The newest 100% bolt on Greddy Hybrid turbocharger!
Agreed , that's a large part of it (but not the whole story ).
BTW - you infer that I have the issue ............................ I don't
BTW - you infer that I have the issue ............................ I don't
Last edited by Brettus; May 17, 2010 at 07:04 PM.
And just for clarification, here is the compressor flow map (provided by Kane, verified by Bryan) for the "60-1":

As you can see, it is a "50 pound compressor" only if you run it out to almost 18 PSI and well off its peak efficiency range.
Which is fine. Not optimal, but people do it all the time.
Just not on a Renesis - for the very reasons that Bryan pointed out.
So, again, I want to understand the thought process behind this recommendation so I know what to do to help customers of mine that have purchased this "upgrade" and are not seeing the flow that they expect.

As you can see, it is a "50 pound compressor" only if you run it out to almost 18 PSI and well off its peak efficiency range.
Which is fine. Not optimal, but people do it all the time.
Just not on a Renesis - for the very reasons that Bryan pointed out.
So, again, I want to understand the thought process behind this recommendation so I know what to do to help customers of mine that have purchased this "upgrade" and are not seeing the flow that they expect.
It was my fault for the misunderstanding of Air Mass. Sometimes everyone needs their wake up call. I just totally took the terminology Air mass the wrong way. I knew the air has its efficiencies/inefficiencies but I am not all into reading compressor maps and doing studies on air flow and knowing the terminologies. So forgive me for for my ignorance. You are very knowlegeable on compressor maps and readings. I always think in a different way than most on some of this stuff. All of it is personal experience and no deep study on the flow charts. Try something out that works, try to find something thats better. You definately tought me a much needed lesson Jeff, thanks!
I do not base my builds souly on compressor maps. I have had almost every turbo on my RX7's. If I like a particular powerband, I make that happen as a product offered. If I don't like a set up or the way it responds and drives I will not push the product. Right now I am experimenting with a GT61 (35R compressor) hybrid. I do not like it one bit compared to the 60-1. The T61 just doesn't get going until 4-4500 RPM. Very lazy in first gear. It may outpower the 60-1 by 40ish RWHP up top, but below the curve the 60-1 will walk all over it. I don't think peak RWHP is worth losing a big portion of your powerband. We can discuss Air mass and air volume, but to me it all comes down to how it works in the car...
Last edited by Bryan@BNR; May 19, 2010 at 10:03 AM.
In the meantime , when anyone buys this upgrade and makes less than 290whp they just wasted their money IMO
Last edited by Brettus; May 17, 2010 at 11:05 PM.
Which is what started this discussion in the first place . Poor results . I'm 90% sure it is just a WG actuator issue but until someone actually resolves that we can't be sure .
In the meantime , when anyone buys this upgrade and makes less than 290whp they just wasted their money IMO
In the meantime , when anyone buys this upgrade and makes less than 290whp they just wasted their money IMO
I agree with you on the 290 WHP. The actuator needs to be replaced and the low boost issue needs to be resolved. Also I think the Greddy intercooler is a restriction, but I don't know the efficiencies of that piece. I will have some actuator brackets made and I will send all my customers upgraded actuators. Just got to get some feedback on the new actuators...
What actuator spring tension are you running on your hybrid? You are running an H3 compressor wheel which has about the same charactoristics as the 60-1.
I agree with you on the 290 WHP. The actuator needs to be replaced and the low boost issue needs to be resolved. Also I think the Greddy intercooler is a restriction, but I don't know the efficiencies of that piece. I will have some actuator brackets made and I will send all my customers upgraded actuators. Just got to get some feedback on the new actuators...
I agree with you on the 290 WHP. The actuator needs to be replaced and the low boost issue needs to be resolved. Also I think the Greddy intercooler is a restriction, but I don't know the efficiencies of that piece. I will have some actuator brackets made and I will send all my customers upgraded actuators. Just got to get some feedback on the new actuators...
I just jam the wg closed by adjusting the arm according to whatever mass flow/whp i want to make . Works well for me but does get me into arguments with MM all the time LOL .
FWIW - i tried a higher flow IC and did get more flow (at the same WG setting)but was not as dramatic as I expected.
I did about 424 at around 17psi w/ about 315 or so ft/lbs of torque back in 2000 and then on New Years Eve 2006 did 439 and change at 360ft/lbs of torque at 23-24psi. The compressor does start to run out of useful "steam" about 17-18psi or so (with diminishing gains thereafter) but is still a terrific street turbo for a 2-rotor setup. It won't crack 500 but it will make 400. It's small enough to have some decent spool on a full T4 platform but large enough to make really good numbers on a street car. It'll do the 300-375hp range all day long without breaking a sweat and doing it at under a bar of boost so I agree with Bryan that it'd be an ideal compressor for a turbocharged 13B (older or Renesis) setup. It might be a "dinosaur" (haha!) but it's good and is a great workhorse turbo.
crunching numbers between BDCs 424 RWHP dyno sheet 65 peak lb/min, and the 50 lb/min calculated for the renesis at sub 18psi. There is 15 lb-min/110 BHP flow difference at the same boost level. Is the renesis that restrictive, or is it getting into territory that isnt commonly explored so we dont know exactly what it will do?
Waste? Not really (on an FI car).
It doesn't make power, though.
In fact, on all the FI cars I've tuned with W/M, there is a slight loss of power when the spray comes on. (Unless you run really high alky concentrations where it is a wash.)
You can run more timing to make it up, but then you are kinda defeating the purpose.
It doesn't make power, though.
In fact, on all the FI cars I've tuned with W/M, there is a slight loss of power when the spray comes on. (Unless you run really high alky concentrations where it is a wash.)
You can run more timing to make it up, but then you are kinda defeating the purpose.
Waste? Not really (on an FI car).
It doesn't make power, though.
In fact, on all the FI cars I've tuned with W/M, there is a slight loss of power when the spray comes on. (Unless you run really high alky concentrations where it is a wash.)
You can run more timing to make it up, but then you are kinda defeating the purpose.
It doesn't make power, though.
In fact, on all the FI cars I've tuned with W/M, there is a slight loss of power when the spray comes on. (Unless you run really high alky concentrations where it is a wash.)
You can run more timing to make it up, but then you are kinda defeating the purpose.
point missed.
did not mention making power, just imply was not a waste, more so on the track!
very tongue in cheek. and really should have not been in this thread.

beers
Good thread, good info.
So glad that there are tunners like Jeff out there and also people like Bryan who have tried crap loads of combinations to find out what works best for what.
I will stick to the hardware side of things..lol.
So glad that there are tunners like Jeff out there and also people like Bryan who have tried crap loads of combinations to find out what works best for what.
I will stick to the hardware side of things..lol.
Totally.
Huh?
I do run W/M on my car at the track.
It is a great detonation suppressant.
Too bad it doesn't lower engine temps! I've thought about taking the nozzle out and pointing it at the rad instead!
I do run W/M on my car at the track.
It is a great detonation suppressant.
Too bad it doesn't lower engine temps! I've thought about taking the nozzle out and pointing it at the rad instead!
^ thats a good one........I saw that bumper for the first time when the fellow who purchased my turbo kit drove from Canada...I think its odd that wasnt an option here in the states.
Hmmm, not a bad idea to consider for FI applications/track days... I should look into that; to tell you the truth those headlamp washers a pretty useless, other than for spraying washer fluid all the way up my hood when I'm on the hi-way.
You can get it here from the parts department at any Mazda dealer. I found out when they asked us if we wanted that bumper when my buddy had to do a front end repair on an RX8. I do not have the part number for it though. Sorry for off topic reply to OP.
crunching numbers between BDCs 424 RWHP dyno sheet 65 peak lb/min, and the 50 lb/min calculated for the renesis at sub 18psi. There is 15 lb-min/110 BHP flow difference at the same boost level. Is the renesis that restrictive, or is it getting into territory that isnt commonly explored so we dont know exactly what it will do?
What actuator spring tension are you running on your hybrid? You are running an H3 compressor wheel which has about the same charactoristics as the 60-1.
I agree with you on the 290 WHP. The actuator needs to be replaced and the low boost issue needs to be resolved. Also I think the Greddy intercooler is a restriction, but I don't know the efficiencies of that piece. I will have some actuator brackets made and I will send all my customers upgraded actuators. Just got to get some feedback on the new actuators...
I agree with you on the 290 WHP. The actuator needs to be replaced and the low boost issue needs to be resolved. Also I think the Greddy intercooler is a restriction, but I don't know the efficiencies of that piece. I will have some actuator brackets made and I will send all my customers upgraded actuators. Just got to get some feedback on the new actuators...
Bryan@BNR
No risk, no reward! I boomed one about 4 months ago running too much timing. Side seals collapsed... 5 hours later engine was back in the car running :D.
It takes us 5 hours just to clean the engine components before assembly!
How did you get the motor out of the car, the engine torn down, cleaned, clearanced and assembled and then back in the car in 5 hours?!?!
When I take my motor out it takes 4 hours to do it by myself.
Holy crap!
It takes us 5 hours just to clean the engine components before assembly!
How did you get the motor out of the car, the engine torn down, cleaned, clearanced and assembled and then back in the car in 5 hours?!?!
When I take my motor out it takes 4 hours to do it by myself.
It takes us 5 hours just to clean the engine components before assembly!
How did you get the motor out of the car, the engine torn down, cleaned, clearanced and assembled and then back in the car in 5 hours?!?!
When I take my motor out it takes 4 hours to do it by myself.

All the accessories are all easy to come out. The intercooler has 2 clamps holding it in, the DP is 2 v band clamps, intake pipe is 2 bolts, intake manifold and wiring harness can be removed in 3 minutes :D. 5 trans bolts, 2 starter bolts, 2 engine mount bolts. I guess the biggest pain is removing the radiator. I really like to simplify things when i fabricate parts. Makes it quick to work on. If the car gets past dyno tuning, A/C is getting reinstalled so that will add complication.
Last edited by Bryan@BNR; May 21, 2010 at 11:33 PM.



..