Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Garrett GTX Renesis anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-14-2010, 12:12 AM
  #26  
No respecter of malarkey
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
^^^^That's some serious hardcore pr0n
Old 11-14-2010, 03:22 PM
  #27  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Fricken Red x's - I wonder if it is a Win7 bug... I cannot even see the imageshack ones pdxhak posted!

I can see the one Brettus posted, and oh baby
That's because I got it off a different site .


I'm liking it - from what I can make out it outperforms the 3076 up top but should spool almost as well as the std 3071!

Last edited by Brettus; 11-14-2010 at 03:36 PM.
Old 11-14-2010, 04:49 PM
  #28  
Original Turbo 'd Auto !!
 
09Factor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Surprise its Az!
Posts: 2,126
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Fricken Red x's - I wonder if it is a Win7 bug... I cannot even see the imageshack ones pdxhak posted!

I can see the one Brettus posted, and oh baby
I think it's an issue between the links and IE8. I see Red Xx'es in IE8 and all pics work fine in FF.
Old 11-14-2010, 08:39 PM
  #29  
No respecter of malarkey
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
That's because I got it off a different site .


I'm liking it - from what I can make out it outperforms the 3076 up top but should spool almost as well as the std 3071!

I wonder of MM can make it work for the Greddy upgrade kit?
Old 11-14-2010, 09:01 PM
  #30  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
I wonder of MM can make it work for the Greddy upgrade kit?
Should be a breeze - pity no-one else has done that conversion as it would be an awesome option to have ...
Old 11-14-2010, 09:07 PM
  #31  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I can see them from my laptop just fine. Dang desktop.

That is some nice looking stuff right there. Thanks
Old 11-14-2010, 09:10 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
IronTanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Gt3071R is coming back out tomorrow to have the center section clocked... too bad it looks like it's over a grand even without the housing or I'd swap to the GTX3071R in a heartbeat.

Maybe once the engine goes out I can sneak it in as part of the rebuild
Old 11-14-2010, 09:13 PM
  #33  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 09Factor
I think it's an issue between the links and IE8. I see Red Xx'es in IE8 and all pics work fine in FF.
Yep - that worked also.
Old 11-14-2010, 09:23 PM
  #34  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by IronTanuki
My Gt3071R is coming back out tomorrow to have the center section clocked... too bad it looks like it's over a grand even without the housing or I'd swap to the GTX3071R in a heartbeat.

Maybe once the engine goes out I can sneak it in as part of the rebuild
be the first - do eeeeeeet !!!!!
Old 11-14-2010, 10:31 PM
  #35  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I already have a GTX3076R sitting here.
That should tell you something.
Old 11-14-2010, 10:36 PM
  #36  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
/\ that you get all the cool toys to play with .....
Old 11-15-2010, 01:46 AM
  #37  
No respecter of malarkey
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
It doesn't tell us anything which is why you should tell us more ....
Old 11-15-2010, 10:39 AM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
For a start, the '76 is a better choice than the '71.
Old 11-15-2010, 11:12 AM
  #39  
Registered
 
IronTanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Besides matching the machining done to the compressor housing on the GT3071R would the GTX3076R CHRA be a direct swap into the existing turbine housing on your kits and fit into the same location without any additional modifications?
Old 11-15-2010, 11:39 AM
  #40  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by IronTanuki
Besides matching the machining done to the compressor housing on the GT3071R would the GTX3076R CHRA be a direct swap into the existing turbine housing on your kits and fit into the same location without any additional modifications?
Qualified yes.
Old 11-15-2010, 11:48 AM
  #41  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
For a start, the '76 is a better choice than the '71.
Doesn't that depend on what you are doing with it ?
Below 2PR the maps are very close so unless you are shooting for 400whp wouldn't the the gtx3071's quicker spooling would make it a better choice ?
Old 11-15-2010, 12:25 PM
  #42  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
Doesn't that depend on what you are doing with it ?
Below 2PR the maps are very close so unless you are shooting for 400whp wouldn't the the gtx3071's quicker spooling would make it a better choice ?
Nope - unless you are building a piston engine.
The GTX '76 will produce comparable flow rates at the same turbine flow as the regular '71, so any boost onset differences will be compensated by the increased mass flow.
Old 11-15-2010, 12:39 PM
  #43  
No respecter of malarkey
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
I would respectfully disagree with the choice because our goals are different. I have no doubt that it will spool the same or better than the standard 3071, but given the top end limitations of the Renesis I'd rather spool up faster still.
Old 11-15-2010, 12:51 PM
  #44  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
I would respectfully disagree with the choice because our goals are different. I have no doubt that it will spool the same or better than the standard 3071, but given the top end limitations of the Renesis I'd rather spool up faster still.
You didn't understand what I said.
The '76GTX will produce as much flow down low as the '71 (which is as much as you can use) at a lower spool speed.
There is no "spool up faster still" without destroying the motor and the turbo.
Old 11-15-2010, 01:10 PM
  #45  
No respecter of malarkey
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
I would again respectfully part ways with you on that assessment
Old 11-15-2010, 01:29 PM
  #46  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
I would again respectfully part ways with you on that assessment
OK - So tell me what you expect to happen if your theoretical turbo could "spool faster" than the 3071?

Keeping in mind that:

a) Manifold pressure does NOT equal flow and
b) a 100% increase of flow on a 3071-powered motor at, say, 2500 RPM would equate to only the same airflow at 3200 on the same setup, which, once normalized for the reciprocal losses, lack of mechanical advantage from the lower RPM and necessary ignition retard at low RPMs, would equal a net loss of torque at that RPM.
Old 11-15-2010, 01:49 PM
  #47  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
The GTX '76 will produce comparable flow rates at the same turbine flow as the regular '71, so any boost onset differences will be compensated by the increased mass flow.


I am struggling to understand your theory there but the proof will be in the pudding . If you have anyway to compare spool difference to the stock 3071 once you have it installed then I'm sure many of us will be interested to hear your findings .

Last edited by Brettus; 11-15-2010 at 02:50 PM.
Old 11-15-2010, 04:16 PM
  #48  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Well, let's put it this way:

Simply upping the compressor wheel to a '76 on the "standard" 3071r only raises the onset boost threshold by 500 - 700 RPM (while providing more air than most people will need across the entire RPM band).
The GTX '76 will flow the same amount of air in that "hole" as the regular '71, even though the shaft is spinning at the same rate as it does in the "regular" 3076.
Old 11-15-2010, 04:33 PM
  #49  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
/\ I see what you are saying but I don't see how you got that the gtx3076 would outflow a stock 3076 at low shaft speed . IE how do you arrive at that from looking at the map?




UNLESS THE KEY IS THE TURBINE MAP - WHICH i CAN'T SEE BECAUSE OF THE WHOLE red x SITUATION

For reference : uncanny how the GTX3071 matches the gt3076 map almost exactly ..

Attached Thumbnails Garrett GTX Renesis anyone?-3076.jpg  

Last edited by Brettus; 11-15-2010 at 05:02 PM.
Old 11-15-2010, 06:42 PM
  #50  
No respecter of malarkey
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
Ran the calcs rather than estimating in my head and would say that MM is right and I'm wrong, but would also say that you should have been using the 3076 all along rather the 3071 for the upgrade kit

Ps: used a different desktop and could only see Red xs on the Garrett site so there does seem to be some kind of browser comparability issue out there


.

Last edited by TeamRX8; 11-15-2010 at 06:46 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Garrett GTX Renesis anyone?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.