Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Fazdarx_8's Top Mount Turbo Build

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 08:48 AM
  #101  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
no surprise with the smaller divided housing, how is the load holding up at higher rpms is the question
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 10:47 AM
  #102  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
From recent logs on 4psi , it climbs to 170ish.

But forwhatever reason the car doesnt like to go past 7400rpm. Standing on the throttle it goes 7300,7400,7350, 7370.
Maybe to rich, wo2 is pegged, lc,1 reads 11.1.

Or maybe a broken intermitten plug wire, i have the bhr kit, just need to test the wires
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 11:01 AM
  #103  
Turblown's Avatar
Boostin'
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
no surprise with the smaller divided housing, how is the load holding up at higher rpms is the question
Am I missing something here? 1000rpm difference from JUST a turbine housing swap? That is impossible.

FYI guys a .84 P trim turbine housing is about the same volute as a 1.06 GT35R( T3 or T4)
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 11:22 AM
  #104  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
I thought going from an open 1.0 AR to a divided 0.84 AR was generally considered to be a big change, but will defer to your expertise
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 08:16 PM
  #105  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
1.00 divided to .84 divided, on a p-trim.


Originally Posted by Turblown
Am I missing something here? Nearly 1000rpm difference from JUST a turbine housing swap? That is impossible.

FYI guys a .84 P trim turbine housing is about the same volute as a 1.06 GT35R( T3 or T4)


fine call me a liar.....
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 11:12 PM
  #106  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
Thanks for the clarification
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2011 | 10:28 AM
  #107  
Turblown's Avatar
Boostin'
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities, MN
I'm not calling you a liar, its just that something else was also changed( outside air temps makes a big difference), or you are basing this off just driving conditions.

I have done back to backs on many vehicles, piston and rotary. To get a 1000rpm jump takes going from a 1.19-1.32 down to a .84/.81.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 11:53 PM
  #108  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
I wanted to share this

I have found it increasingly annoying that my stock wideband does not seem register in WOT situations, its placed 3 inches from the turbo inlet. this makes it challenging for tuning, so

I decided to install my second wideband in the downpipe about 10 inches away from my turbo, my Friend who tunes his RX-7 tunes this way so I thought I would try it aswell.

my hypothesis was that the stock wideband becomes saturated or something due to the extreme heat and pressure present before the turbo.

after the install was complete a test run was in order, in 3rd gear WOT, the stock wideband read 10.9 from the AP unchanged for the entire run.
the secondary wideband however read, 11.5 and a apv lean spike of 12.4

so it seems my hypothesis was correct for my situation.

I have added more fuel to my tables since then......
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 12:09 AM
  #109  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Well, yeah - you can't put it before the turbo.
I thought that was pretty well understood.

I don't think I've ever seen anyone even try that.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 12:10 AM
  #110  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
how do you know which is correct and which is not?

if your hypothesis is actually correct you might try installing a high temp isolator fitting instead to prove it out
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #111  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Well, yeah - you can't put it before the turbo.
I thought that was pretty well understood.

I don't think I've ever seen anyone even try that.
I am going to pretend that you forgot this is a top mount and leave it at that.......
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 12:30 AM
  #112  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
it doesn't matter, he just told you straight out, I was going to lead you around the long way to demonstrate how your assessment and logic is flawed, which is all too common around here

the O2 sensor will not read properly in a high pressure system, this is why it has to be installed after the turbo


.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 12:40 AM
  #113  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
I am going to pretend that you forgot this is a top mount and leave it at that.......
What does that have to do with it?

All of the proper top-mount systems put the O2 sensor in the DP, just after the turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 08:48 AM
  #114  
Chris's Avatar
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 29
From: Tampa, FL
yikes, mounted the o2 pre turbo??? That needs moving.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 09:16 AM
  #115  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
the O2 sensor will not read properly in a high pressure system,
I'm not certain that this has anything to do with it - the temperatures are simply too high and the gas velocity too low for the pump to make its own reference. The heater just goes out of range.

Now, several of the early top-mount systems put the O2 sensor too far away - essentially in the physical stock location, which is too great a distance (in terms of piping) from the exhaust ports.
Another salient point is that the sensor, should the WG be VTA, must be unaffected by the gaping hole in the gas flow that this causes.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 09:24 AM
  #116  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
You can address the temp, especially since the top mount pre-turbo position is not much different than an NA manifold. That piece of info comes from someone smarter and more experienced than me and likely anyone else on this forum. Believe it or not, your choice.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 09:50 AM
  #117  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
You can address the temp, especially since the top mount pre-turbo position is not much different than an NA manifold..
The distance/position isn't really relevant since the gas is doing something totally different. Port-to-inlet EGTs are WAY over N/A EGTs and the gas velocity is low.
The whitepaper on the Denso WB puts its thermal saturation point at 2000°F. It was essentially designed to work at 1700°F.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 11:46 AM
  #118  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
you would argue with GOD about the creation of the universe if you had the chance ... next time do your homework before you shoot your mouth off. Temperature matters, but you have nothing to indicate what the actual temp is or that the same thing still applies when temps are lower like in a piston engine or alternate fuel rotary ...

Reasons for Inaccurate Lambda Readings – Exhaust Back Pressure
Wideband Lambda sensors primarily count oxygen atom numbers through measuring the oxygen ion current within
the molten electrolyte of the sensor’s pump cell. The exhaust gas pressure affects this oxygen ion current – more
pressure means more atoms per unit volume and a higher current at the same Lambda. At a higher exhaust gas
pressure
�� a rich reading will appear richer than it really is, and …
�� a lean reading will appear leaner than it really is.
This is the main reason you should position the sensor after the turbo where exhaust back-pressure is lowest.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 12:20 PM
  #119  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
you would argue with GOD about the creation of the universe if you had the chance ...
Were there such an entity, you are correct.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 04:38 PM
  #120  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
I did pre turbo in the beginning to avoid the lag, and at the time sfr and turblown had the sensers preturbo. They where tuned this way, and so was my car (by mm) and I dont ever recalling you telling me about the sensor position during our tuning session.

In any case its fixed.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 05:27 PM
  #121  
bumblebeerx8's Avatar
Rear Mount GT35R
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 976
Likes: 2
From: toledo,ohio
ok question is where the hell is mine supposed to be?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 05:34 PM
  #122  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
Originally Posted by bumblebeerx8
ok question is where the hell is mine supposed to be?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 05:58 PM
  #123  
bumblebeerx8's Avatar
Rear Mount GT35R
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 976
Likes: 2
From: toledo,ohio
lol my thoughts exactly lmfao
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 07:26 PM
  #124  
wcs's Avatar
wcs
no agenda
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
Likes: 66
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by bumblebeerx8
ok question is where the hell is mine supposed to be?
Beside the Maf right after the BOV
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 08:54 PM
  #125  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by wcs
beside the maf right after the bov
yes!
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.