RotorMaster "blown 13B-MSP" RX-8
08-12-2005, 11:09 PM
#26
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gold Coast Australia
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
i couldnt just leave this wilting from lack of attention in the Aussie forum. rounded up that is 273 hp
now you know why Gomez and myself cross borders in our posts . 
B...free
michael
08-12-2005, 11:15 PM
#27
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
Originally Posted by Lock & Load
Rotarygod
Thanks for pointing out the possible shortcomings of this kit as you said most of the power is up the top end i want more power down low 2000rpm to 6000rpm :D hopefully Hymees twin screw supercharger will offer both low end and top end power ??
My main concern is the TSI unit they are using to control the ECU id much rather see the Mazsport system in place , would it work with this set up ???
B...free
michael
Thanks for pointing out the possible shortcomings of this kit as you said most of the power is up the top end i want more power down low 2000rpm to 6000rpm :D hopefully Hymees twin screw supercharger will offer both low end and top end power ??
My main concern is the TSI unit they are using to control the ECU id much rather see the Mazsport system in place , would it work with this set up ???
B...free
michael
08-13-2005, 02:02 AM
#30
Originally Posted by racer 13b
wow Looks great! Cant wait to see the final product with management.
Cheers,
Hymee.
BTW - RG, I'm glad you worked out that was the boost graph, not the torque!
08-13-2005, 02:07 AM
#31
Originally Posted by Aoshi Shinomori
As I understand it, Hymee's twin screw blower will run at a constant boost pressure. It will make the same boost at every rpm level as opposed to having to build up power, it is always there. I'm sure I missed something, but I think that is mostly right.
You can see there isn't much boost down low. And as it builds, you can see the HP curve starting to go steeper than normal. What I hope to get with the screw is the boost down low as well, so the HP curve will have around the same peak, but it will "fuller" starting at the low end, i.e. more area under the curve.
Anyway, congrats to Joe. It makes some good numbers. A bit "peeky" for my liking, but that is just me. I reckon that is better than the little turbos that are constrictive up top.
Cheers,
Hymee.
Last edited by Hymee; 08-13-2005 at 02:09 AM.
08-14-2005, 11:15 AM
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Doylestown, PA (philly suburb)
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do we have any idea as to when this might come out? I know it is hard to estimate when you are still testing, but are we looking at sometime in 2006 maybe?
also, around what cost is the kit? I am guessing around the same as the greddy kit?
also, around what cost is the kit? I am guessing around the same as the greddy kit?
08-15-2005, 01:22 AM
#33
New Member
DMRH,
I wonder if Joe can make the intake pod anywhere but just behind the radiator.
As RG said, it may suck hotter air.
To be honest - it looks very much the same as the HKS setup. Good number too. Hopefully I will see it in the Nats.
Cheers,
Taka
I wonder if Joe can make the intake pod anywhere but just behind the radiator.
As RG said, it may suck hotter air.
To be honest - it looks very much the same as the HKS setup. Good number too. Hopefully I will see it in the Nats.
Cheers,
Taka
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
38
05-14-2024 06:57 AM
