Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

SpeedForceRacing-326WHP with dyno chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-23-2006, 12:39 AM
  #26  
Club Marbles Member
 
Raptor2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whao, and this is actually for sale. Interesting.
Old 02-23-2006, 08:25 AM
  #27  
Registered
 
rkostolni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia/Maryland
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EyeBall Fixer...(o)(x)
Yes, I am a novice in rotary engine technology...
I don't understand why the HP/Torque peaks at 7200 and then peters out...
So really, from 7200 to 9500 is pretty much useless.... is this correct?
They've turned our rotary into "acting like" a piston engine,
except there's no appreciable grunt off the line...

I don't get it (stupid is as stupid does)?!
I imagine its gotta be difficult to size a turbo to work at maximum efficiency throughout such a wide rev range. On any engine, if you want it to spool fast and give lots of low end torque, you usually have to sacrafice some up top. If you want lots up top, then you have to sacrifice spool time and low end torque. With modern turbo's this effect can be greatly mitigated, but it will be somewhat magnified in a rotary since it has such a large cfm range.

So if you want it to hold power till 9krpms stick a bigger turbo on there, but realize your not going to spool up to full boost until 4,5,6... k rpms.

Last edited by rkostolni; 02-23-2006 at 08:29 AM.
Old 02-23-2006, 09:16 AM
  #29  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you got this kit with the Inter-X you still would save $500...so why are we getting your EMS again?

No offense, thank you for working on this and making a product for the RX8!!!!

Also...did I miss it or did you explain why you messured this at 7.2K? I would think you could make more power at a higher RPM or is there a huge drop off or something?

Please explain...us newbs need to know.
Old 02-23-2006, 09:35 AM
  #30  
TurboTim
Thread Starter
 
SpeedForceRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you got this kit with the Inter-X you still would save $500...so why are we getting your EMS again?


For starters.......you could have already had this kit a year ago if you bought a tuner kit.The big problem is everybody and there brother said this kit doesnt make power,we are lying about our claims,we dont know what we are doing,we are idiots,Greddy is the best,etc...........So now we make the power and all of a sudden,hey you can buy this kit and use interceptor X.Why didnt anybody do it sooner? Actually there were quite a few guys that did because they realized the potential of this system right away.Unfortunately, the majority of the masses thought it was impossible to do what we did and provide a real dyno chart.One of our customers seen similiar results with an Emanage but his Emanage is not working right so he is not gettng the smooth idle and drivability that we have.

If you do the math you wont be saving $500 because you still need to get injectors with the interceptor X because we dont provide injectors with the tuner kit.Then add in a boost control solenoid and I dont think you will save anything.On top of that the EMS we supply you is tuned for this application.Sure you might need a little fine tuning for your particular mods but you dont have to tune from scratch so you will save money on dyno time too.



No offense, thank you for working on this and making a product for the RX8!!!!

Also...did I miss it or did you explain why you messured this at 7.2K? I would think you could make more power at a higher RPM or is there a huge drop off or something?



Well you can see that the power starts to drop off at 7850.If I remember correctly at 8500 rpm it is below 290WHP so there is really no use revving it any higher because you are out of the powerband.It is not uncommon for most cars to make peak power before redline and this car is no different.I think some of it has to do with the butterfly system and the fact that this rotary is not as efficient at 9000 rpms.To summarize........if we are making really good power without revving the crap out of the motor, then it means there will be more reliability to the end user.The stress on the motor at 9000 and 10,000 rpms is much greater then at 8000 rpms.

Last edited by SpeedForceRacing; 02-23-2006 at 09:44 AM.
Old 02-23-2006, 10:06 AM
  #31  
Screw gas mileage
 
Gambit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 2,179
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
if we are making really good power without revving the crap out of the motor, then it means there will be more reliability to the end user.The stress on the motor at 9000 and 10,000 rpms is much greater then at 8000 rpms.
and less stress on the tranny
Old 02-23-2006, 11:05 AM
  #32  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you do the math you wont be saving $500 because you still need to get injectors with the interceptor X because we dont provide injectors with the tuner kit.
I see...my mistake, thanks.

SFR...OK, I understand now...thanks. (about the 7.2K thing).

Thanks for the hard work...at 9psi that's pretty dang impressive.
Old 02-23-2006, 11:27 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice results.

What is the larger turbo you guys are going with? I'm assuming that would be to continue climbing with power towards redline?

Does you EMS function like the Interceptor? Or does it manipulate the code like the Emanage? If it functions like the Interceptor, I'm curious how it doesn't trip the "too rich" CEL.
Old 02-23-2006, 06:18 PM
  #34  
#1 Legend
iTrader: (1)
 
BigOLundh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Cool...that looks pretty fun, now is that whp or flywheel?

...and what do they mean shifts vs gear?

Like...how many shifts to 60mph and what gear....I don't understand that part??
I'm pretty sure that is Wheel Horse Power.

Shifts (i believe) is referring to the number of ***** in your 1/4 mile - essentially this reflects gear ratios. I am pretty sure on our car it should be around 4 shifts

Gear is referring to weather or not its a 5 or 6 or 7 speed transmission.

If you want a definete answer, you can just call Rotary Performance and ask them for yourself. Their phone number should be up on the website.
-hS
Old 02-23-2006, 08:20 PM
  #35  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rkostolni
I imagine its gotta be difficult to size a turbo to work at maximum efficiency throughout such a wide rev range. On any engine, if you want it to spool fast and give lots of low end torque, you usually have to sacrafice some up top. If you want lots up top, then you have to sacrifice spool time and low end torque. With modern turbo's this effect can be greatly mitigated, but it will be somewhat magnified in a rotary since it has such a large cfm range.

So if you want it to hold power till 9krpms stick a bigger turbo on there, but realize your not going to spool up to full boost until 4,5,6... k rpms.

Unless you do like Porsche in the new 911 Turbo and use variable turbine geometry system to improve flexibility... http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3253
Old 02-23-2006, 09:04 PM
  #36  
Student Driver
 
EyeBall Fixer...(o)(x)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks rkostolni for your helpful explaination, now I don't feel like such a
"rotary retard"
Al

Originally Posted by EyeBall Fixer...(o)(x)
Yes, I am a novice in rotary engine technology...
I don't understand why the HP/Torque peaks at 7200 and then peters out...
So really, from 7200 to 9500 is pretty much useless.... is this correct?
They've turned our rotary into "acting like" a piston engine,
except there's no appreciable grunt off the line...

I don't get it (stupid is as stupid does)?!

Originally Posted by rkostolni
I imagine its gotta be difficult to size a turbo to work at maximum efficiency throughout such a wide rev range. On any engine, if you want it to spool fast and give lots of low end torque, you usually have to sacrafice some up top. If you want lots up top, then you have to sacrifice spool time and low end torque. With modern turbo's this effect can be greatly mitigated, but it will be somewhat magnified in a rotary since it has such a large cfm range.

So if you want it to hold power till 9krpms stick a bigger turbo on there, but realize your not going to spool up to full boost until 4,5,6... k rpms.
Old 02-23-2006, 09:35 PM
  #37  
Registered Drifter
 
drifter_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
very interesting. good job SFR.

dd sends...
Old 02-24-2006, 09:03 AM
  #38  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure that is Wheel Horse Power.

Shifts (i believe) is referring to the number of ***** in your 1/4 mile - essentially this reflects gear ratios. I am pretty sure on our car it should be around 4 shifts

Gear is referring to weather or not its a 5 or 6 or 7 speed transmission.

If you want a definete answer, you can just call Rotary Performance and ask them for yourself. Their phone number should be up on the website.
Thanks! I re-did it and that calculator looks pretty dang accurate.

It "looks like" your setup on an 8 would get us into the mid 12's which is just amazing. I know I know, there are alot of factors (driver, grip, reaction time, weather , modded 8 weight, etc etc) but my goal of 300whp for the RX8 would honestly be more than enough for me.
Old 02-24-2006, 10:37 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gearing - I don't think they are talking about how many your vehicle has - a 4 spd can have the same gear ratios as a 5spd or 6 spd...they are more likely referring to your final drive gear ratio...the RX-8 is 4.44.
Old 02-24-2006, 11:17 AM
  #40  
Consiglieri
 
MadDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: yourI'mgirl
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately, there's a lot of history with SFR and the forum. Most of it is water under the bridge now. But, you're right. There are a lot of doubters here.

Low 13's is pretty easily attainable nowadays. While I haven't gotten a time slip yet, I'd be willing to bet I'm almost there. STi's are supposed to run mid to low 13's and I'm beating them - even though they are really tough to beat off the line with that AWD.
Old 02-24-2006, 01:01 PM
  #41  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMEN Charles, I agree 100%!

It's so cool how people doubted the RX8 and now it's making huge power gains and it's also lovely to see the aftermarket for the RX8 blossom into what we have today. No...not perfect and honestly still pricy for me but once my 8 is paid off I'm glad there will be several options to make the 8 faster and better overall.
Old 02-24-2006, 01:35 PM
  #42  
Need'd a Turbo
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think there has been a turning point on this fourm. Ever since the interceptor has produced power gains it seemed to open the flood gates in the minds of the people on this forum. Power is possible and we now know that 300+ whp is much more attainable then we believed 6 months ago. Now the next obsicle is to make the general tuner population to realize what we are slowly realizing, meaning that the 8 is a fast car. I like the idea that we wont have to stay in the twisties to win anything. We now can have some grunt and as of this moment this is the most powerful kit we can buy.
Old 02-24-2006, 01:38 PM
  #43  
Need'd a Turbo
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How big is the piping on this kit?
Old 02-24-2006, 01:43 PM
  #44  
Registered
 
crimson-rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No...not perfect and honestly still pricy for me but once my 8 is paid off I'm glad there will be several options to make the 8 faster and better overall.
That won't be for a while for some of us. (Dang trade-in roll over)!!!

Congrats SFR. Now go to the track and scare people.
Old 02-24-2006, 01:46 PM
  #45  
Need'd a Turbo
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crimson-rain
Congrats SFR. Now go to the track and scare people.
I second that!!!
Old 02-24-2006, 02:42 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To further hijack...Charles, how much does the OEM PPF weigh?
Old 02-24-2006, 05:55 PM
  #47  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charles...keep up the good work.

....and NOW...back...to yada yada yada
Old 02-24-2006, 07:41 PM
  #48  
Senor Carnegrande
 
BaronVonBigmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charles, do you have access to finite element analysis software, or would that even help? We have AlGor at work, and things are fairly slow for the moment.
Old 02-24-2006, 07:50 PM
  #49  
TurboTim
Thread Starter
 
SpeedForceRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Charles for your support.I feel your pain since we have been through it on these boards just like you.The piping for the RX-8 turbo system is 3" intake. 2" turbo to intercooler and 2.5" to 3" intercooler to throttlebody.
Old 02-24-2006, 10:47 PM
  #50  
Senor Carnegrande
 
BaronVonBigmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lemme guess, the "Machinery's Handbook"?

Yeah, it's probably the additional cost of aluminum, the additional cost of welding (or is there any welding, I don't know), etc. Mazda designs cars with a price point in mind just like everyone else, and if you've gotta carry more weight to save money, the bottom center of the car is probably the best place to do it.

If you have an autocad model of your 3 proposed designs, I could analyze them and you could see the weak spots like this, then change materials or design until you reduce the stress to an acceptable level.



We use algor for huge ball valves, but we've also done steel brackets. The president of the company has waterfront property and needed some special kind of brackets for his bulkhead. :P

Of course, if your designs need to remain classified, that's cool too.

Last edited by BaronVonBigmeat; 02-24-2006 at 10:52 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SpeedForceRacing-326WHP with dyno chart



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.