounted has the additional con of having NO access to clean air for the intake - I've only seen bastardized efforts at locations, even the best of them is in a wheellwell - awful!


S
this is so mind boggling. sure there's some way of having a better air-box location. even in the trunk?...hmmm...nah.
we need a pic of a stripped car.
Old 01-20-2008, 12:23 AM
  #16  
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah...i guess a lil further back from the manifold is the best place. as long as it can be far enough back to not vent heat back into the engine...
just noticed...what if your cat blew out? for those who choose to stay with a cat...your turbo is fucked with the rear mount...bad idea.
Old 01-20-2008, 02:21 AM
  #17  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by StealthTL
Rear mounted has the additional con of having NO access to clean air for the intake - I've only seen bastardized efforts at locations, even the best of them is in a wheellwell - awful!


S
i know you know more than me.. so bear with me. but i dont think so. im sure some sort of roof mounted (or side mounted behind the rear door windows or thereabouts) air ducts could be built. supercars do it all the time.

the real problem i see is that you would be exposing the turbo directly to the street. and as i use my 8 as a dd, i just dont see that as plausible. but maybe its fine.
Old 01-20-2008, 02:26 AM
  #18  
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kersh4w
i know you know more than me.. so bear with me. but i dont think so. im sure some sort of roof mounted (or side mounted behind the rear door windows or thereabouts) air ducts could be built. supercars do it all the time.

the real problem i see is that you would be exposing the turbo directly to the street. and as i use my 8 as a dd, i just dont see that as plausible. but maybe its fine.
i'm sure in the case of that sts corvette, if it was a hard-top version, some scoop or whatnot could've been fabbed up to use an airbox in the trunk.
kinda like a turbo mr2 style...if you think about it...the concept is similar.
Old 01-20-2008, 09:51 AM
  #19  
i'm the undead
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i've grown accustomed to seeing in front of the engine. i think it's cool for a couple of reasons. having access to it and having more size options are among the most important of the reasons. access was my biggest complaint for my MR2 and i suspect sizing may be an issues with my current Rx-7 project. i won't be turbocharging my current Rx-8, but i might in a future project and i think the front placement is the ideal solution for my concerns.
Old 01-20-2008, 11:39 PM
  #20  
The Professor
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by TrochoidMagic
yeah...i guess a lil further back from the manifold is the best place. as long as it can be far enough back to not vent heat back into the engine...
just noticed...what if your cat blew out? for those who choose to stay with a cat...your turbo is fucked with the rear mount...bad idea.

True, i forgot about that, I wonder how the STS turbo handles that

Likely you would have to get a metal core cat to make it work.
Old 01-22-2008, 11:35 AM
  #21  
RotoRocks Powered
 
rotorocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by staticlag
True, i forgot about that, I wonder how the STS turbo handles that

Likely you would have to get a metal core cat to make it work.
Mine blew, nothing happened.
That cat is dual core, remember? 1rst half burns and clogs the second half. You are done. no more boost, no more GO, Turbo is safe and sound.

Ask me how I know


There is nothing wrong with hanging the turbo in the back.
The intake placement is also not an issue. intake filter sitting inside the rear fender is perfect. It is about 2-3" higher than your tail pipe tips, there is never water there even at high speed hitting a huge puddle, and the air up there is as clean as it gets anywhere else, plus it is truly cold.

Ask me how I know

There is no risk of exposing the pressure pipe. 2" alluminized steel pipe fits perfectly well on the other side of the differential (parralel to exhaust) held with the cross braces. It is no more exposed to anything than your exhaust pipes.

turbo itself is not afraid of water, and you have much higher chances of ripping apart your muffler (and you don't see it happening anywhere do you?), than damaging that turbine, by banging it on something.

By the way all of this questions and issues were addressed long ago in my "another turbo" thread, where the initial build took place more than a year ago (and almost 30,000 miles)

Vlad
Old 01-23-2008, 05:26 PM
  #22  
Soon to be born.....
 
ShAdOwFoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: AC<-->NYC
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
correct me if im wrong but the Mazsport type 2 is a front mount engine bay turbo while the type 1 and 3 are on the manifold right?
Old 01-23-2008, 08:53 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rotorocks: Could you show me where the filter sits (with a picture) I'm VERY interested in your kit, I'm just wondering if I should get a custom box w/ duct built (or maybe you might incorporate one into your design) for the filter.
Old 01-24-2008, 11:10 AM
  #24  
RotoRocks Powered
 
rotorocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Daemos
rotorocks: Could you show me where the filter sits (with a picture) I'm VERY interested in your kit, I'm just wondering if I should get a custom box w/ duct built (or maybe you might incorporate one into your design) for the filter.


See where the oil pump is located, above the exhaust tip?
Exactly in the same spot but on the opposite side, currently I have stuffed the intake filter. If you ever looked under that fender, you'll see how big, clean and secure of a place that pocket is.

Last edited by rotorocks; 01-27-2008 at 11:55 PM.
Old 01-26-2008, 01:23 AM
  #25  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wow.......... My eyes hurt


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Turbo placement - where is best ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.